
EXCLUSIVE: A promising package for a feature film on guitar god Jimi Hendrix looks dead — confirmed as recently as of today. Even though it had financing from Legendary Pictures, and a directing commitment from Oscar-nominated Paul Greengrass, and The Hurt Locker’s Anthony Mackie poised to star. The pic wen belly up earlier this year because Experience Hendrix, gatekeeper for the dead musician’s music rights, refused to authorize the film out of fear it could hurt the music catalog.
Legendary Pictures and its chief Thomas Tull certainly aren’t the first to be interested in filming the story of Hendrix, who died in 1970 at age 27 and recorded just four albums. But is still considered the greatest rocker to ever plug in an electric guitar. Among the actors who reportedly wanted to play Hendrix at one time or another are Outkast’s Andre 3000, Eddie Murphy, and Will Smith. But each approach was rejected by the Hendrix estate, which is currently controlled by Janie Hendrix, the adopted daughter of Hendrix’s late father. Tull went ahead anyway in 2009 and paid Max Borenstein to write a script. There was reason to be optimistic: aside from co-financing films like Batman and Watchmen, Tull had the street cred of having financed the documentary It Might Get Loud, with Led Zeppelin’s Jimmy Page, U2’s The Edge, and Jack White. Tull and producer Bill Gerber figured they’d bring a package to the Hendrix estate. The script landed The Bourne Ultimatum and United 93 helmer Greengrass, and they approached Mackie to play Hendrix.
Unfortunately, the estate rejected the package earlier this year. A statement from Experience Hendrix president/CEO Janie Hendrix to me today is as follows: ”Legendary proceeded without our permission, direction or involvement. It didn’t ‘fall apart,’ it never was. When we do the Jimi Hendrix feature film bio, we will be involved and in control from the beginning.” But producer Bill Gerber counters: “To say we proceeded without permission isn’t fair. Thomas Tull couldn’t have been more generous and eager to collaborate with the estate. He was ready go finance their version of Jimi’s story, he got a script that made The Black List and brought Paul Greengrass to the party. It boggles the mind.”
Legendary Pictures wouldn’t comment, but I’ve heard the filmmakers were told that the estate feared the movie could potentially hurt sales of the Hendrix backlist, which is what supposedly happened after Oliver Stone’s movie The Doors. (A spokesman for the estate denies this was the reason they rejected the film). The Hendrix movie could have been made anyway; while the estate controls such seminal Hendrix tunes as Purple Haze, Foxy Lady, and Voodoo Child, it doesn’t control songs written by others which Hendrix performed. That includes The Star Spangled Banner (which Hendrix played so memorably at Woodstock – see video); Wild Thing (Jimi set his guitar aflame when he sang the tune in the 1967 docu Monterey Pop), Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, and All Along the Watchtower. But Tull refused to move forward without the estate’s cooperation. His primary motivation was and is to make a studio-caliber movie about his rock hero. Unless Experience Hendrix has a change of heart, the movie has gone up in flames, just like so many of Hendrix’s Stratocaster guitars.
I write often about Hollywood development deals involving projects with tantalizing elements. Though I know many of them will fall by the wayside, I spark to the potential. That drives some Deadline readers up the wall, particularly those who’ve had projects crater. Well, for those of you waiting to read a story about how a worthy project probably won’t get made despite having everything going for it, this one’s for you! Happy Holidays!


“the movie has gone up in flames, just like so many of Hendrix’s Stratocaster guitars.”
Actually, he only did that a few times early in his career. But otherwise good reporting.
No big deal. Jimi had absolutely NOTHING on Darnell Dawkins anyway.
Yeah, but I heard in the Dawkins biopic the only Jimi moments were “Star Spangled Banner” and “Wild Thing”. I guess we’ll find out next year how they got around it.
There was a TV Film made by VHI depicting Jimi Hendrix, starring Wood Harris of the “Wire” fame. Low production values and shaby story development almost over shadowed a good performanc Mr Harris. With a good script and Paul Greengrass directing I could imagine the great potential this dead in the water production.
