
EXCLUSIVE: After almost a decade in Hollywood as the head of UPN and its successor broadcast network, CW entertainment president Dawn Ostroff may be going back to New York. I hear Ostroff would be leaving the CW at the end of her contract in June to relocate to New York with her kids. While the decision is not final, sources indicate that Ostroff is leaning heavily in that direction and is expected to make it official early next year.
Ostroff is the longest-running sitting broadcast entertainment president. She had been based in New York as SVP and EVP of Lifetime until CBS Corp. boss Leslie Moonves tapped her to run UPN at the beginning of 2002. She relocated to Los Angeles with her kids and her husband Mark. But Mark’s job has kept him bi-coastal, and for the past year, he has been based in New York full-time, commuting to Los Angeles every Friday night and flying back every Monday morning.
That has put a strain on the family, forcing the two parents to consider a move. In anticipation of the possible relocation, I hear the Ostroff kids have already interviewed with private schools in New York. Dawn Ostroff has been a key member of Moonves’ senior executive team, and I hear they both would love for her to stay on but the truth is she won’t be able to do her current job of running the CW out of New York.
For the time being, Ostroff is fully focused on the CW’s midseason and development. She will soon be ordering pilots for fall, will oversee the launch of the network’s midseason reality series Shedding for the Wedding and the relocation of Hellcats to Tuesday. She is also expected to be at the CW’s upfront presentation in May. Ostroff would be leaving the CW in a good place. The network, which has been going through some growing pains since its 2006 launch, has hit its stride this year. Season-to-date, the net, co-owned by CBS and Warner Bros., is up 7% in total viewers, the biggest gain for any English-language broadcaster. It is only one of two networks in positive territory year-to-year, along with CBS (up 3%), with new drama Nikita broadening its audience. Additionally, the new online sales initiative introduced by the CW at this year’s upfront market has been deemed a success and may be adopted by other nets. It involves the CW selling “convergence packages,” combining the traditional TV airings of its shows as well as online streaming with full commercial loads. “We’re no longer looking at digital pennies, we have achieved digital dollars,” Ostroff said at the network’s TCA session in July, noting also that, as the first broadcast network born in the digital age, the CW was the first to adopt Twitter and Facebook in its campaigns.
Also at that TCA session, Ostroff ruminated on her longevity in face of the constant revolving door that the top broadcast executive jobs are. “I always say these jobs are rented chairs,” Ostroff said in the context of ABC’s Steve McPherson’s departure. “I’ve been sitting here for 9 years, having seen a lot of people come and go.”
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


She is one of the rare tv execs with good judgement. The CW will miss her.
Hilarious. Good judgment? That network is a disaster.
do u know how many fans bitch over her creative decisions? after all these years, the CW is just now showing some real positive strides. I’m looking forward to someone else coming in and making some big, bold, better decisions about bringing in good tv. Up until the past year and a half, the CW has been making me yawn. With the exception of Supernatural and the now cancelled LUX, the shows are lacking high quality writing and acting.
I hope she stays!! What a wonderful woman. I have had the pleasure of working with Dawn and I have to say, she is one of the most creative and hardworking individuals I seen in my 15+ years in the industry. May she be successful in all her future endeavors.
She has nurtured the CW from the new kid on the block, to a maturing a well respected network. From her choices of great entertainment, to her sagacious marketing savvy, she has my utmost respect. They will surely miss her.
IS that you Dawn…? Sagacious Marketing Savvy? Come on… The CW is bad… They should have jsut left it the WB and it would have been better…
” They should have jsut left it the WB and it would have been better…” – Where the hell do you get that stupid idea from? The ratings for EVERYTHING were an effing joke when it was the WB, and it IS the WB nimrod they just changed the name. Man you people are stupid!
“Hilarious. Good judgment? That network is a disaster.” – What’s hilarious is that you CLEARLY didn’t read the facts in the article. You’re probably another LUX wannabe know-it-all, know-nothing-at-all that doesn’t like the fact that they cut a NON-PRODUCTING, UNPOPULAR SHOW. Get over it, loser. If the network were a “disaster,” then how is it one of the ONLY networks to have consistent GAINS when ALL other networks are LOSING viewership?! Didn’t think so, STFU.
