
UPDATE: True Grit doesn’t open until December 22nd but started screenings this week just under the wire of critics groups and SAG nominating committee deadlines.
It’s the last unseen film of this awards season thought to have a serious chance of cracking the Best Picture Oscar list, especially now that there are 10 nominees. Can Joel and Ethan Coen’s much anticipated new take on the John Wayne classic do what that 1969 Paramount film couldn’t? First, a little history. The first version of the Charles Portis novel landed just two Oscar nominations, for Best Song and Best Actor, winning the latter as a heartfelt career swan song for star John Wayne. But the fairly standard western was shut out of Best Picture, never a friendly territory for oaters. After all, other classics of the genre, like 1956’s The Searchers and 1959’s Rio Bravo (both also starring Wayne), couldn’t even manage a single nomination between them even though both are now included on lists of the greatest films of all time. Only Kevin Costner’s 1990 Dances With Wolves and Clint Eastwood’s 1992 Unforgiven changed the Oscar outlook because they were untraditional westerns and that won them Academy Awards for both Best Picture and Best Director. Since 1992, no western has been nominated unless you count Brokeback Mountain — and I don’t. On the other hand, very few have even been made.
But a western coming from the Coens would seem to have a reasonable chance. They each won three Oscars for Best Pic winner No Country For Old Men (2007) and another nomination last year for A Serious Man and have been Academy favorites since breaking through with 1996’s Fargo which picked up a Best Picture nomination and Best Actress for Frances McDormand and Best Original Screenplay for the Coens. Paramount’s new version of True Grit benefits tremendously from the Coens’ screenwriting skills because of a literate and dazzling adaptation of the novel and its quirky dialogue. Starring Jeff Bridges in Wayne’s role as cantankerous Marshall Reuben ‘Rooster’ Cogburn who agrees to help a determined young girl Mattie Ross (played by newcomer Hailie Steinfeld) avenge the murder of her father, the Coens used the book much more than director Henry Hathaway’s first film in crafting this adaptation. However, at least one scene — the big climactic horseback gun battle — looks identical to the 1969 film right down to Cogburn’s famous line: “Fill your hands, you son of a bitch!” The film also benefits from an outstanding supporting cast including Josh Brolin, Barry Pepper and Matt Damon who gets everything right about Texas Ranger La Beouf, the role that singer and then first-time actor Glen Campbell screwed up in the original. That’s really a part that should have gone to Clint Eastwood then but at least this version fixes that egregious piece of miscasting with the talented Damon.
Given how perfectly matched are the Coens to the material here, their True Grit would seem to be an instant contender for nominations in several categories including Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Actor for Bridges, Supporting Actor for Damon, Editing, Cinematography (from longtime Coens collaborator Roger Deakins), Music and Costume Design. As for Jeff Bridges’ chances of triumphing in the Best Actor category for a second year in a row, no one has ever won an Oscar in a remake that brought an Oscar for the original actor–in this case John Wayne’s Cogburn. And then there is 13-year-old Hailie Steinfeld who adroitly manages the Coens’ brilliant wordplay and doesn’t just hold her own but often steals the show: Paramount plans to campaign for her for Supporting Actress, an easier category this year where she probably stands a very good shot at a nomination particularly considering this is really a leading role giving her lots of screen time. Still, the actors branch decides where performers should rightly go. (Witness the case of then 13-year-old Keisha Castle-Hughes who was campaigned in the supporting category for Whale Rider in 2003, largely due to her age, but instead won a surprise nomination for lead actress making her the youngest nominee ever in that category. On the other hand, as the studio well knows, both Timothy Hutton in Paramount’s Ordinary People (1980) and Tatum O’Neal in the same studio’s Paper Moon (1973) won Oscars in supporting categories for arguably leading roles because age tended to dictate those decisions back then.)
The biggest drawbacks for this darkly funny PG-13 True Grit Oscar-wise would seem to lie in its original cinematic origins. To those questioning if this is indeed a “remake”, that’s by my and Hollywood’s definition a film that was already made once and is now being made again. The original True Grit was also based on the Portis novel just like the new version is. However different the Coens’ take might be, the fact is they are remaking a movie that was made once before (and by the same studio) and one scene is almost identical. Only one straight American remake has received a Best Picture nomination when the original didn’t and that was for 1998’s The Thin Red Line, a loose Terence Malick remake of a 1964 war film of the same title and both filmmakers based their films on 1962 James Jones’ novel. A few remakes and their earlier incarnations have both received Best Pic noms — including Mutiny On The Bounty’s 1935 version (which won) and 1962 version, as well as Cleopatra’s 1934 and 1963 versions, and also 1941′s Here Comes Mr. Jordan which inspired 1978’s Heaven Can Wait. In 1992, an American remake of the 1975 Italian Screenplay and Foreign Film nominee Scent Of A Woman won a Best Pic Oscar nomination and the Best Actor award for Al Pacino. Also, The Departed, which won Best Picture in 2006, was an Americanized version of Hong Kong’s Infernal Affairs — another example of Oscar success in the remake area.
