EXCLUSIVE: Warner Bros and Legendary Pictures have found their new Man of Steel.
Deadline had been hearing for the past weeks that British actor Henry Cavill was the frontrunner for the much coveted Clark Kent/Superman role in this much anticipated reboot. But as of last week, Warner Bros film chief Jeff Robinov hadn’t seen Cavill’s or the other screentests and made his decision in recent days. Repped by CAA, Cavill, known for his portrayal of Charles Brandon on Showtime’s The Tudors, just wrapped production on The Cold Light of Day and stars in the upcoming Immortals opening this fall. Directed by Tarsem Singh, Caville in Immortals plays the he-man Greek warrior Theseus who battles mythological gods including Poseidon, Zeus, Minotaur, and Herecles. Given that set up, Warner Bros clearly has chosen a more macho leading man for Superman than the previous Brandon Routh or even Christopher Reeve. ”He’s got an amazing quality. He doesn’t look too much like Reeve and Routh but he’s big and strong and he has a very modern feel to him,” a Warner Bros exec just told us. “We’re really going to try and make Superman as contemporary as possible.” And just like it did with Christian Bale in the Batman reboot, the studio has gone with a British actor.
In fact, Cavill also auditioned for the Batman role but lost out to Bale in 2005. He also was a contender for James Bond but was deemed too young and lost out to Daniel Craig. Clearly, Cavill is a franchise waiting to happen. He also has a past with Superman. Before Bryan Singer came on to direct Superman Returns and cast Brandon Routh, Cavill had been one of the frontrunner choices for directers Brett Ratner and McG when they were going to helm the picture. That Superman was younger, and this time, the intention was to cast an actor near 30. Cavill, who will be 28 this year, was born in the Channel Islands and his film credits include The Count Of Monte Cristo.
The new film from Warner Bros and Legendary Pictures is being produced by Christopher Nolan (It’s A Bird! It’s A Plane! It’s Chris Nolan! He’ll Mentor Superman 3.0) and directed by Zack Snyder, who made this statement: “In the pantheon of superheroes, Superman is the most recognized and revered character of all time, and I am honored to be a part of his return to the big screen. I also join Warner Bros., Legendary and the producers in saying how excited we are about the casting of Henry. He is the perfect choice to don the cape and S shield.” Warner Bros, Nolan, and Snyder cast a “wide net” to find the next Man of Steel. Last November, insiders told Deadline that the studio was open to creating a star as it rebooted the Superman franchise: specifically, that the actor would either be a discovery or on TV but likely someone who isn’t well known yet. And he’d be in the age range of 28-to-32. The studio considered hundreds of young actors before making a decision just like Sony Pictures did before choosing Andrew Garfield. There was buzz on actors like Armie Hammer, the strapping 6’5″ actor from The Social Network who was eyed to play Batman in a Justice League movie that Mad Max helmer George Miller was poised to direct, and True Blood’s Joe Manganiello, who claimed during a recent movie junket that he’d been considered, and Ian Somerhalder of The Vampire Diaries.
While the Batman films have been populated by established stars Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, George Clooney, and now Christian Bale, Superman has always lent itself to discoveries. Christopher Reeve was a find in the Salkind franchise, as was Brandon Routh in the Bryan Singer-directed Superman Returns. (Before Routh got the job, Matt Bomer was eyed seriously by almost-directors McG and Brett Ratner.) Even on the small screen, the original Superman TV series star George Reeves and Smallville’s Tom Welling and Lois & Clark‘s Dean Cain were discoveries. The lone exception we can recall was the time that Tim Burton tried to put together a Superman film with Nicolas Cage, an effort that failed because the budget became so high. And then Josh Hartnett was courted during the Ratner version (that got scrapped when Singer took over), but Hartnett didn’t take the role, even though he stood to potentially make $100 million for three pictures if all had been made. Trust us, the new guy is going to get hired on the cheap.
Other producers include Charles Roven, Emma Thomas, and Deborah Snyder. The screenplay is being written by David S. Goyer based on a story by Goyer and Nolan. Thomas Tull and Lloyd Phillips are serving as executive producers. The new Superman is targeted for release in December 2012.


I didn’t know Batman, Superman and Spider-man were all British. The only superhero we have is Captain America (for obvious reasons), and the studio actually thought about casting a Romanian in the role (Sebastian Stan).
Does America not have any more acting schools?
Superman was actually a Canadian creation (Joe Shucter was the artist). The Americans of course understood that a man with such incredible powers MUST be an American – so they kidnapped him.
In point of fact, Joe Shuster was Canadian and Jerry Siegel, the writer and co-creator of Superman, was American born. Both were living in Cleveland, Ohio when they created the character, so he wasn’t ‘stolen’ from Canada.
