
EXCLUSIVE: A ticking clock situation is playing out at Paramount Pictures over the sci-fi classic Dune, one that is emblematic of how studio infatuation for branded fare has brought with it the added burden of pleasing rights holders who not only get gross deals but also a big say in how movies are made and released.
Rumors raced recently that Paramount would end four years of development on the Frank Herbert novel by putting the project in turnaround. I’m told that’s not true, but the studio will be done with Dune by next spring if it hasn’t firmed a production start by then. The rights holders won’t grant another option extension. Armed with a new Dune draft by Chase Palmer, the studio and producers Kevin Misher and Richard P. Rubinstein are going out to directors today to create a new movie out of the 1965 book that is reputed to be the biggest selling science fiction novel ever. Despite the ticking clock, Paramount is proceeding as cautiously as it would on any project that will carry a price-tag well north of $100 million. Unless studio brass is absolutely confident by the time the buzzer goes off, Paramount will kiss the project goodbye. It will forfeit the six figures it has paid in option costs and risk development costs, though it could recoup some of the latter if another backer embraces the script Paramount paid Palmer to write.
These rights-holder chess games are playing out all over town. For instance: the start dates of Spider-Man, Ghost Rider and development of other Marvel Comics character reboots are influenced by the knowledge that those properties will revert to Marvel and its Disney owners if specific deadlines aren’t met; Superman is being raced into production by Warner Bros because certain rights revert back to the heirs of creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster in 2013; Universal’s deals with board game owner Hasbro includes stiff multi-million dollar penalties if deadlines aren’t met, though the toymaker waived its right to a $5 million penalty payment when Universal pushed the start of the mega-budget Battleship back one full year because it was such a massive logistical undertaking.
Though the estate of Robert Ludlum has also put pressure on Universal to mount another installment of the cash cow Bourne Identity franchise, the estate showed flexibility recently after it tried to supplement its movie income with a series pilot deal with CBS that had CSI creator Anthony Zuiker to hatch Treadstone, a drama revolving around the shadowy government organization whose brainwashing techniques turned operatives like Jason Bourne into remorseless assassins. I’m told that before original Bourne Identity scribe Tony Gilroy would sign on to direct the spinoff movie The Bourne Legacy (which also treads on Treadstone mythology), the TV series had to be back-burnered or the movie wouldn’t have happened. No one’s saying exactly what will happen to the series, but between calls made by me and my colleague Nellie Andreeva (Nellie broke the TV deal story), we are confident a hot project has cooled.
Despite Dune‘s outsized book sales, Paramount can hardly be blamed for being careful. The 1965 book still sells, sequel books by the author’s son Brian and Kevin Anderson routinely hit the bestseller lists, there are videogames and a SciFi Channel miniseries was a big success. But from a feature standpoint, the book is indelibly linked to a 1984 David Lynch-directed flop, and there is that lingering memory of a giant desert worm and the rocker Sting, clad only in what seemed like a blue diaper, menacing star Kyle MacLachlan. The new film has been re-imagined but deals with the same trippy concept, an interplanetary battle for control of the desert planet Arrakis and its supply of the spice Melange. Those who ingest Melange live longer, have a prescient sense of awareness, and the substance is necessary for space travel.
Rubinstein and his company New Amsterdam made the successful Dune miniseries and he is the liaison to the rights holders, which are the Herbert estate and ABC. Director Peter Berg spent several years developing a script with writer Josh Zetumer, before Berg left to direct Battleship. Palmer then rewrote that script under the supervision of Taken helmer Pierre Morel. It appears that Morel has stepped off the project. He’ll be an exec producer, though Rubinstein — who said the estate and studio have to be in agreement on a director — likes Morel for the job.
Rubinstein said he and the estate will be is okay whether Paramount moves forward or not, because he and Misher have such a strong script now. But he makes it clear Paramount will have to be ready to fish or cut bait by next spring. “We don’t want to extend an option and watch the studio take seven years,” he said. “This is on a short tether. It’s a major book franchise, you can’t walk into a store and not see a shelf full of Dune books.”
Fredrik Malmberg, the Paradox CEO who controls the rights of the Robert E. Howard-directed Conan the Barbarian, knows first hand the frustrating of working at a studio’s pace. He went through seven years of futility at Warner Bros with directors as Larry and Andy Wachowski, Robert Rodriguez and original director John Milius, before shocking the studio in 2007 and refusing to give them another option. Instead, he put auctioned the property and made a 2007 deal with Millennium Films that paid $1 million a year. Three years later, the picture is wrapped. It’s a 3D film that cost more than $60 million, directed by director Marcus Nispel and starring Jason Momoa as the title character. Millennium, which is releasing through Lionsgate, just set an August 19, 2011 date. Malmberg said he has no regrets over pulling back the property. While he believed Warner Bros was trying, he finally tired of having no answer to the question asked over and over by shareholders: where is the movie?
