
You know the oft-repeated phrase heard this time of year, “It’s an honor just to be nominated”? That was never more true for some who might have actually won the Academy Award but tripped on their way to the Kodak stage by failing to get to first base with a nomination this past Tuesday. This year, presumed frontrunners in different categories weren’t moved forward in the Oscar race because of their own peer group. In case you’re not aware, peer groups pick the individual nominees in their categories. In the final vote, the entire Academy votes for the winners. The membership at large, thought not to be as technically judgmental as the formidable peer groups (or, in some situations, as swayed by petty jealousies), usually tend to select the more obvious choices. But what should be an anomaly happens a lot when it comes to Oscar.
In 1989, Driving Miss Daisy was the big winner with four Oscars including Best Picture. Its director Bruce Beresford almost certainly would have made it five except for one small thing: the Director’s branch didn’t nominate him so the Academy at large couldn’t vote for him. It was the first time since Grand Hotel (1931-1932) that a director was not nommed for a movie that won Best Picture. (Instead, Oliver Stone won for Born On The Fouth Of July.) Most famously, Hollywood was shocked when the actors branch didn’t nominate Bette Davis for 1934’s Of Human Bondage even though it was considered one of the greatest female performances ever and its omission caused such a stir that the Academy augmented their rules to allow a write-in vote. (The write-in didn’t work, and Claudette Colbert triumphed.) Out of embarrassment, the Academy tried to make amends and gave Davis the Oscar the next year for the much-lesser Dangerous.
For instance, this year in the Best Make Up category, Alice In Wonderland was considered the frontrunner among the seven finalists – but shockingly failed to even be nominated. Instead, the final three nominees were Barney’s Version, The Way Back, and Universal’s early 2010 dud The Wolfman, forcing Academy voters to choose from these far more obscure entries. Which is why I have to ask: Was Paul Giamatti’s disheveled hair in Barney’s Version really better than the Make Up artistry on the Red Queen or the Mad Hatter? It’s all a very closed club, and the answer may not lie in the work itself but in who did the work and who is a member of the club.
For instance, the critically drubbed The Tempest‘s Sandy Powell, a 3-time winner in Oscar’s Costumes category, can get nominated for just about anything she does because she is one of Costume branch’s inner circle. The same is true for the Music branch and John Williams who doesn’t score for movies as much anymore. But any time he does, he’s likely to get a nomination because he’s an icon among musicians.
Regarding the Best Documentary nominations this year, I heard that one Governor of the Academy’s Documentary branch told a consultant that if Waiting For ‘Superman’, Davis Guggenheim’s widely favored education doc from Paramount, received a nomination it would win Best Feature Documentary with the membership at large. But he wasn’t voting for it and neither were some other branch members he knew due to questions they had about the way some of the documentary was conducted. Specifically, objections were raised about one scene recreated for the camera after it happened in real life. The result is that Guggenheim won’t be getting that second Oscar this time around (he won for An Inconvenient Truth) since his documentary didn’t make the cut with his branch.
Christopher Nolan was now infamously passed over in the Best Director category, first for The Dark Knight and this time for Inception. Would he have won this time out for staying true to his passion project? We’ll never know. My guess is there’s a certain level of jealousy because he pretty much can do whatever he wants and wherever he wants. (I often say he could go in and pitch a remake of Howard The Duck and studios would say yes.) Steven Speilberg was famously not nominated as Best Director for the Best Picture nominee Jaws. (Worse, a TV show following around Spielberg that day the Oscar nods were announced showed him anxiously anticipating a nomination that never came.)
Lee Smith’s dazzling Editing for Inception was thought to be an easy winner in that category once it got to the general vote. Problem is, the editors themselves dissed it. No Oscar for Lee this year.
