
In an era where review aggregation sites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic have erased individuality and replaced it with a percentage statistic that can be
quoted more easily than the words of Roger Ebert or other name reviewers, we are seeing a pack mentality emerge with critics groups come awards time. No matter which region of the country, they all seem to be moving in step with each other for the most part. For David Fincher this has to be especially sweet. Just two years ago he sat on the sidelines as nearly all these groups lined up for Danny Boyle and Slumdog Millionaire against his highly touted The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. When Oscar time rolled around there was no question which film would win. Now it’s hard to find a single critics group that doesn’t want to friend The Social Network — and rivals in this still very fluid race are feeling the pain, no doubt trying to figure out how to counter it all before it’s too late.
While most Hollywood offices are shutting down for the holidays, Sony Pictures’ awards campaign crew are working overtime for contender The Social Network in advance of next week’s mailing of Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences nomination ballots. That’s why director Fincher, who was supposed to be on a 2-week holiday break from shooting the studio’s The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo in Sweden, actually isn’t getting much of a break at all. Last week, he was in New York doing a Q&A moderated by pal Spike Jonze. And now Tuesday and Wednesday he is on the Sony lot in Culver City for 3 more sessions aimed at actors, editors, sound designers, cinematographers, and other various voting groups who are still in town and not preoccupied by the holiday. I am told Fincher only agreed to do these Q&As in order to support various crew and cast members who will be appearing with him.
An evite “Save The Date” notice also went out for a January 6th DVD/Blu Ray “launch event” for The Social Network — although some voting groups already got a taste of it when Sony sent yet another For Your Consideration DVD, this time featuring the movie and a 2-hour second disc full of supplementary features. Even though groups like the BFCA and HFPA have already received screeners, this seems like a smart move; it freshens the film and adds extras to give it another whirl in the player over the holidays timed just before final voting gets underway. Sony can’t do the same for the Academy, however: sending anything other than the movie is against the rules.
Why such a hard sell? While it made a huge splash when it opened on October 1st, The Social Network maybe faded a bit in Hollywood’s awards firmament when other later entries like The King’s Speech and The Fighter hit the spotlight. Now it’s roaring back with help from the same critics groups who first championed No Country For Old Men, Slumdog Millionaire, and The Hurt Locker creating a consensus and perhaps influencing the vote for the last 3 consecutive Best Picture Oscar winners. Time Magazine’s selection for 2010 Person Of The Year of Mark Zuckerberg, the real life inspiration for Aaron Sorkin’s script, certainly also hit just at the right time for Sony’s re-energized awards campaign.
No film has been honored more this season or won more critics groups’ Best Picture awards than The Social Network in what has been the most wide-open race in years. In fact, no other movie has won any Best Picture award from critics (okay, except the San Diego reviewers who courageously broke ranks to give it to Winter’s Bone). Whether it has been critics orgs in Boston, Chicago, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Florida, Houston, Indiana, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, St. Louis, Toronto, Washington DC, online, offline, or at the “Satellite” awards, the result is always the same: The Social Network = Best Picture. Of course not every friggin’ state or city with a “critics society” has weighed in yet. But how much do you wanna bet that Phoenix, Iowa, Kansas City, Oklahoma, and Vancouver follow like lemmings. Anyone wanna guess which way Central Ohio and Utah are leaning?
It all started at the beginning of the month when the National Board of Review named The Social Network its Best Picture — and they don’t even call themselves critics. We’re not sure who they actually are but they jumped on board first. Most recently, the London Film Critics showered it with nominations. And of course the high profile televised awards shows – NBC’s Golden Globes from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association and VH1’s Critics Choice Movie Awards of the Broadcast Film Critics Association (I am a member there) – also have it in contention big-time for their January ceremonies. Even the African American Film Critics Association which handed out its main acting awards to Halle Berry, Michael Ealy, and Kimberly Elise and included films like Frankie & Alice, For Colored Girls, Blood Done Sign My Name, and Night Catches Us in its Top 10 list — but still fell right in line when it came to naming Social Network its Best Picture despite not much diversity in its cast, as I recall.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


After the Social Network hit, True Grit was the only movie with a chance to beat it, but TG ended up being a bit too easy to contend for the awards. Social Network was excellent, but it’s another movie that nobody is going to watch in 10 years. No draw at all for the Oscars this year.
