
Skins co-creator Bryan Elsley today addressed the growing controversy surrounding the racy British series’ MTV version, which he is shepherding, in a lengthy statement:
Skins is a very simple and, in fact, rather old-fashioned television series. It’s about the lives and loves of teenagers, how they get through high school, how they deal with their friends, and also how they circumnavigate some of the complications of sex, relationships, educations, parents, drugs and alcohol. The show is written from the perspective of teenagers, reflects their world view, and this has caused a degree of controversy both in the U.K. and the USA.
In the U.K., viewers and commentators very quickly realized that although there are some sensational aspects to the show, Skins is actually a very serious attempt to get to the roots of young people’s lives. It deals with relationships, parents, death, illness, mental health issues, the consequences of drug use and sexual activity. It is just that these are characterized from the point of view of the many young people who write the show and has a very straightforward approach to their experiences. It tries to tell the truth. Sometimes that truth can be a little painful to adults and parents.
Consequences do flow from incorrect or selfish behavior but in the show, these are shown to be unexpected, hard to predict, and more to do with the loss of friendship than anything else, which in any context, is a disastrous outcome.
We proceed from the idea, not that teenagers are inherently likely to misbehave, but rather that they are intensely moral and disposed to make judgments on their own and others’ behavior. Sometimes, but not always, they get things wrong. In this teenagers are remarkably similar to adults. Their morals may not be the same as those of their parents and teachers, but they are nevertheless, highly developed and active in their world.
When viewers have taken the time to watch the show in a little more depth, they are less concerned about the behavior of the characters. Teenagers can be loyal, supportive, dedicated, focused, and capable of making informed value judgments about their lives. In the pilot episode of Skins, it’s possibly easy to overlook the story wherein a young boy sets off to a party to sell drugs and have sex, but ,in fact, does neither of these things, because, he senses that he has been manipulated by friends and does not feel ready to have sex with someone he does not know properly.
Skins is a traditionally made television series which has won countless international awards and gained a worldwide audience for stories about the joy, misery and challenges of being a teenager. The show has been used in anti-drug campaigns, has drawn praise for its portrayal of mental health issues and explorations of bereavement, sexuality, bullying and gender stereotyping.
I have lost count of the letters we have been sent by viewers who tell us that they have been able to approach their parents or teachers with their difficulties after watching the show. It is something that we take a great deal of pride in and which can unfortunately be eclipsed by some of the negative attention.
Our approach is not careless. We’ve created a supportive and protective environment for everyone working on the show. And, of course, abide by the law, and give respect to our work colleagues who in this case, are young energetic and exciting people with so much to offer to an imperfect world.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


“…sets off to a party to sell drugs and have sex, but ,in fact, does neither of these things, because, he senses that he has been manipulated by friends and does not feel ready to have sex with someone he does not know properly…”
If only that were true. But in the US version, he doesn’t have sex because the otherwise willing girl calls him out for liking someone else, then passes out, and he doesn’t sell drugs because he’s too dumb to know how. He doesn’t decide not to do these things, others decide for him.
The UK version is more nuanced, sure, but in the US version, no one ever stops to consider their actions. They fly into every situation, with little regard for themselves or others. Yes, it might be “realistic” behavior for some teenagers, but not teenagers anyone likes, and not teenagers people want to spend an hour with each week. I don’t blame the fleeing advertisers.
It seems every attempt to make the UK Skins more American, just made it more heartless. Is that really a representation of who we are?
Having watched and marveled at the entire four-season run of the unedited UK version of “Skins” I can firmly agree with Bryan Elsley’s position. While, as an adult, I can’t affirm the veracity of its portrayal of British teenagers, it certainly felt miles above the puerility that passes for accuracy on the contrived reality shows seen on U.S. networks, including MTV. The importance of “Skins” is not just that it speaks to kids but that it speaks to adults. The original UK series also takes kids seriously, which is something that adults say they do but don’t, or do in the wrong way. I have no interest in what MTV has done because TV-4 already did it.
The 4th season of The Wire did a much better job of portraying kids as real people with real problems and true development of their moral centers. Those felt like real kids with real lives. Skins feels exactly like what it is, the MTV version of high school. Every adult on the show is portrayed as a buffoon. It’s a live action cartoon.
The girls are all prostitutes and / or blow up dolls and the boys are pimps.
Which ‘old fashioned television series’ is this guy referencing, exactly? I did tune out of THE WALTONS for a season, but I don’t think I missed THAT much.
The PCT will not be satisfied until this show is retooled as revolving around a boy who is saved from the bottom of a well by a collie dog every episode.