Diane Warren won a Golden Globe this month for the anthem she wrote for Cher in Burlesque called “You Haven’t Seen The Last Of Me”. And she was considered a likely Academy Award winner this time after 6 previous Oscar nominations. Plus, Cher was expected to perform it on the telecast. Unfortunately, the Academy’s grumpy Music branch decided we had seen the last of Warren this awards season and nominated only four tunes, none of them from the critically reviled Burlesque. Talk about a backlash. (A publicist connected with Warren’s campaign even wanted to ask for a recount but knew the Academy would never allow it.) The same Music branch disqualified Clint Mansell’s soaring blend of original music and Tchaikovsky in Black Swan which almost certainly could have triumphed with the general Academy membership when voting starts on February 2nd.
The Best Foreign Language Film race also could have looked much different had rules allowed Sweden’s sensation The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo into the running. A couple of bread and butter Academy voters have written me asking how that wasn’t in there. here’s why: rules allow only for one submission per country and Sweden’s entry was the more obscure Simple Simon which did manage to make many’s list of nine finalists but not the final five. The same thing happened in 2007 when France entered the animated Persepolis in the foreign film race and not La Vie En Rose which could have won (Though it did become a double Oscar winner anyway for Best Actress Marion Cotillard and Best Make Up, proving the Academy’s love for it even if the home country didn’t have complete faith.)
It’s got to be frustrating to know you coulda, woulda, shoulda been a contender on February 27th.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


Yeah, it sucks that Nolan isn’t nominated. But on the plus side, at least we have something new to bitch about!
I still think it’s a joke the christopher Nolan didn’t get a nomination from the directors, who the hell gets 3 DGA nomination and no oscar. That seem cruel to me. I hope he wins at the DGA, as a nice fuck you to the academy but doubt that will happen. Also the snub of the editing of inception is even more baffling, I think that’s one of the best editing in year and also most creative.
To be fair, the music branch was right in not allowing Clint Mansell’s score to be nominated. When every major theme in the score was composed by Tchaikovsky, Clint Mansell shouldn’t be rewarded for it, despite his brilliance. He’ll get an Oscar one day, but it’s right that he won’t receive one for Black Swan.
Same thing happened to Jonny Greenwood for “There Will Be Blood” a few years ago although Greenwood’s score had more original music. It’s unfortunate that the rule is so strict – the music in “Black Swan” and “There Will Be Blood” heightened the quality and experience of those films a lot more than many all-original scores.
But Mansell’s score doesn’t sound anything like Tchaikovsky in several places, including the “menacing” passage of the score used in the trailer. Also, ironically, Tchaikovsky himself cheerfully and freely admitted to incorporating traditional Russian folk melodies into his music. He once claimed to have been inspired to compose a masterpiece after hearing a peasant woman walking down the street whistling a lovely folk song.
This is also the basic principle of jazz, where you take a standard song (usually composed by someone else) and perform endless melodic and harmonic variations of the original melody. To say this can’t be art is like saying Charlie Parker or Duke Ellington aren’t artists.
You also forgot they snubbed Michael Douglas for “Wall Street 2″, Best Supporting Actor.
Just a personal opinion, but I don’t think he was that great in “Wall Street 2.” That said, I would’ve totally applauded a Douglas nom for “Solitary Man.”
Douglas deserved nothing this year. He was in two dreadful films. If was was given a nomination, would have been because of the cancer. Just a thought.
Thanks for talking about the jealousy/politics involved, Pete. And I think this is why everyone needs to take these awards, all awards, with a grain of salt.
The academy almost always comes away with egg on its face (Gladiator, anyone?) and you have to remind yourself that you’re not in it for the awards. You’re in it to leave behind something that MATTERS. The Wire never got any love for its work and it’s quite possibly the best storytelling done in the motion picture medium. Saving Private Ryan will rest in our minds far longer than Shakespeare in Love. And the list goes on…
Unfortunately, artist like Nolan have to live with it hanging over their head their entire career until they’re in their 70′s and the Academy says, “HOLY S**T, we’re disgusting a**holes.”
People should take a page from Terrance Malick and skip the hoopla altogether. There’s more to life than a popularity contest.
