
Apparently she wasn’t content to let the Paramount and Relativity marketing machine do all the campaign work. So Best Supporting Actress frontrunner Melissa Leo personally paid for Hollywood trade ads (including on Deadline.com) Thursday showing her super glammed-up wearing “Faux (not real) Fur” and a glittery evening gown. The text simply said “Consider” and then below that, “Melissa Leo”, and in very tiny fine print off to the side the web address www.melissaleo.com, a photo credit, and a faux fur credit. There is no reference to her movie, The Fighter, or her critically acclaimed and gritty real-life character, Alice Ward. Perhaps the point was to show a completely different side of the actress from the blue collar mother and fight manager she portrays in the film, a Supporting Actress role that has already won her the Critics Choice award, a Golden Globe, and a SAG award. It’s a trophy haul that has put her in lead position to take the Oscar.
So why go rogue now? I spoke to Leo today moments after she arrived in New Orleans to resume her role in HBO’s Treme. She explained the ads followed months of her frustration at not being able to land magazine covers, even with all the awards and attention for The Fighter. Leo is 50 years old and she attributes the media’s lack of interest to ageism and because of that and other factors she’s not considered “box office”. “I took matters into my own hands. I knew what I was doing and told my representation how earnest I was about this idea. I had never heard of any actor taking out an ad as themselves and I wanted to give it a shot,” Melissa told me. So she and three friends arranged a special “fun” photo shoot instead of using the usual studio-prepared photo from the film for “For Your Consideration” ads.
“I am quite certain I have not overstepped any boundaries of the Academy,” Leo told me. “I did hear a lot of very positive comments, particularly from women of a certain age who happen to act for a living and happen to understand full well the great dilemma and mystery of getting a cover of a magazine. I also heard there were negative comments, but no one said them to my face, sadly. I like to hear what people think. I could explain myself.” She noted that the night before she had been guest of honor at a party celebrating her nomination and thrown by Robert Duvall, James Brolin, James Gandofini, and Demi Moore. “All I ask of Hollywood is they consider Melissa Leo. If you want to hire me, give me a shout,’ Leo added.
Leo’s ads were limited to this week as ballots went out and “are now Kleenex” as she says. It will be interesting to see if they have made any impact at all on a race that, at this point, appears to be hers to lose. A studio source tells me Paramount and Relativity were completely unaware of the ad until seeing it print themselves. Paramount plans no individual ads for any of their Supporting Actress nominees, a list that also includes Leo’s co-star Amy Adams and True Grit’s Hailee Steinfeld. But there are two new 30-second TV spots highlighting Melissa Leo and Christian Bale because both have swept early precursor awards. How Leo’s personal ad will play is a bigger question as it’s rare to see actors these days, particularly frontrunners, go this route.
Oscar consultants have long thought that personal campaigns can send the wrong message or come off as overkill. Some frontrunners have proven you don’t even have to campaign at all to win. Last year Mo’Nique was criticized by some bloggers for staying in Atlanta and doing her new talk show and refusing to “play the Oscar game”. Yet she won handily that year just by letting her performance speak for itself.
On the other hand, Candy Clark paid for a steady series of quarter page ads for her role in 1973’s American Graffiti. As the only cast member to launch a campaign, it paid off with a Best Supporting Actress nomination for the then-little known actress. Similarly, in 1987 Sally Kirkland paid for a series of ads cramming critics quotes into an Oscar ad campaign for her small indie, Anna – and that resulted in a Golden Globe win and an Academy Award nomination for her for Best Actress, a real feat considering the low profile of the film and no budget to campaign it.
Throughout Oscar history, though, there have been some prime and in some cases notorious personal ad campaigns which have backfired after being launched by Oscar-hungry nominees or the reps behind them. The most infamous was the tasteless Supporting Actor campaign which Chill Wills ran for his role in The Alamo (1960). His ad featured a photo of the entire Alamo cast and read: “We of the Alamo cast are praying harder – than the real Texans prayed for their lives in the Alamo – for Chill Wills to win the Oscar as the Best Supporting Actor – Cousin Chill’s acting was great”. It was signed “Your Alamo Cousins”. It caused star/director John Wayne to publicly take out his own ad renouncing Wills, saying in part, “I refrain from using stronger language because I am sure his intentions were not as bad as his taste”. Groucho Marx also took out a small ad that said he was happy to be “Chill Wills’ Cousin, but I voted for Sal Mineo”. Wills later blamed his publicist. He lost to Peter Ustinov in Spartacus.
And many think Diana Ross could have won the Best Actress Oscar in 1972 for Lady Sings The Blues were it not for the daily barrage of big gaudy ads paid for by producer and mentor Berry Gordy. They were generally seen as way too much and in-your-face. She lost to Liza Minnelli for Cabaret.
