The Deadline Team of Nikki Finke, Pete Hammond, and Mike Fleming have spent recent days interviewing the studio moguls to gauge their perspective on this very close Oscar race:
WALT DISNEY STUDIOS
12 Nominations: 5 Toy Story 3, 3 Alice In Wonderland, 1 Tron: Legacy 3D, 1 The Tempest, 1 Tangled, 1 Day & Night
DEADLINE’s Nikki Finke: You’ve never done an Oscar campaign before. These weren’t even your movies. What was the biggest challenge you were facing?
RICH ROSS: For me to be able to support films that I didn’t greenlight was putting me in the brain of a marketer. I certainly knew I was lucky that I saw Alice In Wonderland before it was complete, and I saw Toy Story 3 way before it was complete. I think what made it very easy for me, in all honesty, was working with Tim Burton on Alice or working with John Lassiter — people who pour their heart and soul into these movies. And seeing how these movies both performed and were talked about and heralded is no less thrilling because I didn’t greenlight them. I see the faces of the people who win and you know they are thrilled. And that makes me happy. I would say that the most challenging situation was coming in and coming up with a strategy of support. At the same time you don’t have relationships which people have had for 20, 30, 40 years with the different organizations who determine the outcome of those races — people in the Directors Guild or people in the Producers Guild or the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, or the National Board of Review. These are many, many organizations aside from the critics who are giving out kudos.
DEADLINE: But you had Oscar consultants.
ROSS: We already had Tony Angelotti on the animation side, and we had Kira Feola on the live action side. They’ve split up the responsibilities. And the late Ronni Chasen was working on Alice In Wonderland, too, because she had worked with the Zanucks for a very long time. So Dick had asked me if it was possible to bring in Ronni to help support the film, and of course to support the filmmaker we said sure.
DEADLINE: It must have been such a blow for everyone at Disney when she died.
ROSS: Well, it was beyond shocking because I saw her the night before and she was very much in the heat of the moment because she was very close with the Zanucks and so when it happened it was very tough.
DEADLINE: You’ve done plenty of Emmy campaigns. What is the difference do you think now?
ROSS: The Emmy campaign is so much more targeted because you’re really going for one group of people who are voting on that series of awards. The Oscar campaign difference is the diversity of the groups. You have to thread the needle. You are going from literally that first National Board of Review list through every critics group that are in Iowa and St. Louis to all the Guild groups til you get to the Oscar nomination and an Oscar win.
DEADLINE: Let’s talk about Alice in Wonderland first. It didn’t get a Best Picture nomination.
ROSS: My feeling on Alice was I knew going into it we had a proverbial issue of timing. Obviously, it made a billion dollars. But that doesn’t help you. It opened in March. So it was about getting people to remember what they saw. Aside from the problem of when they do see it, the No. 2 challenge is commercialism which seems to come up every year. Last year the ultimate was with Avatar vs The Hurt Locker where people felt Avatar already had its success because the box office was there. It’s not that it doesn’t get attention but it’s definitely a challenge in terms of people’s interpretation of the Awards season. And one of the curious things for me was Mia Wasikowska who was doing her first film and held together a $150 million plus film that made a billion dollars. And when people are talking about breakout stars, I would stand around talking about her, and they are like, ‘Really?’ Now she’s getting huge movies and I believe she will be a huge star. But to me that was the most curious.
DEADLINE: And then Tim Burton has been pretty much ignored by Oscar voters.
ROSS: I think he’s clearly at the top of his game. This was a giant year for him and I assume he wanted to be appreciated. I do believe that day will come before it has to be an honorary Oscar. And I don’t believe it will be a small movie, Nikki. I do believe it will be some substantial commercial film where people will say, ‘It’s about time.’
DEADLINE: He’s so much about the visual feast and Oscar requires a message or heart.
ROSS: And personal. You always get a sense of the more personal a story, the more promising it is in the Oscar derby. That’s why small movies have that opportunity like The King’s Speech and Black Swan, but even the personal stories like even True Grit are more chamber pieces that allow the actors to not be overwhelmed by their surroundings.
