
While James Franco and Anne Hathaway have been busy pulling it together to host Sunday’s Oscarcast, Franco’s CAA reps and Disney have closed his deal to play the title role in Oz: The Great and Powerful. That puts the film on track to begin production in July, with Franco reuniting with his Spider-Man director Sam Raimi in the prequel to the L. Frank Baum novel that was scripted by Mitchell Kapner and David Lindsay-Abaire. Joe Roth is producing.
There had been much discussion around town lately about Disney’s gyrations in trying to pare the budget of the film down to a mere $200 million, but they must have figured it out if they locked in Franco. For Franco, the multi-tasking marvel’s dance card for 2011 now looks like this: he’ll first star in the Noah Baumbach-directed While We’re Young, and then will shoot Oz. That brings him to the late fall/winter, when he’ll star in Sweet Bird of Youth, the David Cromer-directed revival of the Tennessee Williams play that will be produced by Scott Rudin. Kidman will play Alexandra Del Lago, the aging voracious movie star, while Franco will play her gigolo paramour Chance Wayne. While Franco has starred in eclectic indies and is even a recurring soap opera star, he has event film experience from the Spider-Man films with Raimi, and stars this fall in Fox’s Planet of the Apes prequel Rise of the Apes. Still, this is a big step up commercially and is the biggest deal of the actor’s career so far and a byproduct of his Oscar-nominated performance in 127 Hours. In between all that work, Franco will continue matriculating toward his PhD in creative writing at Yale, planning to attend class each day and then commute to NYC for his nightly stage turns.
Oz is a major piece of business for Disney, and joins the parade of revisionist fairy tales and classic kid stories that started with Disney’s billion dollar grossing Alice in Wonderland, and continues with CBS Films’ Beastly with Alex Pettyfer and Vanessa Hudgens and the Catherine Hardwicke-directed Amanda Seyfried-starrer Red Riding Hood from Warner Bros. Also gearing up for production starts are rival Snow White pictures The Brothers Grimm: Snow White from Relativity Media that has Julia Roberts starring, and Snow White and the Huntsman from Universal Pictures, with Kristen Stewart, Viggo Mortensen and Charlize Theron starring. Nicholas Hoult was just set for the Bryan Singer-directed Jack the Giant Killer at New Line and Paramount/MGM just set Peter Stormare to join Gemma Arterton, Jeremy Renner and Famke Janssen in Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters.
Franco is also repped by James/Levy Management.


Does this mean Viggo is no longer a part of “Snow White and the Huntsman?”
Are you sure Michael Fassbender will be in Snow White and the Huntsman? I thought it was Viggo…
Viggo’s playing Snow White and the Huntsman.
Here’s my .02, which is worth way less, about the same as anyone else’s…
Disney is banking on the masses’ love of The Wizard of Oz here, to get people into the seats. Of course they are also banking on Raimi and Franco, too. But what happens when a studio finally sees that some titles are so beloved that a microwaved rehash is met with the masses’ scorn?
Many people are going to pass on this out of principle, as they would a remake of The Godfather. Now this is not a straight remake, of course, but OZ in the title will be close enough for many to get a knee-jerk bad feeling. A Scooby-Doo movie is one thing, but the Judy Garland film is so beloved that it’s possible people will turn against anything reeking of a bastardization of it.
Now to Franco. Unless he does a vanishing act until this movie comes out, which does not seem to be happening, he will not draw. Why pay to see him in a movie when he’s already everywhere and we know so, so, so much about this pretentious douche?
So spend 200 mill on the movie and another boatload of cash on marketing and cross your fingers, Disney. Or you can just leave all things OZ alone and make something fresh. It will sure be fun to see the risk-averse, fear-based reliance on pre-branded titles backfire in epic fashion here. At least that’s what I’m hoping for.
James Franco is not a pretentious douche. You would have to be a pretentious douche to make such a comment.
I’m hoping Raimi makes an epic, textured film that captures some of the wit and cheeky world-building of the Oz BOOKS, which are brilliant in their own right, and deserve adaptation outside of the classic film.
Franco seems busy, creative, unstoppable, geniune and engaged in many different forms of art. What’s wrong with that?
Dude, Next Big Thing, why such hate for Franco? Went to High School with the guy and he has been working his ass off for the last 15+ years, one of the nicest guys you could hope to meet. Deserves every ounce of success he is currently enjoying.
Love for the Garland classic hasn’t stopped WICKED from becoming a huge hit.
Hate to backtalk on backtalk, but to The Next Big Thing: In what world is James Franco a pretentious douche? He seems nothing but sincere and humble in every interview and he’s following his bliss in every endeavor he takes on, including earnestly working on another huge college degree despite his success. Seems like a driven, honestly good guy to me.
The Next Big Thing is just jealous of Franco because he spends most of his time in furious masturbation benders in his parents’ basement. If he wasn’t so illiterate he’d know the Oz story has many incarnations not just the Judy Garland musical.
Franco is the Johnny Depp of our generation. The guy is the man.
Actually, Dana, I’m repped by one of the big three-letter agencies and do quite well. It seems to be the go-to retort here, to simply write-off any criticism as coming from someone in their parents’ basement. So I’m sorry to inform you that does not apply here.
Your citing of the other OZ books has nothing to do with my point. Once again you come on hard but miss. The point is that the one OZ movie has become such a beloved classic that anything similar may turn the masses off; some may feel it is a bastardization of a classic– regardless of whether or not other books do exist. To many, the OZ film and its world should be left alone. I am not one of them, but the risk is being taken with many who hold certain classics as sacrosanct.