Take comfort though, dear Canadian brethren! You’ll always have Alpha Flight!!! Oh and Wolverine….so I guess that’s pretty cool.
So, is this where I gripe that none of the actors have been Jewish? After all, both Seigel & Shuster were Jews…
Hahaha, well played sir.
By the way, this is great casting.
Oy, and away !
LOL – well done, but shouldn’t that be: “Oy, and avay!” ?
Andrew Garfield is Jewish
I’m very disappointed that it is not Tom Welling, but I am not going to let that negatively affect my view of the movie. Superman is my favorite character and I WILL go see any movie of his.
All the commenters at Yahoo News and the girls and the gossip sites are raging that it isn’t Welling, but they don’t understand that there would be huge continuity problems. They think in simple terms: they love Welling and that is that in their minds. They don’t get it. Crossing continuities causes utter confusion and chaos. Not to mention the possible legal problems. Too many hands are already in the profit pie, without adding even more. I liked Welling, but knew it couldn’t be. I’m sure the ladies will calm down by the time a trailer arrives.
I love Tom Welling but KNEW it could never happen. So I wasn’t crushed. The fans and young women are just reacting badly to the moment. They had their hearts set on something and it didn’t happen. Once they get over this moment and the heartbreak, I really think they will come to embrace this movie. Cavill is nice looking, even if he isn’t EXACTLY what they wanted. Snyder will deliver the action. Nolan will deliver the story. This film can not fail. It will be awesome.
Tom Welling is a shitty actor. I’m glad he was never considered.
You may hate his acting. I respect Welling’s acting. It all evens out. Am I bummed he won’t be in the movie? Maybe a little. But I love Snyder’s work. Zack can do something truly exceptional with the scope of Superman. People are going to be amazed.
Tom Welling is too Emo to play a serious Superman.
But Welling is the only actor millions take seriously as Superman. That’s why there has been strife with the announcement. However, this doesn’t reflect personally on Cavill. It would be the same with any other actor.
Millions of people take Tom Welling’s acting seriously?
Things are worse than I thought!
Welling has publically stated that he never wanted to wear the Superman suit, and is only going to wear it briefly in the very last episode of Smallville because it will be a brief shot and as a way to end the show on a high note. Once Smallville is done, Welling doesn’t want any more connection to the character.
Correct Ken. Warners would be overjoyed to give Welling the role. Those guys aren’t stupid. They know the public wants Welling. But, he plain won’t do it. Turned them down more than once. End of story. Fanboys can stop blaming Warners and find something else to rant about.
Canada also had the original James Bond. And Ryan Reynolds as both Green Lantern and Deadpool! We’re the little country that could…
Um…why did the headline need to have “Macho” before “British Actor?” You don’t really see such adjectives in headlines; what’s next, “Girly Katherine Heigl,” “Womanly Meryl Streep” and “Hirsute Robin Williams?”
It’s pretty funny that the word “Macho” had to be added before “British Actor.” Poor Henry, we know you are macho; the headline says so! Just kiddin’, I’m guessing some thought went into that headline. And everyone knows Henry Cavill just screams testosterone. No, really. Okay, I’ll shut up now.
I think Henry Cavill looks better as superman then the previous Tom Welling. He’s totally hot, and a great actor in the Tudors. Can’t wai t to see it!
Superman landed in a cornfield in kansas, therefore learned to speak the way people from kansas would.
seems people here never read comics
Hey, I’m from Kansas (originally) and I resemble that remark!
Pass the cornbread please.
(We Kansans are also very polite.)
Technically, Superman is an illegal alien… Just because he landed in a cornfield in Kansas doesn’t mean he’s American… Last I knew, being adopted doesn’t automatically make someone a citizen… And I doubt he has a green card…
Bookwyrm that is HILARIOUS!!! Good call too
Of course some skeevy, white trash twatty Canadian with a hate-on for the U.S. would chime-in with the typical Canadian anti-U.S. vitriol.
Piss off canuck. This is why we hate you.
You’er rather alone in hating canucks I’d say. Seems wherever I go in the states they love (if misunderstand) us. By the by… you get the vast majority of your oil from us, not the Middle East.
LOL! OMG someone that finally knows whats what!
Bill Hopper:
“By the by… you get the vast majority of your oil from us, not the Middle East.”
And you get all of your freedom from US.
typical coward response…”anonymous”, I thought you had a lot of things to hate, mostly yourself…..(tell your compatriots to remove the Maple Leaf from their luggage when they travel)
Superman is a Canadian transplant…okay, I’m going out on a limb here.
How about Jim Carey plays Superman?