“I’ve hated her since she cancelled Veronica Mars.” – Which shows that people that don’t like her don’t have much taste anyway. ‘Veronica Mars’ was completely stupid, grow up. The show was a blatant rip-off of ‘Alias’ only with really bad acting, nothing to miss there.
“She should have been gone a long time ago. She has run the CW into the ground. It’s pathetic performances, last place finishes Mon-Wed almost like clockwork, have turned the CW into a joke.” – Again moron, READ THE ARTICLE AGAIN. You can’t run ANYTHING into the GROUND when you GAIN. It’s in last place according to what? Your opinion? That doesn’t count for anything. “We need someone that would have taken Smallville and Supernatural, some of their top shows, and put them on a night that actually benefited the network.” – Newsflash: Those two shows ARE the biggest hits on the network, so what’s your problem aside from the fact that you’re an idiot that doesn’t know what they’re talking about?! “Smallville would easily be pulling in 3-4 million viewers on a Mon-Thurs night. Supernatural would definitely be in the 3 million range, as well. “It’s disheartening to see shows like ‘Shredding for the Wedding’ being picked up instead of unique ideas like ‘Nomads’” – ‘Nomads’ is neither unique nor interesting – it’s a freaking reality show mixed with ‘Alias’ again, so if they would have picked up that stupid shit then they would have had a problem. “and ‘Global Frequency’” – Again see my last point, they need to stay away from the CIA and intelligence shows altogether because most of the time the bitches in the shows can’t act – so no one watches the shows in the first place and they get cancelled. It’s better to not pick up the POS in the first place then let it run like 3 episodes before it gets cancelled. “that would have benefited the network with new viewers and break free from their ‘girly’ targets.” – Moron, those shows that you listed ARE for females and they wouldn’t have benefitted anything because they would have failed miserably because they are both the exact same show, and again, would have been cancelled in record time. And if it were for us ‘girlies’ you wouldn’t have a HIT show anywhere. Little boys like you aren’t the only people in the world, get over yourself, fatass. No subsidiary networks pull in anywhere near that many viewers consistently, EVER. You’re delusional if you think you know what you’re talking about. These smaller networks don’t need that many viewers because they are owned by bigger networks, so if they lose anything the bigger network can handle the loss without the smaller network having to fold. ‘Supernatural’ would NEVER get 3 million viewers anywhere at this point, ratings always go down after a few seasons, plus the show isn’t that good anyway. ‘Smallville’ is STILL the overall ratings monster and it always has been for the network, so again, why are you complaining about something that has already happened? ‘Smallville’ is the ONLY show on the network to average over 3 million a year, until last year, which is pretty effing good since it’s been on for 10 years. The CW is NOT lacking in ratings for their REAL hit shows, so you’re complaining about nothing.
Your points would have come across better if you didn’t use childish insults.
That being said[and I’ll pre-face this by saying I watch half the shows on the CW(Gossip Girl, One Tree Hill, Life Unexpected, Nikita, Smallville), even if I have to tape shows on my old-fashioned VCR while I’m watching other shows):
1) Funny how the CW is the WB when the person currently running the CW ran its main competitor UPN before the merger put her in charge of the CW and eventually, the only UPN show left is America’s Next Top Model.
2) Yeah, the CW so far has gained 7% viewership over last season, but they don’t have to program Saturdays(where every network airs reruns except Fox while ABC has college football in fall) or Sundays(the CW used to but gave it up).
3) How was Veronica Mars “an Alias ripoff”? Didn’t watch Alias, but I’m familiar enough to know that a teenage private detective is not a rip-off of an uncover CIA agent. Hell, thinking about it, Alias was, in a way, a rip-off of the La Femme Nikita franchise that the CW just remade(Nikita’s a great show). VM was still better than 90% of the garbage that was on TV then and even now, so it certainly wasn’t “stupid”. Not the show’s fault that Ostroff didn’t have the ovacular fortitude to promote the show more than once or twice a week while airing ads for 7th Heaven(a piece of garbage show in which the only good thing it ever did was launch Jessica Biel’s career) every commerical break.