I always wondered why there wasnt a movie about Jimi Hendrix and now I know why. How selfish of his step daughter. I would love to see a movie of Jimi Hendrix. He is a legend. I never heard of dawkins mention above.
So disapointing we wont see movie
El-wrongo. I saw him in Detroit just before Axis came out and he burned an old strat – apparently it was just part of every show at that time.
Well something must be really wrong with your memory sir.
Jimi burned his guitar on stage TWICE ONLY. In London Astoria in March 1967 and in Monterey in June 1967
Whoa, can’t believe(yes I can)that Jimi Hendrix movie won’t be made. Is it due to money? OF COURSE! Greed, ETC. All those things…Jimi frowned upon. IF you think about it. Am I right? Of course, He waved his freak flag HIGH, so I would propose to tell his story accurately,real & let’s face it, Oliver Stones “The Door’s” was panned by critics, and it may not be a 5 star classic, but it’s not that bad. I would also assume these folks who make films(something I have always wanted to do & as a matter,”Dante’s Inferno, The Divine Comedy, whatever, NEEDS to be made…with today’s effects, etc… WOW! I would make it ever so epic, so…greased, so natural and as much to the original story as possible.
I digressed all over the place, lol, anyway my point, I love The Door’s by Oliver Stone & so do so many others, want to know why?
Because US, WE, True fans of these people, James Marshal Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Keith Moon and hey…they’ve re-done SO many films… Make Another Door’s film… NOT A TV version either…BUT HBO, etc… a huge maybe.We Love Our Rock Stars And from that time period, it’s LEGENDARY beyond anything describable, anyone who lived through the 60′s, the “hippies” FREAKS is more appropriate. (we know why) or just is A natural, freak, lol…we want to change our World. Open minds, etc… Freedom and self expressionism IS so important, RIGHT? And lastly, 2 things, sorry I rambled,lol, and…HELLO 4 films WHICH should have been made or at least MAKE THEM are, The Beatles, The Stones,Pink Floyd(if your a fan you know why it would make a GREAT film, hi Syd!)and….A Movie about what this decade did, from the years, 1963-1973…10 years… That’s what id call it.
Peace…
No offense to Tull, but why didn’t he call the estate and talk to Ms. Hendrix first, and try to work out a deal with her up front? Now the script can only be read, not seen. Expensive.
Because Janie Hendrix is out for money only and doesn’t really know a thing about Jimi. She tried to come out with a Signature Jimi Hendrix Gibson Strat, which was absolutely stupid because there was no such thing at that time Jimi was playing and he never played one anyway. She also had a left-handed guitar put on his tombstone. It’s just one dumb thing after another with this lady. She’s authorizing unfinished music recorded by Jimi Hendrix to be put on CD and releasing it as new music. Some of this stuff was music Jimi Hendrix would have never released himself because there were obvious mistakes, wrong notes, practice sessions..etc. It’s a crying shame she is trying to squeeze every bloody nickel out of the estate that she can. She’s hurting the Estate by her lust for greed, money, and selfishness. Jimi Hendrix was never any of these things. He just wanted to play his music the way HE wanted.
That’ll learn you, musicians — stay off the drugs or else someone will rape your 4-tracks for album material for years I’M TALKING TO YOU ELLIOTT SMITH
why would anyone try after the Hughes Bros project blew up to star Andre Benjamin? The estate doesn’t want a true depiction – period! no drugs. No sex. Just rock n roll.
If anything, it would help the estate. I don’t get it.
Two words…… Sex, Drugs……
Born again….
Damn Straight!
A good Hendrix bio will never be made. A made Hendrix bio will never be good.
The estate is only interested in a false, family-friendly, church-approved creation and continuing the stream of ugly reissues and vault-raiding that takes the hard edges (sex, drugs, etc). Sad. Note to self: don’t let my father’s adopted daughter handle my estate after my passing.