Hold you fire! I was just kiddingggggg!!!!! (running for the door)
Um, Superman was “created” by American Jerry Siegel & Canadian born American Joe Shuster in 1932, both living in Ohio @ the time…Chill on the Nationality thang, if Canada was so great, actors wouldn’t move to the USA and neither would creators. What I find amusing, is you attempted to claim Superman was created solely by a Canadian…Interesting. Is it that bad in Canada, that you have to lie? Really? REALLY? You can claim Shania and Kids in the hall…Both cool, be happy with it.
“Kids in the Hall”!!!!
LOL!
Hey, that’s rough with KITH and Shania – they’ve got the mints and the geese too, don’t overlook it. Not to mention they basically own the entire distortion-guitar+flue music genre. It’s not all just mounties, hockey, and Molson, eh?
Uuumm Superman actually originated in the mind of the American artist Jerry Siegel when his father died. Him and Joe Shuster eventually created Superman together, both living in American at the time…making them both Americans.
Nice try in trying to steal our American icon, Canadian. Run along now with your ketchup chips and amazingly hot actresses, eh?
Despite the nationality of the Superman creator, the character was an American farm boy who was larger than life. It drew directly from the American archetype of the farm and the rural values that predominated the landscape.
Well, you know, there’s that whole Superman motto, you know… Truth, Justice, and the AMERICAN way? Maybe that’s why people know he’s American. You know, just maybe.
Actually – Shuster was FROM Canada, but he was an immigrant and created Superman after his family moved to the states. Superman is the ultimate immigrant story – and his own experiences led to his creation. Superman has always been and will always be – AMERICAN first, and KRYPTONIAN second.
being a canadian artist does not make superman canadian, the creator of the story is what you would judge by.
Canada is basically part of America.
Superman was a Canadian creation? Superman was created in Cleveland Ohio, by American Jerry Siegel. Joe Shuster, the artist, was born in Canada, but had been living in Cleveland since he was 10 years old.
Poor Canadians and their inferiority complex.
If we were able to kidnap superman then that makes US the greatest ever
Leave it to Canada to find any tenuous connection. Shuster WAS born in Toronto, but grew up in Cleveland, Ohio.
Shuster’s parents were immigrants and found it hard to make a living in Canada and moved to Ohio when Joe was ten years old.
Canadian? You get that on a technicality.
But, Jerry Siegel, the son of another immigrant, Mitchell Siegel also created Superman, making him a son of many countries.
Coming to America in 1924 was vastly different than it is today.
You just drove over the border.
Heck, in 1978, I personally flew to Mississauga with nothing more than a Louisiana driver’s license.
Seems off point, but it’s a big changing world and Superman is an alien masquerading as a human, mush less as an American.
As long as the actor is good, it shouldn’t matter if he’s from Afghanistan or Texas.
I’m pretty sure that Superman is from the planet Krypton, not America or Canada.
You’re an idiot. Superman was created by two Jewish kids from Cleveland Ohio . . . USA!
ITA. Henry Cavill is a fine actor, but three American icons played by Brits, all opening in a single year, is insulting. The frustrating thing is, it doesn’t go the other way around. Remember the hissy fit the British press threw when Haley Joel Osment was in talks to play Harry Potter?
If I had enough money, I would make a movie about Queen Victoria and have Madonna star just to piss them off.
It’s hardly insulting: it’s insulting when the best actor doesn’t get the job. The most iconic film franchise of all time (James Bond – in terms of adjusted gross nothing comes close) has had its lead character, who is supossed to be English, played by two Englishmen, an Irishman, A Welshman, a Scotsman, and an Australian. Who is from where? Who is the best Bond? The worst Batman was Clooney – a fine actor, normally, who was terrible in a terrible movie – but he’s American, and Bale is not only a better Batman, but a better Bruce Wayne. All that matters is that the best actor for the role gets it. Stop being insulted. Or, at least, recognise that the guy who directed the highest-grossing and best reviewed super hero film of all time might know something about casting Superman.
I’m with this guy.
the best batman ever was ADAM WEST!!
Actually, Bond is supposed to be Scottish, but that doesn’t change your argument any. Good point.
Didn’t Fleming only specify that Bond was a Scot after having seen Connery as Bond? I’m not sure if I recall this correctly and I haven’t the time right now to dig up the information.
I think you’re right that it was apparently a post-film release description. I don’t think his parentage was any more descriptive than both parents were killed in a skiing accident before Connery came along.
Cavill is too soft looking. His face is pretty, but weak. Bad choice Warners.
I doubt you’ve seen enough photos of him or all his film work. He is definitely not “soft looking” and I have no doubt he is perfect for the part. You’ll be eating those words! Checkout his photo gallery at Picasso if you don’t believe.
