
I’ve had boats since I was a teen, and it’s a frustrating relationship because they are expensive and you never use them enough. Nothing’s better than getting out in the ocean where the fish are biggest, and dropping your line 80 feet down to them, with the ocean swells creating a gentle rocking motion. And nothing’s more frustrating than when you bring a guest who is rendered green by those swells, usually just when the tide is perfect and the big fish start biting. You head in, a great day is redefined as something else, and you remember why you prefer to go alone.
This reminds me of all the reports I’ve been reading on Danny Boyle’s 127 Hours, which has been in danger of being defined not by its cinematic achievement, but rather by the number of faint-hearted folks who, reports suggest, have been dropping like canaries in a coal mine. I saw the film at its Toronto International Film Festival premiere, and have rarely felt as moved by a movie, especially when Boyle and James Franco were joined onstage by hiker Aron Ralston. But the audience continues to be part of the storyline: at last Thursday’s Academy screening, the crowd reaction was huge, but press focus was on a single moviegoer who fainted (apparently not from the amputation scene, but a health issue). I’m told a Producers Guild screening also had a body count. Reviewers weren’t squeamish – The New York Times called the film “nearly flawless” – and the limited-run opening weekend sellouts and high per screen averages give hope that the film won’t ultimately be defined by the thud of falling audience members. Boyle, though, might have some explaining to do to his fellow Brits when he gets home to barnstorm for BAFTAs. At last Thursday’s Academy screening, the Manchester-born director called cinema “primarily a U.S.-based art form,” and said that while British actors are wonderful, “there is a level of brilliance and naturalism that James exhibited, in the American tradition, that Marlon Brando pioneered with Streetcar, that was extraordinary.” Colin Firth, who will certainly compete against Franco for his performance in The King’s Speech, might feel differently about the British vs. American acting argument. Certainly, the Brits have been plying the acting trade longer.


It screened Friday night as the closing film of the Savannah Film Festival, and we had what I assume was a fainter. Right after the amputation scene, somebody yelled “doctor!,” and the theater brought up the house lights and stopped the screening for about 5 minutes. There was an ambulance outside after the movie.
127 HOURS is an incredible movie. This is an unlifting and inspirational movie that everyone should see. Please run – don’t walk – to the theater and do not be deterred by the reports of fainting. Sorry to be so effusive – I am still reeling from seeing it on Saturday and can’t get it out of my mind.
I think you mean uplifting, except for the fainters whose experience is somewhat unlifting.
What is uplifting about this movie? What is the moral of this story? That a stupid person survived and is now being rewarded?
He was TSTL – Too Stupid To Live. Even a MORON knows that you do not go hiking and rock climbing alone.
Why pay money to see this movie when his story has been told all over TV and the Internet?
THIS COMMENT CONTAINS SPOILERS (That is, if you’ve been pinned under some rock for the last year)
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
“Even a MORON knows that you do not go hiking and rock climbing alone.”
Correction: Only a moron would think that hiking and rock climbing alone is safe.
If he’s prepared to accept the risks and the consequences of doing these things alone, then that is his right. He’s paid a very high price for indulging his desire, but as far as I know, he doesn’t blame anyone but himself for what happened. Nor does he advocate the practice.
That said, I don’t have much desire to see this movie, either. Up until the moment where he cuts off his own arm, I’ll just be waiting for the moment when he cuts off his own arm.
Sounds like the type of stuff that generates conversation thus free publicity and butts in seats
I guess I’m the odd man out because I saw the film and while I liked it, wasn’t blown away by it. I found myself checking my watch every once in a while.
Buried, the Ryan Reynolds film–had kind of a similar concept and in my opinion was much better.
Similar concept? I wasn’t aware Buried was based on real life.
He meant that both movies are about characters trapped in a confined space and facing their imminent deaths. Obviously.
It’s a great film during a year of not-so-great films. The fainting issues are free publicity but people shouldn’t see the film for the amputation seen, they should see it because of how inspirational it is. It’s still unbelievable that Aron survived that ordeal and to see Danny, James and the rest of the crew bring this survival story to life is pretty fucking awesome.
This is going to do well getting in the “Saw” crowd that wants the gross out moment. But it will work against the film when it comes to the Oscars – Franco is getting raves, but he’s treading on James Woods “The Onion Field” turf – too much for the timid Oscar voters who don’t want to pass out and puke in their living room.
I loved the movie, but it is excruciating. Franco and Boyle made a great movie, but this stuff isn’t BS. It is hard to watch and while it may be just a movie, it actually happened. While I watched the film, I waited for each moment that I knew happened (having followed the incident very closely when it happened). That sort of anticipatory viewing experience is similar to that of any horror movie. I think this press is probably good for the movie, but I found the viewing experience awe-inspiring in both good and bad ways. Worth watching… ONCE!