In 1985, The Color Purple Supporting Actress Margaret Avery ran an ad that read: “Dear God, My name is Margaret Avery. I knows dat I been blessed by Alice Walker, Steven Spielberg, and Quincy Jones who gave me the part of ‘Shug’ Avery in The Color Purple. Now I is up for one of the nominations fo’ Best Supporting Actress alongst with some fine, talented ladies that I is proud to be in the company of. Well God, I guess the time has come fo’the Academy voters to decide whether I is one of the Best Supporting Actresses this year or not! Either way, Thank You, Lord for the opportunity. – Your little daughter, Margaret Avery.” Avery was roundly criticized for the ad which was written in a dialect not even used by character in the film. She lost to Anjelica Huston for Prizzi’s Honor.
Awards Columnist Pete Hammond - tip him here.


So she wants to win and cares about her work? When is that a crime? I say good for her! Can’t wait to hear her Oscar speech!
Melissa Leo is overrated. Amy Adams should win the Oscar if only to right a huge wrong.
Wrong.
Amy Adams is overrated. Melissa Leo should win the Oscar if only to right a huge wrong.
The ad is simple and classic. Melissa Leo should win the Oscar as her performance in The Fighter was outstanding. Should she lose, it won’t be because of her age as other performances are also worthy.
As a voting member, I do not like the ‘marketing’ of the awards. Voters have a responsibility to see the films and vote accordingly as they see fit.
It would be naive to think that all the various marketing efforts do not impact voters, but I wish this were not so.
I liked her performance, but this seems naff to me – whatever her age.
If she really wanted the Academy to make a statement about ageism then she’d ask them to vote for Jacki Weaver who’s about 13 years older than her. And in a smaller movie, too. Now that would really be sending a message of “you don’t have to be young and in a big Hollywood movie”, wouldn’t it?
why in the world would you pay your own money to support someone else that is in the same category as you — that is pure insanity.
Ageism works both ways. Just ask Annette Benning who keeps losing to pretty young “it girls”. I deplore Oscar campaigns of all kinds, they just rub me the wrong way. The work should be what is rewarded, not how many magazine covers and interviews you give.
This is what gets me….What is the award given for? Last years performance or five years ago’s performance? Or, getting screwed out of an award ten years ago? Bless her heart, but Benning loses because either her material isn’t good enough or she just gets out performed. Or a youngster comes along that gives a better performance than her. Such is life. Giving it to someone who doesn’t deserve it, for whatever reason, is akin to giving trophies to every kid on every team so they don’t feel bad. Maybe she needs to better choose her material, or turn her performance up a notch….or maybe she just doesn’t have what it takes to win an oscar. This “ageism” crap is just ridiculous.
As for Leo’s ad, some people will see it in a bad light, some won’t. What will the ones that matter think of it? Not very much, I believe. It is extremely narcissistic, pretentious, and totally in bad taste. This wasn’t needed, and I think she may just regret being so “in your face”. She wouldn’t want me to be the deciding vote. Will any of the voting members feel the same?
So tacky. I find her more and more annoying every time she’s interviewed. What happened to getting rewarded for you work — she’s practically a shoe-in anyway. For comparison: (although there was drama here by the actress to get paid for promotion admittedly) she should take a page from Mo’Nique who didn’t go around self publicizing the fact that she’s not as skinny as all the other actress. She was amazing in the role. Period. Can’t this just be about performance and not spun as ageism or some slant on beauty. Academy members do like humble after all… annoying and dumb move.
I agree with you she should sit back and let her work speak for itself, but Monique isn’t a good example. The fact is, Monique was constantly criticized and vilified in the media for not campaigning and not taking the Oscar race seriously enough. She was lambasted as rude and full of herself simply because she wouldn’t play the game.
You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t, it seems.
Maybe Hollywood needs to notice that everything touched by Betty White in the last year has gotten a nice viewer bump.
Holy shit! SHHHHHHEEEEEEEE can pay for her own ads to promote herself…. BUT CHRIS SPALDING, THE BURIED SCREENWRITER CAN’T SHOOT OUT FUCKING EMAILS ON HIS WORK????
This is sooo fucking hypocritical. I love ML and her work in the fighter, but what is the difference between her doing this and what Chris Spalding did? ML is great, and a really her own woman in this mad biz, but she should be subject to the same rules as her less fortunate colleagues.
I have loved Melissa Leo ever since “Hollywood: Life on the Street”. She was a standout among a great cast.
It’s great that she is getting some long overdue recognition. More power to her. Women have to take the bull by the horns.
Excuse me but that was “Homicide:Life on the streets” …I know Hollywood can be a tough town, but I don’t think Barry Levenson did a series about it’s mean streets! And, yes, she was great In it.
@ lola: It’s “Homicide: Life on the Street”, not ‘Homocide’.
She explained her motives and put herself out there. I’ve seen worse. She was really great in the role and should win.
Good performance – but a complete egotistical nutcase.
Absolutely! Bad, bad, bad!