(And, when VM was cancelled due to poor ratings, but not after Ostroff waffled for a month before finally making the decision, I moved straight on to acceptance, because I saw the writing on the wall, just as I saw the writing on the wall for Life Unexpected; I’m just going to enjoy the last episodes and move on.)
4) Again, while they gained viewership over last season, they’re still in last place in that coveted Adults 18-49 demo advertisers like. Keep in mind that Smallville and Supernatural were moved to Fridays after Vince McMahon decided not to renew WWE’s contract to air WWE Smackdown and moved it to MyNetwork for a couple of years before settling on Syfy this year. And they were moved to Fridays specifically to kill the shows because they didn’t fit the CW’s target demo. Only problem is that they gained viewers on Fridays and have been near #1 in their timeslots.
While the CW has gained viewers this season, they’re headed toward a downturn next season with Smallville in its final season and One Tree Hill most likely being cancelled because its remaining original cast members are ready to move on to bigger things.
A little parable: While Fox became big when Married With Children and The Simpsons became huge hits, Fox didn’t truly make it until they outbid CBS for the broadcast rights to the NFL, which skews mostly male and accounts for the vast majority of the most-watched shows on network and cable TV(this past February, Super Bowl XLIV, won by the New Orleans Saints for their first championship, beat the M*A*S*H finale as the most watched show all-time). And the NFL’s viewership continues to grow among both genders.
The bottom line: a network needs both male and female viewers to grow. Focusing on just one gender or one narrow demo is shortsighted. And The CW does need both since it is a broadcast network with affilate stations, not a cable network where it can get away with focusing on such a niche demo.
It’s unfair to say that she tried to kill Smallville or Supernatural. Smallville obviously has been performing admirably on Fridays, Supernatural was certainly going to do well there. And genre shows have a better chance to performing on Fridays.
Funny how men gripe about gender networks when it’s focused on women, but don’t complain when it’s focused on men
BearDogg-X, marry me! Because that was quite an intelligent and excellent summation of the whole thing. Bravo! (swoons at intelligent writing and countenance)
Tyler: it IS entirely fair to say that Ostroff tried to kill Smallville and Supernatural by moving them to Fridays. With the occasional exception of ABC’s late-90′s TGIFridays line-up, Friday night timeslots have been where ALL of the networks send shows to die. The shows that CBS has had success with on that night have been almost purely accidents — even going back as far as CSI: Original Recipe, which aired at 9pm Fridays its first season, almost instantly turning into a raging success that by simple virtue of being a success necessitated it being moved onto another night. It’s signficant in this context to note that CBS moved CSI: New York from its competitive slot on Wednesdays at 10pm to the mothership’s original timeslot of 9pm Fridays. Likewise, it’s massively significant that CBS moved CSI: Miami from the 10pm Mondays timeslot that it had always had to the Sunday 10pm/”after football” timeslot. Because these are both *inherently* demotions from good timeslots to bad timeslots.
Smallville was at the start of its 9th year when it was moved to Fridays last season and Supernatural was at the top of its 6th year when it was moved to Fridays at the top of the season. They were moved to Fridays because their ratings on Thursdays, the most competitive night of the week for programming across the networks, were falling. That they’ve rated high enough on Fridays to make the night competitive for the network is entirely an accident on The CW’s part.
Finally.
I’ve hated her since she cancelled Veronica Mars.
“Veronica Mars” stayed on the air at least a season longer than it probably should have considering it’s horrible ratings. Some TV fans are simply far too unrealistic concerning shows with bad ratings. You can’t seriously expect a network to keep a show on the air that gets such poor ratings. If Dawn Ostroff deserves flack over cancelling a show, she should get it for her decision to cancel “Everwood” in favor of bringing back that insipid show “7th Heaven” for another season even though it had already had a “series” finale.
Everwood was beaten out by One Tree Hill among the bubble shows. The decision to rescind the Seventh Heaven cancellation happened later.
No it didn’t. It happend on the day the fall scheduled was released. The same day the cast of Everwood were told it was over. Until then they thought they would be coming back. By the way Runaway or whatever the show called came also infront of Everwood. Runaway lasted 3 episodes.
