
EXCLUSIVE: William Monahan, the Oscar-winning The Departed scribe who made his directing debut on the upcoming London Boulevard, has found his next film. He’ll write and direct Becket, a new adaptation of the Jean Anouilh play that was previously turned into a 1964 film that starred Peter O’Toole and Richard Burton. That film, about the friendship and estrangement between King Henry II and the Archbishop of Canterbury, won an Oscar for scribe for Edward Anhalt and was nominated in 11 other categories.
Monahan is basing his film on the original text of the 1959 French play. He’ll produce with Smuggler Films’ Patrick Milling Smith, John Hart and Brian Carmody. They are raising the production financing and plan to start pre-production in the UK early next year. London Boulevard, which stars Colin Farrell and Keira Knightley, opens in the UK November 26 and opens in the US in February.
“It’s an adaptation, or re-invigoration, of an older play, which has already been a brilliant film,” Monahan said. “For me, it’s a chance to take on one of the greatest stories in our civilization, a double tragedy with two heroes, each of them paradoxical, each of them brilliant, each of them making mistakes that lead to their undoing. The world of the Plantagenets was very rich and we’ll open the play up into that world and go into the relationships of the Angevin court more than the 1964 film was able to do. To adapt something is to do a literary personalization of a story, so in that sense I’ll be doing a very different Becket.” The WME/Anonymous Content/Independent-repped Monahan just scripted The Falcon for GK Films, he’s writing Oblivion for Tron: Legacy helmer Joseph Kosinski at Disney and adapted John Grisham’s The Associate for Paramount and Tony Scott. He’ll also adapt Barry Unsworth’s Booker Prize winner Land of Marvels at GK Films. Here is a recent trailer for Monahan’s directorial debut:


Awesome!!!
What is this industry made of these days? 20 million sequels and no one has an original thought anymore. They have to remake everything?
Let people see the original and leave the good stuff alone. If you don’t have an idea what to make, go into television
It isn’t a remake … it’s an adaptation from the play.
As if the film bizness wasnt risky enough now someone is goin to risk money their money on some ancient play
and it will probably be better than most of the crap Hollywood is turning out
Some ancient play?! Come on! It’s a classic. Probably one of the most important points in british history. I hope the film gets close. Definitely an audience if they get close to the stated ambition.
Seriously>!? There are some pretty compelling arguments to suggest classic material like this can work.
his debut film isn’t even getting a US release, and he’s getting a second chance?
I read February for US.
that’s news to me; if it is getting distributed in the US, it’s by a small studio, which means almost no one will see it–they might as well not release it at all, and just make it a straight to DVD film
Nope, it was posted on THIS site and many others, weeks ago, that Film District, Bob Berney’s company, is distributing in the US theatrically.
Can’t imagine it being better than the original film — but it should be interesting anyway.
No originals anymore? We can only copy?
Thank you.
The original play was phenomenal, it’s subtitle was “The Honor of God” The film starring Peter O’Toole and Richard Burton was spellbinding, a tour de force of acting. I certainly understand Monahan’s desire to put his stamp on this tale, BUT how will it stand up to the spectacular work that it is an adaption of? A period piece for the intelligentsia? Going for the over 35 demographic…Hmmm
The Kings Speech seems set to be doing well. I’m hoping it sparks a run of smart historical drama with some serious acting. I have my fill of 3D sequels.
the original movie was a success but a missed opportunity. The play is a great. I think a better film can be realized. Not sure there are two better actors out there for it than O’Tool and Burton but thats to be seen.
This is the kind of news that should explain and justify the Hollywood system to a wider world. At the margin, talented people get to do something completely niche to develop their own sensibility, because, in some sense, the industry understands the need. Europe will never have a real film industry until it relearns this lesson.
The play was far more complex than the film; Anhalt did a remarkable job untangling its non-linear structure and making it emotionally involving. Monahan is a writer who knows how to use irony, and the relationship between Henry and Becket certainly illustrates that, but he’ll have a hell of a struggle resolving the fact — now embraced by historians — that Becket was not a Saxon but a Norman like Henry, a fact that will neutralize most of the play’s character mmotivation(s).
Will no one rid me of these meddlesome reboots?
The Public deserve to spend their money on a film of great historical significance rather than the plethora of mediocre banal films we film buffs seem to have to endure.
The human mind can take so much of special effects and monsters , vampires and blue people the thought of something as special as BECKET fills us all with a bit of hope and potential enjoyment.
I guess i’m excited. Yes. I’m actually just happy Ridley is not directing. No offense but Robin Hood was brutal. All down to the cast on this. The original was actually very funny so add a little more balls and battles and this could fly high.
One suggestion: find a way to work in The Hulk.
Re shooting and investing on an old film is funny to me. Why not invest on The Holy Urim and Thummim Book in viewing the world from its beginning to the end. This is a movie that the world is waiting to behold.
Thanks.