
After a two-week blackout, Fox signal was restored in some 3 million Cablevision homes just before the start of Game 3 of the World Series. Fox just announced that the two sides have reached “an agreement in principal for a new distribution
agreement.” The agreement covers Fox O&Os WNYW in New York and WTXF in Philadelphia as well as MyNet’s WWOR in New York and cable channels FOX Deportes, FOX Business Network, and Nat Geo WILD. It will also allow Cablevision customers in the New York area to watch home NFL team, the New York Jets, in tomorrow’s match-up with the Green Bay Packers on Fox. The deal comes a day after Fox reached an agreement in its other carriage dispute with DISH Network. In its statement, Cablevision called the terms of the deal “unfair” and took a swipe at FCC for not intervening in the standoff. It also indicated that the rates in the final agreement were lower than the “unprecedented” fees Fox had initially asked for and that it would pass the rate increases on to its customers. (Financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed but Fox had been seeking retransmission fees in the $0.50-$1 range per subscriber for its O&Os from cable and satellite providers.) Earlier this week, Cablevision offered to match the terms of Fox’s carriage agreement with Time Warner Cable for the network’s O&O stations but Fox turned it down as it wanted its MyNet New York station and 3 lower profile cable channel covered under the terms too. Here is Cablevision’s statement:
In the absence of any meaningful action from the FCC, Cablevision has agreed to pay Fox an unfair price for multiple channels of its programming including many in which our customers have little or no interest. Cablevision conceded because it does not think its customers should any longer be denied the Fox programs they wish to see.
Cablevision thanks its customers for understanding the reasons for the dispute and for staying with us. We are also grateful to the 175 government leaders who raised their voices to urge government intervention and binding arbitration to prevent this blackout. It is clear the retransmission consent system is badly broken and needs to be fixed.
In the end, our customers will pay more than they should for Fox programming, but less than they would have if we had accepted the unprecedented rates News Corp. was demanding when they pulled their channels off Cablevision.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


Right. Because the Jets are doing well this season. If they weren’t, there’d still be a blackout.
The Dolans sure do suck asshole.
I think fox is criminal, their news is hateful and feeds on the fears of the less educated and narrow minded. Sorry for cablevision that you were bullied by them. I’m a baseball fan that missed three games though was cheering for cablevisions integrity. Hopefully next year, all sports coverage is carried elsewhere.
Wow, your arrogance is so inspiring. And calling those you disagree with less educated and narrow minded isn’t itself the very definition of narrow minded? Brilliant.
The only thing that upsets me is that Cablevision will pay less than what FOX originally asked for. FOX should have held out and made CV pay every last cent. Cablevision is a cancer that destroys everything it touches. In many cases, its subscribers are held hostage by building owners that refuse to allow a competing service. Its sports properties are failing as it steals millions in tax breaks from New York City.
I am happy to hear the rumors that Cablevision hemorrhaged subscribers during the blackout. Not only will Cablevision suffer a great loss in revenue, but the former subscribers have likely switched to a much better service at a far lower price.
Amen.
I wish Cablevision would have not caved in. Freaking Fox sucks. It’s only going to get worse.
Your complaint makes no sense because those increases would have been passed on to customers. That may have hurt Cablevision in the long run (doubtful) but would have set a terrible precedent. Fox and other studios like them are pushing the cost of their bad management on to everyone else.
THANK GOD!! I can watch “BONES” on Thursday night! My guess is Cablevision caved, they played the “FOX is evil” card and FOX said, Fuck you!
My only concern in this matter was that we could finally get Fox Soccer Channel in HD but it was not address at all. Maybe in the future then…
The issue was not just what to pay for Fox. it was Fox ramming other channels down Cablevision’s throat in order to carry Fox. it’s called bundling and it is one of the worst practices of big media. it keeps smaller cable programmers from getting their channels going. Disney forces cable operators to carry all these ESPN spinoffs if they want to carry ESPN. Sure, they will sell you ESPN on stand-alone basis at an inflated price tag. Bundling is bad.
I’ve cut the cable so stories like this make me loff and loff.
But keep updating us from the 20th century. Sounds fascinating.
I’ll never understand why the other TV outlets seem to have so many issues with cable channels while DirecTV moves right along. Granted they had a brief sojourn with Versus, but even that was settled in short order. Nothing in this back and forth has made me miss cable.
If companies are going to withhold broadcasts that are otherwise available on publicly owned airwaves they should be penalized or be fined as part of their license agreement. If they want to withhold their other channels that are otherwise only available by subscription then I guess they can play that game and find out how much people want their content. Charging for retransmission of an otherwise free network broadcast is, if examined, borderline criminal.
Like I’ve said before if content providers actually had to live on what people want to watch on a per show basis their business models would make internet vs. music look like a grade school recess skirmish.
This is the third time in recent history that Cablevision channels have gone dark because they can’t reach agreements with the channel providers. Wake up people, there are alternatives. The family that owns Cablevision is nothing but rich, greedy spoiled brats. The son even sued the father that started the company. Remember when they spent millions to do away with the west side development in NYC because they didn’t want any competition to their precious Madison Square Garden that they get tax breaks for? The day FIOS came to town, I happily switched and my picture and internet quality has never been better…..oh, and I have never lost any channels to poor management not being able to negotiate fair deals prior to the contracts ending.
The day that some genius like Apple or the like can provide with a la carte channels, that will be the day that we will stop paying for 80% of channels that we do not see.
Something has to be done on that front, that business model is the last bastion of the 20th Century.