
LOS ANGELES, CA, MARCH 3, 2011—Warner Bros-based financing and production company Alcon Entertainment (“The Blind Side,” “The Book of Eli”) co-founders and co-Chief Executive Officers Broderick Johnson and Andrew Kosove, in the most significant property acquisition negotiations in the Company’s 13-year history, are in final discussions to secure film, television and ancillary franchise rights to produce prequels and sequels to the iconic 1982 science-fiction thriller “Blade Runner.”
Alcon is negotiating to secure the rights from producer-director Bud Yorkin, who will serve as producer on “Blade Runner” along with Kosove and Johnson. Cynthia Sikes Yorkin will co-produce. Frank Giustra and Tim Gamble, CEO’s of Thunderbird Films, will serve as executive producers.
Alcon’s franchise rights would be all-inclusive, but exclude rights to remake the original. The Company, however, may produce projects based on situations introduced in the original film. The project would be distributed domestically by Warner Bros. International rights are yet to be determined.
Johnson and Kosove stated: “We are honored and excited to be in business with Bud Yorkin. This is a major acquisition for our company, and a personal favorite film for both of us. We recognize the responsibility we have to do justice to the memory of the original with any prequel or sequel we produce. We have long-term goals for the franchise, and are exploring multi-platform concepts, not just limiting ourselves to one medium only.”
Among its many distinctions, “Blade Runner” has been singled out as one of the greatest movies of all time by countless polls and media outlets, and overwhelmingly as the greatest science-fiction film of all time by a majority of genre publications.
Released by Warner Bros. almost 30 years ago, “Blade Runner” was adapted by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples from Philip K. Dick’s novel “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” and directed by Ridley Scott following his landmark “Alien.” The film was nominated for two Academy Awards (Best Visual Effects, and Best Art Direction).
“Blade Runner” was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.” The film was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry in 1993 and is frequently taught in university courses. In 2007, it was named the 2nd most visually influential film of all time by the Visual Effects Society.
Alcon’s COO Scott Parish and head of business affairs David Fierson are negotiating on behalf of the Company.


Like this a lot.
Thank god it’s not a re-make. I’d start the anti campaign today.
Please just leave it alone, you mf vultures.
Ugh. No.
Let me guess… 3D?
Would rather see a cable TV series than prequels/sequels.
Yes! This.
Just kill me now.
this is the worst idea I’ve ever heard.
This is wonderful news now I can finally learn if I’m human or android. I still don’t know what I was or what I am can anyone help me?
As long as there’s no plans to remake the original, I’m good. But in all likelihood a prequel or sequel will suck.
No!!! It’s like the Terminator franchise all over again. “Blade Runner” doesn’t need any prequels or sequels. Leave it alone, and either create new stories or tap into the great wealth of science fiction novels and short stories that have yet to be filmed (just as that is how we got “Blade Runner” in the first place).
Highlander 2?
Dear god, please don’t do this. I am imagining the pitch meeting “Ok, it’s ‘The Graduate: Part 2′ “
Yeah I mean who the fuck needs Ridley Scott involved. They should get the guy that made that Justin Bieber movie to direct. Because the Justin Bieber movie made money, therefore he is the right guy to do this.
you my friend are a DICK
NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fantastic news! The producers who brought us gems like ‘Love Don’t Cost a Thing’ and ‘Chasing Liberty’ are planning to re-make one of the most iconic films of all time. What could go wrong?
Read the article Mac – it says quite clearly that they do NOT have rights to re-make the original film and can only do prequels and sequels. Still a lousy idea though.
Clearly your reading comprehension skills are not at the same high level as your own perceived cleverness.
“Alcon’s franchise rights would be all-inclusive, but exclude rights to remake the original.”
rack em
Blade Runner is a collection of strong scenes and ideas buffered by lethargic self-reverential traveling sequences and full stops that should have been edited out of Scott’s “Final Cut.” It looks very good, but when people say it puts them to sleep I can’t fault them. The whining in sighing soundtrack often contributes to this. It’s a useful for any fan who wants to do a “Phantom Edit” and explore more effective ways to re-order scenes and trim fat. I don’t see the movie as being sacred or perfect, so the prospect of a prequel or sequel is interesting. Will we see a factory of digital Deckards? Likely they’ll leave him alone. I’d like to see a young actor approximate M. Emmet Walsh who has such a distinctive style.
