UPDATE: The Walt Disney Studios deal to buy Paramount Pictures out of the final two films of its six-picture distribution deal with Marvel Studios amounts to the Mouse paying a premium to get cracking on its $4 billion investment in Marvel. When you break down the numbers, it’s a pretty good deal for both studios. Paramount had been earning an 8% distribution fee on the Marvel titles like Iron Man. Paramount also put up P&A and got reimbursed over time. The $115 million will be paid in two installments–half when The Avengers is released May 4, 2012, and the other half when Iron Man 3 is released May 3, 2013. If those movies perform more strongly than expected, Paramount will earn more than $115 million advance. I’m told that Paramount is actually getting 9% on that third Iron Man movie, a reward for launching one of Hollywood’s most valuable franchises. So essentially, Paramount is getting paid without having to put up the P&A or exert the manpower that goes into releasing summer blockbusters.
Paramount loses bragging rights that come with counting the worldwide grosses in its annual tally. But considering that Disney kept 92% of the profits that came from Iron Man 2′s $622 million worldwide revenues, how much were those bragging rights really worth? Paramount needed the Marvel deal when it was signed because the studio had little of its own homegrown franchise product to lean on. Marvel and DreamWorks product got the studio through lean times. DreamWorks is gone and Marvel will be out in 2012, but Paramount is already in a much better place. The $50 million grosses on the $20 million budget Jackass 3D indicate that this franchise is far from done. Transformers 3 gets released in July, a fourth Mission:Impossible is in production and will be released for holiday, 2011. The following year brings another Star Trek, G.I. Joe and the relaunch of the Tom Clancy-created Jack Ryan series, with Chris Pine playing the CIA analyst. Paramount next week releases Paranormal Activity 2, and it owns worldwide distribution rights on sequels. Many of those movies are coming from core lot producers Bad Robot and Lorenzo di Bonaventura, and newcomer Platinum Dunes is revamping the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise. Clearly, Paramount won’t need the product in 2012 as much as it has in recent years. Paramount will still distribute Thor on May 6, 2011 and The First Avenger: Captain America on July 22, 2011.
For Disney, the deal brings its superhero franchises under one roof and eliminates the difficulty and power struggles of trying to work with another studio’s marketing and distribution. Bruised feelings and egos are inevitable. We don’t believe that Disney will try to buy up other Marvel franchises that are tent poles for other studios, like Spider-Man, X-Men and other franchises. Sony, Fox and other studios can hang onto those titles as long as they keep making payments and occasional movies that they finance. The difference here is that the films under the Paramount deal are the ones that Marvel Studios began funding under its $500 million credit line with Merrill Lynch, an accommodation made before the studio was bought by Bob Iger last year for $4 billion.
BURBANK, Calif. – October 18, 2010 – The Walt Disney Studios, Paramount Pictures and Marvel Studios announced they have reached an agreement under which Paramount will transfer its worldwide marketing and distribution rights to Disney for Marvel Studios’ The Avengers and Iron Man 3. Paramount will remain the worldwide distributor of the upcoming films, Thor and Captain America, as well as the previously released Iron Man and Iron Man 2.
Under terms of the new deal, Disney will pay Paramount $115 million for the transfer of the distribution rights to Iron Man 3 and The Avengers to be paid on the theatrical release dates. These monies will serve as a minimum guarantee against the distribution fees.
“In completing this agreement, Disney will now assume worldwide marketing and distribution of The Avengers and Iron Man 3 and leverage these two highly-anticipated films across the multiple global platforms of The Walt Disney Company,” said Rich Ross, Chairman of The Walt Disney Studios. “We appreciate the tremendous momentum that Paramount established with these iconic Marvel characters and look forward to propelling the brand even further in the coming years.”
“Five years ago, when Paramount and Marvel made our initial deal, both our businesses were in very different places,” said Brad Grey, Chairman & CEO of Paramount Pictures. “We are grateful for the partnership we have had with the terrific Marvel team over these years and proud of the work we have done together. Today, this new agreement is the right deal for Paramount, for Marvel and for Disney. We look forward to working together on Thor and Captain America, and we wish Disney and Marvel the utmost success, in what we know will be a very productive and wide-ranging partnership.”
“Paramount has been a wonderful partner in helping Marvel Studios bring our characters to the big screen,” said Alan Fine, Office of the President, Marvel Worldwide, Inc. ”This agreement makes sense now that Marvel is part of The Walt Disney Company.”
Paramount will release Marvel Entertainment’s Thor and Captain America worldwide beginning on May 6 and July 22 of 2011, respectively. The Avengers will be licensed to Epix under Paramount’s existing pay television arrangement.






I wonder… does this then dissolve Marvel’s 5 film distribution deal with Paramount, or will these subtracted films now be supplimented with something else?
This is a first: Paying over $100 million for the right to spend a $100 million more… Huh? This makes even more sense since Disney has proven their marketing prowess lately.
For the shareholders, let’s hope the Disney team can sell Iron Man on DVD better than Paramount did… OUCH!
