EXCLUSIVE I’ve just learned that Neill Blomkamp is reteaming with his District 9 star Sharlto Copley on his second sci-fi feature Elysium. Copley played Wikus van de Merwe in District 9 as well as HM Murdock in this summer’s The A-Team reboot. Meanwhile, director Blomkamp and Media Rights Capital now need to choose a distributor. “Neil is taking meetings all over town. There is a lot of interest from every studio,” an insider tells me. I hear Blomkamp is including a graphic novel in his presentation. Elysium is Blomkamp’s long-awaited story set in the far future on another planet and, like District 9, is filled with many sociopolitical ideas wrapped up inside a Hollywood action film. So far no one else has been cast. ”They have been working out budget and are now meeting with actor reps,” the insider tells me. Universal and MRC have a deal, but I hear this sweepstakes to distribute Elysium is wide open. Remember when Universal and Fox would have had to gamble on the then unknown filmmaker to make the videogame Halo into a big budget film but couldn’t get it together even though Blomkamp was to be backstopped by Peter Jackson and his WETA facilities? Morons!) Instead, Blomkamp and Jackson made District 9 which went on to gross $211M at the worldwide box office but the indieprod only had a negative cost of $30M. The alien apartheid film also snagged one of last year’s 10 Best Picture Oscar nominations. Sony Pictures is still pushing for a sequel, which Elysium is not. The secret of District 9‘s success is that it was made outside the studio system and marketed outside the studio formula, and contained edgy and original content and an unknown but fresh South African cast. It now looks as if Elysium is travelling the same road.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



Excellent! District 9 was one of the few true surprises in genre cinema I’ve had in years. Hopefully this means Copley is sticking with acting. He even managed to be great in The A-Team (no small feat!).
District 9 was brilliant, the best picture winner in my book.
Let’s get something straight, District 9, while VERY inventive in its base idea, was a terrible, terrible, TERRIBLE movie!!!
The main character Wikus never evoked so much as a shred of sympathy from me or anyone I know who has taste. He kept making one insanely incoherrent choice after another, until FINALLY —when he freaks out and bashes the alien that helped him so he can hijack the shuttle and fly who-knows-where to accomplish who-knows-what, only to be (LAUGHINGLY) shot down — do you hope the STUPID f**k just dies already.
And don’t get me started on the scene where he needs to get guns and goes to the war-lord dudes and is like, “Hey, can I get some guns from you guys? Here’s like some money and a sandwich.”
This is the most OVER-RATED film since the English Patient. Sorry, but if you really liked this movie, you are f**kin tone-deaf to basic logic.
Which is probably why our country ate it up.
Yea, since making decisions in the position he was in must have been terribly easy. I can’t believe he didn’t take time(since he had so much of it) to sit down, and hash out his plans more thoroughly. Stupid bloke.
I don’t need to have sympathy for characters, only find them interesting. If I want to root for something I’ll go watch a football game.
Wow. The straight from Jack.”The most over rated since the English Patient”.Your kinda funny.I get amazed at the morons on these sights.
It’s also kind of harsh to bash someone as a moron while spelling “site” and “you’re” wrong.
Don’t you think it’s funny that not one person has agreed with you? I bet you feel like a douchbag now… and by any means, you said it yourself. He freaked out. I know that I completely think everthing through thoroughly when I freak out! …Douch
why do you have to be so negative? Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Whether or not you like it you should respect it. In my opinion District 9 was an awesome film, it had its own style, it grossed over 200million and got so many positive reviews! So accusing people of being a douche bag, kinda makes you one??
Make sure you read what you put beforehand for next time, I mean all the guy said was he liked it and your accusing him as if he’s done something wrong.
He’s realistic, dimwit.
I agree with Jack. I had a decent time at the movie — visually it was astounding and the action was fun and I thought Copley was good, but I did leave shaking my head and laughing because I expected a sci-fi Schindler’s List and I got GoldenEye. I was completely flabbergasted when I saw its Rotten Tomatoes page. And since then it’s become a sore point because so many people defend it so vehemently and there are so few people who seemed to have a similar experience as me.
I agree that the metaphor is interesting, I just felt like it never really went beyond being a metaphor. I didn’t feel like it actually had anything new or insightful to say about the subject. (Apartheid = bad. And?) For example, Schindler’s List (since I brought it up) isn’t about “Nazis = bad.” It’s about the discovery that transformation is possible for even the most self-centered person — and that transformation comes gradually throughout the film and requires risk and sacrifice; it doesn’t magically happen at minute 90 because that’s what the beat sheet says. I just didn’t sense a sincere attempt at that in District 9 — I felt like it used a sociopolitical issue to mask the fact that it was an action film. The script just felt jumbled, cliche, contradictory and downright silly.
