
EXCLUSIVE: Steven Spielberg has committed to next direct Robopocalypse, a Drew Goddard-scripted adaptation of the Daniel H. Wilson epic novel about the human race’s attempt to survive an apocalyptic robot uprising. Deadline broke the story that Spielberg was eyeing the novel as a directing vehicle last March, before he instead chose War Horse as the first film he directed for DreamWorks since Spielberg and Stacey Snider left Paramount and made a deal with Reliance and a distribution deal at Disney. At that time, the novel wasn’t
finished, but Spielberg was so excited about it that it was already being storyboarded and designed as Wilson was turning in pages of the book and Goddard was translating them into the screenplay. Spielberg will start shooting in January, 2012 and Disney’s Touchstone will distribute in 2013. It puts Spielberg back into the large scale terrain that is important in his relationship with Reliance, because it is the kind of movie that can succeed on a global tent pole scale. Spielberg has two pictures he directed that are in post-production, Tin Tin: The Secret of the Unicorn will be distributed in the U.S. on December 28, 2011 with War Horse following 5 days later. This might seem like a lot of action for one director, but remember, this is Steven Spielberg, and he has multi-tasked successfully before. Like when he shot Jurassic Park and then moved directly into Schindler’s List. He turned out a summer blockbuster, followed later in 1993 by the film that won the Academy Award for Best Picture.
“Robopocalypse embodies an imaginative story of a robot rebellion unleashed against the human race,” said Mark Sourian, who’s announcing the project with his co-prexy Holly Bario. “This is a project we immediately sparked to and with Steven directing it we knew it was in the best possible hands to bring it to worldwide audiences.”
Doubleday will publish the book June, 2011. Wilson is hot stuff, in the kind of hi-tech scifi terrain that was the domain of Michael Crichton. His rep, Justin Manask, is preparing to shop his next book, AMP, which is a near-future science fiction thriller set in a world where the technology to make the disabled whole, turns them into supermen. That book will also be published by Doubleday, with 120 pages done so far. This one is being eyed for summer, 2012.
NBC Sets Oklahoma Tornado Benefit Concert For May 29


human race’s attempt to survive an apocalyptic robot uprising = Terminator.
Or Battlestar Galactica. Both of which will probably outclass this attempt if they try to make it “serious” in any way.
But how realistic were Terminator and Battlestar Galactica? The key word here is “near future”, not time travel or galactic civilizations.
You’re not implying Terminator originated the “robots overthrow man” concept, right?
Right???
James, I was thinking the same thing, except this story seems to get rid of the pesky time travel element.
Wait a minute … !
Didn’t Will Smith just go there???
What’s the name of it……
…ah, yes, I Robot. And it was a crap movie. That says a lot when not even Will Smith can save the pic.
Hey all was not lost. It gave us the Roomba.
My Roomba started an uprising too… it refuses to stay on.
The scene when he’s driving in the tunnel and the big trucks pass him by and the robots attack his car is one of my all time favorite scenes though. Whenever my brother and I are driving on the highway we like to reenact it by slowing down whenever a big truck is next to us. Real adrenaline boost XD
That’s fucking retarded…..
Sssh. Here’s $3000. Get a trailerbed, ride in back of it, film the whole damn thing, and put it on youtube.
Near future: could be a riff on Vernor Vinge’s concept of ‘the Singularity.’
I just finished reading the book and it does rock. No offense but not sure that Mr Spielberg style is gritty enough to do justice. And if this wasn’t in production I would be taking it around.
Have you not seen Saving Private Ryan?? The mans got grit budd.
The movie or the book AMP is being eyed for 2012?
This is a lie. He’s already directing a new biopic of the Bee Gees life and he’s starting that after ‘War Horse’ which he is currently filming in England, so it’s highly unlikely that this ‘news’ is accurate.
They said filming would begin in 2012, which leaves plenty of time for it to not be “a lie”.
I, Robot with Will Smith — been there.
But this is Steven Spielberg at his best!