Robert Duvall, who played Ned Pepper opposite Wayne in the 1969 film and is a bonafide Best Actor contender again himself this year for Get Low, finds it odd that anyone would want to remake the original True Grit. “The Coens can do whatever they want. But when I first heard about it I said ‘Why? Why?’ But then, if they want to do it, why not? I’m sure it’ll be interesting. But John Wayne was wonderful. He had some chops… and in True Grit he was so good,” Duvall reminisced. Whether Duvall finds himself up for Best Actor against another Rooster Cogburn 41 years later will be one of the fascinating questions answered when Oscar nominations are revealed on January 25th.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


Did you just say this movie is PG-13? Expectations significantly lowered.
Interesting considering the novel is for young adults, and the original film was rated G.
Lola must have been expecting some full frontal nudity.
Uh… No Country For Old Men is a “western”.
Two things:
1. The Departed was a remake. Did ok Oscar-wise.
2. Maybe I’m not reading this right, but did you really say that very few Westerns had ever been made? Um, really?
you’re not reading it right.
The original movie was based on a splendid novel that never really got its due on screen. On the one hand, Wayne was terrific, and Lucien Ballard’s cinematography was gorgeous. The director, Henry Hathaway, made one of his better films, but if you look at an earlier Hathaway John Wayne western, The Sons Of Katie Elder, you can see why his TG never had much of a shot at greatness. Despite the great source material, Hathaway buried as much originality as he allowed. Add a celluloid-destroying performance by Glen Campbell and an awkward turn by Kim Darby as the girl, and you’ve got a movie that is memorably fun, but not much more. Watching it, it’s hard to tell that a superb American novel lay trapped inside.
That’s the best reason for this remake. The Coens must have slapped their heads and said, “Holy Cow!” After making No Country, they obviously wanted to try on an authentic western–adding one more genre to their long list of genre-benders–and what could be better than a book that never really got made the first time around? And who better to play Cogburn, the closest John Wayne ever got to playing a hippy, than Jeff Lebowski himself?
I can’t wait.
Just based on the full trailer Hailee should absolutely get the nod for Best Actress. It’s clear she’s not playing second fiddle and is a full lead in every sense. Had Jody Foster or Sissy Spacek (an adult) played her part there would be no end to the amount of critical praise and awards — and again, that’s based only on seeing the trailer.
True Grit is a very good book. Portis wrote several other hilarious books including, Dog of the South, Norwood, and Masters of Atlantis. Check ‘em out.
Throughout the article you continue to use the term remake. Of course this film is not a remake. The Departed is a remake. This is a reinterpretation of a novel which is significantly different. When a new film version of Pride and Prejudice or Hamlet is released is it referred to as a remake? No. This is a very fundamental error that invalidates this whole article.
You beat me to it. The Coens have stated many times that this is NOT a remake, and shouldn’t be taken as one. The fact that so many think it is, will probably dampen reaction from critics who don’t know any better and consider it a straight remake.
Oh shut up please. It’s most definitely a remake so stop whining and trying to convince us that it’s just “a reinterpretation or a reimagining or a reboot.” Why such fear over the word remake? There’s nothing bad about it. Your paranoia about the word is very evident. They could only make this movie at Paramount because Paramount owns the rights to the original True Grit which was excellent. Panning the 1969 version is a waste of time those who’ve watched it know how good it was. The Coens should have written their own original western but they decided to be lazy and remake yes remake a western classic. I’ll wait to watch it for free on TV and so will millions of other people.
the Coens can spin it however they want, this IS a remake. I just read the script and it is practically scene for scene what occurred in the original movie. I would say easily 70 percent. Maybe in the “auteur world” of the Coens that may not mean much, but a remake is a remake like a duck quacks.
This said, True Grit looks wonderfully realized (actually better than No Country) and should be very present on Oscar night. I love Westerns when they are well down. This could be one of the best in a decade.
So send the screener already!
To the point of being a “remake”… it IS a remake. They are remaking the novel. It was made into a film once before.
If the Coens wanted it to be viewed differently, they should have retitled it.
WESTERNS ARE BACK! FINALLY!
Where’s today’s John Wayne, Tommy Lee Jones? Wonder if he was considered. He would’ve be great as Rooster.
The trailers look great. The cast is top shelf, and the Coens have a track record for making good films.
It has my attention and I am eager to see it.