So … that’s why I sympathize with Jack. It was definitely fun, and I love movies like that, as long as they know that’s what they are. I just don’t think the script had the depth that people ascribe to it.
Here goes MRC again trying to repackage something that worked in the past, but of course this time lacks the freshness that made the original a success…
Thank god for companies such as them, though, for pouring hundreds of millions of dumb-money into the biz and keeping people working.
If it’s so great, why don’t they want to own it and release through their uni deal? I thought they shopped this already
Blomkamp is a visionary. The future of VFX artists who can turn 20-30 million into films that look and feel like 300 million. However, Blomkamp also understands narrative and story structure. His characters, dialogue, and development are all extremely well written. A filmmaker I am going to absolutely enjoy watching throughout his career. D9 was a rare Hollywood film that maintained a substantial narrative and literary purpose while providing top notch visuals and style. Looking forward to Elysium. Sharlto Copley also can act his ass off. The A-Team was abysmal but Copley was still a bright light in an atrociously written and directed adaptation of a lame 70′s show. He was brilliant in D9 and I expect big things for him as well down the line.
A-Team was 80′s show smartass.
I heard Columbia wants this project.
I always believed in Neill Blomkamp even when people doubted him. When Peter Jackson chose him to direct the Halo movie, I knew this guy had to be special. After District 9, all the haters were proven wrong. I cant wait for his next film, but I really hope Universal gets to distribute this film. They have a deal with MRC so it would make the transition pretty easy. They also need a rare gem hit like this.
Just don’t put Marky Mark in it.
Blomkamp is the (very) next Chris Nolan…but money says he surpasses Nolan in every way, come 2014. That is, of course, if he manages to keep his head on straight and withstands the “Yes Personnel” polluting his brain.
Would there were more Blomkamps and Nolans and Audiards and Boyles…
L.
And Joneses (Duncan)!
I really hoped that Blomkamp would get the Spider-Man directing job. I don’t know if he would have taken it if he had been offered, but I think he would have been able to do something really interesting with it.
Who’s directing Spiderman again? I forgot.
Oh yeah, Webb.
Cool, I can´t wait! Their cooperation in D9 was amazing and Copley is a great actor. The A-Team was a pure action fun movie but he managed to get a human factor into it, which wasn´t easy. No wonder he is the one promoting the movie at the DVD launch.
They could prove that you can still make a great sci-fi without gazillions dollars. Not many directors can do that. I believe that Blomkamp can. I wouldn´t be surprised if Copley was one of the producers or writers. He is one those people who can do anything.
Sharlto Copley gave the best performance the year D9 came out. I was stunned he wasn’t nominated.
Way to go, Deadline. Only post the MRC-bashing comments and deny my remarks, which state from experience the growth of this company’s management style and its support of filmmakers. Modi Wiczyk is a guy with a business background – he makes no attempt to deny from what cloth he is cut; but he has adapted, and now, MRC is a haven for artists who want something other than studio intervention at budget levels north of $30,000,000. Where else does that exist in this town? Those of you who bash MRC above – have you worked with MRC? Or are you simply repeating the uninformed criticisms of others?
The proof will be in their upcoming slate of pics.
Huh? They already have a major track record and it’s horrific… They have failed miserably at everything… and at all levels.
@Tom C.,
Do you work or have worked with Modi Wiczyk?
I agree, District 9 is brilliant , and Sharlto Copley deserved an Oscar nomination for his riveting performance. Copley was the best thing in “The A-Team.” What is so amazing about Sharlto, he has very little acting experience – a very natural actor.
D9 “original’ and “Visionary”???
COME ON!!! “D9″ was stylish (in a Cloverfield/verite way), had seamless effects and a good leading man, but certainly NOT “original and visionary”…it’s basic story goes back to the sci fi “B” flick (and subsequent TV series) “Alien Nation”, which also mined the Apartheid Allegory, only in an more “standard” American Urban/cop story setting. “D9″ was a solid, mass appeal movie, but certainly displayed far less “originality” than Nolan’s “Following” (his first film) or his breakout “Memento”. Blomkamp’s certainly has some talent but it’s still WAY too early to call him “visionary” (remember Shane Acker, director of the animated bomb “9″? Yeah, he was called “visionary” too…where is he now???). All this hyperbole sounds like “basement dwelling LoserFanboy Hero Worship” chatter, and as “Scott Pilgrim” proved, if all you do is appeal to JUST the “Fanlosers” and not the “public at large”, you’re on a one way ticket to obscurity.