In the history of the Awards, many talented people have been not been nominated and others have multiple nominations and no wins. Peter O’Toole should have multiple awards if it was for quality and not campaigning or to make up for past snubs, none wins. When Paul Newman finally won it was most likely because it was his “turn”, not because he was necessarily the best. Though I think Newman deserved many awards for other films, just not for the one he got it for.
Many people get them because of the “campaign”, not the performance, which is beyond annoying. But until the campaigns are either limited or eliminated, many others who refuse to campaign will not be nominated and those with good campaigns will be and win. Many get nominations because they are insiders and play the game, others just refuse and get passed over. Monique won purely for the performance since she was slammed for not “campaigning”, which was unusual. Some will never win because of the jealously, but that is not unusual in Hollywood.
“You’re in it to leave behind something that MATTERS.”
I seldom comment on boards, but I love and agree with the above statement.
Absolutely, when I think about art in any medium and discuss the subject with my daughters we always wonder if the work in question would stand the test of time. Would we see the work as something good and valued or just dated and part of the zeitgeist?
So in reality (to my untrained opinion-not in the entertainment industry), the award isn’t so much an arbiter of great or (sometimes) even good work, rather it appears to be predicated on the who vs. the work.
Sorry if I am sounding a bit showy with my word choices today, I am in work (writing) mode and not in my “comment on board” mode-which would likely include comments like-dude that f*ing rocked or f*ing sucked.
I don’t know the behind-the-scenes b.s. that prevents “Shakespeare in Love” from being shown on basic cable every five minutes, like “Saving Private Ryan”, but the former features a fabulous script and brilliant performances, down to the cameos. No doubt the writers finally had their say (and their revenge) with this one! Probably one of the best-written Best PIcture winners of the past 20 years.
Except for the D-Day recreation, which was original and epic, “Ryan” was a retread of every other war film ever done. Only with better production values.
What about TRON:Legacy? Should’ve been a shoo-in for Visual Effects.
The visuals for that film were clever and almost seamless… Some ballots got lost in the mail (obviously)
Is no one else surprised that Daft Punk didn’t get nommed for score? I understand that Desplat and Rahman are darlings, and Trent and Atticus are a lock to win, but I am far from a fanboy and that score was a delight.
Interesting. But I guess at the end of the day if the peer groups don’t filter then in theory some highly talented but less successful less obvious choices would fall by the way and you’d just get 2 or 3 movies picking up nearly everything – since lore says voters pick best director/movie/actor/actress and as they get down the list pretty much just tick all the other category boxes for the movies they like – since few of them can distinguish quite which sound or costume or what-have-you is technically better.
Indeed unless you were a peer group expert, given the high standards at work in most movie making – how exactly are you to decide who edges it with the sound editing and such – for these sorts of movies it’s pretty much always going to be top notch people dong a top notch job.
As Tom mentions above, Nolan has received three DGA noms and no Oscar nominations for directing, so they snubbed him for “Memento,” too.
Whoever the Academy members in the directing and editing branches are they should be ashamed.
Any theories why Leslie Manville got snubbed for “Another Year”?
I guess you don’t need a theory: it was a Best Actress role for a character who felt for much of the film more like a supporting character (“troubled/pain-in-the-ass friend”); not enough people saw the movie; plenty of other worthy female performances this year, etc.
Still, I thought it was the performance of the year and it sucks she didn’t get nominated.
I agree – it was the best performance by an actress this year in any category – and even more so since much of Mike Leigh’s work with his actors is improve – but she picked up big Hollywood agents, which may be a reward in itself. Kidman got the nom she should have gotten, and it is clearly a Hollywood insider thing.
I really want to check out the footage of Spielberg anticipating the Oscar nom. Does anybody know the name of the show or where I can watch it?
they show clips from it on the blue underground produced documentary about joe spinell that is a bonus feature on their Maniac DVD’s and Blurays. Joe spinell was there hanging out for some reason
Ryan Gosling not receiving at least a nomination for his role in Blue Valentine is baffling to me… and seems to not bother most other people which surprises me intensely.