DEADLINE: Do you think Oscar discriminates against 3D and did so for Alice In Wonderland or for Toy Story 3? If people cannot see the screeners in 3D, it is inherently unfair…
ROSS: Yes, I think knowing the mechanism by which most people see a 3D movie is definitely not in its favor. And I’m not sure going forward whether any of us have a solution to that. I think there’s no doubt that a movie like Avatar and certainly ‘Alice’ and some of the other finer features are hurt. And when they see 3D work in 2D, it doesn’t help our cause any because then they say, ‘Oh well it’s fine.’ So I think it’s a challenge. I don’t know how we are going to meet it. It probably will mean a more aggressive screening program in the most convenient way possible to get people into a movie. Even a technical film like Inception – not seeing it on a big screen you can’t appreciate it. But The Social Network can be embraced and understood in whatever medium you’re showing it in.
DEADLINE: Let’s talk about Toy Story 3. You and Jeffrey Katzenberg went for not just the animation nomination but also Best Picture. You got it, he didn’t. That must have felt good.
ROSS: The feeling that I had then and certainly the feeling I have now is people are judging movies as movies. We don’t have the greatest western or the greatest action movie. Animation is just a way the story telling is done, not anything different. If it’s not the year we win, at least it opens a conversation. Everywhere I go people say, ‘You know what? Toy Story 3 was my favorite movie.’ It’s been a certainly interesting journey for me to watch, I guess. You know The Social Network has gone up and down, and The King’s Speech has gone up and down. But I know people are saying, ‘Well, I’m not sure why any of these others are presumptive favorites.’
DEADLINE: Should major studios be in the business of making Oscar movies? Or do they owe it to their shareholders to make movies that make a lot of money? Are the two mutually exclusive.
ROSS:I think obviously the goal that we all have is to make high quality movies. I think the days when your commercial films were lower quality have gone because the consumer is aggressive with the choices they have. So that’s why I guess when I look at this year and I see big studio films are actually being recognized, then I do believe it’s part of our job is to win Oscars. I think consumers are voting that way, and I think the Academy hopefully will vote that way, too.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.






My biggest question for Ross would’ve been about the near total shut-out of TRON LEGACY, which arguably should’ve been nominated for Score, VFX, Costume Design and/or Art Direction, but only got a single nod (Sound Editing).
(Also curious when/if they’re moving forward on a sequel, given it’ll hit $170 million domestic this week, and has done $212 million overseas.)
Rich is a PR machine but his “high quality movie” remark is the truth, but Disney hasn’t made a quality live action hit in YEARS. AND Tron wasn’t a break out live action studio hit by any means. Didn’t it cost like $400 million to make and market when all is said and done? I would have asked Rich why does Disney always have to go to outside producers (e.g., the likes of a Bruckheimer) to source and try to make a live action hit or dip back into the sequel well (Pirates). There’s tons of in fighting between Pixar and Disney on the animation side. Pixar is a cash cow and knows how to create great stories. Why can’t Disney’s live action group create amazing stories internally? Pixar’s success and boasting how awesome Toy Story is still doesn’t solve the root problem at Disney. It’s a silo’d muddled mess of a system with insecure execs who don’t know how to cultivate great writers, stories and producers. Also, is Sean Bailey trying to turn their live action group into a Sci Fi mess or are they really trying to just create awesome content? I think Rich wants a break out live action hit, but they way they run their business and all the in fighting will be his down fall
There is no in-fighting between Pixar and Disney Animation. Please provide facts before starting baseless rumors.
Tron was awful. That said, the art direction and vfx were lazy. The score was nothing special, but then again, it didn’t have much to support. Maybe if they do make a sequel, they’ll hire both a writer and director who know what they’re doing.
I know it doesn’t stand a chance in hell, but I really do hope Toy Story 3 wins Best Picture. It’s the best reviewed, highest grousing and (as far as I’m concerned) best film of the year.
Why on earth would Alice in Wonderland and the phrase Best Picture Nomination be uttered in the same sentence? In spite of it’s box office success it was a dreary, incomprehensible bore with terrible performances!
Agree totally. My wife and I like Tim Burton and like big spectacle movies. But Alice was not good in any comprehensive sense.
