
EXCLUSIVE: Universal Pictures has acquired domestic distribution rights to Tinker, Tailor, Solder, Spy, the Tomas Alfredson-directed adaptation of the John Le Carre novel that stars Gary Oldman, freshly minted Oscar winner Colin Firth, Tom Hardy, Mark Strong and Ciaran Hinds. The rights were held by Studiocanal, and the film was produced by Working Title. Universal is eyeing a November or December release for the picture, which is in post production. Script was written by Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughan.
The project was one of the hottest titles shopped in Berlin, where buyers watched several minutes of footage and read the script for Afredson’s follow-up to Let the Right One In. I’m told that Universal, through its first look deal with Working Title partners Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner, had a first look that it initially didn’t exercise. Then the picture got hot, with The Weinstein Company and Summit Entertainment chasing it hard. I’ve heard the bidding was in the vicinity of $5 million for domestic rights before Universal swooped in and took the project off the table. Studiocanal, which fully financed the film, will distribute in the UK, France and Germany and is handling international sales throughout the rest of the world. Bevan and Fellner produce with Robyn Slovo, with Liza Chasin, Le Carre, Peter Morgan, Douglas Urbanski and Debra Hayward exec producing.
In the Cold War tale, a retired espionage vet named George Smiley (Oldman) is pulled away from his semi-retirement to ferret out a Soviet agent in MI6. While the heat is on King’s Speech star Firth and Inception and Dark Knight Rises star Hardy, word is the film’s a tour de force for Oldman.
Universal and Studiocanal confirmed the deal, but would not divulge the price.
“I am very happy with this agreement, Universal is the natural home for Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, and it’s always a pleasure for us to work with our long-time partner,” Studiocanal COO Olivier Courson said in a statement. “We are thrilled that the film assembled such an incredible cast with Gary Oldman, Colin Firth and Tom Hardy, the director Tomas Alfredson and talented producers Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner at Working Title.”
Rodolphe Buet, Studiocanal’s Executive Vice President International Distribution added: “The great reaction from all buyers to the first footage we screened in Berlin made us all very happy. We sold a lot of territories very quickly, and now having Universal on board with a wide release commitment for the US is really a great achievement.”


Lucky. Would have been an embarrassment for Uni if one of their competitors had made hay with this.
It will be tough to surpass the genius of the BBC mini-series with Sir Alec Guiness but cannot wait to see how they will be able to pack so much information, plot twists and characters into 2 hours.
YET ANOTHER MINDLESS REMAKE OF A CLASSIC— force 6 hours of the classic story of twists and counter twists into 2 hours.
I knew Alec Guinness— Alec Guinness was a friend of mine— gary oldman is no Alec Guinness!!!!!!!!
Next up, James Franco as James Bond in the Connery Classic DR. No.
djt, your comparison of Gary Oldman to James Franco pretty much undercuts whatever limited validity your argument may have had. Gary Oldman’s 25+ year career includes noteworthy performances in such noteworthy films as Sid & Nancy, Prick Up Your Ears, Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead, Romeo Is Bleeding. It also includes noteworthy performances in some less-than-noteworthy films (e.g. The Fifth Element, Dracula, etc.). In short, he’s exactly the sort of thoughtful, intelligent actor who can make us think of someone other than Alec Guinness in the role of George Smiley.
Don K,
Uh, it was a joke. A witticism. Some humor. A current analogy. The inverse— pointing out how miscast Gary ” Dracula” Oldman, known for his over the top acting, is for role of LeCarre’s subtle, quiet, droll Smiley. You are familiar with the character??? ( GET IT!!!! OVER THE TOP OLDMAN WRONG FOR SUBTLE SMILEY; STONER FRANCO WRONG FOR AGRESSIVE BOND???? )
ABOVE ALL, the main point which you missed entirely is that this is yet another pointless remake from brain dead Hollywood.
Putting aside the comments on Gary Oldman, which mainly make one wonder if you’ve watched even a single one of his performances all the way through, I’ll move on to your dismissal of the film as a “pointless remake from brain dead Hollywood”. The film is being produced by Working Title Films. Their track-record runs from My Beautiful Laundrette to Frost/Nixon, with several Coen Brothers movies along the way. Put another way, all indications are that this is intended to be a quality effort to do right by Le Carre’s novel. If there’s anything that’s “brain dead” here it’s people pre-judging it without a lot of information.
Your blanket disdain of remakes also invites comment. You seem to be suggesting that books shouldn’t be adapted for the screen more than once. By that token, the version of The Maltese Falcon with Humphrey Bogart never should have been made, as it was the third adaptation of that book. And don’t tell me it’s about whether a particular version is “definitive”, because there’s no such thing as a definitive adaptation of any work into a different medium.
Money well spent by Universal. This is probably my most anticipated film of the year. It really boasts an amazing cast
I;m more interested in seeing Benedict Cumberbatch in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy.
Don K is 100% correct
Yes Don K is very correct, and besides, they are not adapting the BBC Series they are adapting the novel. And when you have an amazing Director an amazing cast and JOHN LE CARRE helping out also you know this will be something special.
Also Gary Oldman is one of the most versatile and amazing actors alive, on the level of Daniel Day Lewis.
I’ve read the script and it’s a cracker, manages to fit in the story pretty well.
fingers crossed for the movie.