On Nolan: Now that the Best Picture category is inflated to 10 nominees, EVERY year there will be at LEAST 5 “snubs” for Best Director. Nolan joins 4 other fairly other worthy potential Directors who got “snubbed” despite a Best Picture nom.
On Mansell and his BLACK SWAN score: Fan of Mansell’s, but the score branch made the simple calculation that too many voters wouldn’t have been able to distill the fine work that Mansell did from that of the long-loved Tchaikovsky ballet perennial. I was disappointed, but hardly surprised, that Rachel Portman’s lovely NEVER LET ME GO score was overlooked.
re: Ryan Gosling and Anonymous…Content…
perhaps cause Ryan outwardly doesn’t give a _____ and he’s more about the work than the accolades? Also, a friend and I were talking about Leo’s lack of campaigning and hype. Granted Leo’s performance was his usual strong performance, but look at the politics in that situation. If another more ‘hotter’ ‘newer’ actor had played that role, don’t you think the hype and politics would have garnered a nomination? Maybe Leo doesn’t ‘need’ any more noms or awards? He’s been almost non-exant this campaign season, I don’t remember seeing him anywhere. If I’m not mistaken, was there not early buzz about his perf pre-release? It’s interesting to watch and learn. Life is politics I guess, but occasionally in Hollywood, great art can result.
The solution is simple – expand every category to ten nominees, like Best Picture. That way they’ll be no more “shock” snubs and the ratings will climb because everyone’s favorite director/actor has been nominated.
Nothing for The Ghost Writer – even though Olivia Williams and Pierce Brosnan were both fantastic in it.
Nothing for Get Low – Duvall’s best performance since Tender Mercies and Lonesome Dove.
And Tilda Swinton doesn’t get a best actress nomination for I Am Love?
And no cinematography nomination for Never Let Me Go?
Could not agree more on Swinton and no love for “Never Let Me Go” which should have AT LEAST gotten a cinematography nom, but already feels like one of those movies people will be quietly discovering for years to come. Also kind of half-agree on “Ghost Writer.”
“Get Low,” however, was too much for me. I thought it was so badly directed that it hurt not only Duvall’s performance by framing it with poor everything-else, but Murray’s performance which was one of the better ones he’s done of late. Another director and I’ll bet voters would’ve smiled just that much more on Duvall, but it’s hard to get past everything that brings the rest of the movie down. But if “Get Low” had a higher profile, Lucas Black would get a Razzie nom, so maybe it balanced out for the best.
Pierce Brosnan actually was great in The Ghost Writer. But you can only get nominated for being a bad guy if you’re the lead OR wildly colorful a la Training Day. Plus, Ghost Writer was a thriller and it’s very tough to get nominated in one of those (Natalie Portman this year notwithstanding – but she got to be wild and crazy. Brosnan had to be withdrawn and rageful – the Academy, despite being comprised mostly of actors, curiously has no idea which are roles are difficult and which are hard – not to say that Portman isn’t/wasn’t great).
Ghost Writer should have been nominated for best cinematography & score.
The subtle aging work in Barney’s Version was some of the best make-up work this year. It wasn’t about Giamatti’s disheveled hair but rather the fantastically effective way they aged the characters.
exactly. and this is why the guilds nominate. because they can see what others (mr hammond, perhaps?) cannot
I was expecting at least a nomination for Tron: Legacy for it’s stunning visual effects, production design, and AMAZING music score by Daft Punk.
This seems to be a year of big box office snubs.
Ah, well… here’ hoping to Nolan’s nomination for Dark Knight Rises. (come on… you know it’s going to be awesome!)
In the DOCUMENTARY category does anyone know why THE TILLMAN STORY, the riveting tale about the NFL star, Pat Tillman, who gave up a life of riches to serve his country and was killed by his own men in Afghanistan, didn’t get a nod? I thought people were saying that it and RESTREPO were neck and neck for nominations?