Bada BOOM!
The only Brit who complained about the Harry Potter thing was the author.
Plus Superman is CANADIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you retarded?
Superman comes from a different planet and landed in Kansas
Not to mention he’s a freakin’ COMIC BOOK CHARACTER! Not real people. Not real.
Not to mention he’s a freakin’ COMIC BOOK CHARACTER! Not real people. Not real.
You. Me. Outside.
NOW.
Bro, the artist was Canadian, the write was American. He was created in Ohio. Nice try though.
The British press had a “hissy fit” because their film industry is – alas, given most of their films are good quality – tiny. In fact, American money made Harry Potter, so in terms of ownership it is/was an American film franchise.
As for British actors in American roles – they are often simply better. Also, they can do American accents whereas American actors cannot, as a rule, do British accents.
And before anyone accuses me of being a British superiorist or something, I’m Irish, and I’m from the bit of Ireland where you *don’t* like the Brits.
Henry Cavill’s claim to fame is doing historical soft porn. Nobody is overawed by his acting skills.
Have you actually seen all his work? I have and as an actor he has incredible range, he can cry “on demand”, he has comedy and presence. He will be perfect for this role. You won’t be disappointed. He has the leading role in 2 films coming out in 2011 which will possibly be his best work. Kudos.
true, he did do a pretty hot nude scene in tudors s1 ep1
“As for British actors in American roles – they are often simply better. Also, they can do American accents whereas American actors cannot, as a rule, do British accents.”
What a false and ignorant thing to say
I disagree. Hugh Laurie’s accent is pretty bad in House, and Ian McShane (tho i loved the part) was lousy in Deadwood. I will give you that Americans (and Canadians) have struggled with British accents. Namely Natalie Portman (does she count?), and Kevin Costner to name a couple of the worst. But you can’t say the British actor can always pull it off.
A young fellow (at the time) named James Marsters handled his English accent like he was brought up with it. For quite a while, I didn’t think he was American.
Gillian Anderson spent seven years of her childhood in England and has somehow after moving back as an adult reverted to a splendid accent.
It’s called acting.
Mimicry is part of it.
Hugh Laurie’s accent as House is atrocious, though.
As for British actors in American roles – they are often simply better. Also, they can do American accents whereas American actors cannot, as a rule, do British accents.<<<
That's a pantload. A Brit might not be able to distinguish one American accent from another, but I certainly can, and Brit actors try American accents with varying degrees of success, just like the reverse. Doing RSC does not make one a great actor.
Madonna’s already played a cultural icon from another country. She was, of course, cast as Argentina’s First Lady, Eva Peron, in “Evita,” and there was quite an uproar at the time, despite some eventual solid reviews of her performance. Something tells me she’ll never agree to do something like that again.
Other transplants from the Yank side of the Atlantic:
Movie “From Hell” had two American leads Johnny Depp and Heather Graham.
Robert Downey, Jr plays Sherlock Holmes.
Brad Pitt as Mickey O’Neill in Snatch (Irish/Pikey)
Renee Zellweger as Bridget Jones in Bridget Jones’s Diary
Mickey Rourke as Martin Fallon in A Prayer For The Dying
They’re all professionals playing pretend. I wish more closet Yanks on the UK side would take a chance at playing an American. It’s very entertaining. I knew of a Brit who’d get George Bush down perfectly. He stopped mimicing Bush when I said that if he kept it up England may not allow him to return. His eyes widened like saucers and he went several shades whiter…which is quite a feat for someone without a tan. Any whiter and we’d have used him for solar energy.
This debate about actor nationality reminds me of the once famous dilemma that involved Vivien Leigh and Scarlett O’Hara. Because Leigh was British, there was some public outcry ( much like I am reading on this message board) that an American and a Southerner should claim the role of Scarlett from the novel, Gone with the Wind. Although no one today could imagine another actress in the role, it was a real issue back in 1939. The public ire was evidently assuaged by the studio submitting a statement about the genesis of most southern families and that they had all invariably had British roots! That seemed to appease everyone. I suppose it might work today as well.
Wasn’t Kevin Costner as Robin Hood punishment enough?
That’s really ignorant.
They choose the best actor for the job – regardless of their nationality.
Oh and the “it doesn’t go the other way around” comment made me laugh. At least the brits attempt (and often succeed) at doing the character justice and doing a good american accent. There have been many cases where american actors potray iconic british roles as completely american e.g Blade (yes, he was english) Peter Pan, Robin Hood, Sherlock Holmes etc etc. So stop b
Dear America, produce better actors under 40 and this doesn’t need to happen. If he’s good in the role I certainly won’t care.
