Peter Douglas is going retro with his Montecito based indie Vincent Pictures and focusing only on remakes and sequels of such interesting 1960s film fare as director John Frankenheimer’s. Not surprisingly, most of the rights already secured are from films that his father Kirk Douglas produced or starred in, with Peter self-financing the acquisitions and intending to form partnerships with established filmmakers who have existing distribution, production, and financing deals. But many of these movies were iconic, so the pressure will be on to ensure these modern reinterpretations live up to their reputations.
The list includes Seven Days In May, the gripping 1964 political thriller from Frankenheimer who directed one of Kirk’s best performances, Seconds, the 1966 cult classic elevated because Frankenheimer coaxed Rock Hudson’s best dramatic work, and Grand Prix, which featured Frankenheimer’s fab racing footage, became one of the 10 highest grossing films of 1966, and won Academy Awards for Best Sound Effects, Best Film Editing, and Best Sound.
Brian Dreyfuss of Featured Artists Agency is repping Vincent Pictures slate’s first two projects, Seconds and Seven Days In May. Rights also have been acquired for The Vikings (which Peter acted in) and The Final Countdown (which Peter produced). Peter, like his half-brother Michael Douglas, has been producing for nearly three decades, with credits ranging from Whip It, Drew Barrymore’s directorial debut last year, to the Fletch films from the 1980s. Peter and his Dad, who turns a robust 94 on December 9th, are collaborators not only on the remakes from Kirk’s Bryna Company films but also on the Douglas Foundation, which Peter heads for the family. That foundation backs the Kirk Douglas Theatre in Culver City, Harry’s Haven at the Motion Picture Home in Woodland Hills, the Anne Douglas Center for Women at the Los Angeles Mission, and the 401 playgrounds in the Los Angeles Unified School District, and much more.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.






So this dude is actually having a production company ONLY doing movies based on remakes and sequels? Is this a joke? It’s almost like a parody..but in real life, so that makes it rather pitiful actually.
Given how risk averse the industry has become it’s not a bad strategy. Given the improvements in on board cameras now seen in Formula 1 coverage, a re-make of Grand Prix could be quite interesting, especially if the FIA is on board, otherwise it’ll probably be based on the current GP / GP2 program. God help us if NASCAR is involved.
I simply don’t understand the connection between being risk-averse and doing remakes of 1960s films that most moviegoers haven’t heard of and don’t care about.
It’s fine if you know all of these films and love them and would be willing to pay money to see them, but you’re in a VERY SMALL MINORITY of the moviegoing public, and as such, very much a niche audience. I don’t see how making movies for niche audiences like this mitigates risk.
They task of educating audiences about these films (if they’ll even bother to try) will be no easier than if they were just marketing original material.
Stupid.
A remake of Seconds could be incredible, given the advances in new face surgeries, hgh infusions for old men, etc . The movie’s ‘masking’ of its main characters and his fake Malibu ‘artist’ life (at least the version imagined by Hudson’s ‘original’ self) still has much resonance: plastic surgery to create a new self, actors masking themselves with fake public sexual interests, rich people ruining the concept of an art world, outside controllers like Facebook completely controlling people’s psyches (for full detail, see Zadie Smith’s incredible takedown of Facebook in the NY Review of Books, now online)…so who controls you?
Anybody interested in a Seconds remake already has some taste, so tell Douglas to keep the hacks from hacking into the life of the source material. Fans are watching with hyperextended fangs…
I’ve seen that script for the Seconds remake, and it’s pretty amazing. Here’s hoping Douglas can get this going.
That is weird. I just sat down and popped in Seven Days. I have always loved that movie. When Mr. Douglas drives on to the Army Post and spots the Senator going into General Scott’s home his look of suspicion was great. I was thinking how could they do a remake today, and keep the story in tact. Would they have to go into the direction of CGI, effects, and crap that gets in the way.
Lancaster towered physically over everyone else. He was just perfect. Good Luck…
PLEASE, NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OH SHUT UP PURIST, FANBOY!
I’d love to see the Grand Prix a big remake.
If imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, I am flattered for my late father. Exposing a new audience to remakes will possibly interest them in seeing the originals….which is exactly what happened with the Manchurian Candidate remake fiasco.
I hear what you’re saying, Kristi. But your dad’s work was so awesome and on-point that there’s a risk that a paltry re-make may stink up the air when the classic suffices and triumphs.
What next? A remake of “To Kill A Mockingbird”? “Clockwork Orange”? The very thing that happened to “The Manchurian Candidate” and the “Taking of Pelham 1, 2, 3″ are proof positive that older versions of perfect movies are best left in their state of dated perfection. That’s how they remain, I think, timeless classics. And that’s how I feel about your dad’s body of wondrous work! (Thanks for sharing your thoughts, by the way!)
I am so intrigued by the idea of a “Seconds” remake – as a huge Rock Hudson fan it is one of my favorite films of all time. It would be impossible to improve on your Father’s version, but you are right that it would only increase interest in the original which I think would be a wonderful thing.
Seconds may be a “cult classic” but it deserves to be a household name.
Seven Days in May was re-made by HBO about 15 years ago, called The Enemy Within. It wasn’t a good idea then…
For several years I have always thought a re-make of 7 days in May would be a good idea. After reading Woodward’s latest book about Obama’s decision to send more troops, one could see the tension between the President and most – but not all – of his generals/admirals. Consequently, the “possibility/premise” of a military coup by the Joint Chiefs of Staff is as “likely” now as it was back in the 60′s when the original movie was made.
Why bother remaking SEVEN DAYS IN MAY? Just turn on the news and watch the same thing for free.
This is a super-relevant update, breaking news: Peter Douglas was also trying to remake SECONDS back in 1997.
Fifteen years and nothing happening but that script that has just floated around forever.
Please, for the love of all that’s holy, no. None of these movies need to be remade. No reason except greed.
As to Grand Prix, it is wonderfully shot, edited, and remixed (terrific sound). However, the story is really good. Instead of remaking Grand Prix, why not write a script about automobiles, technology, and the personnel similar to Network? The egos. The emphasis on incremental changes. The global consolidation of companies.
Just a thought.
7 days in May : WHICH SCENARIO WOULD YOU PREFER:
– REMAKE BLACK&WHITE NEW DIALOGUES
– RE-ADAPT WITH OBAMAISH AS THE PRESIDENT