
EXCLUSIVE: After several unsuccessful attempts in the past, the Primetime Emmy Awards categories for outstanding miniseries and outstanding made for TV Movie categories will merge this year. The decision, which had faced resistance from longform producers in the past, has been approved by Academy of Television Arts & Sciences’ Board of Governors, which represents the TV Academy’s 28 peer groups. The combined category will now be expanded from 5 to 6 nominees.
The vote follows 2 years of a best miniseries category featuring only 2 nominees because of lack of enough qualifying projects as the number of minis has steadily declined over the past 6 years. The Pacific and Return to Cranford were nominated last year, Little Dorrit and Generation Kill in 2009. That triggered an Emmy Awards rule that calls for any category lacking the requisite number of entries required for a full complement of five nominees for two successive years to be reviewed by the Board of Governors. At its discretion, the board may delete that category, consolidate it with another category or leave it as is. In this case, the board opted for the second scenario. The decision is certain to please the broadcast networks, which have been pushing for the consolidation of the two long-form categories, long dominated by cable, for awhile. That is important for the TV Academy, which is yet to seal a new “wheel deal” with the broadcast nets for the awards show.
Miniseries and made for television movies will now appear in a single, consolidated program category on the nominating ballot, in sync with the rest of the miniseries and TV movies categories (lead and supporting actor and actress, writing, directing), which also are merged. Additionally, miniseries and TV movies also compete head-to-head at the WGA, DGA and PGA Awards.
In other Emmy rule changes, miniseries will now be entered in the Original Main Title Theme Music category.
Additionally, the cinematography field will be reconfigured to acknowledge the rise of single-camera comedies. Now divided by Cinematography for a Half-Hour Series and Cinematography for a One Hour Series, the categories will be changed to Cinematography for a Multi-Camera Series and Cinematography for a Single-Camera Series.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.
New ‘Man Of Steel’ Television Spot #6


No disrespect but “Cinematography” for a Multi-Camera Series? Um, okay.
mr. really dude,
this is a re- establishment of this award.
so really, dude get your ass outa your fuggin’ head.
He/she did say “No disrespect…”
And I totally agree with him/her. I wonder if the category was reinstated because multi-camera operators were upset that they were (deservedly) being snubbed in favor of single-camera photographers. Or maybe the Academy felt they needed to separate the categories to honor the superior camerawork in multi-camera shows like “Hot in Cleveland” or “Bleep My Dad Says,” LMAO. Categories like this one are why shows like “According to Jim” can call themselves “multiple Emmy nominated series.” Blech.
I don’t understand the desire to honor fewer people rather than more.
The entire point of an award, ANY award in the entertainment business, is to honor excellence and garner publicity for the medium and those associated with it.
How can consolidation, which is basically nothing more than bureaucratic housekeeping, benifit the Academy, the creators or, for that matter, the Emmy Awards show? What??? They want FEWER people on the Red Carpet? Makes no sense.
You may as well merge Best Actor with Best Actress. They’re ALL actors, right? Why be so sexist and separate male roles from female roles?
The EMMYS are not about excellence they are about money.
The current Board of Directors want fewer writers/producers on the show winning from CABLE TV. The Emmy agenda is to honor NETWORKS because the Emmy telecast airs on NETWORK TV. NETWORK TV who pays the multi- million fee to air the Emmys.
The multi-million dollar fee which keeps the Academy in business.
It is NETWORK money that runs the organization. To pay for board meetings at the Four Seasons Hotel, to pay for the open bar and dinner at the Governors meetings.
John Shaffner and his loathsome academy cronies have proven their distaste for CABLE and writers/ producers over and over again.
Then it’s time to bring back the Cable Ace Awards.
Wow, “Emmys are not about excellence”, you are really plugged in — and have no idea what the BOG wants. They DON’T want fewer writer/producers eligible — that is complete dribble, they gave 97% of the “producers” Emmys last year – the difference being managers and network execs who take/steal the credit. You are sadly mistaken and really ignorant to the details.
Claps for this decision. A good third of the Emmys is dedicated to these miniseries and movies, and it can get really monotonous to see one of these miniseries and/or movies take over their segment of the show due to lack of competition.
Who cares if the Emmys are boring to you Dan? These are not the People’s Choice Awards. They are the Emmys. Sorry if you don’t like mini or movie. You can’t cherry pick these awards unless you are part of the douche bag Board of Governors who want to bring down what the Academy used to be about which was rewarding excellence in all areas of TV.
The Academy just doesn’t want HBO to have one more chance at an award.
Next we can merge the drama and comedy categories.
then actors and actresses.
I find lots of awards dull but I don’t want them cut to the show. The Emmys are no longer about excellence but politics.
The Emmy BOG is all about pleasing the networks for money to run their organization and their lavish events. The networks would just assume their actors paraded around the stage with network signs on their heads. No producers, writers, directors allowed. The below the line President of the Academy Johnny Schaffner (who gives his boyfriend the gig to design the show — conflict of interest?) needs to be investigated.
Reducing awards so we can have more commercials is what this is about. And to screw a cable network out of an award.