The Hendrix legend has always been greater than the reality. His estate will never authorize a film which accurately portrays how deeply he fell into substance abuse, nor how fragile and unpredictable his personality became. And by all accounts his coterie of groupies and hangers-on was a very depressing and dark scene, one which the estate would be loathe to show onscreen. These are the kind of revelations which made biopics like Ray and Walk the Line so compelling, but the overprotective Hendrix estate would never want to make public.
We all can only guess why Janie pulled the e-brake. Any blame towards Jimi on the way he lived his life is silly (Otari). But lets face it Hendrix can still make some serious cash flow. Thats all this is about. Money.
This is the kind of myopic,foolish and nihilistic historiography that the Hendrix Estate WANTS to put out; a fantasy of poor,oppressed and totally naive and defenseless Hendrix,at the mercy of his “dark” and “sad” “druggie,groupie,hanger’s-on”–what absolute bullshit.His is the tale of the Famous American(like the first ‘Famous American’,the Chevalier Joseph Bologne,the forgotten composer of fantastic symphonies,imprisoned after defending the revolution,written out of history by Napolean),who had to go to Europe to be “discovered”(like so many Dixieland,Jazz,Bop and Rock and Roll musicians in their day,because America still eats it’s young and cares more about the color of the skin than the content of the soul,no matter how poetic that soul may be.)All this palaver about,”the Legend is greater than the reality of…”What an absolutely,mean-spirited,truly insipid,knee-jerk-reactionary and clearly revisionist punter’s retelling of the story of the sixties,as if you can absolve the fascistic security services’Agents Provacateur,anti-communist witch hunting “Policeman” and rabid racist Counter Revolutionary Movement front men types,within the intelligence apparatus’themselves,by blaming this EXTREMELY SUSPICIOUS and controversial death by violence,in an era of repression and state sanctioned murder,on a few Manson-ite “crazy hippies” or his(clearly) mobbed up management.No wonder the estate is so succsessful at manipulating the fans and the supposedly objective Rock “Press”.Your all so easily led to the kool aid and dunked under.He was killed because dreamers and healers are dangerous to a Police state.And the business of music is a nasty,viscous and treacherous snake-pit of ripp-offs,shake-downs rub-outs and back catalouges,posthumously released once the principal beneficiaries are gone from this world, and so pose no threat to profit.
The explanations by the estate are either bullshit or the executor is completely stupid and irresponsible. How would ANY film – even a bad one – hurt an artist’s back catalogue? Never mind that this package has one of the top 10 filmmakers working today and one of the best actors out there. There has to be more to this story. I mean, who is the estate going to get to make the movie that’s better than Greengrass & Mackie? Uwe Boll and Sinbad?
LMFAO, thank you.
Donald Glover for Jimi!
Having worked on the 2000 TV biopic (which had a lot of inaccuracies for many reasons), it is exactly what ‘Jake’ says. The family does not like the images of sex and drugs which are so intertwined with Jimmi’s story. The estate was controlled by his father at the time I think.
If you look at the back of a recent reissue of a Hendrix CD will you now also see God was involved.
Who cares about a Jimi Hendrix biopic anyways? His music isn’t even that good. He only has one good song (“Foxy Lady”) and that was already used really effectively in Wayne’s World. Let’s close the book on this no talent 60s relic and start making movies about bands that matter, like Jethro Tull or Yes.
Are you serious? You’re entitled to your opinion, but I’m sorry… YOU EITHER KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ROCK N ROLL or YOU’VE GOT SOMETHING AGAINST AMERICANS. There are great non-British bands too…
You saying Jimi is talentless is like me saying Jeff Beck is talentless. C’mon buddy, do you listen to rock n roll?
Beck and Jethro are great but Yes??? Any band can be great for decades if they change their members every 5 years.
I was so with you until you said that “Yes” and “Jethro Tull” are bands that still matter, LMFAO.