No is buying shiny drink coasters with movies on them anymore, so you can’t blame Paramount for that.
I hope that Joss Whedon will still be allowed to direct The Avengers. The man has a great eye for storytelling.
I’m sure they won’t. He did co-write TOY STORY and helped write the story for ATLANTIS: THE LAST EMPIRE.
not to mention serious writing chops! his ‘voices’ are among the richest in our business. BB
Color me shocked. But then again, IM:2 was a mess of a script. Marvel needs to hire writers to write and not thespians to make an attempt.
I didn’t mind Iron Man 2, but how fresh can you keep this franchise. How many movies can you make about guys dressed in big, steel suits smashing into each other? Sure Iron Man 2 opened well, but it dropped like a stone. I do not see Iron Man 3 being huge. Disney should just let Paramount keep Iron Man.
Smart move for Disney. AVENGERS is the title to release. THOR is going to be a disaster.
How is THOR going to be a disaster? No one’s seen the film, let alone an official trailer (aside from the leaked CC teaser).
This is a nice deal for both studios. Disney gets all the rights to “Avengers” and “Iron Man 3″ (minus pay TV rights for the former), and Paramount gets reinbursed for their cut of distribution fees.
I don’t know about a disaster, but it definitely has an uphill battle. Thor is IP that nobody cares about. Ironman was B material (X-Men: A-, Batman: A+), but the first film was done about as well as possible.
The IP is comparable to “Ghost Rider,” “Daredevil/Elektra,” or “Punisher.” Branagh is capable of doing some good things, but he also helmed “Valkyrie,” so… at least they have a solid cast.
Ah…No, Branagh did *not* helm ‘Valkyrie’ — he only co-starred. Bryan Singer directed that bore.
Bryan Singer directed Valkyrie, Brannagh only starred in it.
Thor will be a tough sell and the early promo stills and CC trailer haven’t yet fully convinced.
A few people commenting seem to be confused, but Disney already owns all of these movies though its ownership of Marvel; Paramount was just distributing them. So Disney can’t let Paramount “keep” Iron Man. It’s just a matter of what studio label is slapped on it and who pays to market and distribute it. They are probably letting Paramount hang on to “Thor” and “Captain America” because Paramount is likely already far along into developing the marketing and distribution plans. Production hasn’t even started on “Avengers” yet, so Disney can step in and have ownership of the whole process from start to finish. Most importantly, they can start putting the Disney brand label on these superheroes and capture some of the boy demographic that they crave.
Disney did NOT keep 92 % of Iron Man 2′s worldwide revenues of $622 million. They got paid a rental fee from the theatres for a major chunk of that total but the theatres get to keep a percentage of every ticket sold.
The studios do NOT report rental income on the weekend box office numbers- they report the total ticket grosses while the revenue split is kept private between the exhibotrs and the studios.
IM2 was a mess because of trying to align new characters such as black widow to accomadate the avengers film.
What I wonder is if the contracts that were made under the marvel/paramount share for samuel l jackson (9 picture deal as nick fury) and with raliegh studios (renting manhatten beach lots etc) along with the contracts for wheadon,brannagh et al on the thor,captain america and avenger films are still in effect.
Sorry man, not buying it. It was a mess of a script that lacked the drive the first one had. The first one was an action movie with humor. The second one aimed at humor first and then action. More so, the villains were too flat. And let’s not get started on the great cast that they totally misused.
There is still more than enough story lines for disney/marvel to do an IM3 picture. They barely touched on the “demon in a bottle” storyline in IM2, they hinted at the whole Mandrian storyline in IM1. That is also not including any “recent” developments with the character with the whole post “civil war” storyline. That’s just off the top of my head.
If “Thor” and “Captain America” are hits, who would distribute the sequels? Is that determined or TBA?
Disney will release the sequels. Paramount had no existing agreement to release any Thor or Captain America sequels.
It’s going to be very difficult for me to take these movies seriously if the Disney Cinderella castle logo is attached to IM3 and The Avengers, because I fear they’ll be watered-down to the point where they won’t be worth adding to a Netflix queue.
Funny because I was just thinking the same thing. Even if they aren’t watered down at all, the psychological suggestion in having that Princess Castle slapped on the front end is going to be tough to get past.
Ha! That reminds me of the movie “The Straight Story.” I will never forget seeing the logo come up.
Walt Disney Pictures Presents
A David Lynch Film
Although it was a G rated family film, I am sure David Lynch was amused by the irony.
No they won’t.
Disney have owned Marvel, including all films released under the ‘Marvel Studios’ label, for over twelve months. If they were going to start ‘watering down’ films, this would have happened to the Iron Man sequel.
On more than one occassion, Disney have stated that they will not interfere with Marvel Studios. It would appear they are taking the ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ mantra seriously.
More to the point, commentors on this post seem not to comprehend the basic fact: Paramount, at no stage had the rights to any of these characters. When Marvel created it’s film production arm they could not distribute their own films, and were looking for a distributor.