I didn’t realize “Skins” is an old fashioned show in the vein of “Little House on the Prairie”. There is nothing “old fashioned” about this show. MTV has shepherded this project to make a show about teens having sex and doing drugs, not for the altruistic nature of the producers, but for the sole reason of drawing younger viewers to the screen (with complete disregard for the material involved). I’d be hard-pressed to find a teenager that would “claim” that this show helped them through a tough time. I watched the first episode and I’m sorry, I’m personally not offended, but let’s call a spade a spade here.
“Sometimes that truth can be a little painful to adults and parents.”
Thank you Bryan so very much for informing us that teenagers have sex and do drugs. We had absolutely no idea this was going on. You have done everyone a great service by letting us by way of this program that teenagers are having sex and doing drugs. This truth is very painful, but we will survive this pain. Thank you again.
I’ve watched it and don’t see why Prude America hates it. It’s no better or no worse than anything that has been on cable in the last 40 years. Besides, if you don’t like it…change the channel!
What a liar. I saw some of this show. What part of these pretty gorgeous girls were supposed to be escorts. Escorts don’t look like that and if they hang out in a drug dealers den they REALLY wouldn’t look like that.
Come on. Why would security people tackle some older guy for no reason, especially if he works there.
I think MTV should just come clean and say that they like peddling garbage to people. Just come out and say it. That way we can stop being subjected to their ‘Rock the Vote’ campaigns or any other social message even if I agree with the message. It’s become tired. Obviously they can’t be a music channel anymore. It’s a different time.
hey, that’s it. It’s Molester TeleVIsion. that’s what MTV stands for.
America is so backwards… all because of religion.
Hi, Anti!
This is not a matter of religion. Teenage sex and drug use tends to become tied up into religion, but to address this situation, let us know what you feel about the content of the show itself. Do you think teenagers would be/are influenced to imitate the actions of the characters/”real people” on MTV programs? Do you think it matters?
What about ALL THE VIOLENCE that is on TV? I did you complain about 24? Lots of killing on that show? What about SONS OF ANARCHY are you worried your kids will join a biker gang? You ca’t have this argument and only draw the line at SKINS. The point you are trying to get across has to be true for ALL shows on TV.
I’ve watched it and don’t see why Prude America hates it. It’s no better or no worse than anything that has been on cable in the last 40 years. Besides, if you don’t like it…change the channel!
“…the pornographer lied sweetly.”
Then next time maybe you should cast some people with some talent and/or some acting expierence if you want to be taken seriously. Your show is unwatchable due to the performances (if you can call them that). Do yourself a favor, pull the plug, recast and reshoot.
Sorry one more thing;
Dear Hollywood Execs,
Since you like to reboot so much here is the perfect show for you to take on. It has some potential and is in desperate need of a makeover.
MTV’s ONLY approach is careless. They have made stars out of people that curse instead of have discussions, screw instead of building relationships, hurt themselves and others for fun and drink themselves into unconsciousness to be the center of attention. MTV’s programming showcases excess, then brings in Dr, Drew every now and then to “make things OK.” I was a teenager. I have teenagers. Teenagers imitate what they see and roll their eyes at the idea of learning a lesson. Those that are immune to the urge to duplicate these grotesque creatures MTV touts as “real people” are the ones that just don’t watch. Don’t get me wrong – MTV is giving people what they want. it’s just something they do not need to see.
Give it a rest Brian. yes the UK show treated the teens with subtlety and respect while they engaged in and/or talked about drugs/sex/death/parents/etc. Unfortunately the US show is more interested in the window dressings of those things, not the whys and hows and consequences. MTV wants to sell merchandise and CDs, so the story and characters went out the window. The US show is shallow and spineless, so please stop comparing it to the UK show. US Skins is an EPIC FAIL on so many levels. And that is the real tragedy.
how can you say this after one show?
Hey MTV – get a frickin’ clue. in the UK, 16 year olds are considered adults. Not so much in the US, so hiring the same age kids here was just showing ignorance. Oh in case you didn’t know, they also drive on the other side of the road than us.
Thanks for displacing Abercrombie and Fitch for the title of creepy images.
Mr. Elsley:
You are truly a fool if you think that people would buy into your long-winded plea.
It is “old fashioned.” Old fashioned bullshit.
This show is basically a poor man’s Gossip Girl meets a horribly cast remake of KIDS. I actually saw both the pilot and tonight’s episode, and while I am not offended in the least, I am put off by the fact that it just plain sucks. Based on what I hear from casting directors and agents in town, Skins isn’t exactly well respected. CDs mock the horrible Canadian casting and agents wouldn’t want their clients on it.