And there are those who get bored with and would like to edit 2001, Vertigo, Mulholland Drive, Apocalypse Now, The Godfather, The Seven Samurai etc. But I think those people are missing the point of this kind of cinematic experience, driven more by an individual vision than by what a test audience might get bored with, not understand or even like. Every film is not deserving of this kind of reverence, certainly, but Blade Runner is one that is and I’ll trust Ridley Scott on how it should be edited. The great films, the real groundbreaking films, almost always felt slightly off when I first saw them because I wasn’t seeing something I was expecting. I was seeing something new. Usually, it wasn’t until I had seen them several times that I truly appreciated how perfect they had been from the start.
This is an absolutely brilliant comment, jm. I couldn’t agree more.
Thanks Dave, for being so supportive of jm. Its really touching. But as longing as we’re stroking one another, Jawsphobia offered much bolder and more insightful filmmaking commentary. Please stop the blind reverence for “genius filmakers.” They are one piece of a massive collaboration and often fuck up what was once a better script, or shot , or edit or score…
what are you like 16? FinalCut didn’t exist in 1982.
Sorry I was actually completely satisfied with Blade Runner, I don’t actually need anymore. Thanks for asking though.
Utter, total and complete FAIL.
Oh my god – they wouldn’t??….
I guess they learned nothing from Soldier.
See, I like this news a lot. With most announcements I have the problem of where I’ll find the money to watch those movies. With this news, I know I’ll be saving my cash. Sucker someone else with cynical, chimpanzee-brained sequel/prequel/reboot cinematic ponzi schemes.
Ridley’s is already a Vatican Assassin. Everyone involved here in this is not winning at all.
#WINNER
Taylor Lautner is going to make such a dreamy Deckard. And maybe they can get Miley Cyrus as Rachael.
BOX OFFICE GOLD!
It was a tragedy when Do Androids Dream of Electronic Sheep author Philip K. Dick died just prior to the release and warm reception of Blade Runner in 1982. It is a mercy that he is not alive to hear this news. I, myself, am aghast.
warm reception? when this film came out it got the worst reviews ever. it was a big dud.
bladerunner is handsdown one of my favorite films. but even i had a problem with the unicorn sequence at the end in the original version. i laughed my ass off.
There was no warm reception to blade runner on its first release. the reviews were not kind and the box office was poor. I know, I was there opening day to an empty theater in Chicago. I saw it 3 times in the theater and encouraged everyone I knew to go. those who did were thrilled. Sadly it never caught on with moviegoers or critics at the time.
The last few paragraphs of this article is reason enough NOT to make sequels or prequels. Back in the 80′s, I would have loved to have seen it, but everyone since has copied it and has even parodied the floating advertising blimps. 30 years is too long to have waited. It’s not something that needed an improved version, like Tron did.
It’s a movie I didn’t appreciate on opening night because a rowdy audience spoiled the opening (clapped for everyone’s name except Joanna Cassidy, I guess I was the only one who knew who she was and applauded alone) and their expectation of another Alien of Star Wars muted the films energy. I only saw it as Harrison Ford doing a bad Bogart narration hunting crazy super cyborgs. Film Noir meets a high tech future. The theater emptied quietly
It wasn’t until a second run viewing that I understood the movie and heard the remorse of Roy of what would be lost with his programmed death. The lights came on and I understood the films deeper themes. None of this could be improved upon.
Blade Runner is a valuable title so they were smart to go after the rights. How about hiring Harlan Ellison to write a script? They won’t do this because they’re idiots but he’d be the right guy to take all of Phil Dick’s related stories and turn them into something that makes sense for the Blade Runner world and he won’t need any stupid development notes either which is why they’ll never hire him. We can also look foward to a director derby in which Aronofsky and Fincher and perhaps Verhoeven compete. With the right director a sequel or prequel could work so they’ll probably hire Brett Ratner or McG and that’ll be the death of it.
visually, the only people who could do a prequel or a sequel justice are chris nolan and james cameron. everyone else should just step aside. but plz don’t let cameron write the screenplay.