Just wondering if this will be similar to A.I. and War of the Worlds? Great effects and pretty good storytelling until the forced and unfulfilling Spielberg ‘happy’ unbelievable ending?
Ummmm…. happy ending to A.I.? Hardly, unless you consider Terry Gilliam’s original ending to Brazil happy, since both endings are in the same vein. I thought A.I. was Spielberg’s best science fiction foray since Close Encounters of the Third Kind.
Yep, totally agreed. I think AI is Spielberg’s VERTIGO — his masterpiece that will only be appreciated in decades to come.
And the ending is wrenchingly tragic, far from happy. David gets to spend only a day with the mother he has dreamed of for thousands of years, knowing with every second that the time is passing, and he only finds complete fulfillment in death alongside her corpse. Brilliant, and straight out of Kubrick.
I’ll grant, though, that War of the Worlds has a ludicrous happy ending, complete with the dead son magically reappearing, but until the last ten minutes it’s brilliant.
AI was one of the creepiest movies ever! It’s like “my robot son – the stalker”. You can’t flip a switch and have someone love you. Children love their parents because of the care and love they’re provided with in their formative years. David loved his mother because she “pushed a button”. Wrong! Then he couldn’t take no for an answer. Also wrong.
Thank you…I thought A.I. is great too
I don’t think the ending to AI is terribly happy. Most people don’t stop to think about the implications of what they are seeing on screen for the ending.
1) That ending was in Kubrick’s original plan.
2) Since when are Spielberg endings “happy”?
Close Encounters – Man tears apart family, leaves Earth without even telling them goodbye.
ET – The kid’s only friend leaves for good.
Raiders – The guy who worked so hard to get the MacGuffin has it taken away by the Government.
Jurassic Park – About a dozen people dead and a frail old man’s life-long dream is dashed into a million pieces. Two children are now scarred for life.
The Terminal – Guy doesn’t get the girl.
Yep. Spielberg’s ending have a bittersweet quality to them.
Hm. Spielberg’s a notorious multi-tasker, so I’m not so sure a January 2012 shoot would mark his “next” film, per se.
He may yet manage to get another one in there.
… and Battlestar Gallactica
Look forward to the book. Curious to see how something so familiar-sounding was exciting enough to land Spielberg. How does it differ from Terminator/The Matrix/I-Robot?
my guess is that it will rehash portions of all three. There’s no new territory in this genre.
Will they change the name? The only thing that is missing is “Written, Produced, and Directed by Edward D. Wood, Jr.”
Perhaps they can change it to I, Robot… oh wait…
SOUNDS like it could work, but, like Tom I fear that current day Spielberg will soften any hard edges that book will have in the climax to force a “Spielbergian” ending. MINORITY REPORT is in many ways the best SF film of the past couple of decades, but, the last 15 minutes severly lessened it’s impact
(SPOILER: IF it had ended with Cruise entombed in that hyber-prison, it would have been a classic).
Spielberg has kind of lost me with SF ever since he said on the CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE 3rd KIND dvd that we would never today have shot the ending with Dreifuss’ character going in the ship at the end and leaving his family. Talk about ruining a classic.
Thanks, Joe.
Perhaps the word ‘happy’ is less accurate than your comment about Steven softening “any hard edges”
Steven certainly appears to have done this, and for me and others, it makes some of his SF films fall short.
.
Maybe it’s just me, but I disagree. I find CE3K impossible to get into. A selfish man decides to abandon his family to live out his fantasies. And as the audience we’re told to accept this because the wife is presented as a nagging shrew and the kids as irritating brats. I’m glad to see Speilberg say he couldn’t have made the movie today, it’s an adolescent’s movie.
Yes, EXACTLY, CE3K is an “adolescent’s movie”! That’s the whole key to it’s sense of wonder and amazement. The film has a youthful excitement. Sure, Spielberg was only in his mid-20′s when he made the film, but, even back in ’77, folks like renowned SF author Ray Bradbury marvelled at the film. Some of that spark is missing in many of Spielberg’s latter films. Instead, you get creaky stuff like INDY 4 – heck, I’ve forgetten 99% of it and it was only released a coupla years ago………
C’mon Mr Spielberg, some orginality please!
