Loach, giving the keynote speech at the London Film Festival, ridiculed senior TV executives, such as James Murdoch using last year’s Edinburgh TV Festival’s annual MacTaggart Lecture to sound off. Loach said: “I knew Jimmy MacTaggart and I have to tell you Mr Senior Executive, Mr Junior Murdoch, Mr Big-Head-of-Whatever-You-Are, you are no Jimmy MacTaggart. Jimmy would have been horrified to think his name was taken to justify the overblown self-importance of these people.” BBC director general Mark Thompson gave this year’s Mactaggart speech. Loach, who began his career at the BBC, wished “good riddance” to senior Beeb executives recently made redundant and said more should follow. The BBC is stuffed with executives who rule by committee and stifle all original ideas, he said. Loach said the BBC has become the enemy of creativity, run by “time servers” who have reduced what was meant to be a National Theatre of the air to “a grotesque reality game.” He welcomed this week’s announcement of job losses for Sharon Baylay, the highly paid marketing chief, and deputy director Mark Byford, who leaves his £475,000-a-year post with a £3.7 million pension pot and a pay-off of almost £1 million. “I’m pleased to see — we all are — that people are going to lose their jobs, albeit that they need a £1 million handshake to get out the door. Great, good riddance, maybe a few more will join them. But let’s start cutting further down,” Loach said.
The 74-year-old director called for cinemas to be publicly-owned. He said it was a “disaster” that British cinema-goers are fed a popcorn diet of Hollywood movies, while European and world cinema accounts for just 2-3% of cinema screenings. He compared the situation to walking into a library and finding 63-80% of shelves stocked with American fiction, while every other writer in the world has to share 3% between them. Loach said: “They could be programmed by people who care about films … not by people who care about fast food, which I guess is most of our cinema managers.”
Loach, who turned down an OBE award from the Queen in 1977, questioned fellow directors and producers accepting knighthoods and other honors. He said: “The woman you are kneeling before represents most of what is wrong with this country — inherited privilege and inherited wealth. Let’s have a bit more dignity than crawling before that woman, please.”


Spot on Mr Loach. I thought Mark Thompson’s speech was narcassistic and rather embarassing to the Beeb and I am so glad there is a backlash for it not just from Mr Loach but from various corners of the British media.
Having to work against these same executives he mentions day and day out you come to realise that they offer nothing but their own, uneducated opinions and quite often go against the wishes of the creatives and those who are doing more than just trying to tick boxes and justify their vastly overpaid wages.
It comes as a relief that it is not just me and a handful of others that feel that the British film and Television industry is rule by bureaucrats. Let’s get rid of some more.
Ken Loach is a fabulous director, with an integrity I can’t match, but he undermines himself by coming up with silly policies for cinemas; whilst crowing at anyone losing jobs, rich or poor, doesn’t gain him dignity.
Spot on! A balance of homegrown films with American cinema is good for everyone.
Film should not just be about popcorn movies but also an opportunity to engage ways to see the world and the people that live just down the road or across the ocean. If we don’t make theatres available for smaller films and nurture ideas and creativity we will continue to have this throwaway society that is paper thin and leaves us with no emotional connection.
I LOVE A LOT of American cinema but I also LOVE finding small films that for the most part come from foreign talent. When the exhibition, creation, funding becomes just about the deal or taking a paycheck the flame dies out.
So let me get this straight – he wants cinemas to be publicly owned so that British films (i.e. like his own films) can be forced onto a population (by constraining choice), even though the demand isn’t necessarily there? Isn’t that just ” what is wrong with this country – inherited privilege and inherited wealth.”?
I have had this debate and I think he could be correct. The idea is “access”. Most theatre goers will never know of a movie that does not play in their local cinema. And as we all know, movies in the theatre are really just advertising for the DVD and VOD these days.
You demand a cinema dedicates one screen to indigenous productions and give the consumer choice and the filmmakers the opportunity.
Works for me.
V
The debate over cinemas is stale and obsolete. With all the on-demand options available, most people now watch movies on their TV or computers. This in turn has made a much wider variety of films available. I susbscribe to TimeWarner cable, and I’m consistently surprised by the amount of “little foreign movies” they have available to watch, stuff I’d never heard of and never makes to the several “art cinemas” in my neighborhood. If Loach framed his issues in terms of modern technology, as opposed to fantasies from his youth, he’d see the situation is not nearly as dire as he seems to think.
Sir, I salute you.
(Right up to your face and dissed you, Murd.)
Ken Loach is man of integrity. Bravo, sir! And how brilliant that he rejects the pomp and circumstance of the Queen. The royals in Europe are ridiculous and out-dated. Your tax dollars pay for these Etonian dandies to go skiing in St. Moritz. Enough.
Leftist buffoon who makes movies no sensible person would pay to see.
as spoken by self-annointed philistine with their head nuzzled up mr. murd’s trousers. tsk tsk
tim seems to be reporting every murdoch dis.
No offence to Mr Loach, but if 1000 UK cinemas programmed the stuff he’s been making for the last 10 years, they still wouldn’t make a shilling. The fact of the matter is that audience tastes have changed – cineastes will happily watch a Loach movie on a Friday or Saturday night, but no one else will.
If Loach wants to see more British film in cinemas, the film-makers have to start making movies that audiences want to see. Faced with the choice of a breezy rom-com or a gritty look at poverty, general audiences will choose the former.
That’s not to say their isn’t room for the latter, but we need a bit of balance. Instead of Loach lamenting the proportion of American films, perhaps he should lament the proportion of worthy-but-dull Brit flicks compared to breezy populist ones.
Agreed on all points.
Loach Schmoach. Self-righteous, pompous and self-regarding. The fact that almost no-one wants to watch them – in any medium – is clear proof of the great Yankee capitalist stitch-up. Isn’t it?
Veteran British director KEN LOACH has always been a man of principal and defender of the working class. His kind is sadly of another era as society becomes more and more humanoid and unable to comprehend the enslavement of what the mega corporations through their wholly owned media, are conditioning us all for.
Whether you like his films are not… at least they’re honest and real. And real is really sadly lacking in this superficial, latte mentality world!
Defender of the working class? Rubbish. He makes movies about working class people with good looking actors that uglify themselves all for the simple reason as to win awards from the snobby highbrow limousine liberal intellectuals who like to get a taste in the dark side of life. He makes films ABOUT the working class but not FOR the working class.
He exploits the working class for his own personal gain.
Few people inside the beeb had any idea what Mark Byford did.
Deputy Director General??? Like being Vice President, except way less important. And the only thing it turns out Byford was a heartbeat away from was his million pound redundancy pay-off.
Ken Loach makes some great films and some bad ones. Anyone assuming everything that emerges from Hollywood is crap automatically loses the argument with British cinema goers who understand that while many commercials films are crud, so unfortunately are many arthouse films. A good film is a good film
wherever it comes from.