
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee today unanimously approved legislation to provide the Justice Department with new tools to crack down on the theft and distribution of illegal digital movies, television shows and other counterfeit material by rogue websites on the Internet. The following is a statement by Bob Pisano, President and Interim CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA):
“These rogue sites exist for one purpose only: to make a profit using the Internet to distribute the stolen and counterfeited goods and ideas of others. The economic impact of these activities—millions of lost jobs and dollars—is profound. That’s why dozens of labor organizations and businesses groups have come together to support the bill approved today by the Judiciary Committee.
As part of a wide ranging coalition of workers and businesses whose jobs and financial health have been placed at risk by content theft, we commend Senators Patrick Leahy and Orrin Hatch for their leadership on this bill. We look forward to working with them and the other cosponsors of the legislation, along with their colleagues in the House to help the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act become law.
The film and television industry alone is responsible for more than 2.4 million hard working, middle-class jobs in all 50 states. For these workers and their families, digital theft means declining incomes, lost jobs and reduced health and retirement benefits. Unfortunately, this means nothing to the operators of rogue websites who seek to benefit illegally from the hard work of others.
The operators of these sites use a variety of means to facilitate their goals – advertising, rentals, sales and charges for premium services. They are commonly assisted—sometimes unwittingly– by American companies whose ads are placed on the sites by brokers. They are also often aided by enterprises that provide the financial services for their schemes.
As Sen. Leahy has noted, these are the ‘worst of the worst’ online websites. The operators of these sites knowingly break the law, harm the American economy, deprive American intellectual property owners of their rights, cost American jobs and, in the case of counterfeit prescription drugs, potentially threaten the health and welfare of American consumers.
It will take a strong, sustained effort to stop Internet thieves and profiteers. We believe that Congress and the Administration can make a significant contribution to that effort by turning the Leahy-Hatch bill into law and giving law enforcement significantly enhanced tools for addressing a threat that deprives American innovators of the fruits of their labors and menaces our nation’s economic health.”
Background:
The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act will provide the Department of Justice with tools to track and shut down websites devoted to providing access to unauthorized downloads, streaming, or sale of copyrighted content and counterfeit goods. It will:
· Give the Department of Justice an expedited process for cracking down on websites that are dedicated to making infringing goods and services available;
· Authorize the Department of Justice to file an in rem civil action against a domain name, and seek a preliminary order from the court that the domain name is being used to traffic infringing material. The Department must publish notice of the action promptly after filing, and it would have to meet clear criteria that focus on the sites’ substantial and repeated role in online piracy or counterfeiting;
· Provide safeguards allowing the domain name owner or site operator to petition the court to lift the order;
· Provide safeguards against abuse by allowing only the Justice Department to initiate an action, and by giving a federal court the final say about whether a particular site would be cut off from supportive services.


The law as written is an insane overreach that allows courts to demand the blocking of a website if it is merely “substantially used” for piracy, and allows the DOJ to unilaterally politely suggest that a website be blocked. I cannot imagine that, as written, the law is even close to constitutional.
‘worst of the worst’ & “potentially threaten the health and welfare of American consumers.”
I think that’s a little much, eh?
This represents a finger in the dyke of the coming avalanche of illegal downloads and filesharing. While I don’t condone the practice of peer-to-peer, the distributors must look at the lessons learned by the now moribund music industry and determine how best to embrace and monetize the web culture that has always considered the best price as being “free”. Unfortunately that usually means a ton of advertising clutter.
It really is a stretch. Many of the TV series on these sites are ones that can’t be found anywhere else.
Because of copyright laws and FCC rules I already can’t get access to unedited UK series such as The Inbetweeners. And they will never be available on DVD in the US.
Piracy needs to be dealt with but there also needs to be a complete redoing of broadcast laws and access to international programming. In this day and age there is no excuse for us not have be able to get any channel from anywhere in the world whenever we want it. Only the FCC and Congress stop this from happening.
Completely agree. If shows were broadcast/made available for download simultaneously via internet at the time of broadcast in the originating country, with legal advertising, or even for a fee, that would resolve a lot of this problem.
It’s the refusal of the content providers to provide up-to-date means of access which means they bring this problem upon themselves. Draconian laws – equally based in the past, and worse – will not fix this problem.
Piracy kills dreams.
Ah nice, another industry with its head in the sand. Instead of focusing on innovative ways to market and distribute their content with the new technology available to them we’ll just blame the collective piracy community. God knows that it couldn’t possibly be because no one can afford the outrageous ticket prices they charge to see a film that isn’t worth $2.
