
2ND UPDATE: The new MGM brass, Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum managed to leverage the James Bond #23 film for a piece of Sony’s in-the-works big movie based on the Stieg Larsson bestseller, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, which has already been shooting in Sweden under director David Fincher and starring Rooney Mara. Deadline has learned that Sony Pictures bosses Amy Pascal and Michael Lynton agreed to give MGM a co-financing deal for the big title and possibly other films already shooting, too, to help the reconstituted studio generate quick cash flow. This allows MGM to have revenue which it hasn’t had in a long time, so the books look better, and more funds for production could be forthcoming. (That’s exactly how Birnbaum and Barber built their Spyglass Entertainment in the first place: by investing in films it didn’t make, like the recently rebooted Star Trek.)
UPDATE: We’re told Paramount dropped out of the Bond bidding when MGM insisted on bringing the distribution fee under 8% and when MGM got “grabby” in wanting a piece of a Paramount established franchise that studio didn’t want to give up.
EXCLUSIVE 5 PM: Deadline hears that Sony Pictures is close to landing distribution rights to MGM’s James Bond franchise again, and specifically for the next untitled Bond #23, even though several studios are still very much in the hunt. Sony Pictures chiefs Amy Pascal and Michael Lynton distributed both Daniel Craig 007 pics, Casino Royale and Quantum Of Solace, and now have moved into first position to recapture 007. That’s because Sony is
agreeing to allow MGM’s new leadership to leverage the next Bond pic, and indeed the Bond franchise, to create more cash flow for the reconstituted studio post-bankruptcy. The new brass, Spyglass Entertainment co-owners Gary Barber and Roger Birnbaum who are now the Co-Chairmen andCEOs of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, are finishing negotiations to co-finance a number of films with Sony. Deadline has learned that Pascal and Lynton have already found a title on the Sony slate for MGM to co-finance. That’s exactly how Birnbaum and Barber built Spyglass in the first place: by investing in films it didn’t make, such as The Sixth Sense and the recently rebooted Star Trek.
There’s no doubt this is a shrewd move by MGM, but Deadline also learned it wasn’t sitting well with the majors. Top execs at Sony and Fox and Paramount and Warner Bros were increasingly frustrated with the way that the Spyglass duo were playing one studio off another — “and enjoying it,” in the words of one exec involved. Sony at the time even described its strategy to win Bond #23 as ”pleading”. Now it looks like that worked along with agreeing to much of MGM’s negotiating terms.
Even though MGM holds sway on where Bond #23 lands, a 007 return to the Sony fold would please EON partners Barbara Broccoli and Michael Wilson. Amy Pascal in particular has developed a strong personal and professional relationship with Broccoli when they were making the transition from Pierce Brosnan to Daniel Craig. Broccoli and Wilson found Craig among a list of possible 007s, and the choice wasn’t popular at first. But Pascal supported Craig. Also Sony has a reputation for spending big to market Bond: for Casino Royale, Sony spent a humongous sum worldwide to introduce the new Bond. MGM was supposed to distribute the 23rd Bond film itself, until the studio was pushed into bankruptcy.
We’ve told you already that studios including Fox, Paramount, and Warner Bros as well as Sony have been vying to distribute Bond in a series of tough negotiations with MGM’s Barber and Birnbaum. We wouldn’t yet count out Fox and Paramount — the latter has a strong relationship with the Spyglass duo built on Star Trek and its sequel — but things are looking good for Sony. As Deadline previously reported, MGM wanted to make an overall deal for worldwide theatrical and home entertainment distribution of not just Bond but also MGM’s new product as well as its library of films. But what wasn’t known is that, as part of that deal, MGM sought from whichever studio is chosen to distribute Bond #23 an agreement to co-finance a number of films. ”That would provide MGM quick cash flow,” an insider told Deadline. “The quick cash flow allows MGM to have revenue which it hasn’t had in a long time. Thereby their books look better, and therefore the possibility of getting more funds for production is increased. So expect whichever studio lands Bond to also announce it is several co-financing deals allowing MGM into other pics that are already shooting.”
Broccoli and Wilson had been in pre-production on Bond #23 for release on November 9, 2012. But then it took almost a year for MGM’s future to sort itself out what with the failed auction sale of the studio, then the pre-packaged bankruptcy getting approval, and eventually Spyglass taking over studio filmmaking. Daniel Craig will be returning as the legendary British secret agent, with Sam Mendes directing a screenplay written by Neal Purvis, Robert Wade and John Logan. That script is being kept under wraps but the story begins after Quantum Of Solace leaves. Bond #23 already is casting up, as Deadline revealed that director Sam Mendes recently offered the villain role to Javier Bardem. There are unconfirmed rumors that Slumdog Millionaire‘s Freida Pinto is under consideration as a possible Bond girl.
Cannes: Un Certain Regard Winners Include Ryan


EON will be happy with Sony because Sony knows how to spend the $$$. It’s the smartest decision, anyway. Hope these new guys don’t frak things up. (too late) Incidentally, how the hell are they listed as a production company for Cabin in the Woods? They had less than zero to do with that film.
I’m looking forward to the third installment of Bond. Now that MGM has got itself back on its feet. What about the remake of Red Dawn which was schelduled for Nov release of last year. Has thier been any news on that film’s release since it’s been completed? It’s been getting some buz around the net but so far new release date thus far on the new Red Dawn. Why not look into that one?
If you’re not familiar with the Red Dawn remake it involves Chinese this time who invade the US and it plays off the comptempery themes related to 9/11 and the fears of the Chinese. Principle locale filming was done in Michigan and one can see it on Youtube.
