
As broadcast network executives were leaving for their holiday destinations last week, most of them were certainly glad to get away, and not only because of the dreary wet Los Angeles weather. The broadcast networks had little to cheer about this fall, which failed to produce breakout hits of the size of Modern Family or Glee a year ago. This year, the breakout hits were all on cable: The Walking Dead on AMC and Rizzoli & Isles on TNT, which ranked as the top basic cable series of 2010 among adults 18-49 and total viewers, respectively. The biggest new reality hit was also on cable, MTV’s Jersey Shore, which launched at the very end of 2009. Here are some notes on the fall season, evaluation of the performance of the individual networks and a look ahead at midseason.
- The biggest thing on TV this season has been football, which set ratings records for NBC and ESPN. It dwarfed the entertainment competition not only in live viewing but also in Live+7 where scripted series gain a significant chunk of their viewership.
- It’s nearly impossible to launch a new series at 8 PM. Two of the 3 new 8 PM series, NBC’s Undercovers and ABC’s My Generation, are history, while ABC’s No Ordinary Family was on a ratings decline until moving to 9 PM where its numbers stabilized. NBC’s new reality series School Pride barely registered in the Friday 8 PM slot, raising concern over CBS’ plan to launch new drama Chaos in the slot in midseason.
- Big-name producers don’t guarantee success unless the name is Chuck Lorre. While the Lorre-produced new CBS sitcom Mike & Molly is the highest-rated new series this fall in the 18-49 demo, J.J. Abrams’ Undercovers went bust as did the Jerry Bruckheimer-produced ABC legal drama The Whole Truth, while another Bruckheimer series, Chase, is fading. The jury is still out on Dick Wolf’s Law & Order spinoff Law & Order: Los Angeles, which has had so-so ratings so far. Next up are Shonda Rhimes with ABC’s Off the Map and David E. Kelley with NBC’s Harry’s Law.
- Texas proved the unluckiest setting for new series. Of the four freshman series set and filmed in the Lone Star state, My Generation, Lone Star, The Good Guys and Chase, 3 have been already been canceled and one, Chase, is struggling.
The networks (all ratings are season-to-Dec. 19):
8.2 million +4% 2.8/8 n.c.
The good: Football. The red-hot Sunday Night Football (21.1 million, 8.0 rating in 18-49) is up 12% in viewers and 10% in 18-49. And the limited holiday reality series The Sing-Off did well.
The bad: Everything else. SNF is the only NBC series in positive territory year-to-year and the main reason for the network to be on par with last fall’s performance deflated by five nights of The Jay Leno Show at 10 PM. Leading the declines among returning series is veteran reality series The Biggest Loser, (8.2 million, down 21%; 3.1 in 18-49, down 24%). The network’s new series also sputtered: Outlaw and Undercovers have been canceled, while Chase, The Event and Outsourced are middling.
7.8 million -15% 2.8/8 -18%
The good: Glee. The musical dramedy is soaring in its second season to become Fox’s highest-rated series (12.5 million, +41%, 5.3, +29%)
The Bad: Like NBC, besides Glee, all other returning Fox series are down, led by former flagship drama House, which has taken a dive (10.5 million, -33%, 4.1 in 18-49, -35%). Fox was also hurt by a shorter, Yankee-less World Series as well as lackluster freshman class, which produced two cancellations, Lone Star – the first new series this fall to get the axe – and Running Wilde, as well as one series that has shown some potential, the modestly rated comedy Raising Hope.
9.3 million -4% 2.7/7 -7%
The good: Like Glee, ABC’s sophomore comedy Modern Family (13.2, +34%; 5.3, +36%) is flying high in Season 2. And so is another sophomore series that gets far less attention than Modern Family or Glee, ABC’s The Middle (9 million, 2.8), which is up a whopping 26% (in viewers) and 22% (in 18-49) despite airing in an earlier time slot, 8 PM, vs. 8:30 PM last fall. Also hot is ABC’s reality veteran Dancing with the Stars, up double digits with a very well-cast cycle, helping crime dramedy Castle to post double-digit gains.