Let the Oscar chips fall where best deserved.
And, the film will stand by itself…remake or not or whatever.
I continue to be confused by all this talk about the Coens and how they are not “remaking” True Grit because they are “staying closer to the book” than the John Wayne film did. Now, let me start off by saying I love the Coens and everything they do. But the John Wayne film True Grit is one of the closest cinematic book adaptations I have ever seen. The reason the two climaxes are identical is because they are both taken verbatim from the book. (As were numerous other scenes in the original John Wayne movie such as the dugout sequence and Mattie’s initial meeting with Rooster among numerous others.) I’m forced to wonder if people claiming that the Coens’ version will be more like the book have actually read the novel and watched the John Wayne movie. The only significant difference between the novel and the original movie is that the novel bookends the story with narrative from a grownup Mattie. But the actual story in the John Wayne movie is as close a book adaptation as I’ve seen. Quite frankly, if the Coens’ film is actually closer to the book than the John Wayne movie than they should definitely not win an award for best adapted screen play because they just used the novel as a script.
Matthew, you have hit the nail on the head. I saw the 1969 version of this film so many times I can still recite large chunks of the dialog. I only heard one line in the trailer that wasn’t as familiar to me as “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn” or “Make my day.” The tone seems different, but the script is extremely close to Marguerite Roberts’s script for the original–not because the Coens copied her script but because BOTH are extremely close to the novel. I daresay that, percentage-wise, the Wayne True Grit is closer to its source novel than Gone With the Wind is to its. Having read the script to the Coen version, I think there’s only one or two scenes (outside the adult-Maddie bookends) that aren’t pretty much verbatim in the Wayne version. I don’t object to a revisit to this source material (I’ve got two or three Hamlets I really like), but if the Coens are to be praised for “sticking closer to the novel,” it’s got to be because of tone, not scenes and dialog. In those areas, it’s pretty much identical to the Wayne film. I can’t wait to see it. I loved the first one and think this will be a fine but familiar new take.
“…if the Coens’ film is actually closer to the book than the John Wayne movie than they should definitely not win an award for best adapted screenplay because they just used the novel as a script.”
This is truly one of the more ignorant and ridiculous statements uttered in recent times.
Yes, the Coens just typed out the novel in script format. Don’t you know that’s how movies are done?
If you think that my post is one of the most “ignorant and ridiculous” statements of recent times, you must not follow politics.
Yes, that was a ridiculous comment. What the Coen brothers did is exactly what the “adapted screenplay” category is for.
I hope that people, and critics, watch this movie for what it is, and don’t waste timne comparing it with the John Wayne movie. It should stand on its own, not be viewed in comparison to any previous film.
Ah, finally the return of the “untraditional western”. I’ve been waiting for this for quite some time. I thought only Clint Eastwood was allowed to make westerns any more. Time to start marketing.
the movie is terrific, the crowd at the dga tonight loved it.
Ben-Hur, based on the novel by Lew Wallace, was a remake. It had first been a silent film, but this was before the Academy Awards existed. The remake won 11 Oscars.
Marguerite Robert’s screenplay was about as accurate an adaptation of a novel as I’ve seen, even making an effort to include Mattie’s thoughts and asides into the actual dialogue. The only difference is the older Mattie bookends, the death of La Boeuf, which is in Hathaway’s film but not in the novel, and Mattie’s farewell to Cogburn, which is likewise not in the novel. In fact, one of the most poignant moments in the book is when Mattie learns that Cogburn has been dead only a few days when she goes to visit him in 1903, long after the events in the story, and learns about his death from Frank James and Cole Younger (who I don’t see listed in the credits)–both stars of a Wild West Show that included Cogburn. If the Coens want to claim greater accuracy or fidelity to Portis’ book, it will be based entirely on those bookends, and the fact that the actress is the same age (younger, actually) than the character. Not so accurate is that Cogburn is something like 20 years younger in the story, than Bridges or Wayne, who both tapped the part at 60–that fact alone might qualify the new picture as a remake.
It seems unlikely, but it’s possible that this might be the first time, to my knowledge, that two actors have won best actor for the same role.
Remakes are not all horrible. It’s when they come a dozen at a time and don’t attempt anything new or different, and are remade within mere years of the previous versions.
I’m the John Wayne look-alike, having made the Coors Light commercials as the Duke. Nuf said. Now about Westerns, I keep hearing “Where are the Westerns?” and I agree – whyremake any Western? “Red River” was done – “Stage Coach was done” even actual scenes made into another film.
I am a Western author with 6 good novels under my belt that should be looked at. “Across the Brazos” for one. http://www.ermal.com
John Wayne’s “True Grit” is a classic. Yet, I still look forward to the Coens’ version. Thank you.