We all know the fuddy-duddy Oscar voters are going to go with The King’s Speech, because its the most obvious Oscar-bait. British period drama about royalty with a disabling problem. Double whammy. And no one will beat Colin Firth, possibly Jeff Bridges, but looking unlikely. Then the Academy throws in a few movies in the Best Picture race like Toy Story 3, Inception, etc. that people actually saw, but have zero chance at winning in order to bring in viewers who otherwise wouldn’t tune in because 99% of them haven’t heard of The King’s Speech or Winter’s Bone.
i’m glad it’s getting so much love- it is the best picture of the year. i’m also glad the African American Film Critics Association went with Social Network, and not another movie that may have had more diversity. film quality isn’t about that, in my opinion
shall we just skip all the pomp of the Academy Awards and Golden Globes and save some dough and just give the remainder of the awards to The Social Network, Natalie Portman, Colin Firth, Melissa Leo and Christian Bale?!
David Fincher is a genius. It’s a complex story, the creation of Facebook, told in a way that makes it understandable and relatable(friend betrying friend, social outcast becoming top dog)–its the best film of the year.
Besides, they have owed him an Oscar since FIGHT CLUB!
What a snarky article.
Why are critics “lemmings” for liking a well-made film? Did you think they were
acting like mindless rodents when they all lined up behind L.A. Confidential in 1997?
If they’d gone for something obscure, you’d accuse them of being elitists.
What exactly is the point you’re trying to make?
I agree: what point is being made. The only “real”
competition would be The Ghost Writer.
I much preferred Black Swan, Inception or The Kids are All Right, but I’m not a lemming Oscar voter. Haven’t seen The King’s Speech yet, but will do so before the end of the year. But what do I know?
THE SOCIAL NETWORK is the best film of the year… so far. People are recognizing it. What’s wrong with that? The script is tight and stellar, the acting is profound, the story is riveting, the production values are more than adequate. What’s not to love? BLACK SWAN tried too hard. TRUE GRIT looks impressive but it’s hard to declare without having seen it. I’d place my bets on THE SOCIAL NETWORK for the Oscar any day of the week.
…soooo….you say TrueGrit is out of the running cause “you havent” seen it? or should i restate the point: you say you are putting your money on SocialNetwork cause “you have” seen it? thats weird.
The venerable British Sight & Sound also gave The Social Network top honors. I’m not a critic, nor do I write blogs about movies, etc. I’m just a fan who pays to see movies – twelve times for this one with the purchase of the Blu-ray to follow, and I have not been as excited by a movie in years as I am with this film. The direction, the writing, the acting, the score, the editing – I am delirious with delight that a movie of this quality has come along in my lifetime, a notion which I once thought only could exist in a time past, particularly from the 1970′s. Thank you Fincher, Sorkin, Eisenberg and Company for creating a work of art that I can appreciate for years to come. Team Social Network deserves every single accolade it has been getting and will get in the future. Bravo!
Sheryl Sandberg? What are you doing on Deadline?
Great piece, Pete, though I think the race could change when the bigger organizations (Guilds, BFCA, Golden Globe, BAFTA) start announcing their winners : IF The King’s Speech manages to winBAFTA and/or GG bp OR Inception pulls an ‘Avatar’ and wins the GG-bp, we have a slightly more interesting race. Black Swan is the dark horse. IF these bp-awards – especially GG and BAFTA – go to The Social Network, as well, the race is OVER.
Anyway, here’s a summary of critics awards :
http://dijleso.blogspot.com/2010/12/awards_9651.html
In the end, if The Social Network doesn’t win Best Picture, it will come down to two things: 1) Women. The movie has almost no women. It’s a boy’s film. So was Hurt Locker, but that had a woman behind the camera. TSN was a sausage fest. The King’s Speech and The Fighter both have meaty roles for women. 2) Older Academy voters. These people may not understand or care about a movie so plugged into the problems of millenials.
The Academy will probably award David Fincher the Director statue, since Tom Hooper is too green and David O. Russell is not well liked, but I personally am expecting the Academy to swing toward The King’s Speech for Best Picture.
Well, it did have hot asians and models in that nightclub scene.
I agree about your women comment but even though i am a painful fight-for-your-rights feminist, the level of achievement of every art category in TSN was such that i didn’t even notice women were not represented. Maybe because it was a talented true depiction of a social phenomenon (the creation of FB) that did not include women in real life. As for the “older academy voters”, yes they may not care for a movie about Facebook, but they’ll want to pretend they do. It is rare that a piece of art so brilliantly reflects a contemporary social revolution. Not only will it win Best Picture, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it won in every other major category as well.
@ John Doe’s comment:
There are many great films this year that are considered great for myriad of reason. The Academy will again be wise and spread the love around. No one film will take home all the gold. But a Social Network Best Picture/Best Director/Best Adapted Screenplay win makes plenty of sense, will plenty of gold for King’s Speech, Black Swan etc. Chris Nolan is Fincher’s challenger here.