The bad: Of the network’s new series, two, My Generation and The Whole Truth, have already been canceled, with Detroit 1-8-7 also on thin ice. The other two freshmen, No Ordinary Family and Better with You, are only modest performers for now. The network’s Dancing with the Stars spinoff Skating with the Stars, was a flop. And, except for Dancing, the network’s veteran series are all down by double-digits, led by Extreme Makeover: Home Edition (8.4 million,-22%; 2.3 in 18-49, -30%) and Desperate Housewives (13.1 million, -17%; 4.4, -20%)
12.3 million +3% 3.2/9 n.c.
The good: The network has been the biggest ratings winner this fall with the strongest freshman class among the major broadcast networks led by Mike & Molly, Blue Bloods and Hawaii Five-0. CBS’ bold scheduling move on Thursday has paid off, with The Big Bang Theory establishing itself as the new top-rated series on Thursday, and Survivor keeping its Thursday ratings levels in its shift to Wednesdays 8PM, dramatically improving that time slot.
The bad: Two of CBS’ freshman series, $#*! My Dad Says and The Defenders, have been underperforming and are getting an early first-season exit with shorter orders. The network’s two other scheduling moves, of CSI: NY to Fridays and CSI: Miami to Sundays, may have shortened prematurely the life span of the veteran procedurals with big audience erosion due to the time-slot changes. Overall, the declines among returning series at CBS are more modest than those at other networks, with The Mentalist‘s (16 million, 3.5) 15% drop in the demo probably the most alarming.
Questions for midseason:
- Can comedy work at 10 PM? After the hour had been dominated by dramas and newsmagazines for decades, two networks, NBC and ABC, are launching 10 PM comedy blocks in midseason. Comedies at 10 PM have been a staple on cable, so why not also on broadcast TV? But then, dramas have struggled mightily at 10 PM on the broadcast networks while thriving on cable.
- It is a big year for the queen of daytime and the king of reality TV who are both embarking on new ventures. Will they be able to replicate their success? Will Oprah Winfrey’s cable network OWN work? Will Simon Cowell’s X Factor be as big as the show that made him a star in the U.S., American Idol?
- Will American Idol work without Simon? And will it lead to a sea change on Thursdays where it will air for the first time this season?
- How many singing reality series can the broadcast nets sustain? In the U.K., X Factor pushed out Pop Idol and alternates with Britain’s Got Talent. Here in America, in 2011 we will have American Idol, X Factor, America’s Got Talent and The Voice. What’s more, The Voice, NBC’s recently announced singing competition from Mark Burnett and John de Mol, will go head-to-head with Idol.
- What choices will Robert Greenblatt and Paul Lee make in their first pilot seasons at NBC and ABC, respectively?
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.



Wow you’re amazing!! Its New Years and you’re writing?! God Bless you Nellie!! Happy new Year. Great article btw
Boardwalk Empire, Breaking Bad, Dexter, Mad Men, Big Love, House are the only one hour shows of any quality. Blue Bloods could be good. Men of a Certain Age has grown. The majority of one hour quality shows are on cable.
Modern Family, Community, 30 Rock, Big Bang, Mike and Molly, The Office, Nurse Jackie have some great stuff going on. Networks can still make these shows.
ABC had the worst development in years under McPherson, Dungey, Patmore and the clowns at ABC-P did a horrendous job.
NBC under Bromstead is a disaster. Her team is so stressed out. They wouldn’t know a good idea if it fell on them.
CBS brings it in for the Geritol crowd. Hopefully one day they will want to tell stories again. Les pulls the strings. Nina is now a yes woman. A very nice liar. Everyone there is charming and CBS tries to takes all the license fees from the studios. Ruthless and classy. Catering to white fear.
CBSP gives development executives a bad name.
Fox is so shallow. They have their heads up their asses with development. It’s so sad. Because they have had some truly innovative shows through the years. They used to be an exciting place to go.
