
UPDATE: On Fox News’ America Live, Juan Williams reacted to the resignation of NPR’s Ellen Weiss, the executive who fired him, and discussed the future of NPR. He didn’t have many nice things to say (video below):
PREVIOUS: The NPR Board of Directors today released the findings of its review into the circumstances leading to the October firing of news analyst Juan Williams over remarks about Muslims he had made on Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor. (Williams has since signed a new deal with Fox News.) The board recommends new “internal procedures concerning personnel and on air-talent decisions” and “appropriate disciplinary action with respect to certain management employees involved in the termination.” But here is the most interesting part:
- Williams’ contract was terminated in accordance with its terms. The contract gave both parties the right to terminate on 30 days’ notice for any reason. The facts gathered during the review revealed that the termination was not the result of special interest group or donor pressure. However, because of concerns regarding the speed and handling of the termination process, the Board additionally recommended that certain actions be taken with regard to management involved in Williams’ contract termination.
- The Board has expressed confidence in Vivian Schiller’s leadership going forward. She accepted responsibility as CEO and cooperated fully with the review process. The Board, however, expressed concern over her role in the termination process and has voted that she will not receive a 2010 bonus.
- NPR also announced that Ellen Weiss, Senior Vice-President for News, has resigned
This is the same executive who axed Williams two days after his Fox News appearance in a phone call, claiming he violated the public radio service’s ethics guidelines. Weiss, a 28-year NPR veteran, then became a target of criticism over the way Williams’ termination was handled.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


The best way to comment is to use Juan Williams’ own words:
“She had an executioner’s knife for anybody who didn’t abide by her way of thinking,” he said. “And I think she represented a very ingrown, incestous culture in that institution that’s not open to not only different ways of thinking, but angry at the fact that I would even talk or be on Fox.”
This is one of the few liberals willing to speak the truth. Many on the left and the “progressive” movement are intolerant of any point-of-view which differs from their own.
And this why real news doesn’t happen. Conservatives complain with such fire that news organizations duck and give in.
It doesn’t happen nearly as often from liberal viewers
Firing traitors (people who go on Fox) is not “giving in”.
Are they keeping the money George Soros gave them? I don’t remember drama like this at FOX News, it’s happened at NPR, CNN and MSNBC, but not at FOX News. Why is that?
Oh, there’s PLENTY of drama at FOX; it’s just that, like the REST of the Republican Party, they like to keep it under cover.
Let me put it this way: you won’t see Shep Smith and Glenn Beck doing a show together anytime soon…
Ellen and Vivian are shocked to learn the hard way what W.F. Buckley’s meant when he said:
“Though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view.”
What makes NPR hard to listen to especially near an election is this attitude that their take on some hot button issue is the only valid one possible.
Translation: Please, please don’t cut our funding. Here’s a sacrificial lamb … and fake apology.
Its because the on-air help isn’t allowed to mention the Saudi Prince who’s the biggest shareholder of Fox, or how Murdoch’s dependent on selling to the Chinese.
Also, the other networks you mention are news networks. Fox successfully argued in a court case in Florida that they are not required to tell the truth in their news programming.
It’s true. But at least the lies on Fox News make more sense than MSNBC’s or CNN’s.
“Also, the other networks you mention are news networks. Fox successfully argued in a court case in Florida that they are not required to tell the truth in their news programming.”
You’re kidding right? You believe that ‘the other networks’ are ‘required to tell the truth’??
And perhaps occupy some higher moral plane than Fox news?
Also, the other networks you mention are news networks. Fox successfully argued in a court case in Florida that they are not required to tell the truth in their news programming.
You have to be the biggest idiot to ever post on this site, and that’s quite an accomplishment!
I worked for one of NPR’s top affiliates for over 20 years, and we watched as the network emerged from financial chaos in the early Reagan years to eventual stability. Unfortunately, as so often happens in business, success led to ossification. The diversity of what NPR will produce or accept – both in general programming and specific genres – has shrunk to nothing. The Kroc bequest insured that NPR’s self-image as an all-knowing monolith would last forever (or at least as long as Joan’s money held out). Vivian Schiller’s poor handling of the Juan Williams situation had little to do with “liberal bias” or “political correctness” as such, but owed more to the self-righteous internal culture of NPR management. One would have to venture into the Appalachian hollers to find a situation where so much stupidity-from-inbreeding is not only encouraged, but rewarded!
I thought it odd that Juan would take the time to point out that NPR shuns people who don’t have Ellen Weiss’ viewpoint. One could say the same about Fox News Channel bias.
Having worked over ten years for an NPR affiliate, I have to admit that NPR has a pro-homosexual viewpoint — especially on the “Fresh Air” program. Almost every F.A., All Things Considered and Morning Edition program has a story of particular interest to homosexuals. Kinda like the conservative news networks (SRN and USA) which regularly have a story of interest to anti-abortionists. I think CBS and ABC are the last places to find unbiased news.