@ Jeff Beck: As soon as you brought up Jethro Tull & Yes, you damaged your argument critically, even more so than saying Jimi was basically a one trick pony. He fused different elements of music together, heavy rock, jazz, country, funk, and blues, then used some radical guitar techniques and studio visions to create art.
Every top guitarist at the time was blown away by Hendrix’s radical approach, including Beck.
Sorry if in 2010 you are not blown away, but at least learn a little history before commenting.
Janie Hendrix needs to be removed from heading up the estate. She is making bad move after bad move in damaging his legacy in pursuit of lucre through cheap merchandising, but won’t let a quality truthful film get get made. The mind spins.
Their should be a film made with this family. It has been a soap opera ever since Paul Allen helped the family get the rights back. Now it is time to make some Jimi Hendrix coffee (and yes the estate does sell Jimi coffee, gimmee Jimi:)
Amen, Santa. Jeff Beck’s comment was about as well-supported as a Sarah Palin speech. Jeff, you’re entitled to your opinion–as ridiculous as it is–but you’re in a very tiny minority, my friend. Jimi Hendrix is considered by MOST people who listen to rock to be one of the greatest guitarists in rock history, mainly because he was such an innovator and amazing artist. I defy you to find ANY survey of rock listeners and musicians on top guitarists and not find Hendrix in at LEAST the top five. You won’t find one. Jethro Dull and No, er, Yes? Are you freakin’ kidding me?! So do you listen to them on your Sony Walkman cassette player too?
His music may not have been good to you but there are hundreds of thousands of people that disagree with you, which makes you a lonely minority. “Good and Bad Music” are subjective to the one’s that listen to it. It’s just an opinion so if that’s all you are giving then that doesn’t make it close to the truth at all.
what the fuck, man.
Jimi has made many, incredebly, good songs
if you say that foxey lady is the only good song jimi made, that is stated upon your own, narrow-minded, ignorant taste and opinion.
I’m glad the estate is standing firm. There will be many upset Henrix fans if the biopic turns out inaccurate, dramatized, exaggerated, or just plain bad.
Hollywood needs to be delicate with biopics. If a person who doesn’t know much about Hendrix watches the movie, you are permanently scarring their vision of the man, especially since most people don’t bother reading these days.
I prefer documentaries for such legendary icons. I love Stone, but not a fan of his flick on The Doors.
I agree. The younger generation are obsessed with famous peoples’ drug problems because Hollywood is obsessed with it.
Everybody knows Jimi did drugs, along with millions of other people (including our parents) who were a part of that generation…
SHOW US SOME ROCK N ROLL! SHOW US WHY JIMI IS LEGEND! You’re going to need a hell of a guitarist or use real footage to do that by the way…
A huge mistake to go off and write a script without the involvement of Janie Hendrix,an insult to her. Further, even with a script, unless she would be involved as associate producer at least, you can never be sure the script isn’t modified during filming, that is often the case. She would need some say-so on that.
Jimi expanded the universe of rock/blues guitar like no one before or since. It was a time of sex, drugs and rock and roll — take a peak at Keith Richards’ autobiography — but those issues could be handled with respect and restraint.
Of course you don’t.No one wants to find out about Morison’s father being an Admiral who was at the Gulf of Tonkin incident,or that there is still much controversy over rumored political asaissination of prominent American citizens(like Morrison,Jean Seberg,Phil Ochs,etc.) whose cultural outlook on Vietnam or the repression of groups like the Black Panther Party for Self Defense was not shared by the government of Richard Nixon,nor the FBI of J.Edgar Hoover,when they could be indulging in hero-worshiping Bio-pic movie-of-the-week brain-wipe..More orgies,less politics.Chug that Kool aid.That’s better.Stick to Any Given Sunday,you’ll be much calmer.