Nelli, it’s important to note that none of the networks respect writers or creators anymore. There are next to no writing deals in development at studios just big producer deals and a handful of rich writing deals. The networks believe they can actually develop the ideas themselves. Or remake shows from Israel. As a result they are having less success. Sure lots of money gets thrown away in development but if you get one hit it pays for a 2,000 development deals and then some.
Development deals are smart gambling. The networks had more shows to syndicate when they had development deals. I don’t believe it’s about the money. I think they don’t want to give writers power. Even HBO would rather have fancy producer deals than writer deals.
Yes. That’s it in a nutshell. Let writers create things that are interesting to them. Take a risk. Sure, there will be plenty of failures, but the successes will stay on the air forever. The problem is, the network execs, who aren’t writers, are creating the shows. And that’s why no one comes to a Chase, or The Whole Truth, or Undercovers. These shows feel like, just-add-writer-and-stir kinds of shows. No imagination, no originality. Just a cynical belief that audiences like this kind of shit, so let’s throw it at them again.
The Whole Truth was the victim of bad scheduling. It never had a chance against L & O:L.A. and the Defenders. It really is a great show with great stories, but no one ever got the chance to see it.
Great post, Killer Joe, very insightful. Posts like this are why I like Deadline, not all these right-wing Drudge fucks always spouting off. More hip, industry guys like this, please.
Terrific post, Joe. Bottom line is Network executives believe in their research so intently they have little space for personal observations. There can be a healthy balance between what executives do and what creators do. Can you imagine what would happen if a pitch meeting started with the executive asking the writer what they’ve been thinking about lately? What do they see happening in the world? What’s been in their craw to the extent that they have something to say about it? And what would happen if a writer answered the question and the executive said, great. Go put the idea together and I’ll buy it because I like the idea, the way you write and the way you think. How monumental a shift would that be! The cost of programming today and the reliance on instant ratings to determine success or failure, is the perfect storm of disaster and the broadcast networks squeeze tightly when they should be letting go that things can’t change. But imagine what would happen if an executive said to a writer they loved or felt had something interesting to say, you have 13 hours to tell a story so start thinking about your idea as a series and not a pilot. What would happen to that writers Studio if they learned they were not in the pilot business, but in the series business on that same project? Would the writer be inspired to do something bold? Would the Studio be inspired to make creative deals and not go to Vancouver because their default button tells them to? The ripple associated with enabling writers to create would be bold and would benefit everyone involved. It’s easy to be glib and say that we in LA don’t understand that the broadcast business is still big business in the middle of the country, but it’s equally glib to believe there’s too much difference between viewing habits of those living in the middle of the country from those living on the coasts. We’re all inteconnected and we all respond to provocotive key art and creative advertising from which we’ll sample an interesting show. So if the creative on Cable is working. And if the economics of Cable are working. And if Cable presents the kind of creative freedom that many are looking for. Then why does broadcast keep getting it so wrong? Look, I’ve produced series in Cable and there’s no more meddling a group of executives than what you get at USA or FX, but you still get a chance to do something in a different way and that’s all people really want; the belief and hope that maybe they’ll have a better shot at staying on the air. Not always the case, but it’s a hell of a lot better place to start than CBS where they invariably take their cutting edge pilot for a younger audience and test it in Las Vegas in front of their CSI audience.
that interplay between executives and creatives actually happens all the time….
Also stop casting my committee and market research. Let the writer/creators do it because they know what works more than a bunch of B-School grads who’ve never written/created/directed anything, ever. If “NYPD Blue” was launched today the suits would never cast Dennis Franz (“too fat…” “to old…” “who’d want to fuck him?…”). And he turned out to be one of the most memorable characters on TV in the past 25 years.
In this era of cost-cutting, the nets should give big name writers their deals in case they do hit on something big, despite JJ crapping the bed with Undercovers, but they should take young, cheap writers, give them a tiny amount of money, and with that security, watch the hungry kids churn out product. The problem is, the expensive, established writers are either not hungry or have lost their touch, and the young writers are too often lacking in talent.
Hey Killer Joe, sorry to hear no one bought anything from you this development season.