Totally agree, and if Ross and Disney did not waste so much money trying to get Alice nominated when it was not even close to being a best picture contender …maybe, a few less heads would be rolling at Disney as we speak?
A billion dollar global box office for a mediocre film should have been reward enough…but, Ross dreamed of more and wasted resources chasing this foolish ego driven idea.
And, I too, like Tim Burton…but, do you really think even Tim thought of Alice as a best picture nominee…doubtful.
just wait until next year he’s going to spend another fortune to get prom nominated for best picture the movie was his idea and he’s determined to see it achieve oscar glory and if that means more people have to be laid off then that’s the price of success
The big question really should have been, “Rich, you’ve been on the job for over eighteen months and in that span of time, you’ve somehow managed to greenlight only one (1) motion picture. Therefore, how is it that you can still sport that ear-to-ear, overbearing grin? “
I really like Alice. Since it made a billion dollars, it looks like a few other people did, also. Bloggers love to hate on Tim Burton…it’s their second career.
And “N.C.I.S.” is the highest rated scripted show on T.V. and “Just Go For It” came in #1 at the B.O. this past weekend. Since when is success a barometer for quality? If that were the case then “Ed Wood” would be Mr. Burton’s highest grosser. I’m glad you liked “Alice”, wish I had too, I like liking movies actually. Also I’m not hating on Tim Burton, I think he is an excellent production designer, it’s his storytelling skills I question. He is only as good as his script, and it has been some time now that he’s had a particularly good one of those. I was a real early on Tim Burton fan, ever since he screened his then brand new short film “Vincent” for a class I was in at USC in the 80′s. However, it’s been a very long time since he has made a film that was not almost impossible to sit through. I remain ever hopeful.
Rich Ross was great at Disney TV , and Hanna Montana being his best accomplishment. but to put him on the top was like saying Bob Iger had a lack of option.
No Oscar-nom for Danny Elfman’s ALICE score. How did this happen? Disney should have submitted his original song “Alice’s Theme”AFTER they swapped it back into the film instead of the forgettable Avril Lavigne tune.
In all its years, The Disney Company has never been a Best Pic Winner–clearly that is NOT their area of interest-money is. Any company that would drag Alice around as a Best Pic nominee, clearly has no interest in truly winning…
Since The Walt Disney Co. acquired Miramax in 1993 it has won 4 Best Picture Oscars for The English Patient, Shakespeare in Love, Chicago, and No Country for Old Men.
Rich needs to be fired or demoted–the lack of production out of Disney is embarassing and Wall Street still seems oblivious to the matter. Also they have owned Marvel for a year and a half and it seems like nothing has happened to increase that division’s feature film output.
The fact that Disney is running a distant 3d in the Snow White sweepstakes is perhaps the most disastrous single symptom of the Ross/Baily regime.
“The fact that Disney is running a distant 3d in the Snow White sweepstakes…”
Disney hired the screenwriter of Toy Story 3 and Little Miss Sunshine to write a re-imagining of the classic story.
The other studios hired Brett Ratner to produce and Kristen Stewart to star.
I’m not seeing how Disney is in the negative position here.
In the past 20 years Pixar has been the most innovative, high-quality and entertaining studio in all of Hollywoodland. Any of their films could and should have been nominated for “Best Picture” in the past, so this year “Toy Story 3″ should win.
But it’s not dark and profane, so the odds aren’t good.
I never realized it, but with that smile, he sort of looks like Mickey Mouse.
It’s lovely that they hired a blue chip writer but they’re going to be beat into cinemas by many MONTHS. And KStew has a much bigger following than Michael Arndt.
Deep Impact came out before Armageddon and Antz came out before A Bug’s Life. what’s your point?
Twilight has the following, not Kristen Stewart. The Runaways and Welcome to the Rileys weren’t hits.
Besides, we don’t know who will be in Disney’s Snow and the Seven. It might have the biggest stars.
Couldn’t you find a better picture of the guy?
Just sayin….
Toy Story 3 isn’t “profane,” but it’s themes are easily some of the darkest this year–or any.
I can’t for the life of me get the love for “Toy Story 3″. All three movies are the same exact film. Toys get separated from Andy and have to get back. I too cried at the end, that I wasted $15.00