Bruce Lee inspired Millions into Karate, Hendrix is responible for inspiring Millions, including myself, to pick up a guitar. That was the era, and that is what we did, smoked pot and listened to Hendrix. Not to make a picture about Hendrix, is an unjustice to us all, time to put ego’s aside, and roll with it. I would pay to see a Hendrix movie. Thanks
um, Bruce Lee didn’t do Karate – he pioneered his own brand of martial arts called Jeet Kune Do, based on wing chun Gung Fu. In fact Karate represented a very linear style within martial arts that bruce lee hated.
But they both went to high school in Seattle and that’s why they were special!
He didn’t say that Bruce Lee did Karate.
He said he inspired millions to do karate. Which is accurate.
You could also say he inspired millions to do kung fu, tae kwon do, akido, hapkido, and general “I’m going to flail and kick and hope I hit your nuts” martial art imitation.
There have been many attempts over the years to get this to the screen, as the Hendrix estate could attest to. I’ve wrote about it years ago myself.
I covered marketing for years, and I hate to say this, but I see time passing this project by. The next generation will be the wrong ones to do it. Heck, the Vietnam War is something they only have read about in history books. And to kids nowadays, Woodstock doesn’t’ mean much.
It is THIS generation who have the sensitivity to do it right — and man, I can’t think of a better group — Tull, Gerber and Greengrass? Tull respectfully and wonderfully did “It Might Get Loud,” Gerber is himself a musician and one helluva producer, and Greengrass is a top notch director. All that’s missing is Jimi fan Paul Allen to help finance.
In all these years of watching people try, I have to say that THIS is the best combination I’ve seen. And I have no horse whatsoever in this race.
The time is now. Ms. Hendrix. The time is now. Think about this one really hard, because it doesn’t get better than this.
I gotta say, Anita, these are exactly my sentiments, but Janie Hendrix could care less about what the fans or the moviegoers want. She is sitting pretty in her castle made of sand.
Which is why a Jimi movie will not get made. Sad but true. The only good ones have already been made and are in collectors’ vaults. I have my VHS of A FILM ABOUT JIMI HENDRIX and JIMI PLAYS BERKELEY and a whole lot of footage that’s been shuffling around for years.
Well said Mike! Is it possible that you post articles like this because you personally would like to see this movie? and by posting it on the most respected movie site in the world, it might give the project some much needed attention which could result in a green light in the future? If this is true, you are the man Mike. Now Im off to play Voodoo Child about 50 times…
Jimi Hendrix knew Janie about as well as he knew anybody on this board. She’s an idiot and always will be. From Michael Jeffreys to Alan Douglas to Leo Branton to Janie Hendrix, the Hendrix catalogue has been pimped for the last 40 years. The same thing is happening with Michael Jackson. Do your estate planning, Artists!!!!
Wait, no. Experience Hendrix…whatever else you want to say about them, put a stop to all the shoddy bootlegs that flooded the market in 70s and 80s. Once control was taken, they opened up the vaults to where the GOOD stuff was, had it remastered and released in respectable packaging befitting Hendrix’ stature. Just this year
“Valleys of Neptune” went to #4 on the charts.
Say what you want about the estate on the movie front, but the cds have been keeping Jimi’s fire lit for 17 years now.
Sorry, Seth, but long time Hendrix fans know that Experience Hendrix exists primarily to endlessly repackage previously released material with a sprinkling of new material every now and then as bait. To this day, they have not released a complete WOODSTOCK, with Larry Lee’s songs included. They have also refused to re-release some of the great posthumous Warner Bros stuff, like the STAGES box set or HENDRIX IN THE WEST. The new releases (VALLEYS, FIRST RAYS) sound thin and uninspiring, compared to the hundreds of hours of jam tapes and live shows that have been circulating among the fan community for ages. When Janie and John McDermott say “When we do the Jimi Hendrix feature film bio, we will be involved and in control from the beginning”, this means they will sew up a lucrative payday for themselves first and make sure that only the aspects of Jimi’s life that don’t negatively affect his public image will be shown. Check out A FILM ABOUT JIMI HENDRIX, Seth. Its primary focus is the music, as it should be.