Killer Joe has a hit show on T.V. Don’t be sorry for him.
Sorry to hear that you can’t fathom Joe actually being right.
Killer Joe makes more sense than anyone I’ve heard in a long time.
Look at the movies. True Grit…a period film, a western, about a 14 year old girl… is the mainstream hit at the box office.
It’s a great story well told. Studios keep wanting to entertain themselves and not the audience.
If you build it they will come. If you can get the stupid studio and network folks away from second guessing.
Thanks Nellie, fascinating.
NBC makes me laugh. Ha Ha Ha ha
CW didn’t even make the list. I really hope this is the year cable performs its fatal throat rip on the networks.
Well, the cable channels are all owned by the networks…so..
My two cents:
The networks are all in trouble. No great insight here, of course, but CBS will be fine because of all the reasons CBS will be fine, and NBC thankfully has football. But ABC and FBC are in major trouble. Fox at least has brand awareness of sorts, but Idol is just not going to work without Simon, aside from the fact that the talent pool has been much thinner in recent years, plus, people are a little tired of the program in general. ABC is just putting out some awful event shows.
What they need are shows for young people, like GLEE, that can also attract some older viewers, though that’s sort of impossible to find, or else everyone would be doing it. But FBC will always have some street cred in that area, while ABC is in danger of becoming the old NBC.
Running Wilde was a terrible idea, Will Arnett is creepy to the average American, though I personally adore him. Lone Star, critical acclaim aside, the idea of guy cheating on two women was the problem, especially because the lead, while talented, wasn’t a hunk, nor was he the boy next door. The double life/ripping off families wasn’t the issue, it was the cheating. Women don’t want to see that, and in general, the show looked dusty and dreary. Fox has an element of hipness that they can’t squander on a show that was a soap.
Go young. Something like Hellcats, except…..not Hellcats. Quality programming for the young 14-30 y.o. viewer. Something better than 90210 and Melrose, but in that same sweet spot.
ABC needs their own Gossip Girl, their own Glee, their own anything that isn’t event driven.
MOST IMPORTANTLY — Something PROCEDURAL, but not dull like a crime show. LOST really turned a lot people off to the serial, sci-fi, geek stuff for a while. Life is really, really scary out there for people right now. They want something they can watch for an hour, and be able to digest and talk about at school the next day. STAY AWAY from shows with a mythology. That Cuse/Lind. geek stuff is not going to fly right now. People do not want to invest in anything. It’s why ENTOURAGE and shows like that are popular. I haven’t seen it in three years, but I know the characters, I like the characters, and I know I can tune in for any given episode and enjoy it.
A show like Lone Star, high school kids and 30-year-old’s are not going to talk about the next morning at school/work. Same with Running Wilde, or even Bones, though that show is a good staple. Lie to Me, Human Target? I kind of like Lie to Me, and I hope it stays, but Human Target is a show that Fox should not have on the air. Even on F/X, it’s just so dated and something that, no offense, seems like ABC or CBS would have. Of course, if it were on CBS, it’d do much better.
“Lone Star, critical acclaim aside, the idea of guy cheating on two women was the problem, especially because the lead, while talented, wasn’t a hunk, nor was he the boy next door. The double life/ripping off families wasn’t the issue, it was the cheating.”
This argument holds little weight given how highly rated ‘Two and a Half Men’ is. It seems every third week there’s a subplot where one of the three is cheating on a woman with another woman; Charlie cheats on girl with another girl, Alan cheats on his girlfriend with her sister/friend/mom, Charlie teaches Jake how to cheat on his girlfriend, etc.
you’re a moron. you’re comparing apples to oranges. one hour drama to a charlie sheen sitcom?
Charlie on the show is a bachelor. Plus it’s a comedy. Big difference.
I think CBS hit it big with The Mentalist, which seems like a procedural at first glance, but actually isn’t. It’s basically Bruno Heller’s intention to make fun of procedurals with the stiffer law enforcement agents who get thwarted in their attempts to follow the letter of the law to a tee, by Patrick Jane, who is very unprocedure-like. It’s light and funny, but it also anchored in some seriously dark backstory, with the Red John serialized aspect of the show.
