The Moody’s rating came out today, generated as part of the process of Summit Entertainment refinancing its credit facilities. “Due to the company’s success over the last four years, Summit expects to substantially improve its credit terms. The company remains fully capitalized and will continue to execute its business plan,” an insider tells me. Based on this process, Summit is also expecting a rating from the S&P most likely later today. Summit intends to use the $800M to repay existing debt, finance production, and pay a distribution to shareholders. My sources say it does not look as if the money will be used towards acquisitions, at least at this point in time. Such an incredible story how this Santa Monica-based upstart independent studio which began in 2007 is now worth so much on the backs of those Twilight Saga movies. But that franchise also affected the Moody’s credit rating as both good/bad news. Here’s why: ”The stable outlook reflects a balance between an expectation of strong cash flow from the Twilight franchise and consequent debt reduction over the next few years, and an increase in risk over time with greater dependence on new film production which is not sequel-based… Nevertheless, we remain cautious about the sustainability of strong credit metrics beyond 2013, given the end of the Twilight franchise, uncertainty about a replacement franchise, and the volatile nature of the company’s business.”
Here’s the Moody’s rating info:
Rating Action: Moody’s Assigns B1 rating to Summit Entertainment, LLC’s CFR and New Bank Debt
Global Credit Research – 19 Jan 2011
Approximately $800 million of debt affectedNew York, January 19, 2011 — Moody’s Investors Service assigned a B1 Corporate Family Rating (CFR), a B2 Probability-of-Default Rating (PDR) and a stable outlook to Summit Entertainment, LLC (“Summit”). Additionally, Moody’s assigned a B1 rating to Summit’s proposed $600 million, 7-year senior secured term loan and $200 million, 5-year senior secured revolving credit facility. Proceeds from the new bank facility will be used to retire all existing indebtedness (not including non-recourse debt), to pay transaction costs, and for working capital needs and general corporate purposes including funding new film production and distribution costs, and a special distribution to its members. This is the first time Moody’s has assigned public ratings to Summit. The ratings are contingent upon final terms of the credit agreement.
Assignments:
Issuer: Summit Entertainment, LLC
Corporate Family Rating — B1
Probability of Default Rating — B2
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility — B1 (LGD 3-37%)
Senior Secured Term Loan B — B1 (LGD 3-37%)
The rating outlook is stable.RATINGS RATIONALE
Summit’s B1 CFR reflects the inherent high risk associated with the film business and the company’s dependence on new film production, recognizing its modest library portfolio size. This is partially mitigated by the success of the Twilight franchise and significant expected near term cash flows from the last two sequels in the series over the next three years. Moody’s anticipates that over the next seven years while the debt is outstanding, Summit will have good credit metrics including moderate debt-to-EBITDA leverage of around 2.75x on average, which is expected to start around 4.5x in 2011 and decline until 2013 through debt reduction resulting from Twilight profits and strong excess cash flow sweep provisions in the credit agreement. Nevertheless, we remain cautious about the sustainability of strong credit metrics beyond 2013, given the end of the Twilight franchise, uncertainty about a replacement franchise and the volatile nature of the company’s business which we believe may well drive leverage again to above 4.0x in 2014 due to declining EBITDA. Moody’s notes that expectation of significant debt pay down through 2013 and minimizing refinance risk is key to the B1 rating.The B2 PDR is a notch lower than the company’s CFR due to the company’s all bank capital structure with financial covenants resulting in a higher probability of default and a higher expected family recovery rate of 65%.
The stable outlook reflects a balance between an expectation of strong cash flow from the Twilight franchise and consequent debt reduction over the next few years, and an increase in risk over time with greater dependence on new film production which is not sequel-based. We are forecasting debt-to-EBITDA leverage (on a cash basis) to be around 4.5x in 2011, declining to under 2.0x by 2013 and ramping up again to over 4.0x in 2014, with average leverage around 2.75x over the term of the loan.
A rating upgrade is unlikely in the near term based on the company’s relatively short history, small portfolio size and low visibility on the revenues in later years which bear higher risk. However, if the company pays down debt at a more rapid pace due to better than expected and consistent performance of new films and total leverage falls and we believe can be sustained at under 2.0x by the end of 2014 along with credit protections remaining in place, upward pressure on the rating could occur.
A rating downgrade could occur if revenue and EBITDA are significantly below expectations and the company is not on the projected pace for debt reduction resulting in total leverage which is materially higher than our initial expectation of under 2.0x by the end of 2013 and a 2.75x average over the next seven years.
