
BREAKING: Universal has reemerged as the financier of Contraband, the English language remake of the 2008 Icelandic film Reykjavic-Rotterdam. Mark Wahlberg is set to star, Kate Beckinsale is negotiating, and Baltasar Kormakur is set to direct. Kormakur starred in, produced and co-wrote the original. Working Title partners Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner are producing with Wahlberg (who’s next out in The Fighter), Stephen Levinson and Kormakur. Verve-repped Aaron Guzikowski is writing the script.
Oskar Jonasson directed the original, in which Kormakur played a former smuggler trying to go straight as a night guard. When his wife’s brother (who got him the job) botches a smuggling run, his life threatened and the protagonist is dragged in for one more job. WME, which reps the stars and Kormakur, set up the remake at Working Title. Bevan and Fellner’s deal is at Universal, and the studio originally intended to finance the film, then passed when the budget came in at $40 million. Relativity Media stepped in, but encouraged the filmmakers to try bringing down the cost. The filmmakers brought the budget down to around $30 million. A $30 million drama with Wahlberg and Beckinsale is a package any studio would jump at. When Relativity blinked, Universal swooped back in.
More and more mid-budget dramas that make it to the screen do so because they roll with the punches. This is the second such effort for Wahlberg and Levinson, the guys behind Entourage and Boardwalk Empire who also kept the flame burning on The Fighter, along with producers David Hoberman and Todd Lieberman. That film survived the exits of director Darren Aronofsky, and Matt Damon (twice) and Brad Pitt as Wahlberg’s co-star, before David O Russell settled in as director and Christian Bale took the role of Dickie Eklund. Eklund is the storied Boston fighter who lost his ring career to drug addiction but pulled himself together to train his half-brother, “Irish” Mickey Ward, to several titles and three classic bouts with Arturo Gatti. While The Fighter was staggered several times by setbacks and seemed down for the count once or twice, Wahlberg diligently continued to train in the boxing ring every morning to play Ward. In the footage previewed on last night’s Mad Men finale (and on Deadline Hollywood), all that training paid off. To me, Wahlberg looked convincing in the ring. Is it too soon to make comparisons to Denzel Washington in The Hurricane, Daniel Day-Lewis in The Boxer, Robert De Niro in Raging Bull, Russell Crowe in Cinderella Man, and Carl Weathers and Sylvester Stallone in the original Rocky?


I hope to God they rewrite Aaron Grundsky’s script because it’s a helluva dog.
Excited to see this one. Original was a suspenseful thriller. And Guzikowski is a great choice for the remake.
You betcha having Kate Beckinsale topline your film is something any studio would jump at!
I mean, she’s been on fire recently with “Whiteout,” and before that “Nothing but the Truth,” “Fragments,” “Everybody’s Fine,” all runaway money-makers popular with critics and audiences alike.
Oh, wait a minute — no one’s heard of those movies, and the only studio movie she’s toplined (“Whiteout”) was an embarrassment. But yet somehow every studio would jump at her in a starring role…don’t think so.
I remember a movie called Underworld that did pretty well for itself.
Actually NBTT was popular with critics. She was excellent in Fragments as well in which she was a supporting character as was her role in EBF. If you don’t want to watch her that’s fine but many of us do!
Hopefully this Contraband role is more than just a gf/wife role otherwise she is wasted in it.
The script is excellent.
“Is it too soon to make comparisons to Denzel Washington in The Hurricane, Daniel Day-Lewis in The Fighter, Robert De Niro in Raging Bull, Russell Crowe in Cinderella Man, and Carl Weathers and Sylvester Stallone in the original Rocky?”
Would these comparisons include box office? As wonderful as the respective performances might be, boxing is of limited interest and this new film sounds totally parochial.
I think it’s a great opportunity for Ms. Beckinsale, because lately she hasn’t being on many huge films as she usually did in the years 2001-2007. She is very talented, and a very good actress, by the way!
But some people can’t just be quiet and avoid unnecessary and rude comments.
No one’s saying she’s not talented or even a good actress or a great lady or did some good films in the years 2001-2007 or doesn’t deserve to be in big movies.
Someone was just pointing out that her recent track record is very poor, and therefor it didn’t make much sense for the article to assert that any studio would automatically want her to star in one of their films.
I think the point is being missed: it’s a script with BOTH Beckinsale and Mark Wahlberg. A package, right? She’s not headlining the film on her own, but the combination of the two of them at a cost of 30mm is something a studio would jump at. That IS automatic. Foreign pre-sales alone would cover a huge bulk of that cost for the two of them, if not cover the entire budget (script depending, of course).
In the world we live in, it’s all about the package. And a Marky Mark and Kate Beckinsale package is good at 50mm, so certainly at 30mm.
Sorry, she’s not a very good actress and a pretty awful person in real life. And she can’t open a movie.
Love Wahlberg though. One of the hardest working smartest guys in the biz right now. For his sake, I hope this does well.
“Oh, wait a minute — no one’s heard of those movies, and the only studio movie she’s toplined (“Whiteout”) was an embarrassment. But yet somehow every studio would jump at her in a starring role…don’t think so.”