So true. America has been churning out plenty of pretty boy-men (leo, tobey, etc). But when it comes to the men who fill out the screen, we seem to turn to the Euros and Aussies (bale, worthington, craig, etc). Not sure what it means but America’s on-screen talent needs to step it up.
Tobey is a pretty boy? Could have fooled me lol.
Tobey Maguire is a pretty boy? This is news to me. Leonardo DiCaprio? What is this, 1997? Have you seen him lately? He’s looking like Jack Nicholson these days.
By that do you mean doughy and overrated?
Hollywood is too commercialized. They will never have the likes of of the ‘old’ Hollywood. They are too consumed with trying to be pretty with white teeth and plastic.
Hollywood has always been commercialized. And FYI, it was even worse during “old hollywood”. For some reason people look back at it so fondly.
Maybe because the movies were better.
How about Mark Ruffalo? If they were going the “Henry Cavill” route and wanted an actual American, Mark would have fit the bill. (Although he is 5’8 vs. Cavill’s 6’1…)
Mark Ruffalo is fat.
Ruffalo’s already playing the Hulk in The Avengers. No double-dipping!
Cavill is a great choice… his work is The Tudors was substantial, even though it wasn’t scene-stealing. You can see potential, and he has the masculinity and ‘unknown’ quality that you need for Superman.
That being said, doubt the movie will be any good… particularly if it is an “origin story”, and if the villain is Luther, then it sucks on arrival. While Luther IS a great villain, he’s played out. And Superman’s best foes are aliens, like himself, as they can really test him.
As you American actors under 40 being of quality and substance, blame that on the pretty boy quality that runs rampant for actors in the late teens and 20s; they bank on their physicality and then don’t have a consistent ability to be truthfully dramatic… Robert Pattison? Shouldn’t be a star. Taylor Lautner? Shouldn’t be a star? They’re acting is bland, but compared to K. Stewart Kazan would sing their praises…
He is too feminine right now to be honest. BUT, he has half a year to pack on the muscle and that will cause subtle changes to his face too, making it more masculine. He better end up bigger than the Marvel heroes or the fanboys will raise holy hell!
“Dear America, produce better actors under 40 and this doesn’t need to happen. If he’s good in the role I certainly won’t care.”
80-90% of the actors in American movies are American, and yet you Canadian and Bri’ish sissies still shell out the big $$ to watch our American actors/actresses. Who has better actors/actresses again?
“80-90% of the actors in American movies are American, and yet you Canadian and Bri’ish sissies still shell out the big $$ to watch our American actors/actresses. Who has better actors/actresses again?”
Such ignorance. Take Justin Bieber as an example. Anyone with sense can tell he has no talent, and is a crap singer, yet he has so many fans. Popularity doesn’t prove if something is good or not. And as for calling Canadians and the British ‘sissies’, your average Canuck or Brit is far tougher than your average American.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt
Emile Hirsch
Armie Hammer
Just a few american actors under 40 with talent.
Joaquin Phoenix
Casey Affleck
Leonardo DiCaprio
Jesse Eisenberg
Garrett Hedlund
Anthony Mackie
So what if he’s Brithish!! I thought he was good in the Tudors and he looks the part! Also Also, how many times have Americans played foreign charactors? But I hope for Henry Cavill it’s not a death sentence to his acting career like all the other Supermans!
If talent meant anything, none of America’s famous actors beyond Steep and a Hathaway would be famous. None. The writers and actors in this town are sorely lacking in talent. This is a town that takes James Franco seriously.
“The writers and actors in this town are sorely lacking in talent.”
With pukes like Channing Tatum, and Shia LeBoof stinking up the screen, I agree Hollywood’s Gen-Y actors suck, but you can blame the casting directors for that. There’s TONS of American actors who can “fill the screen” and are talented as any generation of actors has ever been, but as Tarantino said, “casting directors have their little lists, and if you aren’t on that list you don’t get offered the roles.”
A whole generation of American-born leading men has come and are now 40-plus already without having been noticed because Hollywood has passed them over. Most of them have been driven to cable TV and all but blacklisted from features.
As for the writers…
No one can tell me that Tony Gilroy, Oliver Stone, Steven Zallian, David Goyer, Quintin Tarantino, David Milch or Jonah Nolan (yes, his brother is British-born, but Jonah was born and raised in the US in Chicago) are all “sorely lacking” in talent.
Orci and Kurtzman on the other hand are total no-talents, but they’re only dangerous so long as Michael Bay or JJ Abrams can toss them projects.
BTW when I think of UK screenwriters I think of Paul W.S. Anderson. Now THAT’S “sorely lacking” in talent!