“I definitely think it was worth it,” Malmberg told me. “Studios are making bigger and bigger films, they are such huge gambles that it is hard to get a green light. If you are a brand holder, you have to be strong on the deal and strong as a producer, and be willing to move on unless you’ve got strict progress to production language. After waiting seven years at Warner Bros, we went to an indie sector that is eager to get into the branded space. You can have more say in the process than you usually get at a studio, unless you come in with a big financial component the way that Marvel did. Would this have been bigger at Warner Bros? Hindsight is always easy. I will tell you I’m happy. The movie looks great, it was the biggest bet Millennium has ever made on a film, and Lionsgate is very motivated. Ultimately, I had to answer to my investors and shareholders. I defended Warner Bros as long as I could, but I had to take back the property even though it was hard and there were bruised feelings.”


Dune is such an amazing book–but doing it properly and making a good movie out of it is going to take an extremely talented director and a considerable budget.
They should revisit the draft that Ridley Scott was set to direct written by Thomas Pope. Scott & Pope left and Lynch swooped in…
I agree with Captain Awesome on dusting off the old Ridley Scott and Thomas Pope script. Scott would even be a great choice as a director as his aesthetic is better matched with the epic fantasy genre (Alien, Legend, Blade Runner) than your modern day action-drama (American Gangstar etc etc.)
Again, a young fresh visionary could really make this work. But I suppose that’s what happend the first time around and now they are looking at generic, “safe” young action directors.
First: Ridley is a genius whether he directs costume movie (Kingdom of Heaven) or crime drama (American Gangster). Second: Lynch is a genius too, Dune is hugely underrated. Losers like to kick that movie. Third: I am so glad that hack Pierre Morell stepped off. Fourth: yes, Ridley should do it!
Ridley is awesome and all but.. he had Paul/Jessica incest in his script… which is a little odd to say the least :S
No thanks.
I am a HUGE Sci-Fi fan. loved the first two books. enjoyed the other two movies. Yet why on EARTH would they feel they need to make this damn thing AGAIN? Oh, I’d watch it once it made it to cable, but I sure wouldn’t buy a ticket to see another one.
Preaching to the choir here, but Hollywood frequently just makes NO sense.
I was the DGA Trainee on the original David Lynch “DUNE” production 27 years ago in Mexico. Can i be the UPM now on the feature please. ;o)
Ian! I remember you! I was on the “making of” crew on Dune! Was my first experience on a real Hollywood film. Blast from the past just seeing your name here! I was lucky enough to go on and direct a couple of little movies in Hollywood. I’ll never forget my first experience with Carlo Rambaldi in his Van Nuys studio leading us to an old shipping crate in a corner, popping the top and there wrapped inside in a hefty garbage bag was ET! Good times!
Merry Christmas!
It’d be great Mike if you could expand on the whole issue of the various deadlines for the non-Marvel Studios/Disney held properties.
Malmberg uses threatened lawsuits to bully people. Not somebody who will excel in this town.
Who the hell doesn’t use threatened legal action to get their way in Hollywood?!
it strikes me as lazy thinking to dump on Lynch’s Dune 26 years later. Seriously, it’s a great film. Watch it today and then watch Inception and tell me why anyone would give the benefit of the doubt to an insufferable piece of bullshit Hollywood hack-product over a flawed but profound work of art.
Did somebody actually just trash Inception and then praise Dune?
it’s actually not that hard.
Dune will always fail as a stand alone. It requires at least 4 hours to succeed and do justice to the source material. The story is dense, dramatic and has enough action to be epic. The studio bold enough to commit to a franchise will make a fortune.
What is pushing people to remake this novel? It’s already been made into horrible movie and a good, if flawed, mini-series (back when Sci-Fi/Syfy actually made science fiction). Why in the world would you want to remake it again?
Hmmm. Errr. Let me think. Mmmmmm. Oh, I know. MONEY!
Why remake this when there are SO MANY video games, toys and amusement park rides that don’t have a movie yet? WTF, Hollywood??
This is one of my favorite books. But guess what, some of the best books should remain books, because there is no effective way to turn them into a movie. It’s the same way I feel about several of my favorite books. “Enders Game” or “Speaker for the Dead” ? While I love “Altered Carbon” I can’t imagine a movie that could do it justice without a flood of money. Or even standard fiction “Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man” ?
Dune is one of my alltime favorites. But it’s hard to summarize down a 500 page book into 2 hours and deal with the political, social, religious and economic tones of the book. I’d rather nothing then bastardize great literature. Just do something original, I’ll enjoy the written word.
Agreed. But if a motion picture studio is actually serious about tackling this project and has the vision to insure a successful movie franchise, they should NOT begin with a film based on the first published DUNE book. Rather, they should start from the series chronological beginning and produce a movie based on the best selling BUTLERIAN JIHAD “prequel” novel. It is a work much more adaptable to cinema and would be a better choice for general public consumption. The BUTLERIAN JIHAD features less of the complex and harder to film “prescient visionary” aspects of the original novel. It contains more “real-time” action sequences, while still featuring the intricate plot twists as well as the social, religious, political and economic factors that made the original DUNE an acclaimed science fiction classic…and so relevant to current world events. Earth itself, despite its reference as the birthplace of all universal humanity, is treated as an afterthought in the original DUNE novel. In the BUTLERIAN JIHAD, Earth plays a much more prominent role, featuring the one major event that sparks the entire war with the machines…and who doesn’t like (Hollywood included) a great “man vs. machine” movie.