Calm down, Todd. The movie was very good. As good as it could have been. But calm down.
Thank you.
Um, eff off Anhonestanswer. Just because you don’t feel the same as Todd does not mean you get to manage his response to the film.
Incredible film / adaptation. Danny Boyle’s “See… I can do anything film”. The fainting / sickness press screams marketing ploy – and a damn good one at that. The amputation scene isn’t nearly as brutal as is being reported.
Unless there’s some 400-year old British actor somewhere we don’t know of, no Brit alive has been “plying the acting trade longer” than any American! But if we accept your argument, we should remember that Americans invented and have been plying the FILM acting trade longer.
Brits have been acting for Americans longer, that’s a fact. The author never mentioned ‘film acting’ specifically.
Hats and limbs off to Danny Boyle !! The opening title sequence was brilliant and tied in beautifully throughout the film. James Franco was given a difficult task and he delivered a genuine performance. You felt his joy and pain. I’m so glad Mr. Boyle chose to exclude any “search” scenes, that would have discounted the intensity of Aaron’s aloneness. Really enjoyed the film. Thank you Mr. Boyle and Mr. Franco! Well played gentlemen !!
I saw it Friday night. Thought it was one of the best films I’ve ever seen in my life. Danny Boyle really blew me away. Masterpiece, much better than Social Network.
It is so heartening to hear people say a movie — any movie these days, really — “blew them away” with its magnificence and message.
Sounds like 127 Hours is a certifiable winner in so many ways.
Great job by all involved from writer/director to cast/crew. As a climber, I cannot wait to see it. If it squares off against The Social Network for Oscar glory, I can see the older academy members giving Hours the edge, in spite of the squeamish scene, because the film, as stated by others, is wildly inspirational and about a LIKABLE real person — unlike the Facebook film about its brilliant but socially embryonic, arrogant founder.
Plus, how many older people use Facebook? Didn’t Aaron Sorkin, the screenwriter of The Social Network, even say Facebook was not his thing? And I happen to think a lot of Academy voters are closer to his age than mine (the 20somethings/30somethings for whom Facebook is like brushing teeth)
Why is this movie a presumed winner when BURIED was DOA? Both were festival favorites, both are gruesome one-man shows, both feature compelling actors… It did quite well overseas, but Lions Gate barely released BURIED domestically – is it because America can stomach anything but an unhappy ending?
is the whole ‘you might faint’ bit how this movie is being marketed? might run out of steam.
fyi. i don’t think this will get the Saw crowd out. i’m starting to wonder if the limited release –opening in new york and LA and then slowly expanding across the u.s. is still the right model to be using in the age of short attention spans and social networking. but we shall see.
The real question is why have so few people realized how pedestrian this movie is. The most over-praised, over-hyped move in decades. It should just be called “the movie about a guy who cuts of his arm”, because that’s literally the only thing that happens in the entire story.
“The most over-praised, over-hyped move in decades.”
No, that would be Inception.
127 HOURS is NOT just a movie about a guy who cuts offf his arm. It is about so many important things. That is like saying THE SOCIAL NETWORK is a movie about a business deal and a deposition.
Don’t know what the big deal is. I’ve seen worse on Dr. 90210.
Great film though!!
the movie was not amazing it was as good. You know what its about. Youre just sitting there for 72 minutes waiting to see how gross its gonna be when he cuts off his arm. I woulda been more moved if this was a 12 min 60 mins piece. If this happen to me the movie woulda been called “47 minutes”
Hey GTV – I believe the poster was referring to the fact that both Buried and 127 hours involve a single person in a very ‘stuck’ life/death situation you moron. You remind me of the lead character in the movie Nell – I’ll let you ponder why.
In case y’all are wondering, that brilliant “IT’S ONLY A MOVIE…” marketing is taken from Wes Craven’s “The Last House on the Left”.
Due to certain discriminarions within Cinema Chains not a single Danny Boyle film didn’t open in Vicksburg Ms. It really irks some movie buffs that the local cinema operator options instead to hold over movies like the Last Excerism until the beginning of this month. Not to mention with the creation 3d lens for digtial projector cameras doesn;t get one. What disses me off is the fact that good ones have by passed Vicksburg all together. Another fact is that this patucular operator discriminates against Dinsey pictures as well. Secretariat didn’t open.
It’s not fair to the movie buffs how certain cinema operators discriminate. They should have a right see what’s released on opening weekend. Not second rate rilms held over for months at a time. The market is smarter than than one thinks.