If you had ever seen The Unborn, you would have a question mark over David Goyer’s inclusion in your list.
I take it you haven’t.
uh..excuse me, but citing the ever-cheesy Paul Anderson as an example of “British writing talent” is like citing Geraldo Rivera as an example of “fine investigative journalism talent”.. hello
Great Point!
An American is currently Sherlock Holmes, and an American previously portrayed Robin Hood. It’s not that big a deal.
It’s all revenge for making Downey Jr. the next Sherlock Holmes. Expect the trend to continue lol.
I’m appalled that they didn’t cast a Kryptonian in the role.
LOL! That pretty much sums up the futility of talking about casting someone who perfectly matches the nationality/size/features of a character. This is fiction: some of the characters will be IMPOSSIBLE to match exactly.
I was actually hoping for a cardboard cut-out of one of Christopher Reeve. They could pull a ‘Clutch Cargo’ mouth overlay. It’d be the same, right?
Haha great post – people need to chill.
The best person for the role should get the role – end of.
EVEN Captain America is’nt Captain “America” anymore— the producers are changing the name and taking the “AMERICA” out of the American superheroes name.
Not so. At least, not entirely. At least, the last I read. It has been publicized that some such tweaking will take place for certain segments of the international market. But generally, Captain America will, in fact, be Captain America.
The character is still called Captain America – they are only changing the title of the movie to First Avenger in a few countries.
not one thing in your statement makes any sense. Cap is still Cap. and Superman is still Superman
I agree with you on the casting point. I’m getting a bit tired of the European invasion in movies and television. I don’t think it is a matter of American actors not having the acting chops (as some posters are suggesting). I’m sure there is a certain level of international appeal in making these decisions. And Hollywood loves Europeans. They would never cast an American in the role of James Bond or Harry Potter.
These are huge franchises. And I love Christian Bale as Batman. It just would be nice to see some American actors in these iconic American roles. Hell, it would be nice to see more Americans in lead roles across the board (television included).
Oh no, the Brits are taking over the film industry! American’s better step up their game…
The scales have to be balanced. An American plays Sherlock Holmes, so it takes all the American comic book characters to make up for that.
It’s just another example of a foreigner doing one of those jobs Americans just won’t do…
They do but prior to Ricky Gervais pointing out the nonsense that is hollyweird, rappers & pop stars were preferred. So many a serious actor simply chose other careers rather than deal with the madness
Yes, but they’re full of over-emoting soap stars.
how about an american new york born playing sherlock holmes?
No
Andrew Garfield is NOT british. Only his mother is british. andrew Garfield was born in california, and his father is also american.
—TRUTH, JUSTICE AND THE AMERICAN WAY !!!!!!!!!!!
WHY ARE WE OURSOURCING SUPERMAN?????????????????
Unless things go terribly wrong, Warners will make a gazillion dollars in December 2012 (between this Superman and The Hobbit).
Add to this the summer release of “The Dark Knight Rises” and they can live without another Harry Potter adaptation.
I bet ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ Will make more money than Hobbit and Superman
Yowza. Me like.
Agree he was super in The Tudors. Now I will see Superman
Yummy….me too!!
Cavill is a mite fey for Superman, but I’m sure Snyder will whip him into shape. Snyder is very conscious of the visual aspect. His Superman won’t be a fey metrosexual. By the time Snyder is finished, Cavill will make Chris Evans and Hemsworth will look like pikers.
Too true – in Snyder I trust!
Yeah, that’s going to be one epic December for Warner Bros. It will be interesting to see how they will handle this. Two major tentpoles in one month. I’m guessing The Hobbit will open on December 19th, that’s a Wednesday, just like the Lord of the Rings movies. And then they’ll have to find a suitable release date for Superman.
$50 says this is moved to May of 2013 (See ‘Star Trek).
The question becomes, are there enough 3D/ 3D IMAX screens to accommodate? Warners will need to spend the next 8 months making deals for screen time.
Essentially the back-to-back releases of these 3D movies blocks ANY other studio from accessing them for their films.
Just sayin’…
The world ends 48 hours later, spend that money fast
Well, that is, if we are all still here…
Nice!!!
So excited Henry Cavill will be getting the recognition he is due – loved him in Tudors and have hoped to see more of him!
Not buying it need something official. Plus seriously this guy as Superman, what a joke if its true.
Only joke funnier would have been to cast this lump as “BOND, James Bond.”.
Good call!