Give it a chance. This is one of my favorite stories, and the Guiness mini-series is among the top TV ever produced imo. Nevertheless, the recent BBC radio 4 version (3 hours long) was quite good (it also didn’t stray much from the brilliant novel, and it got to all the salient points.)
Somehow I expect I’ll also enjoy seeing this story yet again in a movie with actors this good. (Connie has to be good too, of course). But I would recommend that the editors give the movie all the time it needs.
BTW the miniseries’ tiny Karla role was Patrick Stewart’s best work, imo (& he should have left it at that…)
If this film hits, maybe we’ll finally see Honorable Schoolboy adapted!
Let’s hope this film gets Oldman his long overdue Oscar!
Um, the Cold War is dead, Universal. Other than Metal Gear Solid 3, no one 18-25 will pay to watch a new story based on it. Especially with actors who aren’t even draws on their own.
Stupid them for forgetting that all movies should be made for 18-25 year olds…
Yeah, Colin Firth, Gary Oldman, Tom Hardy…no one wants to see these guys. It’s all about Alex Prettyboy, which is why Beastly has made so much dough.
Tom Hardy, I’m there……….
Benedict Cumberbatch is a Great actor! This movie will continue that reputation.
Congratulations to everyone over at Hasbro’s Film Division (formerly known as Universal Pictures) for picking this up!
Benedict Cumberbatch – what a great, great actor! I remember him in the British TV-movie biography HAWKING – BBC television’s dramatisation of physicist Stephen Hawking’s early career while at the University of Cambridge. All of you should check that out – a truly remarkable performance, in an absolutely TERRIFIC movie that very few people have ever seen.
Gary Oldman is a wonderful actor I can’t wait to see him as the lead. If he gets recognized it may help him to avoid bad career choices in the future. He deserves roles like George Smiley.
I can’t wait!!!!! It will be interesting to see Gary’s take on George. I watch the original at least once a year and I really think it will be hard to beat but keeping my mind open.
cheers – we also love to watch the original at least once a year.
And how is Ann, Goerge’s lovely wife? (SNEER)
I am just ridiculously excited about this. I mean, Benedict Cumberbatch alone….
But seriously, the entire cast looks amazing and I think that, as iconic as Alec Guinness was as Smiley, Gary Oldman is just the fellow to pull off something new and different. It might just be my imagination but I always got the impression that John Le Carre got a bit sick of everyone seeing Smiley as Alec Guinness–he said that he couldn’t write Smiley anymore when he realized he saw him as Alec Guinness too. I’ve also heard that Le Carre loved this new script…and the director is amazing…and Colin Firth as Bill Haydon is a masterstroke.
(But ummm, back to Benedict Cumberbatch–if anyone here hasn’t seen the BBC’s new show “Sherlock”, they really, really, really should.)
It seems this film will be a simplistic good guy vs bad guy film banking on the brilliance of Oldman, Firth, Hurt, etc to create watchability.
It appears that in order to squeeze ten hours of story-telling into two hours of screen time (rather than the 1979 seven hour production), characters such as Collins and Westerby may have been replaced by generic “agents” who give brief hints rather than detailed reportage.
If so, I think this film would torpedo any likelyhood of a production of The Honourable Schoolboy. I am entusiastic to see whatever the film may turn out as.
Bringing Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy to the screen was always difficult to imagine, since so much of its literary power was based on elements that under the best of circumstances can not be translated to film. Yet, in 1979, it was done. And done well. Now, in 2011, they’re trying it again, and while there is an understandable tendency to assume that Hollywood’s going to screw it up, I, for one, will not be allowing that assumption to keep me from a position (more or less) front row center, when it comes to my local multiplex.
To my mind, the primary issue in regards to this story isn’t about the people making the film, it’s about the audiences who choose (or not) to see it. It is a thoughtful novel, was a thoughtful production in 1979, and one can only hope that it will be a thoughtful remake in 2011. Unfortunately, it will need to run the gauntlet of the generally, and distinctly less than thoughtful material that comprises the bulk of filmed entertainment since the days of Charlie Chaplin (The King’s Speech, notwithstanding).
Two hours is going to be a problem, I think. It didn’t take all seven of the hours devoted to the 1979 film to become sufficiently engaged in the tale, but it didn’t happen in the opening installment, either. If memory serves, my first reaction to the first episode was “What??”
The key here, though, will be the screenwriting and its effectiveness in creating the depth of character and tale that marks the book and the original film. I perceive the screenwriter’s challenge as formidable, but not insurmountable.
In some ways, The Honourable Schoolboy is a little off the beaten Karla path. Not entirely, of course, but if the step-by-step unraveling of the mole thread in Tinker was hard to translate, just imagine trying to recreate the subtle motivation of re-establishing the Circus’ credibility that’s at the heart of everything that goes on in Schoolboy. You could probably compress the actual activities of Schoolboy into a film that wouldn’t last an hour.
Anyway, we all here appear to be fans of the tale, original film, and Alec Guinness’ portrayal. In a sort of ‘hope reigns supreme’ attitude, let’s give this remake a chance, shall we?
it seems many of you all have read the script, which is top secret hush hush. We will have to create a top secret reading room with confidential procedures.
I am a great fan of the original and all those actors who were a part of it. I also wonder if two hours is sufficient to tell the tale to it’s fullest. “Smiley’s People” is even better.
Gary Oldman is one of the great great actors of this century. Yes he hasn’t stretched himself since the contender. But his range accent work makes him one of the true acting geniuses out there, So the fool who dimissed him needs to watch his body of work