Would love to know…
b/c there is a certain far left bias at work in Hollywood – still. You can see that at work regarding “Waiting for Superman”. Interesting that he won for Inconvenient Truth, which liberal fell all over themselves to champion. Just disregard that much of the “science” used in it is not settled and subject to much debate, if not outright fraud. But God forbid that a movie DARE state the teacher’s union is screwing up the education system. The horror! Nobody will look at this for what it is. That is why Adrian Fenty has lost his job over Michelle Rhee – even though she was the only reason he should have kept it.
In the case of The Tillman Story, I am sure the Academy is terrified of hacking off the govt. Even though, in theory, this movie supports an anti-war agenda.
It is a great film wrongfully snubbed.
Waiting For Superman just got robbed by a tremendously shortsighted and hypocritical committee.
That’s because it dared to show the teacher’s union for what they are…the problem.
Not to mention, the union’s connection to the Italian Mafia
It’s on YouTube. He just says “ahhh I didn’t get it” and for some reason the dude who played Chichi in the Godfather movies is there in the room. I don’t think it was for a TV show it just looks like home movie footage. But you can find it easily on YouTube by just searching the appropriate words.
imdb had Alice in Wonderland as %75 odds on favorite to win the Oscar.
the next was only at %20.
did you actually see the work of the nominees you are dissing, nikke?
When I heard Alice in Wonderland wasn’t nominated, I smelled a rat with the Academy. How is it possible that AIW already won a Critics’ Choice Award, and is nominated for a BAFTA was snubbed???? It clearly was the best makeup of 2010. Seems like the ‘peer group’ of makeup artists that voted are nothing more than a bunch of jealous a-holes.
Unbelievable that the peer group of make up artists have prevented Alice In Wonderland it’s nomination. If nominated it would have won the Oscar. It is CLEARLY the most innovative make up in years in a feature film. I find it disgusting that people can behave like highschool because this can only be a case of jealousy. Unfair & disgusting behavior. Shame on them. And a shame for Hollywood, because the real innovators & artists will leave the business if this is how they get treated.
ALICE IN WONDERLAND WOULD HAVE WON THE OSCAR FOR MAKEUP IF IT GOT NOMINATED!! THAT’S WHY IT DIDN’T GET NOMINATED,THIS IS WHY IT SHOULD BE VOTE BY PROXY SO IT STOPS ALL THE CORRUPTION AND JEALOUSY OF STOPPING PEOPLE GETTING THROUGH….PERIOD
THIS IS THE MOST PRESTIGIOUS AWARD, TO BE IN THE LAST 3 IS AN ACHIEVEMENT IN ITSELF AS A NOMINEE AND TO WIN YOU ARE THE MOST OUTSTANDING MAKEUP IN ALL THAT YEAR SO WHEN THESE LAST 3 FILMS GET THROUGH WHERE IS THE OUTSTANDING MAKEUP..IT ISN’T THERE,
WHY…BECAUSE RICK BAKER AND HIS ARMY HAVE MADE SURE THAT THE ONE FILM THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN HIS COMPETITION IS OUT “ALICE IN WONDERLAND”.
I THINK THIS YEAR THE MAKEUP CATEGORY SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED FOR CORRUPTION, IF THAT AWFUL MONKEY/WOLF MAKEUP WITH A TINA TURNER WIG OF WHICH WAS MORE CGI WINS IT MAKES THE MAKEUP OSCAR AWARD LOOK A JOKE !
I totally agree with you, you would think rick baker would want to have this film hidden, why he would want people to give him an award for it, its the worst makeup in history, i heard from the uk that the studio wasn’t happy with the makeup and had to reshoot a large part because of the makeup $30 million, he needs to retire not cheat to get this award !!!!
Why, with the expansion of category contenders, was Make-up limited to 3 nominees?
There were many other films that merited at least a nomination – and were ignored.
This omission diminishes the whole process for me, sad to say, and makes it all feel so overtly political- and on so many levels, at that.