Open the pod bay doors!
kinda sad: robots take over…where haven’t i seen this before…?
I, Robot … wasn’t so good. I’d love to see this concept done well.
yeah,and in the meantime he has enough time to do indy 5,it is so clear what is happening
Please no Tom Cruise. He’s as useless as clown shoes.
You’re all missing the point here. DREW GODDARD. That is all.
They haven’t even started pre-production and this puppy is a flop. This theme has been done to death.
Robot is smart
Robot becomes self aware via Deus ex Machina or human interference / stupidity
Robot tries to kill or make slaves out of man
Man does or does not prevail
Audience yawns and farts.
I know where you´re getting at but shouldn’t judge a movie before it´s made.
I know there are similar movies but similar can also be very different if you take Space odyssey vs. Terminator movies or even matrix (1st one mind you) all great movies.
Terminator, 1 and 2 and 3
2000 space oddysey
I Robot, book and movie
and hundreds of other books and movies.
Just one thing: FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NO SHIA LAPOOF
This material is far more Crichton/Sagan than Cameron/Asimov. Wilson received a PhD in Robotics and AI from Carnegie Mellon, he’s consulted with some of the brightest minds in military science and the whole pitch of the partial manuscript when it went out was that the robots, the strategies and the drama are based on imminent science rather than the fantasy of time travel or the speculations of a futurist 50y ahead of the curve. We’ll see for ourselves when it publishes next June.
And yet, this modern Nostradamus couldn’t predict that his title would be the end of the movie…seriously, who would actually see a movie called “Robopocalypse”?
C’mon everyone… this genre deserves to be explored just as much as zombie, vampire and lone action hero vs. terrorist movies.
As audiences, we’re fascinated by our mortality and the threats to our existence. We’re going to be fascinated for a long time with different tellings of A.I. robot uprisings.
I Robot was a let down and the Terminator series is getting tired. Spielberg has the sense and finesse to create something we may have seen before, but maybe in a new way.
Of course, it all depends on the book and what Spielberg does with it.
I agree with Roscoe. Some of us have read the book when it debuted at the Frankurt Book Fair, and I can happily confirm that much of the speculation about the story being deja vu is genuinely off. Wilson brings a very original vision to the table. My hunch is that some of the commentators will be pleasantly surprised: the book is not your standard popcorn/commercial fare. On the contrary, it’s elegant, literary and eerily realistic with up-to-the-minute technology. The author has a Ph.D. in robotics and writes searingly emotional scenes in addition offering up a cool techno milieux. If the film is loyal to the book, this will be the most realistic vision of our technology turning against us that has ever been witnessed. Imagine batting with your own refrigerator or can-opener. No robot scenario has dealt with this level of detail.
Sounds very exciting, actually, glad to hear it’s more grounded. I’m thrilled to see Speilberg do another dark sci-fi film — Minority Report, AI, the first 100 mins of War of the Worlds, he has no equal.
Wonder what this means for Bruckheimer’s World War Robot?
Make Metalocalypse instead!
All the references to “I, Robot” only make the case for a new robot movie to blot out the memory of that hack-fest.
And to say that “the whole robot thing is done” is to forget that what makes movies great is that every now and then someone creatively re-invents the genre. Spielberg has successfully and consistently re-invigorated genres – killer fish in “Jaws”, UFOs in “Close Encounters…”, alien on earth in “ET” and dinosaurs in “Jurassic Park” and so on.
And “A.I.” was and is a great great movie. Haley Joel Osment was excellent and Jude Law has never been better.
The only thing I ever liked Jude Law… And he played a machine.
AI a good movie? Lay off the crack, pal.
By the way. I,Robot kicked ass.
Back to your mommy’s basement.
Christ I’m sick of ain’t it cool cinesnobs trolling this site.
AI sucked and irobot kicked ass? I actually liked them both, but AI is a masterpiece. You dont by chance get around town on a very SHORT BUS do you?