As a satire, of course it follows some B movie tropes, but the plot, setting, characters set it apart from whatever came before it.
People seem to forget that District 9 is a South African movie about xenophobia in South Africa.
Actually, D9 was aspiring to allegory, not satire, and it wasn’t about xenophobia in South Africa, it was about apartheid in South Africa…making it about twenty years too late to be relevant or even meaningful as political commentary/allegory.
I also didn’t see much that was visionary or even original in D9 — on the sci-fi level it gave us aliens we’ve seen countless times before (insect-like humanoids who walk upright), premise-wise it had potential but Blomkamp discarded anything original at the midpoint in favor of tired old buddy/action movie tropes we’ve seen countless times before, narrative-wise the entire first twenty-odd minutes of the film was one pure Exposition Fest told in a very UNoriginal way (the faux documentary full of talking heads).
I mean, it was a fun action movie done well on a modest budget, that’s about it. I do think Blomkamp is a filmmaker to watch, but words like “visionary” are hyperbole, and comparisons to Boyle and Nolan are ludicrously premature.
I second anonymouse’s comments. In the long run, I feel that Nolan stands to be the worthier of the two.
There are lots of stories circulating that Peter Jackson had a lot more to do with the development and making of D9 than has been said so far, so it would be as well to see how Blomkamp’s next movie fares first.
Everyone’s forgetting that Duncan Jones is out there with his second film in the works too.
To throw the stone and attack Blomkamp for the same crap Nolan does is pathetic. Nolan’s themes are derivative just as much from a literary as well as a cinematic perspective. All of Nolan’s ideas are mined from the novels of Christopher Priest, in which case, “The Following” was not original in any way shape or form, nor was “Inception” which was taken from “A Dream of Wessex” — Nolan’s “style” is really an absence of an informed coherent cinematic language, filled with stutters, stammers, and hiccups, which newb fan boys who aren’t design-oriented mistake for a “hip” new “look.” That being said, Blomkamp is far superior in his technical and visual self-confidence than Nolan who couldn’t direct a fight scene to pass an entry level film course. As far as I’m concerned, Blomkamp won’t go as far as Nolan if his subject matter remains grisly; Nolan’s “genius” lies in his marketing ability, as well as the ability to kill all his original ideas in order to achieve mass appeal. Nolan has sold his soul. Blomkamp hasn’t. And unless Jackson protects him, he won’t have the type of success as Nolan, though his artistic innovations will be far surpass Nolan’s.
Holy S**t, you’re delusional…
Blommcrap’s made one movie……..ONE f**kin movie, and one my friends and I thought LOOKED great in the previews but just turned out to be absolute RUBBISH.
Now Nolan, that guy can spin a yarn, an intelligent one at that, and can you seriously tell me another director could have turned around the Batman franchise?
Oh wait, right, Blommcrap’s your guy. Good luck w/ that.
So “NolanSucks”…you’re more of one of those “Fanloser Aintitcool flaming pinheads” I mentioned earlier (more politely) who “hates” Nolan more than he “likes” Blomkamp…thought so geekboy. Better run now, I think your Mommy’s calling from upstairs to take out the trash NOW or she’ll cut off your internet teat.
“Memento” stands head and shoulders as the best Nolan work and LEAGUES better than D9 (which was still enjoyable mass market genre fare). To even compare the 2 shows how little you actually know about film. Seriously.
Ignore Jack’s post. Guy’s obviously trolling. He LOVED District 9, and The English Patient as well. Nice try though, Jack.
Distirct 9 was overrated. It didn’t work as an action scifi movie enough, it didn’t work as a satire….it was a mix and thereby neutralized… neither scary, thrilling nor overly funny or entertaining…
What made D9 unusual was the most original story line. This was a horror film mainstreamed into science fiction. I particularly liked the confrontation with the African gangster, it was pure horror. Blomkamp’s fast pace never let you catch your breath, it was one impossible situation after another. Can’t wait until Elysium, with Blomkamp directing, not even Matt Damon will slow it down! And I hope D10 can’t be far behind.