She should have been gone a long time ago. She has run the CW into the ground. It’s pathetic performances, last place finishes Mon-Wed almost like clockwork, have turned the CW into a joke. We need someone that would have taken Smallville and Supernatural, some of their top shows, and put them on a night that actually benefited the network. Smallville would easily be pulling in 3-4 million viewers on a Mon-Thurs night. Supernatural would definitely be in the 3 million range, as well. It’s disheartening to see shows like ‘Shredding for the Wedding’ being picked up instead of unique ideas like ‘Nomads’ and ‘Global Frequency’ that would have benefited the network with new viewers and break free from their ‘girly’ targets.
“She has run the CW into the ground”. WTF??? The CW never got off the ground
“WTF??? The CW never got off the ground” – Again, READ THE ARTICLE or STFU, preferably both.
So now everyone will love her? I mean come on! CW launched TVD with success but let’s not forget her amazing remakes before that.
CW should do shows like WB did, not some remakes of teen dramas.
“CW should do shows like WB did, not some remakes of teen dramas.” – WTF do you think they’re doing? Why do you think a lot of the newer shows fail? They are doing the exact same type of thing that was done on the WB (which is the same network anyway).
Can I get an AMEN. I never saw a more poorly managed network. Hopefully the two good shows on the CW will now hold strong and the new head will get rid of some of the clutter.
Thank God!! It’s about time.
Phase one complete. Now phase two is to reclaim Sunday nights and bring back comedy to the network. Warner Bros needs to be more aggressive in terms of who is running this because it was obvious from the beginning that this network was too CBS centric.
No variety whatsoever, everything catered to teenage girls.
“Warner Bros needs to be more aggressive in terms of who is running this because it was obvious from the beginning that this network was too CBS centric.” – If it were CBS-centric the network would not only already be better, but the ratings would be FAR better. Warner Bros is the company that screws everything UP, or haven’t you noticed the plethra of failed movies and TV shows they’ve had on the bigger networks, Mainly on ABC?! How many of their newer shows have been cut because they sucked and couldn’t bring in ratings? Try 95% of them. That is Warner Bros for you, they’re failures.
“No variety whatsoever, everything catered to teenage girls.” – Again, if it weren’t for FEMALES you wouldn’t see any hit TV shows. And here’s a clue sherlock, girls don’t like to see each other getting undressed all the time so it’s REALLY TV for BOY NOT GIRLS.
Glad to see Dawn’s assistant replying to everyone. Speaking in all caps doesn’t make you look any more wrong. There was no reason to totally strip the network of comedy and cater strictly to teen girls. None. Her reign was a failure.
Hey brick, get your head out of your ass. Talk about childish, calling anyone that disagrees with you “Dawn’s Assistant” is pathetic. Make your argument, and be persuasive. You obviously are too incompetent to justify your opinions. PS What the hell do you know?
Warner Bros. are failures? Really? Really? Never mind that CBS has been running the CW for the most part even though Warner Bros. and CBS are supposed to be equal partners.
Besides that, the CW has a bunch of shows distributed by Warner Bros.: Supernatural, Smallville, One Tree Hill, Gossip Girl, Life Unexpected, Vampire Diaries, Hellcats, Nikita.
Troll harder next time.
Also recall that everything Dawn Ostroff picked up in her first year at The CW was in development for UPN, NOT The WB/Warner Bros. So, instead of another year of Everwood or the Aquaman pilot we got CBS-owned 7th Heaven and UPN-developed Runaway which lasted for only three episodes. And in that scheduling mess the comedy block, which had done very well particularly with the African-American audience on Mondays, was moved to Sundays for a few weeks. It was a disaster that was quickly changed back, but the damage had already been done.
The CBS side is behind 90210 and Melrose Place. WB – all of the shows listed above. I think the Warner Bros. side is much more on the winners’ column, and recalling what it was like to be a viewer of The WB in its best times when I was in their target demographic, The WB was a brand that young people liked. Sure, losing the frog and some of the later changes weren’t so great, but in 1999-2000 or so, it was a powerhouse. The CW – with its 1970′s looking round branding and gaudy green – might never have that relevance, even with a new president. Even if the Vampire Diaries is a huge hit, there are still a lot of people – including young people – who don’t even know what The CW is. It’s been almost five years; isn’t that a problem?
