
I saw yesterday’s breathless reports that Peter Jackson is close to a deal to direct The Hobbit – and I am bewildered how anyone slaps an “exclusive” tag on a story Deadline broke back on June 25th. That’s when Jackson moved from co-writer/producer into the director’s chair. Recent reports by the LA Times and NY Times have added some nice details, but I laid out back then the chain of events that are unfolding now. Even before Guillermo del Toro withdrew as director, Warner Bros and MGM had set December 2012 and December 2013 as release dates, replicating the release pattern of the original The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Production has to begin in January or these pictures would get pushed back an entire year — and who knows if Jackson would have stayed? Deadline advised that MGM’s creditors needed to get their heads out of their you-know-where’s and either commit funding or step aside to let Warner Bros pay for the films. It was clear those decisions would precede a long-planned prepackaged bankruptcy that won’t play out until year’s end.
The 3D discussion also goes back before Del Toro departed, but I can confirm a NYT report that they’re locked into a 3D two-picture shoot that will cost around $500 million. Unless a third party steps in, Warner Bros most likely funds production because MGM can’t. The movement on The Hobbit doesn’t help James Bond, which is post-bankruptcy business. If Spyglass partners Roger Birnbaum and Gary Barber close the deal and turn MGM into a stripped down production entity, they will have every studio chasing 007. While Warner Bros, Fox and especially Sony Pictures Entertainment will be players, I hear Paramount stands a good chance. Birnbaum and Barber have a great relationship there as co-financiers of Star Trek, and Paramount can certainly use the films as its distribution deal with Marvel winds to a conclusion.
The big part of The Hobbit story that interests me is how much the 3D decision spurs Warner Bros to convert the original LOTR trilogy into 3D, injecting new life and revenue cycle into the original films. I yawned at the announcement that George Lucas’ six Star Wars films will convert to 3D, maybe because I found the prequel underwhelming. But the prospect of a 3D revisit to Middle Earth, the Mines of Moria, Mordor, The Shire, Lothlorien and the epic battles of Helm’s Deep and Minas Tirith? Yes, please.


The timing on locking in Hobbitt for December 2012 is kind of odd. Isn’t that the release slot for the Superman movie they just hired Zack Snyder for?
Enough with the “Toldjas” already, folks.
I’m confused. If WB can just have MGM step aside and fund the production on their own….why didn’t they just do this a long time ago and not lose Del Toro?
Do the MGM creditors still have to agree to allow WB to take over the film?
Because they would not have funded it if Peter Jack wasnt directing.
I’m not clear… when is principal photography supposed to begin… and where — NZ, I suppose?
Well finally some good news for the fans. If anyone other than Jackson were directing I would lose all interest in these films. But I’d only see LOTR in 3D if they add new footage not seen in the Extended Editions.
Didn’t see this coming… oh wait.
Toldja? Wasn’t this already a given, months ago? Way to use a 9 year old photo of Jackson, btw.
And way to use a recent photo of Jeff Zucker!
What a wonderful panacea to the Snyder-Superman announcement. My money’s on the Kiwis in 12/2012!!!
I think this either means that Superman will get bumped to the Harry Potter early November release date, or that the legal issues that I think are forcing Superman into theaters before January 1, 2013 will push back Hobbit to 2013 and 2014 respectively.
3D, lets settle on a format, True HD, as Disney is going to use for the Christmas Carol has my vote, I am not paying $150 for bulky heavy glasses to enjoy at home. I do agree I wold love to see more movies in 3D, but not at that price.
& the dork’s rejoice!
As do people who know that an apostrophe is not to be used to form the plural forms of words.
Who didn’t know this again?
figured since day one when pre production started and mgm started to become the train wreck it is. that one thing about the hobbit would be peter in the directors chair finishing the saga he started with the lord of the rings.
Oh Gods. Please not 3D. 3D ruins movies. By the time they come out I hope the 3D fad will be long gone.
I agree, and I thought that PJ already said that he has no interest in making The Hobbit in 3D. I hope this article is wrong and they don’t do 3D. Other than that, sounds good! I wouldn’t mind seeing the originals converted to 3D, but I won’t pay money to do so.
Really? It took them this long just to get the director of the movie? I want to be watching this in theaters NOW!!!!!!
HEY MIKE!
What does your crystal ball say about the Labor Problems with the New Zealand actors union?? Can you tell us how you project it will play out — will the shooting stay in NZ, or move off to another place like Prague? Or China?
Please chime in and tell us what you hear from your sources! THANKS!
Yeah, like Prague is a likely location for the war of 5 nations or whastitcalled… on the other hand, China would pose a bunch of oportunities for amazing exterior sets…
3D sucks. No point. It’s stupid
3D is failing already – people don’t want to pay the extra cash for something that adds so little (if anything) to the experience. Toy Story 3 is just as good in 2D, possibly better – the picture is much brighter and sharper. On the home cinema front, very few people are going to shell out for a new 3D TV so soon after upgrading to HD, and besides which, even if there was enough 3D content, who wants to sit around at home wearing silly glasses all evening ?
3D makeovers of older movies is just a cash grab by the creatively bankrupt and LOTR really does not need it. It could be worthwhile however, if they take the opportunity to fix the problems with the previous releases though – i.e. badly paced first part, dodgy CGI and the needless 3rd retelling of the finding of the ring, and the loss of the Christopher Lee resolution in part 3… Part 2 was pretty near perfect in 2D though !
The Hobbit doesn’t need to be in 3D.The LOTR weren’t and they rocked. Just keep it to 2D and it’ll cost less and come out sooner.
The targeted 2012 release date for “The Hobbit” has been out there for awhile. This of course was pending the settlement of all the obstacles–but still way before the Superman deal came together.