But the whole reason to comment was to say, fuck this whole “most people never see these films” or “middle america is not interested in the films awarded”. Its bullshit. Winter’s Bone is seven copies deep on every Blockbuster shelf in the country. And so will be the King’s Speech, Social Network, Inception.
The game has change. Smarten up.
There’s still Blockbuster stores?
Consider this wild scenario :
The Social Network wins the BFCA-best picture
Black Swan wins the GOLDEN GLOBE-best picture
The King’s Speech wins the BAFTA-best picture
Inception wins the PGA (maybe even DGA)
Then what ? It’s not like the critics groups can prevent
- the HFPA from making an unexpected decision (Babel, Atonement)
- the PGA from awarding THE most succesful bp-contender
- the BAFTA from awarding their own, something they often do
I think this could actually happen, it wouldn’t be the first time that a critics fave (Sideways, Almost Famous etc.) slowed down considerably once the bigger organizations started announcing their bp-bd winners.
Social Network is clearly the film of the year, not just in its technical brilliance but in its perfect encapsulation of the past decade. I laughed, I cried, it was the feel weird movie of the year.
I haven’t seen “King’s Speech” yet and expect it to be a contender, but have a feeling that the film’s unwillingness to deal with George VI’s anti-semitism is a major hurdle for it. “Social Network” was incredibly misogynistic, but the filmmakers clearly and astutely presented and deconstructed the misogyny inherent in their characters rather than gloss over it for narrative simplicity. Plus “King’s Speech” has advertised on Glenn Beck, which never bodes well for a “mainstream” product. Any word from the studio on their decision to advertise during Beck despite the nationwide boycott?
Well if we’re going to bring in the “S” word, The Social Network could easily be construed as the story of a man struggling to escape his Jewish self-hatred.
…more folks showed up at beck’s rally than colbert & sharptons put together. what “mainstream ” are u talking bout?
sheesh. people even bring in Beck ht pieces in the middle of an oscar thread. LAME
@ richard
Nolan’s movies have no heart. There’s a cold standoffishness to them. Inception will be the last movie of his I’ll see.
How many threads have you said this in now? Troll.
I’m so tired of people calling The King’s Speech fuddy-duddy or typical Oscar fare, positioning The Social Network as the “cool” film that the Academy should vote for to show they’re on the cutting edge. Both films are well-written, well-acted, and entertaining. It’s great TSN is getting awards but you would think the critics would show more imagination in picking a best picture.
It is intriguing that in the age of Internet media, there is a lot less diversity among critical opinion. And after the embarrassment of Crash winning Best Picture, the Academy safely goes with whatever is critically popular in this increasingly homogenized age. However, for the first time ever, I do agree with the critics that The Social Network was the Best Picture of the year, though Black Swan was close and I have yet to see True Grit or The King’s Oscar Bait. But compared to The Hurt Locker, Slumdog Millionaire or No Country For Old Men winning–I don’t care what anybody says, but There Will Be Blood was a masterpiece, as was Sweeney Todd–this one feels like it deserves BP.
But I admit seeing it win so many critics awards for Best Picture makes it tiresome and leads to second guessing. The entire process allows us to now know who will win Best Picture months before the Oscars, which leads to increasing resentment of the obvious winner. Ultimately though, if you can get by some of the more ridiculous hype (ex. Movie of the Decade! Next Citizen Kane!), then The Social Network is probably the best movie of the year.
This article has a very nasty tone and an unfounded argument based on an apparent lack of understanding about how critics groups function. For starters, critics awards, by their nature, are about consensus. And in groups of any size, left-field choices are highly unlikely: it’s about what choices make it onto the most ballots, and how highly those choices are ranked. Clearly, “The Social Network” is the consensus choice amongst all of these critics groups because it’s the one the most critics agree is excellent. If anything, critics groups want to distinguish themselves from each other: the idea that critics groups are following each other like “lemmings” is utter nonsense. Is this a confession of Pete Hammond’s own thinking when he fills out his ballots? And a hit piece because he just doesn’t like “The Social Network” and wishes his favorite movie were sweeping? The “pack mentality argument” = lazy journalism.
Wait, did Pete Hammond just call out Roger Ebert for being a quote whore?
The Kansas City Film Critics Circle has voted “The Social Network” as best picture of 2010. Like our fellow lemmings across the country, we like movies that have good scripts, sure-handed direction and fine performances. For the rest of our picks, you can go to http://www.kcfcc.org.
As for whether the film will be regarded well in 20 years, I’m sorry to tell you, Mr. Hammond, that we are merely critics, not psychics. There are plenty of those in Kansas City as well if you wish to consult them.