No thanks, I think it is far smarter to stick first to the canon books, before moving on to the non-canon prequels.
I actually like the 1984 version. Sting’s sartorial disaster aside, it was a great movie, especially for what they had to work with in terms of special effects. And the narrator, I felt, was an especially nice way to inject plot exposition without making it a twenty-hour movie.
I really liked the film version as well, but I’ve never read any on the novels so I went into the theatre with no preconceived expectations. Sure it has its faults, but it was so radically different from ever sci-fi film I’d ever scene, that I was really blown away by it and content to overlook its faults.
Why did Morel step off the film??
Was it his choice or the studios?
I’ve been saying for years it needs to be split into two films because there is just too much going on in that book. Now that splitting films in two is in style now with the last Twilight and Harry Potter stories maybe they should consider going that route to really do the property justice.
People still bashing Lynch’s version. Oh well. It’s flawed, but it’s an ugly, beautiful piece of sci-fi art. I love it. It probably doesn’t help that Lynch himself has distanced himself from it.
The Lynch film is awesome! A true cult classic. The Sci-Fi Channel miniseries was an abomination from hell. It reduced Dune to the planet of silly hats. It was cheap and stupid. Flush it.
They should do Dune as a 2-parter, like the Hobbit movies. They need a director that can do epic science fiction. But not James Cameron. Stick to blue cats. And not Ridley Scott. His films have been massively boring as of late.
My bet: they lose the option. They don’t know what to do with the property. If the same producer who developed the piece of shit miniseries is developing this, then things are not looking good..
I absolutely agree with every word you wrote.
Agreed. The only problem with the Lynch film IMO is the weirding modules, but that was probably the only way he could reconcile a bunch of guerrillas armed with daggers taking down military armed with guns. People complaining about that movie probably haven’t read the book.
I think it was more faithful to the book than the miniseries, even though the miniseries included more scenes. And the adaptation of Children of Dune was just awful. Their portrayal of Alia and the 9 yr old twins was an abomination (pun intended).
So if Dune’s been in development for 4 yrs, how much have they already spent?
Well, I guess I’m the one guy who loved the David Lynch version. I also liked the miniseries.
@Satan Monica. Inception is a “bullshit Hollywood hack-product”? Maybe that’s why it was critically praised and financially successful, and Dune was panned and bombed. How is life like on your desert island?
Another passing mention of Peter Berg’s Battleship film and another chance for me to say it’s the worst ‘studio level’ script I have EVER read. Seriously. Awful, just awful.
Besides, anyone else feel this potential franchise doesn’t feel like a good fit for Paramount at all? While I think that DUNE has potential but it’s going to take nerves of steel to get it off the ground. And I’m not sure Paramount (for all their successes) are the ones to do it.
I know of one well financed production ‘entity’ that is chomping at the bit to get this property when Paramount passes on it.
Not only that, but with (I imagine) most of , if not all, their money allocated to Transormers 3 and Star Trek 2 how exactly do ‘penny pinching Paramount’ intend to pay for this potential tentpole sized film?
I think they were referred to as ‘flying underpants’ back in the day.
I wouldn’t call the David Lynch movie horrible in any way. I think that’s just being hyperbolic for its own sake. What it is is a missed opportunity, particularly for leaving out some of the familial themes from the book. The makers tried to fashion it like Star Wars and Dune is anything but. Its too rich with complexity to be reduced into a Saturday matinee serial. And that’s where the complications rise. Paramount doesn’t know how to dumb down the material.
star wars? is that a joke?
No joke…many directors of science fiction motion pictures produced since the original DUNE novel was published in 1965 have “borrowed” elements from the classic literary series…perhaps none more overtly than George Lucas and his STAR WARS (“DUNE for DUMMIES”) franchise…
I say bring back Jodorowsky!
exactly. not sure the industry types on this site will know who that is though…
frank herbert was happy with david lynch’s adaptation. he only wished that he had been able to do more of the book, including the banquet scene. universal dumped dune and did nothing to save it, because they didn’t like or understand it. you think that some middle of the road ex commercial director is going to do a better job. lynch had it right in tone, art direction, costumes, and with some great casting (sean young excepted. wild and strange, it was dune as i’ve loved it since i was a small child.
it’s a great adaptation of the source material.
Peter Jackson would have my vote to direct this. If he can turn LOTR trilogy into those epic masterpieces of film, he could easily do it with Dune.
No. Different material, totally. Jackson is so wrong for Dune even he knows it. It would be a debacle like The Lovely Bones, one of the worst pairing of the directer/scritwriter and material ever.
Someone like Nolan or Aronofsky would be up to the snuff. They know how to handle throught-provoking, metaphysical stuff.