The principal methodology used in the instrument rating was Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade Non-Financial Companies in the U.S., Canada and EMEA published in June 2009. Summit’s ratings were assigned by evaluating factors that Moody’s considers relevant to the credit profile of the issuer, such as the company’s (i) business risk and competitive position compared with others within the industry; (iii) capital structure and financial risk; (iii) projected performance over the near to intermediate term; and (iv) management’s track record and tolerance for risk. Moody’s compared these attributes against other issuers both within and outside Summit’s core industry and believes Summit’s ratings are comparable to those of other issuers with similar credit risk.
Summit Entertainment LLC, with its headquarters in Santa Monica, California, is an independent film studio which started in April 2007 and is privately owned by management and a group of financial and strategic investors. The company is engaged in the development, financing, production and distribution of motion picture films for theatrical, home entertainment, television and ancillary markets, and its predecessor was a leading foreign distributor and co-producer of films since 1993. Summit is best known for its production and distribution of the very successful Twilight film franchise.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Hey Erik,
Where’s your first breakout hit outside of a TWILIGHT film?
Who cares what credit rating agencies say? They lost any credibility they ever had in the subprime mortgage debacle. Obama had a prime opportunity to take this crooked industry down, but didn’t.
He’s already done more than any President in the history of the U.S. At least he’s changing laws and holding them more accountable. Other Presidents (Bush, Reagen) have simply “deregulated” and got a pocketful of money in the process.
This is good to hear for Summit as, with the exception of the Twilight films, they have a track record of releasing some pretty decent films.
Hopefully, the take advantage of it and take some creative risks with their better credit status.
Just as long as Summit never touches an animated film again. They totally effed up the promotion for the underrated Astro Boy. My kids can’t stop watching that movie since I bought it for them on DVD, and I think it’s pretty damn good too.
So what’s next after the twilight of Twilight? More mediocre stuff with an award winner no one sees once in a while?
If only Summit had their own Tyler Perry.
I agree they dropped the ball on Astro Boy, which barely squeeked out of post due to cash flow issues. But they didn’t drop that ball as hard as they did on Bandslam.
Wow, what does it take to make some people happy in this business?
An indie company getting rated at all by Moodys and S&P is good news, but a B1 rating and a hopefully successful re-fi is fantastic news for all of us in the indie sector.
As to their track record outside the Twilight franchise, that’s irrelevant at this point. It’s a hits business. That’s how it works. Lots of films, few hits.
Go Summit, says I.
They made their money off of Robert Pattinson’s back, not Twilight. They’ve never made an effort to make those movies into more than a cheap, B movie pile of drivel. They put little money or effort into making them. In fact, they’re an insult to the audience and the fans of the books. They cheapen the love story at the base by playing up a nonexistent love triangle and in turn downplay the importance of Edward in order to make that extraneous triangle more believable.
They’ve made terrible decisions in both the production of the films and in the marketing of them. In my opinion, a company with such little regard for its customers deserves to fail. A simple business credo is to give the customers what they want. They had the chance to do that and they failed.
However, they had one shining light in the entire saga. One chance to turn a profit from the whole thing, and that one chance came in the form of Robert Pattinson who became a breakout star in the first movie. A lot of that was due to the love the public has for the character he plays, but all the goodwill in the world will not help an actor achieve such fame if he does not have that certain star quality needed to back it up. He did and he became a sensation because of it. In return, Summit slogged him out to any media outlet and every promotional event they could find. In effect, burning out both him and the public’s capacity for interest.
Failing that, they turned to the idiocy that became Robsten. Whether they are now or ever have been a couple is irrelevant. What matters is that Summit et al used the idea of a real life Edward and Bella coupling in order to market the film. Again, showing little regard for the fans, who would have been just as happy with a quality, faithful rendition of their beloved series and (much worse) a callousness towards the lead actors whose lives they’ve effectively hijacked.
We’ve seen in the past just how disgusted the public becomes with these Hollywood couples. Interest and curiousity about them quickly turns to disdain and annoyance at their hyper presence in the media. What happens to these people? Their careers become forever tied to that fleeting moment of fame and eventual disgust generated by the coupledom. They are reduced to a joke. A footnote. Their acting skills and screen presence are never the subject of write-ups and reviews. Just the ridiculousness and the circus atmosphere surrounding their supposed relationships.
Summit does not care if the constant marketing of Robsten results in career suicide for these two young people. They care about one thing. Getting people to come see their low-quality, half-considered, poorly produced film series. They care about the buck and that is all. Not the audience and certainly not the actors.
The only movie that came close to capturing the emotion of the Twilight movies was the first one, and that was because of Catherine Hardwicke. Even so, the final product was sorely lacking. Still, she could have produced a better second and third film, given the proper time and money to do it. Summit, however, wouldn’t give her that. They wanted the films churned out like fast food, so they summarily let her go. And the next two movies came out just as bland and tasteless as a fast food hot dog as a result. Again, a poor business decision.