If only CBS would look at The Mentalist, The Good Wife and Blue Bloods and realize the audience likes a good story.
The whole blood and guts franchise of CSI, NCIS, Criminal Minds is so foul. And so successful. It’s like selling porn. Leads people astray but its hard to turn down easy money for making trash.
“What they need are shows for young people” ????
Not that anyone will read this but Young people?? Shouldn’t they be doing their homework about that time of night?? How about all of us old crowd?? I really and sick of reality bs, the “progressive shows” and all the junk without a decent story line or characters that have developed. Try Castle, The Mentalist, Bones and on cable Burned. Some tripe there, yes, but worth watching. All the “generated” screaming by the audience is hard on my old ears. lmaof. But no one gives a rat’s rump about the old folks who can’t get a job and have little else to do but watch the box. Thanks for your time.
SNF?
Sunday Night Football.
You know, the show that gives NBC it’s highest ratings, but, also costs them a mint for the rights.
“It’s nearly impossible to launch a new series at 8 PM.”
This seems like a major overstatement.
How many of the shows at 8pm were any good? I think the network execs are blaming the time period when they should be looking in the mirror (or at whoever green lit those shows.) The one show that had a strong premiere was “No Ordinary Family”, which turned out to be a very ordinary show.
And I’m not sure how you can say that “No Ordinary Family” benefited from “moving to 9 PM where its numbers stabilized”. The show had seemingly stopped the bleeding on 11/23, showing its first audience growth (grabbing a 7, up from 6.69 the previous week).
THEN the series moved to 9 on November 30th and got the lowest ratings of the series (6.23). There was a small uptick in the second 9 pm showing (6.35) but it was still the second lowest ratings that the show got. I’m not sure how you can really consider the time slot switch a success.
Exactly right. Those shows were all embarrassingly poor. Executives can come up with all the reasons they want but in the end they don’t allow writers to bring interesting and unique ideas to the schedule. Glee, as much as I don’t like it, is clearly a unique show they allowed on. But they have no idea how to repeat that model.
Here’s a tip: Executives, you’re there to guide not create.
No Ordinary Family’s kid story lines turned me off. They were frustratingly boring. The rest of the show and concept was good. But I don’t thinkl I’ve watched it since the third or fourth episode, so it could’ve morphed into something different.
Oh God, The Mentalist gets 16 million viewers only? What will CBS ever do with such low numbers? /sarcasm
Can comedies work after 10:00 PM? If they’re funny! And dramas can work if they’re dramatic… and a funny drama would work best of all. So much of the writing on TV is such lame and unfunny crap that it’s hard to plow through to the first commercial break… and is anyone else bored out of their minds by these procedurals? Goofy is not quirky and to be complex, it doesn’t have to be complicated. TV has always been a writers medium… and it’s the writing that’s declined these past years… and that’s not necessarily the fault of the writers; the development process has become so corporate that’s it’s hard for anything original to break through… these kids in suits and ties are scared shitless to take a chance on anything they haven’t seen before — if they can’t explain it to their bosses by saying, “it’s alike CSI but with a dog,” they’re fucked… and so that’s what we get, CSI in three cities but without the dog… that part wasn’t goofy enough to be quirky.
TV development is a game best played while sitting at home, second guessing the current season. No one has a crystal ball, nor can anyone predict what will become hot or not. Television is not a widget business, yet everyone seems to think there’s some science to it. It’s not. It’s taste. The writers vs. the studio development people. The studio development people vs. the networks development people. The network development people vs. the head of the network/time slit gurus. Heads of networks vs. public opinion. Only when these pieces align do you get a hit.
Chances are what pays off big. Playing it safe gets a modest year with a better than 50% chance you’ll be in your job the next year. But it won’t get you remembered.
Take chances. Go big or go home. Cable does. They take chances because they have to — and they get noticed. And the awards.
The Mentalist would do fine if it didn’t have such a poor lead-in.