Whoever they cast as Lois will probably suck just like this dude. Lets all pray this isn’t true because if it is, I smell epic fail.
epic fail? wishful thinking from a hater. i think that stench you smell is yourself, dude. how can you say a project written and produced by the guy who did the batman reboot AND inception as well as directed by the guy from 300 AND watchmen AND sucker punch gonna suck??? superman is gonna be very well written and visually awesome to watch. keep crossing your fingers dude and maybe someday you’ll find that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow too
Sucker Punch isn’t even out yet – why are you using it here?
sucker punch doesn’t need to be already released to see the visual tone of the movie. just look at the trailers and footage. or is that too much thinking outside the box for you?
Actually, calling an ‘epic fail’ isn’t that far off base. Could easily happen. Everyone was touting the Singer ‘reboot’ until it reached the screen and was a serious yawn fest. He didn’t punch anything, fight much other than with Lois, and of course, banter (and poorly I might add) with Luthor (Yes, it was the writers fault). Ultimately, this movie failed to be the monster predicted. While it wasn’t an epic fail in terms of money, it certainly was to most long term fans of the character and the films. Very much akin to Superman III & IV or the god awful Batman & Robin for that franchise (serious shudder then puke).
The one thing we won’t have to worry about a Zach Snyder Superman movie is a lack of action!
Full praise to Henry! I just watched all the episodes of The Tudors and absolutely love him! Fantastic work, Henry!
I don’t recall much I’veen him in, but look wise he might pull it off. He needs to tame his hair and be clean, to the skin, shaven, though
Interesting. Glad they chose a Brit, just like with Batman. I’ve only seen him in The Tudors, but he had a dynamic and charismatic presence that the likes of Brandon Routh, Tom Welling, and Dean Cain definitely lacked. He seems like a real actor, not just some American soap hunk. Definitely a step in the right direction of moving Superman away from being boring and bland.
Well said!!!
Great choice. Glad he has a 2nd chance.
And now suddenly I’m interested in yet another unnecessary reboot! Henry Cavill was my favorite actor in ‘The Tudors’. I never thought I’d be interested in ‘Superman’, but now I change my mind…
Excellent choice!
Excellent work, as usual. I must admit I’m getting a giggle imagining all of the geek movie site heads cursing and wishing it was them that broke this. I’m glad they went with an unknown again.
Isn’t Jon Peters a producer on this as well?
He is doing Hair
OMG SHUT THE FRONT DOOR AND ALL THE WINDOWS MR CAVILLE IS GEORGEOUS CANT WAIT TILL THIS MOVIE FLIES INTO THEATERS!!!! CHARLES BRANDON LIVES AGAIN
What a cruel thing to say about anyone. Charles Brandon was a true explitive deleted.
Cavill is a great choice. Now we need Rachel McAdams as “Lois Lane”… She would be the perfect choice.
I am glad Snyder is directing this. That means the action will be solid.
Mila Kunis would be my choice.
Directors tend to cast from the same pool. Ten bucks says Lois Lane will be played by one of the Sucker Punch actresses. My guess is Abbie Cornish.
Oh man, Rachel McAdams would be perfect, but I’d love to see her cast as Sue Storm in the Fantastic Four reboot so much more.
I wonder why they’re bothering with a “reboot” of FF4. Can’t they just admit that it isn’t worth bothering with scraping the bottom of the superhero barrel for every single movie they can dredge up? Then to add insult to injury they can reboot the lousy movies they made about Moon Knight or Martian Manhunter a couple of years later. Please Hollywood, leave the “reboots” to Microsoft products.
BMG, the fact that you don’t get how Tom Weilling and Brandon Routh play Superman exactly right, because they are AMERICAN, proves you don’t understand Supes. This guy is a fucking affront to million of Americans, who simply will not accept a Brit as Superman. Seriously, this casting is starting the pic off on the wrong foot, and guarantees a backlash like the one that kept Jude Law from this role. Nolan and Co. fucked up, It’s that simple.
ChaosTheory … like how they didn’t accept a British Batman? Pretty sure Christian Bale is widely regarded as a perfect Batman.
I think you’re fucking retarded, it’s that simple.
@kent if you don’t know by now that superman is a america’s hero then you don’t know shit so you can go fuck your self and take your brit with you because this is superman american icon not brit icon this fuck’n sucks and you do to kent.
Duche! The reason why Superman is such an American icon is because he is an IMMIGRANT!!! Yes, he represents American ideals better than any other superhero, but he has always been an illegal alien trying to fit in to our culture. The irony of your comment is laughable.
amen
“Yes, he represents American ideals better than any other superhero, but he has always been an illegal alien trying to fit in to our culture.”
Only if Jonathan and Martha were methhead-level incompetents. Assuming they had obeyed the law (of course they would, its Jonathan and Martha Kent!) and formally adopted him, the district court would have issued a birth certificate listing the Kents as Clark’s parents. Since courts strictly construe adoptive children as legally equivalent to biological children, Clark would automatically take US Citizenship retroactive to whatever birth date was put on the birth certificate. What’s more, as a natural born citizen (since no naturalization proceedings were required), he could run for President.