Like with music, I pay for the artists I choose to support: If I like an album I’ll buy it but I am not going to waste money on something I am not sure about. Maybe instead of attacking people for their lost revenue, they should focus more on putting out a quality product that makes people feel like paying their hard earned money to see it is deserved. I wish this industry lots of luck with their lawsuits though, I mean treating people who are interested in the product like criminals has really helped the music industry after all.
If I were one of the people put out of work due to “piracy” I think I’d be more pissed at big corporation. This press release makes it sound like pirates are attacking workers but what about the corporations that screw their employees, jack-up ticket prices and continue to make billions in profit by doing it? It’s all about greed and, in addition to their short sightedness, that’s what’s killing business… why is that so hard to see?
“If I like an album I’ll buy it but I am not going to waste money on something I am not sure about.”
Translation: I’ll steal — I mean ‘preview’ it first, then forget about paying for it later.
“…I mean treating people who are interested in the product like criminals has really helped the music industry after all.”
Translation: Treating people who steal music/movies as criminals, when if fact they are….criminals.
“…I’d be more pissed at big corporation…what about the corporations that screw their employees…It’s all about greed…”
Translation: It’s THE MAN’s fault that I’m stealing the music/movies! Yeah, that’s it. Blame them. Intellectual property doesn’t exist!
Once again the thief can’t and won’t accept responsibility. I hope you enjoy putting independent producers out of business, thief. Just remember that karma’s a b-tch.
oh please rep man take it down a notch!
Its funny to see how suits like you react when the consumers have the power to torch you the same way you torch them.
yeah karma is a b%$ch and you’re feeling it now!! HA HA
‘Suit’? Nice cliche there, Jake. I’m a suit? No. I’m an independent producer with his own company, producing his own stuff. Films that you’ll no doubt steal. Cause you’re ‘non-corporate’ like that, right?
“Like with music, I pay for the artists I choose to support: If I like an album I’ll buy it but I am not going to waste money on something I am not sure about.”
Wait!! So you’re saying I can go into my local grocery store’s chip aisle, open and consume all the bags of chips I’d like, and then only pay for the chips I liked?! Man I’m not sure where you live, but it’s certainly not where I live.
“I wish this industry lots of luck with their lawsuits though, I mean treating people who are interested in the product like criminals has really helped the music industry after all.”
I’m confused, so you’re saying that if I think your car is of interest to me, I should be able to take it from you and not be called a criminal?
“If I were one of the people put out of work due to “piracy” I think I’d be more pissed at big corporation. This press release makes it sound like pirates are attacking workers but what about the corporations that screw their employees, jack-up ticket prices and continue to make billions in profit by doing it?”
Translation: Everyone is doing it, it can’t be wrong!!….Do you really think this?
Piracy is the symptom. Lack of access is the problem. As one poster said above, in this day and age not getting access to shows because of outdated FCC laws is ridiculous.
The technology exists, so no matter what Congress tries, there will always be digital downloads.
Cure the problem–create access (it’s really not about this “free” crap–or keep fighting symptoms like an idiot.
A good example of the stupidity that leads people to go “elsewhere” – The Poirot movies on PBS. For some stupid reason, PBS edits down the movies to fit their allotted time (they have no problem starting programs on the quarter hour for the pledge drives though!).
So that’s bad enough. But, when they release said movies on DVD for purchase, they use the edited versions! Even when you pay for it, they won’t give you the unedited, proper version.
The only way to get that proper version is to either a] buy a PAL-capable dvd player, hack it to play Region 2 and then buy the dvd from the UK or b] download the UK unedited version from a torrent site. Neither of which will help “American” business.
Idiots.
Worst of the Worst?
I could buy this with relation to movies and even music.
It’s completely unbuyable with regards to TV. With broadcast TV, advertisement and in-show advertisement pays for it, and the supreme court has already taken a stand decades ago on the right to record. Networks already go out of the way to provide this content freely via their own websites, Hulu, hell, to some extent networks provide large chunks of some on Youtube.
If you make the price for your material $0, it becomes hard for me to establish the means as a credible debate.
I think there is a very legitimate debate of the damage done to theatrical releases, DVD exclusives, and for pay content, sure.
Holy cow, Microsoft pays for a 30 second ad to appear -inside- of Hawaii-Five 0 (Bing it, Dano?) Bones (“Oh, Let me Show you My Phone!”) and so on..
What will result in all this fury is.. nothing. We’ll make grand examples of small groups of people… and bankrupt a few or send some other people to jail/prison for nothing.
If you want to get real in the war on piracy, go after and find the sources and prosecute them. The people who are taking exclusive for pay content and leaking it online.. (See: Wolverine getting leaked more then a month in advance; Academy screeners popping online).