CSI is Law and Order in the year it cancelled: a once first-rate show that’s now brain dead. Casting Laurence Fishburne was the tipping point.
Switch CSI with a decent show and The Mentalist would jump back up in the rating.
I think it already does fine. 15-16 million viewers a week is a ton, enough to lead the night most of the time.
You write it’s impossible to launch a show at 8:00pm…and then you mention The Middle increasing a whopping 26%/22% after moving to…8:00pm?
And the reason that show “gets far less attention” is because of its solid middle America appeal…which constitutes a hate crime with many in the media.
CBS may bring it for the ‘Geritol crowd’ but if the over 55s are the fastest growing demographic and a lot more of them have some disposable income – i would consider that a good investment. Blue Bloods has the advantage of a mixed ensemble – tho the young ones seem 2 dimensional. That crowd can be relied on to sit down for an hour and watch a show – if you give them something worth watching – they are not attention span gnats.
Fox comes up with some great programming ideas but ideas have to be developed and thats where they fall flat. The Human Target debacle is a prime example. On its way to being appointment TV and they toss out the baby and keep the bathwater. What a total mess the show is now – gotta think the stars are embarrassed.
But at least Fox can come up with ideas. NBC cant even go that far. Stale, stale, stale looking shows.
Procedural is good – viewers do seem to like it – but bring it down to a younger crowd with maybe a multigenerational cast. Where are the book scouts when you need ‘em? There have to be 50 mystery/procedural/crime/suspense book series that could launch a good show. If you cant come up with ideas, find some novelists who can.
“Raising Hope” is a FANTASTIC show!!!! It hit a 2.9 in the demo and then Fox temporarily took it off for that lame game show? Not sure what the thought was there. Better to keep the re-runs on and get new viewers via word-of-mouth. Let’s “hope” the time off doesn’t hurt it.
I try to like “Raising Hope” but it’s just got too much of that Greg Garcia forced preciousness that swamped My Name Is Earl. Being poor is quirky and fun!
It’s weird. He does “the poor stuff” but I’ve heard his favorite thing to do is sit in the owners box at a Redskins game. That said, I still love the show. My friend on the crew said there’s an episode coming up with Amy Sedaris that is off-the-charts funny.
And every week Cloris Leachman brings the funny, showing how much fun elders with senile dementia can be. (No offense to anyone taking care of a family member with such a severe and debilitating affliction – I commend you!)
Interesting analysis, Nellie. However, I agree with Kevin that I don’t think it’s impossible to launch a successful show at 8pm, rather it’s the show, itself. If Glee were at 8, people would watch. The biggest problem, it seems to me, in comparing cable hits to net hits is that the bar is (still) so much higher on the broadcast nets as to what makes a ratings’ success. I don’t know the current stat on cable/satellite household penetration, but I’d imagine it’s in the 70-80% range, so it’s not like the ‘old days’ when the broadcast nets had far superior penetration and therefore were expected to pull in a lot more eyeballs; yet,ratings that define a monster success like The Walking Dead, for ex,are still much lower than those that define a network hit. The other problem is the continuation of the obsession w/18-49 demo and the perception that older people have brand loyalty and aren’t susceptible to ads & therefore not as important to advertisers This is perhaps the biggest fallacy left over from the past. Perhaps you can discuss your thoughts on these issues in another article
Happy New Year!
Network is playing it too conservative now day. Whatever happened to”All In The Family” and “Sanford And Sons” where RISKS were taken?
That cable genie is out of the bottle and Network better step up, go all sports, or become more of a focus driven niche tv because heads should roll for such dramatic drops. If cable goes ala cart, it’s over for Network broadcast. I mean OVER!
I’m surprised the networks are suffering as much as they are. Not so many jobs around, more people have more free time on their hands…if they aren’t watching TV, what are they doing?
They are either web surfing or playing video games. Hell, one can get several nights’ entertainment just from downloading and playing with iPhone/Android apps. The latter sure beats anything the nets have served up this season.
TwoCents is right, no more mythology shows that appeal only to the geek boys, go with procedurals because this is what people want.