I’ll agree regarding the selected picture. Her pose is worth a head scratch. Consider what, Ms. Leo? Your effort to look sexy and bear some cleavage? I agree with the fact that ageism plays a part in the industry but, at the same time, Awards are often a result of politics and popularity. If AMPAS was truly ageist to the core I doubt Ms. Leo (or Ms. Weaver) would have been nominated in the first place. On top of that, I’m perplexed as to why/how she’s upset/frustrated with how Paramount’s handled the awards season process. In the last three weeks alone she’s won the Globe and the SAG. Damn you Paramount for not making those victories more of a landslide! Odd. Ageism or not the behavior and justification of her actions indicates an age far younger than her 50 years old suggests.
This is crazy! Melissa Leo is a lock to win the Oscar!! Talk about throwing good money away, she should have saved the 5k that ad cost and used it on botox or a facelift next year when she has no movie in the race. I’m tired of hearing actresses complain Abt ageism. Sorry, you knew when you got into this racket that you have a much shorter shelf life then your male counterpart, but that didn’t stop you. If she’s lucky she’ll be Betty White in 35 yrs, or Gloria Stuart, well maybe not her since she’s dead. Enjoy it Melissa, this ride won’t last forever.
I looked up the word “rogue” in an old American Heritage dictionary I have. It’s from the Latin rogare, meaning to ask or beg. It means an unprincipled person. A scoundrel or rascal. A wandering beggar, vagrant or vagabond. An organism that shows an undesirable deviation from a standard. A vicious or solitary animal, like an elephant that has separated itself from the herd.
Just thought I’d mention it.
You shouldn’t have bothered. This is a completely inane, idiotic post.
To all the naysayers out there that have been dissing on me, here is damning proofing that there is discrimination against minorities. Whether it be race, age, religion, or sex, it is out there in both TV and film. Until someone has the balls to shove the crap in the faces of the perpetrator, then it’ll just get swept under the rug. WAY TO GO, MELISSA!!!
Very tacky- her performance is great (her on screen with Amy Adams is like when Amy Adams was on screen with Meryl Streep- it feels like acting class…) and the reward is she is no known so much more than she was previously- to do this feels like there will then be an asterik next to her as the woman who took tacky ads, rather than the woman, who at 50, came out on top
Oh please. Amy Adams is a fantastic actress on her third nomination. She doesn’t need lessons from Leo. And btw, Adams didn’t have a single scene with Streep in Julie and Julia so I’m not sure how you considered it some kind of masterclass of acting.
Haha. I’m sure the Streep/Adams pairing referenced was their work together in Doubt. Where they had plenty of scenes together…
I love melissa leo but when are they gonna give it to amy adams???? They go toe to toe in this movie and give equally great perfomances. Amy adams should get it — she has deserved it so many times.
Melissa-remember you since All My Children. Was thinking last week about the Cinderella story you are, having been out there for 30 years plugging away b/f this excitement. You are an inspiration to actresses that there is a career in film after 35, the age where most start to get bitter ( even those that have huge tv careers but remain unsatisfied b/c they are still reaching for the brass ring in features)
THAT SAID…COVERS are a different world. They are about ad revenue. That is not ageism, it is fact. 50 year old women are not covers. They don’t move magazines (unless you are Streep or Oprah) I am not even sure what covers you want? VOGUE? MARIE CLAIRE? You could perhaps gotten PEOPLE if you won with the Cinderella angle. However, now you have screwed yourself by not letting your long career be your story. You have let your fight against “ageism” become your story. You now come off as greedy. Your “team” should have tied you down and not let you embarrass yourself with the Gloria Swanson photos (yes, you look scary and cheap). Either you should fire them for not keeping you from yourself, or they should fire you because you don’t listen ( I suspect the latter, while no fan of Jason Weinberg, I can’t believe he would approve those tacky, poorly lit photos) . The only one who will benefit from this is Patty Clarkson as no one is going to want you at a junket in the future. Such a shame that the role of a lifetime isn’t enough. Shame on you for your greed. It likely cost you the Oscar. I know I am no longer rooting for you b/c you made it about yourself, not the art.
Melissa has Always been about the Art. That is a given and ingrained in her. She has always said so.
Magazine covers are complex politics. They are also often bought by a studio deal with the magazine as part of a promotion for a new film coming out.
why is she bending over in the first pic?
THis is just the best! As a longtime Producer-the boys club is still very much alive. Good for her-it will benefit her -just you see!
Worked with her. Narcissistic whack job.
Horrible decision. She looks nothing like she does in her onscreen roles. How does she expect voters unfamiliar with her to identify her with her nominated performance?
Oh PLEASE. Goes “rogue”? That’s total bullsh*t. Variety and THR have sales reps assigned to hit up the machines behind every potential nominee in the Awards Race. They court publicists, agents, managers and the talent themselves. They even have their own MUCH cheaper rate card. This is so common practice for both Oscar and Emmy is ridiculous. And Pete, you should know better.
A lot of the FYC ads you see are actually paid for by the talent themselves. The only difference in this one, is that she didn’t try to hide that she was doing it herself. While it is a little more rampant with Emmy campaigns (NPH, Kathy Griffin, every Guest Star partial you see), you’d be surprised at just how A-List the personal shilling gets. Or maybe you wouldn’t actually.
It’s about doing good work, not awards, ML.