I 2nd that!!Right on Kent! Brits Rule! they cant help it if they are just better actors than the generic American actor!
lol. Cavill does historical soft porn. Let’s not go too crazy in the praise ok?
Actually, Keaton was a better Batman but he’s in his 50s. Boreanaz would’ve been a better physical type and is experienced in playing a brooding anti-hero, although his big screen experience is lacking.
I post only to say “well put and I completely agree” to kent.
I couldn’t agree more. They should have stayed true to the character and cast an authentic Kryptonian.
Agreed. I mean, the last guy to do Superman and Clark Kent really well (Reeve, in my opinion) may not have been Kryptonian, but at least he was a Kansas farm boy who grew up to be a reporter. Oh, no, wait, he was an actor who really got the role.
Cavill is an actor, people, and a very good one, who is also really good-looking, sharply masculine, with dark hair and a great jawline and good eyes. I think he’ll be able to do the accent, and he’ll look like Superman. If you’ve seen him in The Tudors you also know he’s a very strong actor. this is a really tough role to pull off, but I like how they’re thinking.
He is not very masculine looking. More feminine looking really. But he still has months in the gym to go. Five months from now, we’ll see what’s what.
fyi…Superman is 1/2 Canadian courtesy of co-originator Joe Shuster (a Torontonian).
I’m a huge Superman fan from childhood and I say if he can act and look the part, give him the part. I don’t care if he’s British, American, or whatever.
HE IS PERFECT for this. Love Henry and kept wondering why his star hadn’t broken out yet. He is perfect for that role. The last Superman with, with all due respect to all involved, was just not Superman. Very happy for him this morning on top of this he’s a good guy which is always a plus. Well deserved.
Great choice!Really hope they get a good Lois Lane as she is just as important hopefully someone like Rose Byrne,Natalie Portman or Gemma Arterton my dream choice would be Erica Durance.
I agree someone like Rose Byrne or Rachel McAdams would be perfect as Lois Lane. Natalie Portman to me is over exposed and always seems to be a candidate for every tentpole. Can’t see her as Lois.
I agree that Natalie Portman would make a terrible Lois Lane, but not because she is overexposed. I think she just lacks the fiery tenacity that Lois requires. Besides, she just did Thor.
Rose Byrne would be PERFECT as Lois!
Another Brit? I refuse to see this!
Forget the ‘another Brit’ issue. Another SUPERMAN? Apparently the film going public is now the equivalent of a child who wants to hear the same bedtime story over… and over… and over…
That’s exactly the reason nobody went to see the last, say, twenty James Bond films. Nobody wants to see a movie about a character so beloved that their grandchildren love them just as much thirty years later.
Oh, so happy to know that we all will have a chance to see Henry in action again. I too, wonder why we can not find an American to play this role and give it the justice it deserves. I love Henry’s way and find him believable in all he has done so far. Gotta give him a chance, we love Superman any way we can get him.
Superman Returns was a DISGRACE! It is widely hated by Superman fans. SO GLAD that the reboot will erase that shameful disgrace from existence!
Superman Returns was NOT widely hated by Superman fans. It was excellently done. Brandon Routh did a good job in continuity from Mr Reeves. My current trilogy Superman (extended edition), Superman II (Donner edition), and Superman returns are really quite good taken together in maintaining a credible storyline. I’ve been a huge Superman fan for over 50 years. I’m willing to withhold judgment on any remake and judge it on its on merits.
Excellent casting. Cavill looks the part; has the charm, intensity and acting chops to do this role its greatest justice. I’m hearing the 2nd draft of the script is solid too. I just hope Snyder doesn’t focus ALL his energy into a visual feast of the eyes and ears, and is sure to also put real focus into the heart, theme and performances of this film. SUPERMAN as a hero and a story has such potential to be as much an emotional experience as a fun and entertaining one. With Nolan guiding the process, I trust the best incarnation of the tale will emerge – just a matter of executing it with all its layers. Please, please, please don’t mess this one up again. I cried for the wrong reason after watching Singer’s lame interpretation. Make this Superman a statement and not an apology!
it’s a movie. theyre actors. who cares where he is from? he’s a great actor, super brooding. i think he’ll play this part really well and find this line of comments offensive.
Cavill has been on Hollywood’s radar for years and he just needed the right franchise to get huge. The man is walking sex and he more than holds his own in the acting department. This is Mel Gibson before the self-implosion.
You said it! Cavill is gorgeous…