EON will not only be happy with Sony…EON wants Bond #23 to be made…and, even with Quantum of Solace cooling the Bond heat…Daniel Craig and Martin Campbell rekindled the flame so brightly it will sustain big time interest for the next installment…thus, the enhanced deals for distribution.
The franchise now is in the hands of Sam Mendes, who has had more prep time than most ever do… to make this a good film.
Don’t let us down, Sam. 007
I have been a Bond fan since childhood. Seeing double bills like “Thunderball”/Dr.No before the days of the multi-plex.
Today my eight year old is a bond scholar.And this induced him to study MGM. He has held quite a resentment. I have kept a close eye on Sony since the days of”The Last Action Hero” and several other near(and not so near)misses. My kid is working on his penmanship so he can submit titles for BOND 23. Cant wait.
Your site is new to me. I like it.
My only regret about the upcoming Bond film is the missing Mr. White.
Why doesn’t Sony just buy MGM or why didn’t they buy MGM when they had the chance? Then they’d have Bond forever.
Jim, you are off your meds. There is no mention of Mr. White either appearing or not.
The actor who played Mr. White has been quoted in articles that can be found online as having thought the first two Bonds as having been bad and had no interest in being in another. Unless his character is that critical to the latest Bond film, I can’t see the producers making the effort to bring him back either after that, even though I tended to agree with the actor’s POV, especially the last film.
This is a big win for Sony, which knows how to do this and it’s also visionary for them to be partners…Its Bond after all. Seems like a great opportunity for both MGM and Sony.
Sounds like an excellent and profitable direction for both Studios. I feel like rolling my eyes at all the haters who said the former SG chiefs didn’t have what it takes to revamp this studio…but I will wait until this and many outcomes play themselves out first.
As for Glickman, I think folks need to separate the notion of quality content from straight mainstream Hollywood business (and profitable at that). I have faith that JG will make smart investments and collaborate with ideal partners.
I’m a hater on this deal. You bet big you win big. You diffuse your assets they’re not worth nearly as much as they could be. This is precisely why I never liked the Spyglass guys getting the studio. They’re going to run the thing just like Spyglass and it’s never going to maximize business the way a well run Studio can do. People keep talking about Star Trek a movie they lucked into at the 24th hour when the original financing partners dropped out. Real visionaries. Jon Glickman is a good executive, but this is about analyzing material and elements and making films with a whole new approach to financing and fiscal discipline. These guys roll the dice and do so with hardly any artistic or business savy to speak of. Too bad the window for MGM is closing as soon as it opened. Within 5 years the company will be broken apart and Gary and Roger, because of their ownership deal, will walk away with a ton of money having done little to enhance and or invigorate the brand they were brought in to do. Tragic…
I don’t think it’ll take 5 years. I’d be surprised if it makes it to the 3-year mark. What a shame.
Bond is a great movie for the Sony slate, the last two 007 movies did about $600m each worldwide. But seriously, Sony have agreed not just to come to the table but to bend over it too. Typical Sony!
YES!!! MGM and Sony Pictures,This is Great News, RERFECT!!!!
Maybe a stupid question but… if MGM has the money to co-finance other studios’ pictures, why don’t they use that money to distribute their own franchise? They wanted to distribute Bond themselves before their bankruptcy, why not now?
OK I may be the ignoramus here, but I was wondering how SPENDING money a film currently in production will generate “quick cash flow.” Seems to me they’re looking at a fairly long wait to see the full returns on the GWDT investment, even if the film performs well.
Then again, I know nothing about how film financing works. Genuinely curious if someone out there can explain…
Further proof that Sony is more concerned with selling TV’s and electronics than having the most profitable Film/TV division. This purchase is all about being able to put Bond on Sony TVs, Blu-ray Players, Digital Projectors and PS3s (driving those sales up) even if the profit margins on the films themselves are minimized. This is why Sony chronically overspends to “open” their films and is far more concerned with market share than profitability.
Don’t get me wrong, I am no hater. It is a really savvy deal for MGM (imagine if someone said to you, I’ll give you money for something you don’t have to contribute to in exchange for giving us a share of something that you couldn’t afford to make on your own anyways). For Sony Corp, it is exactly why they bought Columbia all those years back, to leverage the content to advance the electronics bottom line. Win-Win.
100% agree with this.
Good for the Spyglass guys. Sounds like the Lion is getting abit of its bite back – makes sense for Par to pass (STAR TREK was the ask perhaps?) and if Sony is truly into getting content for its TVs et al (gosh that sounds so 1990s!) then Bond #23+++ makes sense for the deal even if they have to give away a piece of something else [a big world franchise?!] to get it.
If written after QoS, grr, I wonder. Seems weird, huh? Well…
Best to Bond 23, however, I hope some do their homework.
End the dispute over who has the rights to make the films so that the legend of James Bond can be developed. By developing the legend I mean; with each successive story try to add something new to the format of the series so that the followingstories can be looked upon from a different perspective. The format of the series is the setting (time and locations) of the stories, the cast of characters within the stories and the motivations of each character. James Bond became popular because Ian Fleming did more than tell the same story over and over again.
Having been a Bond affecionado since it’s inception, I think there are so many ways to plot the episode. I do believe that maybe a “Blomfeld” son/grandson could figure in nicely in a evil sort of way. Totally unanticipated. Just get a movie going, it has been too long. Who cares if Mr White wants to return or not, too many villains out there to care. Shaken not stirred I still say!