Because so far, I haven’t seen anything of that. You have to be willing to put the bust one where it starts. Not some poor peon in Akron who’s making $32k a year and downloading what their DVR missed the night before instead of using Hulu.
I am often curious about the relationship between piracy and pricing. iTunes showed fairly effectively that offering music at a low per-song basis provides reasonable competition with piracy. Five or six years ago, the music industry was viewed as facing a potentially immediate extinction. That’s not true anymore. The major reason is iTunes.
To date, the battle to accomplish the same thing with television and film hasn’t happened yet. Oddly, each industry has the opposite problem. With television, only the major shows are readily accessible. There’s no reason anymore for me to pirate the most recent episode of Glee – I can get it for a reasonable price any time, or stream it for free. On the other hand, there’s tremendous incentive to pirate foreign shows that don’t have day-and-date airing in the US (Doctor Who is a huge victim of this) or obscure shows with inadequate release (i.e. squee’s example of the Poirot movies). And torrent sites support this long tail style very well.
With film, on the other hand, the trend is to only put lower tier/library titles available for streaming on Netflix while maintaining the antiquated windowing system on major releases. Thus there’s no incentive whatsoever for me to pirate a mildly obscure movie I can get easily on Netflix, but on the other hand if I want a recent blockbuster, odds are the price is in the $10+ range, which is awfully rough for two hours entertainment in a world where TV is $2 an hour and video games are about $1.50 an hour. Accordingly, piracy there is a massive problem for something like Harry Potter or Inception, but much less of a problem down the long tail.
The solution, which the music industry figured out, is to just bloody well embrace cheap digital delivery and slaughter a couple sacred cows.
people are always going to find a way to pirate, no matter what happens. Its just the reality. Sure they can block sites such as priatebay and torrents, but what will that do? Either the pirates will give up, and therefore spend $100′s a year on media, OR they can just spend a few hours finding a new method. Obviously the latter will happen. Its just TOO easy! This will be a long headache for everyone. Change the business model or get left in the dust!
There is no way to ever stop illegal file-sharing and P2P usage.
The simple (and yes, ugly) truth is that ANYTHING that can be encoded digitally can be undone. (Just ask Microsoft, the largest software company in the world)
Those who believe attacking and eliminating existing websites that are well-known online that offer illegal music, film, video content, will actually decrease the problem of piracy are uneducated as to the realities of existing technology.
Offline Intranets that offer P2P files can never be detected, and “darknets” that fly below online detection exist all over the globe.
If the politicians really want to help the film and music industries conquer this problem, they should stop trying to legislate what they don’t understand, and suggest that these industries go about providing solutions for their future existence.
Sending cops down to the Union Square L stop would be a lot more useful in the fight against movie theft than cracking down on websites. Those guys legitimately make a profit (well, their bosses do anyway). Very little of this stuff actually originates on places like The Pirate Bay anyway. Arresting a corner drug dealer is nice and all, but he’s not really the problem.
People are still stuck on the whole “I don’t want to pay for something I don’t know if I like” theory, but that’s just crap. My neighbors won’t pay $1 for a Red Box movie and they aren’t going to pay anything regardless of the access or price. They are just one of millions of people who think they should get everything when they want it and for FREE. They pirate everything from kids’ books to movies to music and they could care less. Some people might pirate a few items they are unsure about, but the majority never go and buy an actual copy of the book/song/move, etc. that they originally stole, no matter how much they love it. Why would they if they already have it???
While I think there should be stronger laws to prevent this, I don’t really see how it’s going to work, especially considering that the attitude for most people is that they are entitled to it all for free.
I also find the comment above saying that these industries should focus on putting out a more quality product quite hilarious. Who decides what is “quality” music, reading or acting? I don’t think “Twilight” is a quality movie (or book), I don’t think that any metal band is quality music, and I wouldn’t read anything by Jenny McCarthy because I think it’s junk. However, it’s not for me to decide what is quality. If people like it and want to buy it great. The issue is that people DO like it but just don’t want to pay for it.
And yet UseNet will go on completely unscathed.. nice..
The bottom line the content providers need to recognize is that their content delivery system has not kept up with changing viewer habits.
Viewers want to watch what they want to watch, when they want to watch it. If content providers give their customers a reasonable means to do that, viewers will pay a reasonable fee. If they don’t, well, there’s Torrenting and dudes on the street hawking ripped DVD-Rs….
Any effort at blocking content based on artificial political boundaries or creating artificial scarcity by trying to limit access to content once it’s been released into the world (you know, like airing a television show) is doomed to failure.
I expect the legislation currently under consideration will be as spectacularly successful as the laws prohibiting the use of marijuana.