The acting is really disastrous for the US Skins – I mean, the confidence that the US Tony exudes borders on arrogance, if only he didn’t seem so unnatural, because then he only looks like he can’t act.
I love the original UK version of Skins, and most of what Bryan Elsley says above is very true about the UK version. However, Elsley is delusional if he thinks Skins is an “old-fashioned television series” — and if he think’s using a phrase like that is going to get him off the hook for the horrible US remake, he’s severely mistaken.
Bryan wants to keep his checks rolling in, so he proposes a defense. Unfortunately he comes off sounding indifferent and arrogant. Did he expect with this statement that the multitudes of people opposing this show would suddenly say, “Oh, I understand now. Thanks Bryan for illuminating us to the virtue of Skins!”
All Bryan had to do was show some humility, acknowledge the concerns and seek common ground with portraying teens more salacious discoveries and coming of age with his producers on the US show. He could of kept his show and perhaps even elevated it.
I found myself on the fence when this whole thing erupted, but after reading this statement, I have to side with Bryan’s opposition. What’s clear is this guy has an agenda and it’s not making a quality show.
This sentence bothered me: “In the U.K., viewers and commentators very quickly realized that although there are some sensational aspects to the show, Skins is actually a very serious attempt to get to the roots of young people’s lives.” I do grow weary of the seemingly endless well of British arrogance. While traveling Europe, it always struck me as strange that their culture seems to encourage a thin veneer of knowledge on a wide range of subjects, as opposed to greater understanding of a smaller set. It seems to be better to know “just enough” to get by in a social scenario, rather than have deep understanding of fewer areas, and be able to ask real questions or admit a lack of knowledge on a subject. I’ve always appreciated the humble nature of the Socratic method. I also appreciate people who aren’t so all-consumed by their social grooming. Some of the smartest people I’ve ever known can hardly keep a conversation going at a cocktail party, but have changed aspects of our world much more than a great anecdote in some parlor room.
“Consequences and outcomes of behavior and actions come as UNEXPECTED results”. JESUS CHRIST, ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING US? Why not show some 15 year old chugging a bottle of vodka, then when the kid DIES OF ALCOHOL POISONING it can come as a BIG FUCKING SUPRISE to everyone involved. DUH, HOW’D DAT HAPPIN ? I’ve read some real horseshit in here at times, and I do think the spin on this is a little excessive. P.S.- My freinds and I did our fair share of partying when we were younger, and survived it, so I do know what the fuck I’m talking about.
1) The acting and writing are atrocious.
2) The BBC version had a soul, or something like it. The U.S. version is pure MTV, which is to say, plastic. As someone who’s around teenagers every day, I can say this show is one of the most unrealistic portrayals of them I have ever seen.
3) “Old-fashioned” … sure, sweetie. You keep telling yourself that. Maybe your remaining advertiser will believe you.
MTV is the problem here not the original series in the UK (“old fashioned” comment aside).
Leave to MTV to take an original spontaneous show like Skins and COPY it word for word shot for shot – they are totally incapable of thinking for themselves – and then offer it as if they’re cutting edge.
why wouldn’t you develop a homegrown show about the same material but not duplicate (did i mention virtually word for word?) another show.
skins should be taken off the air NOT because it’s porn – but because it’s creatively bankrupt. Creativity at MTV is cloning someone else’s work. it’s a long and sordid history. instead of hiring a young fresh new writer. even sanford and suns didn’t do that!
I think there are things to like and dislike about this US version of the show.
I wasn’t partial at first and I’m still not converted but the second episode at least deviates from the original show giving it some vitality of its own. Yes, the acting is green and anyone who has seen the UK version will probably find the US depiction of the characters jarring. Probably the worst thing about this show is that it had to be made with American actors for anybody in the US to watch it which is a depressing symbol of how sterile and xenophobic America has become.
As to the depiction of teenage sex and drug taking (which yes is going on with your children regardless of this show) at least the UK version always portrayed how those things could derail into full blown catastrophes. And speaking for someone whose best friend finally overcame anorexia and suicidal depression this show definitely helped her talk about her problems and seek counseling.
I’m not saying it’s a perfect fit, that it’s as good as the UK version or that the commercial aspects to the making of this show aren’t depressing but it’s not as totally awful as everyone is making it out to be.
And finally I have to defend Bryan a little bit for his comment that this show is Old-fashioned. If it’s content is modern it’s themes aren’t; Skins is a coming of age story and that’s the oldest one in the book.