The great irony is that Janie isn’t even Jimi’s family. She was an adopted daughter of his father and she had Jimi’s brother cut out of the will. She has prevented a movie from getting off the ground several times and instead holds on to his music rights for as much as she can milk from it.
I guess I’m one of the peeps Mike is addressing in this article. I’m a working writer who’s had DREAM projects with the most amazing talent involved fall apart at the last minute for the stupidest reasons. It’s maddening.
“…the estate feared the movie could potentially hurt sales of the Hendrix backlist…”
What backlist is to the publishing industry, catalog is to the record industry. At least that’s what the coupla dozen people still left in the record biz call it.
Good reporting. I did not know the Doors’ sales were hurt by Stone’s movie, but it makes sense. I grew up thinking they were cool, but was so turned off to Morrison by the movie. The pretentious lyrics were put into context hybrid movie, and I started to cringe when I heard them after the movie. Jimi was an original and he changed the game. Tull deserves credit here for trying, but I can understand the Estate’s concerns.
I know for a fact that you cannot license any Hendrix movie for tv or theatrical if the subject matter has any references to drugs or drug abuse. They do not want the newer generations to associate drugs with Jimi. Good or bad that’s apparently the family’s policy.
Having seen Hendrix play about a dozen times & collected just about every note he has recorded I consider myself a true fan. I have directed my share of Rock n Roll film & would have loved to take on a project like this. Paul Greengrass is PERFECT & his visual style is as visceral as Jimi’s performances. The estate has had its head up its ass for years with outrageous licensing demands. I have tried to use the songs they control on several TV shows. Too bad for them Billy Gerber would have produced a movie with a real Rock n Roll Heart.
As far as that Jethro Tull & Yes guy. He is being ironic…………..at least I hope he is.
The Oliver Stone Doors flick really did cool me off to the Doors – although I eventually upgraded my vinyl to CDs.
The only rock biopic that has ever got on the same wavelength as the artist is Superstar – the Karen Carpenter film done with Barbie dolls.
Reminds me of the Bob Marley biopic in so many ways. By the time the estate decides to make the film will anyone even care?
That’s exactly why you won’t see a Bob Marley biopic either. Music rights. So many have tried and they have ALL failed. Really though, does anyone care about a seeing a Jimi Hendrix movie? I know that I don’t. So excuse me while we kiss this project bye!
I agree with you from the point that, in his short life, there’s not much about Hendrix that really makes a good movie. There wasn’t a big struggle for him to get to the top. He grew up in Seattle, joined the army, got out and started gigging with Little Richard, among others, and as word of his skills grew and grew he got bigger and bigger, getting accolades from the likes of Eric Clapton and Pete Townsend, playing Woodstock…and then he died.
The only thing that really presented some friction in his career was when the Black Power movement persuaded him to drop the Experience sidemen and instead change to an all-Black band, The Band of Gypsies. But I don’t know if that’s a subject mass audiences are really keen to watch.
Let’s regroup here guys, if this is what you want to do. You need a better out front person. I say get Joe Smith who along with Mo Ostin ran WB/Reprise records and signed Hendrix. These guys created the estate for the estate. Along with Joe you get Irving Azoff. Cut them in for a taste looking out for the estate interest and I bet you swing a deal. Who in the heck is Bill Gerber to the Hendrix estate? Joe saw something besides hoop playing in Magic Johnson-and was valueable in his career. Think out of the box, if you want to make a movie about the fire playing guitar strumming legend. BTD
You know, I respect Ms. Hendrix and all, but I hate to see a project fall apart over something like this. Movies are still art, and if I wanna make a movie about Jimi Hendrix, goddamnit I ought to be able to. If it were me, I’d change every name in the screenplay, set it in different locations, and make it about a fictional guitarist who would be a very thinly veiled representation of Hendrix. Biopics are usually stale anyway. In short, fuck all this estate business. I understand their side of it, and if it were about my family, sure, I’d feel differently, but honestly, I thin all topics should be fair game.