Ultimately they chose Paramount to fulfil that role; in an arrangement that included both a good deal for the, at the time, independent studio on distribution rates, but also the film rights to ‘The Incredible Hulk’, which Marvel had sold to Paramount several years earlier, and which were several years from lapsing back to Marvel’s control. At no point did this involve surrendering any rights to characters featured in their films to Paramount. Indeed, as outlined above, it actually involved the diametric opposite.
Umm you speak but know nothing. Paramount never had anything to do with HULK.
Tron: Legacy has the castle in front of it, it’s not that big a deal.
This is good news for the Blu-ray transfers of these films. Disney tend to be just as flawless with their live action and their animated HD titles.
Can we dare to hope that they might do the same thing with Sony and Fox to give us Hugh Jackman and Toby McGuire in time for Avengers 2?
Can’t wait to see Ironman 3 I love the come back of Robert Downey I got sad when he got involved in drugs, but he is a good actor another break was given to him and great to him in big screen again.
Stark: How many movies can you make about guys dressed in big, steel suits smashing into each other?
Couldn’t agree more. The Avengers should be the final bow of Tony Stark. Period. Go out on a high note.
People need to realize the difference between “distribution” and “development and production”. Marvel handled development and production on Iron Man 1 and 2 and Incredible Hulk. Love them or hate them, they would have been no different content-wise had Disney distributed.
Long story short, this is a deal about how these movies physically make it into theaters/homes, and how the consumer knows they are coming, not if they are enjoyable movies.
My question is why not go after the other licensed characters, like Spider-man and X-men? Think about it, if Iron Man 3 and Avengers are worth $115mm just to get back distribution, maybe Spidey is worth somewhere around there for Marvel to produce and Disney distribute. How much does Sony think they can clear on this reboot? Is $100mm profit in 3 years worth a $75mm payment tomorrow, provided Sony can cross promote on their electronics?
There’s no way in hell Sony is going to let Disney buy the Spider-Man franchise from them. If that reboot film revitalizes interest in the franchise in two years, it’s a bigger incentive to keep it than letting someone else buy it.
figured Disney would want most of their new toy Marvel under their roof. mostly because as owners of marvel it means they can keep more of the box office of the films. do not have to pay some other company some share.like paramount and once them unleashing cap and thor that means paramount’s deal is done. too bad Disney does not now work on making the same kill deal and get the x-men , ff, and all the properties from fox. and then finish up with spider man out of sony’s hands.though this deal may be the start of that happening
Kevin Feige remains in charge. This guarantees that Disney will lose money on every film.
Very interesting. Very interesting indeed. Wonder which banner they’ll release them under, Disney or Touchstone? Hmmmmmm
I imagine they’ll release them simply under the Marvel label (i.e., no other logo at the front), unless they have to release them under one of the existing labels to qualify for output deals, in which case I would guess Touchstone…
I think the more interesting question is: will they cross-promote to Disney Channel and activate their output deal there for these films? They typically only do that for “Walt Disney” branded content, although not sure if they did it for Pirates…
Disney plans to have a heavy Marvel presence in its theme parks and on their boy-demo cable channel, whatever it’s called. Their math on the subject extends somewhat beyond theatrical and DVD on a couple of movies.
This is bad news for future Marvel comic book films. Disney will dilute these, and more than likely force 3D down everyone’s throats (even though there are many directors that are not committed to 3Das anything other than a fad).
Interesting news. It totally makes sense for Disney to capitalise on their investment by having their banner in front of Marvel biggest upcoming film and truly cement in the publics mind that Disney is the new home of Marvel.
Regarding their other properties at Sony & Fox, I am not so sure that it’s a great idea to go rushing after them just yet. Disney can realistically only realise about 5 – 6 tent poles a year and with a commitment to at least one Bruckheimer movie, one Pixar movie, one in house CG movie and one in house live action movie how may Marvel movies will they be able to release a year? Probably 2 at a push? If they bring in X-Men and all the related characters, Fantastic Four, Spider-Man, Ghost Rider and Daredevil in addition to the characters they currently own there’s is no way they would be able to fully support each of these franchises – it would either mean 3 or 4 Marvel movies a year which would be overkill or long gaps between instalments which would surely reduce the public’s interest?
Not too mention the fact that their cinematic universe is integrated – how in the hell do they integrate an out there character like Ghost Rider into the world of Iron Man for example?! Of course they are introducing Thor & Dr Strange but it needs to be handled carefully.
Sony knows Spider-man is their flagship franchise and they seem to treat it with a lot of respect and support and money. Would Disney stump up $300m on a Spidey movie like Sony did for part 3 when they have so many other Marvel commitments? Of course in time it will make sense to bring them under the Disney banner but at the moment I’d let Sony & Fox (who seem to be taking their Marvel properties a lot more seriously now – maybe it’s the threat of knowing Disney are ready to snap them up) just continue with their handling of them keeping them highly visible to the public while Disney concentrate on their own Marvel slate.
Just hope, that thay don’t mess up making the films.