For me its not about wanting something for free, it’s about access. I buy DVDs, watch hulu with ads and I go to the movies, but I can’t get my favourite BBC and ITV shows any other way, if I could I would gladly pay for them. Region locking DVDs is absurd, they are only hurting their own sales. There is also supposed to be an international BBC iPlayer coming soon that will allow foreign viewers to pay to view their programming. I would do this gladly, still waiting for it. In the meantime, I will see these shows any way I can.
What’s funny is that Stephen Fry (yes, that Stephen Fry) posted links in his twitter on how to use a proxy and use the BBC Live feed… now. I currently pay a (relatively small, $3 a month) fee to have a UK proxy.. and I watch ITV/BBC straight from their sites with no hitches now.. but if the BBC would offer it to me for a small fee – that same $3 or so, I would pay in a heartbeat.
This bill has major, major First Amendment issues. A more accurate headline would be “US Senate Panel approves legislation to appease high-paying lobbyists.”
Remember, there was a time Hollywood wanted to make VCRs illegal.
What? How exactly is shutting down websites that earn revenues through trafficking in stolen goods a free speech issue? Look around, illegal activity is NOT speech. Please, argue the merits of the law. Don’t stock the pond with red herrings.
because it doesn’t STOP at those sites. don’t act the fool wiley.
clueless
So ironic how big companies run by rich people just hate regulation and laws in their industry… unless they think laws make will make them even richer!! They just love those laws!!
This legislation is a good first step. I’m not sure what’s taken so long for the government to realize that the internet is the focal point for an unsavory black market in illicit goods. Now, instead of ripping off and burning bootleg DVDs pirates are creating sophisticated websites that offer downloads of stolen products. Some of these websites charge for subscriptions while others feature advertising. What they do have in common is using stolen content to line their own pockets.
Folks who freak out and cry censorship are being ridiculous. Taking down pirate websites is no different than cracking down on counterfeiters who sell pirated software in flea markets. Every business has moved online–even the bad ones.
Companies that help these pirates will also have to examine how they facilitate this activity. Credit card companies, ad providers and the like will have to reevaluate their complicity in aiding and abetting these black market businesses.
China, Taiwan and Mexico will remain at liberty to continue, however.
This is basic economics people! the customer “has to be WILL AND ABLE” to buy something. The Supplier also has to be “WILLING AND ABLE” to sell something. The market will always find an equilibrium. The problem is that most of the people who “WILLING AND ABLE” to sell these products, simply can’t…As a a result people are turning else where and the tards instead of blaming them selves blame others. If they keep this up what is going to happen is that moves, music and shows will cease to exist………..that’s what I think anyways, it will be the 1880′s again……………
Fail.
This kind of law is completely unamerican and against several good capitalist concepts. P2P filesharing should be embraced by the world to share everything from programs to media. For software and games this is not a problem as those markets will be shifting to SAAS business models and thus piracy will be nonexistent.
The same can (and likely will, as it is the smartest thing to do) happen to the movie industry and reduce piracy to very low amounts. I do think however that movie/music files will still be leaked and that should be 100% ok.
If artists want to make money, I say tour. Maybe artists and their labels don’t need to make so much money? I mean isn’t that the basis of capitalism… their work has less demand. There are many artists who don’t mind their work being distributed, do you know why?
They love what they do and don’t care if they make an insane amount of money. Why should you want more money if you do something you love and can make a very good living? I think the best part of file sharing is all the indie/low end stuff ive discovered.
Musicians who love to play and artists who love to direct act and so on, they would do it for pay or not. If you are an artist and you get angry at a way for MORE people to be exposed to your music than ever before… maybe you shouldn’t be an artist because you’re just doing it for the money and if so… well fuck you.
Why are we so afraid of change in America? Let things change, let banks fail, let the music industry fail, let the old things die and let us evolve as a world. I know most of you have a problem with the word “evolve” but seriously.
This is nothing but scared rich people afraid they won’t have the money and control anymore. If the industry is dying naturally, then you need to find a new skill, new job, new something. That’s capitalism.
Unfortunately what will probably happen in the next 10 years is the digital equivalent of a mad witch hunt. Do you know how many people in the country download copyrighted material? Do you know what would happen when they all saw the government was witch hunting them and they couldn’t do it anymore?
Shit, it’s going to be worse than the drug war LOLOL. And a more spectacular failure.
Finally, i’d like to add in one more little piece of information. Hackers of the world, the real hackers. The people who build open source and believe that all academic information belongs to everyone in the world. These hackers will keep this culture alive, and you will have to wage war with them.
And you won’t win.