I guess you’ve never heard of Underworld and Van Helsing you dumbass. Both of which were very profitable. As for your critque of her other films, allow me to lay some facts on your clueless ass. Nothing But the Truth was a great film, and a hit with critics. In fact, Kate received rave reviews for her performance. The film was only released in a few theaters because the distributor went bankrupt. Not her fault. Whiteout was delayed for two years, and had a godawful director and screenwriter. Also not her fault. She only made that film for the paycheck. Fragments was a small independent film. Only in your delusional mind could that be called a studio film. But it was a good one and she gave a very good performance. As for Everybody’s Fine, she didn’t topline that movie asswipe, Deniro did.
“Someone was just pointing out that her recent track record is very poor, and therefor it didn’t make much sense for the article to assert that any studio would automatically want her to star in one of their films.”
I’ve got news for you, the same could be said for Mark Wahlberg, and then some. His track record is shit, and the only films he’s ever made that were worth a damn are ones in which he is a supporting character. I could reel them off, but it would take far too much time.
As for Kate’s recent track record, none of those films doing poorly at the box office, were fault. Besides, since when is box office ever an indicator of quality? Some of the best films made do nothing at the box office. Kate’s films Snow Angels and Nothing But the Truth were great films. Fragments was pretty good as well. Whiteout was shit, but it was shit because of the director and screenwriters.
Wow, I didn’t know Len Wiseman posted on these boards…
That’s quite a litany of “not her fault” excuses for a crappy box office record: the director sucked, the movie sucked, the writer sucked, the distributor went bankrupt…maybe the dog ate her homework too?
No one cares about excuses. The numbers don’t lie, and her numbers suck.
“Van Helsing” and “Underworld” were fanboy, costume, comic-book movies and they did OK but it’s ridiculous to pretend she carried them.
Pointing out that Walberg’s b.o. performance is poor as well only SUPPORTS what I was saying — that it’s silly to trot Beckinsale out as some kind of box office slam dunk.
Saying that her little-seen movies were actually really good is fine — but maybe you should go back and bother to read what I actually wrote. I wasn’t talking about the quality of her work, and I wasn’t calling “Fragments” or her other little indie movies studio films. That was my whole point. “Contraband” will be a studio film — my point was the OTHER studio film they tried to open with her alone as the star was a big fat belly-flop of a disaster.
“no one’s heard of those movies”
LOL! If nobody’s ever heard of those films, why did you name them you stupid douche.
LOL! To prove that no one’s heard of them!
Boys, boys, you’re both pretty.
I think Wahlberg diligently trains in the boxing ring every morning anyway.
Bale looks very good in the trailers, very skeevy. Didn’t recognize him at first.
rumor has it, relativity had a hard time coming up with the money from their investor in ny.
Whalberg is the worst actor in the biz when it comes to starring roles. Why would anybody in their right mind make another movie with this bum in the lead. He has no foreign. Europe hates him. So they won’t be making a lot of money. But, hey, he’s got Ari in corner, so on and on he goes.
I couldn’t agree more. Wahlberg, like many others, does not know how to use his body and voice to create a singular character; every role, it’s the same performance. As one reviewer (Washington Post?) once said about Wahlberg in “The Italian Job”: He’s a black hole that sucks up dramatic energy.
While we are talking boxing movies and comparing The Fighter to those greats mentioned, I have an idea. How about a boxing movie with PeeWee Herman. He is just a believable as Walhberg. Who the hell is Mickey Ward. Nobody ever heard of this guy outside a Boston boxing gym. So, it’s about Marky Mark boxing. Now, comes Marky Mark at sea. Betcha he frowns and talks in a low voice. This guy has more turkeys than Ralph’s at thanksgiving.
Relativity wised up on the Contraband thing. Decided they already had one flop on their hands. All the marketing people know already The Fighter is a dud. Okay, it’s Dec. 17th, eight days to Christmas. Money is tight, but you’d like to catch a movie. Let’s see with parking, etc, the tab will be around 70 bucks if you bring anybody else. Will it be Jolie and Depp or Narnia or Marky Mark fake boxing and Batman as a junkie? My kids don’t want to see Batman strung out. This is the kind of movie you might rent after you’ve seen all the new good ones. Boxing is a dead topic,already. Nobody goes to see the real fights anymore, so why do they think people will go see Marky Mark play at it.
Contraband? Just another b cheap action movie with no stars. Kate Bakeandsale is not a star. She was in some movies that did well, but not because of her. Could of been any one of a thousand actresses. Out here in the real world nobody knows who she is.
Actually, I am thinking about staging a protest outside the studios to make them stop making Marky Mark movies.
“Betcha he frowns and talks in a low voice.”
rofl
I saw the second cut of The Fighter and at that time, it was pretty good. David O. Russell did a good job of keeping an honest feeling to the film. Having met the Micky and Dickie, I can say that Mark and Christian replicated their real life counterparts accurately. Slam Relativity for making crappy movies but this is probably the one film they have that is worth seeing.