Start programming for the whole spectrum of viewership not just for one segment. CBS does this and they get results. NCIS got 19 million viewers and over 4.0 demo 18-49 (those numbers are higher if you add up DVR 7 days viewing)
One thing Nellie, where does your numbers for The Mentalist, Glee and Modern Family come from? This season 2010-2011 The Mentalist is not averaging 16 million viewers and 3.4 demo but 14.52 milion viewers and 3.0. Glee numers are 11.61 million viewers and demo 18-49 4.8. Modern Family cannot have this season an average of 13.2 million viewers if they only had one episode going over 13 milion viewers, its average this season is 11.86 million viewers and 4.6. Are you using ratings with 7 days dvr viewing?
great analysis, nellie. thanks for writing this.
I think deadline is being very kind about saying No Ordinary Family has stabilized. When it moved to 9:00 p.m.(wasn’t going up against Glee) and had a lead-in it hit series lows in total viewers. The Adults 18-49 demo has also pretty much stayed the same. According to tvbythenumbers if the numbers don’t improve the show will be canceled. I think Fox actually has a lot potential with Raising Hope it’s last episode scored the highest ratings since September, and the audience will probably continue to grow when it returns.
Is it possible that your 8PM deathslot analysis does not take into account that the shows were just not good?
It seems so easy: make good shows and people will watch.
Somebody said Blue Bloods COULD be good. It IS good., Mr. Wiseguy. I have napped my way through the entire season so far and throughly enjoyed the program. The only problem was my Bladder was Blue, not my blood, from sitting in that chair so long!
What I like (besides Tom Selig — so handsome!) is that it creeps on in that petty pace which, as you know, comes from Shakespeare. And it doesn’t get all arrogant and try to present me with anything new or that I haven’t seen a hundred times before.
The reason the networks aren’t doing as good as cable is at cable there’s all that filthy talk, cursing. That’s it. Cable, THEY’re the ones that go for the lowest common denominator. Potty mouth talk and even mirkins like on that “Steel Pier”, from what I understand. And that Mad Men and Breaking show — all dressed up with a lot of arty farty-isms.
The networks don’t trust the intelligence of the audience. Why would you trust the intelligence of the mob? What kind of sel-destructive idiot or corporation would take that chance?
“Tom Selig”
True genius, Aunt Ida.
Thank you.
Funny stuff, Ida. Your subtext, of course, is that if ANY of the countless shows presently on the air aren’t edgy or hip enough and aimed at the X, Y and Z generations, then they don’t deserve to thrive.
Which makes perfect sense, because we should all be watching, and appreciating, the same kinds of shows, right?
TV, just like old people, is in dire need of a Death Panel… and you Ida, you seem like the perfect person to run it.
Here’s my opinion. . .
The best dramas and most of the best comedy by far is to be found on cable. A generation or more has been trained to eschew anything with a story structure that accommodates commercials.
There’s a whole lot of bland on the broadcast networks these days. We’ve seen these tired re-treads over and over again. I’d rather stub my toe and watch it bleed than see singing and dancing competitions or people losing weight. Once Hugh Laurie moves on, I’m through with broadcast. . other than the NBC Thursday comedy block.
I’ve been through with the NBC comedy block on Thursday when it stopped being “Must-see TV” when Seinfeld and Frasier, and Cheers and Friends were no longer on.
Simple:
Release the CAP on CREATIVITY!
when will the networks get it?!?!
Seriously!
You want something CREATIVE!?
LET THE CREATORS CREATE!
WITH ZERO ZERO NONE NADE NIL RESTRICTIONS!
WHEN WILL “THEY” GET IT?!
THE END
“Raising Hope” and “Better With You” are two sitcoms that are actually funny because you can tell they don’t take themselves too seriously. Ala “Seinfeld”. “Outsourced” is a hoot, too.
“The Defenders” is as good a lawyer show as any – and often better. Jim Belushi and Jerry O’Connell have good acting chops and look like they are having a good time.
I tried “Chase” – or was it “The Event”? Oh well, it doesn’t matter.