Good, I hope someone takes her spot and they notice how great Supernatural is and realize they should advertise the shit out of it and give it proper credit oh and y’know GIVE IT MORE MONEY SINCE ITS DESERVES MORE COMPARED TO HER SILLY ASS TEEN DRAMAS.
Is she going to NYC run the Ostroff Center?
If she was responsible for cancelling Life Unexpected, then good riddance!
Alleluia and the PEOPLE said Amen. I hope she keeps her hands off of Life Unexpected. What I dislike most is the coming and going of shows. Warner can afford to give shows a better chance to succeed.
AMEN! The way she and the network have jerked the writers, cast, crew, and fans of Life Unexpected around…it’s DESPICABLE. Good riddance, Dawn. If they cancel a beautiful, touching, REAL show like LUX without giving it the opportunity to grow and develop…and then replace it with crappy reality shows like Bridalplasty and Shedding for the Wedding, the CW is hitting an ALL TIME low.
Amen!!! This is the best x-mas gift ever. I’m so happy about this she is a horrible President!
She is in no way a horrible president. The job was NOT easy and she has showed considerable progress since the networks launch. Why do you people say shit without justifying yourselves? Your lack of education just continues to detract from your arguments.
LOL @ the haters. She actually made Fridays VIABLE with Smallville/Supernatural. Back in the WB days, Fridays were radioactive. I’m not a big fan of the teenage girl stuff like 90210, Gossip Girl, ANTM and the like but she’s made it work for her. And I’m a Nikita fan, this despite it being the FOURTH remake of the concept. I’d say the CW is way more consistent than NBC or ABC at this point. And they don’t yank genre shows like Smallville, Supernatural, the Vamp Diaries etc. If it was Fox they’d all be gone by now like Firefly. So quit your whining.
Finally, a Voice of Reason
The sure sign of a losing argument is calling others haters and whiners because they have valid points. Hopefully those aren’t executives authoring such comments because they are childish and lame. In fact anyone who still uses the shopworn word “hater” shows a lack of imagination and is out of touch. The CW is atrocious and the WB circa 10-12 years ago was superior. Just because the network shared some common ownership doesn’t make it the same network, as reflected even by the name change
Good. I hope she stays away.
Three words:
She cancelled Everwood!!!
Good riddance. Never gave Veronica Mars the love it needed. Missed a nice opportunity with the Melrose Place reboot(good idea, terrible execution). Kept the retched 7th Heaven(should have been killed after one season) in favour of booting Everwood(which could have run a lot longer). Had some other promising shows but decided to put them on hiatus in favour of some brutal reality show(Pussycat Dolls, Search for the Next Doll, anyone?). She got lucky keeping Supernatural during the changeover. Let’s not even get into the “Angel” or “Buffy” business or I’ll start throwing things at the screen…..
“Never gave Veronica Mars the love it needed?”
I am not a Dawn Ostroff fan, but if anything, she gave the show too much! She kept the show going when it should have been canceled at the end of Season 1, and definitely at the end of Season 2. The show got multiple “chances” with runs on CBS and MTV. And then, she scheduled it after two of her biggest shows – America’s Next Top Model and Gilmore Girls. She then let them do that really crappy VM:FBI “pilot presentation.”
If Dawn is to be blamed for VM’s demise at all, it is from the network’s insistence on infusing soap opera elements and angst that didn’t belong there, and the network’s overall branding which especially at the time just felt like other network’s leftovers, and who really wants that?
Kinda hard for a show(that lasted three years on a small network like UPN/The CW when it wouldn’t have lasted three episodes on the other big networks) to succeed when you don’t promote the hell out of it at any and every opportunity.
I’m pretty sure Veronica Mars WAS heavily promoted. It’s just that the UPN/CW promo monkeys sucked so they didn’t do a very good job of it. Fact of the matter is, most of the TV audience just didn’t care to make it appointment television, even though it had 3 seasons to try.