As to the Franco hate, I’m entitled to my opinion: I prefer actors who let their work speak for itself. I don’t care for how the guy does so many interviews, overexposing himself, and trumpets his academic pursuits– when they are not unique. Yale and Columbia have thousands of students. I was once one of them myself and don’t need to have publicists tell everyone that. I think teaching a class about your own work comes off to some as douchey, as another poster said.
The guy can work hard and that work may be deserving of success, and yet he can still come off to some as a pretentious douche. There is too much in the ether about his work and zany, bold career choices. We get that; we don’t need to be told how zany and bold they are. Just let them speak for themselves.
“It seems to be the go-to retort here, to simply write-off any criticism as coming from someone in their parents’ basement.” — you do have point there, it has become cliche. I just love using “furious masturbation and bender” together.
You’re entitled to your opinion… but I don’t have an allegiance to the Judy Garland film, I know its a classic but the world of Oz is more exciting to me than that film and Raimi? Come on, there’s no one cooler in my opinion that could re-imagine that world.
I’m just a big Franco fan and it has nothing to do with his “Tiger Beat” looks.
Had the privilege of seeing not one but 3 short films directed by James franco at the PS Short Film Fest. last year. Each film was unique, bold, gripping in their own way- the short about a serial killer starring Michael Shannon (title- Herbert White) was maybe the best portrayal and most chilling look at a real serial killer I’ve ever seen- all in a tight 15 min. short- check it out, I think you’ll be impressed. When we have jerks like Charlie Sheen or Lohan sucking up all the spotlight, it’s refreshing to see a young actor striving to learn and grow as an artist, and not getting more famous for who he’s screwing or what drugs he’s hooked on. I promise if you had a chance to meet the guy face to face, you wouldn’t have the balls to tell him he’s a pretentious douche. How do I know this? B/c you don’t have the balls to put your name to your comments/opinions. So, if you prefer actors who let their work speak for themselves, then A- get more familiar with them and their work and B- let us know what your work is so we can judge you on YOUR work.
“Actually, Dana, I’m repped by one of the big three-letter agencies and do quite well.”
I’m sorry, but who is the pretentious douche in the equation?
Enjoy your time at that “big three-letter agency” pal. You’ll be schleping it at APA soon enough.
So ‘Get A Life,’
What’s that girl/guy to do, let someone rip them as being in their parents’ basement and not respond when they can? Maybe you’re the type to get dumped on and just take it, but I think that poster was fine to say what they said. It was short and responded to an insult.
Franco is “The Guy” no doubt of it. If your publicist wasnt talking about you in college was because noone cares.
Johnny Depp– what? Franco hasn’t shown close to enough to be uttered in the same breath as Depp.
You can make goo goo eyes at his Tiger Beat poster all you want, but come on. Too soon.
My thoughts on all of this. The prequel script is actually really good. They manage to shift the focus, nod to the original without seeming like a rip-off, and finding the heart of a con man who finds his place in life. I didn’t want to like it, but I did.
I think “hey next big thing” misunderstands the use of “pretentious douche” here. He’s teaching a class on the roles he’s played. That is pretty douchey. And not seeming pretentious…is kind of the point of pretense.
Back to Oz, this isn’t a role for Franco, point-blank. It’s a quick-talking shyster of the 1940s – Downey would’ve knocked it out of the park, Depp can do…just about anything. But Franco, unless he’s an out-and-out better actor than I have reason to believe, will be the weak point in this movie.
lol. how many snow white movies are coming out in 2012? does the world need one that bad?
James Franco and Steve Carrel now attached to everything
Steve Carrell in “Die Hard 5″. This time, it’s not serious…..
Hmmm.. Is the wizard SUPPOSED to look like a 27-year-old?
It’s a prequel…
Disney bought the film rights to most of the “Oz” books, in the 40s, right after MGM’s film in 39. Besides a TV special in the 50s(I think Shirley Temple hosted it), there was “Return to O,” of course.
Perhaps it would have been faster to list the movies he WONT be in next year, hehe.
I thought Kristen Stewart and Charlize Theron hadn’t confirmed yet for the SW and the Huntsman. With Viggo, that’d be the ticket for me.
The last time Disney touched OZ, it turned to crap! Return to Oz, was a Gothic Movie. Dark, violent for little kids. It was the Temple of Doom of Kids films! It should of had a pg-13 rating!
I love Sam Rami, he’s a great cult-film director. I love the movies he’s made with Bruce Campbell. Spider-Man was an ok franchise. But I fear that OZ will be made like Alice n’ Wonderland. Mostly an empty movie, with a lame story line.
James Jurez DiFranco… aka Harrie in Spider-Man, 1, 2, and 3. He was ok in Freaks n’ Geeks. But the Wizard O’ Oz is hard to live up to! The best OZ film that’s non OZ. Is ZardoZ, with Sean Connery. It’s a weird storty about imortality, death. It’s deep at sometimes like Logan’s Run, other times it’s a skin flick. Sean Connery wears clothig like Borat going swiming… and has a pony tale! So thats the best, non-OZ Oz-film I know….
ZardoZ 1974…
I am starting to hate Disney’s guts for the choices they are making. Did they not want to pay Robert Downey jr. enough? Was his image not “Disney” enough? And what has happened to the Miley Cyrus vehicle, Wings? Is she now not “Disney” enough. Screw these people.
I’m surprised at how much people have an opinion about this one. We know SO little!
Here’s what we do know:
-Sam Raimi: GOOD
-James Franco: GOOD
-Mitchell Kapner: BAD
-David Lindsay-Abaire: ehh… MIXED
-Joe Roth: BAD
-Source Material: GOOD
it’s a toss up as of now.
above, chris says the script is good, even thought he didn’t want to like it. those are his 2 cents.
…rumors of Mila Kunis: VERY VERY GOOD. we’ll just have to wait and see