Guess what happens to UPN/CW viewers when they interview with private schools in New York?
This was funny.
Good riddance.
The CW has been a joke for a long time. They started off decent in premiere year but after that Dawn decided to make the network a ridiculous 18-34 women’s Cable outlet. ONE SUCCESS out of the entire network’s tenure and that’s Vampire Diaries. Smallville in year TEN does better than their entire Monday and Tuesday lineup.
They need to diversity at last with her gone it just might.
They got some interesting things in Pilot stage for the Fall. Hopefully with her gone they will get a chance as she has a tendancy to scrap all of them if they aren’t for teeny boppers.
Move Supernatural to a new night. Scrap One Tree Hill which is long in the tooth. Scrap 90210. Make ONE night for that 18-34 women’s demo with Gossip girl or something and thats it! Maybe a comedy night. A Supernatural oriented night.
Hey, I dont care WHO is president, as long as Supernatural STAYS and gets proper promotion and budget. O yeah, and Vampire Diaries too. Great shows.
YEAH!! I HEAR YOU. IF THEY DON’T KEEP SUPERNATURAL I WILL BE SO EVERLY PISSED OFF!!!
I hope this means that they will shift their focus away from the endless stream of look alike teen dramas and back to the type of shows The WB used to produce.
Don’t really know much about her, but i do know that Supernatural is the best show on TV and the CW does not treat it like it is. The show needs to be advertised more and given more of a budget. i wish her luck in the future and hope whoever takes her place understands good tv when he/she sees it
CW is still a huge mess, although I have to admit that it doesn’t look as bad for the network as it did some years ago.
Just a small reminder that CW’s target group are 18-34 year-old women, ,ut two of the best-rated shows on that network are Smallville and Supernatural. Ostroff tried her best to let these shows die quietly on Friday, but they’re still more successful than every other show exept for Vampire Diaries, the only real break-out hit Ostroff produced since the start of The CW.
There are still a few construction sites on that schedule… The abysmal ratings of GG, 90210, OTH, Hellcats, the decline of Top Model, the last season of Smallville… Young women are just not that interested in The CW.
I mean, where’s “Glee” or “The Secret Life Of The American Teenager”? Where are the programming innovations that one would expect from a broadcast network targeting young women?
I’m surprised that Pretty Little Liars didn’t land at The CW. It’s that kind of demographic show they seem to like, yet, it’s not cookie-cutter like Gossip Girl.
With the success of Glee, I’m surprised no one in TV has tried regurgitating Fame also. Something like that would do really well for a network like The CW, if done well… definitely a lot better than bringing back a soap (Melrose Place) that the target demo doesn’t even remember or care about.
They already have a show like “Fame” on Nickelodeon, and that’s called “Victorious”.
What does her husband do?
Mark Ostroff is a successful hedge fund manager. Currently Managing Director of Lazard Wealth Management he was formerly President of the Cantor Fitzgerald unit GoldRock Asset Management.
While Mark is a g, Dawn is still an amazing president of entertainment and ya’ll should stop hating all the damn time. Can you see the upside in anything? I feel bad for most if not all of you
Keep your pity.
What Ostroff oversaw with the CW marketing campaigns was truly appalling. For a network targeted towards teenagers to build all of its advertising around sex – from OMFG to “Menage a Thursday” – is more than crass, it’s destructive. (In fairness to the CW, they’re not alone: see HBO’s Pimp Ho campaign for Hung, or the Dexter with the baby in blood. How many of you have driven with a six year old who reads those billboards out loud?)
And while Ostroff didn’t invent the tendency of these shows to give young women unrealistic body image models, the CW has certainly built upon the WB’s history of such, while further sexualizing them. Anorexic teen actresses breeding a generation of young women with eating disorders and body image issues. Congratulations on that legacy.
YES! The string of ad campaigns you describe added a sick sheen to Los Angeles buses and shelter ads. Not exactly offensive, but reflective of a cynical, nasty approach.
It seems though that the dregs of a ‘seen it all/feel nothing’ culture are wheezing and hissing to a welcome death. Some other idea wave should be along soon. It is no accident all we get is tripe…