
There’s nobody in Hollywood quite like Bill Murray. Even though Sony Pictures and the Ghostbusters creative team built a sequel around Murray, I’m told the actor still hasn’t contacted the studio to tell them if he’s even read the script script by The Office writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky that was delivered to him at the beginning of the year. The movie won’t happen if Bill doesn’t say yes, plain and simple. Now, Murray is being courted to play Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the Roger Michell-directed Hyde Park on the Hudson, the film set up at Focus Features and Film Four with script by Richard Nelson. Like Ghostbusters, this is a film that becomes an immediate go picture if Murray says yes. I’m not sure it happens if he says no, or doesn’t say anything at all.
For days, I’ve heard that Focus has been approaching cast and basically telling them that Murray will do the picture. Focus has denied that to me several times. Perhaps Focus doesn’t want to jinx things because you never really know that you have Murray until he shows up to go to work, which is the reason Ghostbusters III has languished so long–you can’t prep a $150 million picture on a wing and a prayer.
Communicating with Murray has gotten more difficult since he dropped his last agency, CAA. He does have an attorney who makes his deals, but I’ve heard he’s a dead end for information and in my attempts to call him, I can’t get past his secretary. When Deadline wrote a story recently about the complexity of building that Ghostbusters sequel around Murray when he was so difficult to pin down, I got an email that night, purportedly from the man himself. The sender said he planned the read the script shortly, and respond. Was it him? It made some corners of Sony Pictures optimistic, but nothing happened. So Ghostbusters III remains merely a talking point when Ivan Reitman, Dan Aykroyd or Harold Ramis are out promoting other movies and have to suffer the inevitable question.
Murray is hardly a recluse. You can find him on the golf course, and he just presented the Johnny Carson Comedy Award to David Letterman. He sat recently for an interview with Howard Stern, where he confirmed he never read that Ghostbusters script. Sometimes Murray shows up on movie sets. Murray did Zombieland for Sony, after pal Woody Harrelson coaxed him into playing what was a wonderful surprise cameo. Perhaps the best thing Focus can do is put Harrelson in Hyde Park on the Hudson. Murray could bring a lot as FDR in a story that covers his foibles–including an affair between Roosevelt and his distant cousin Daisy–all of which play out during a visit from the King and Queen of England to FDR’s upstate New York home before the start of WWII. It could be a memorable turn for Murray, with no ghost chasing involved.


Guy doesn’t have an agent and more than a few studio guys have opined how hard it is to get a hold of him.
What does opined mean?
Man forget Bill Murray – they needa get Denzel in both of these jams! Denzel wuld killit! Black people can chase ghosts and play prezidents 2!!!
booooooooooooooo
Still trying to figure out how using the word “opined” makes me pretentious. I use my words carefully because I don’t want people knowing who I am because I work with these guys.
As for forcing the issue on Murray, I personally would not make another Ghostbusters. Then again, I wouldn’t make Total Recall either, so what do I know.
It means you should get a damn dictionary.
so you managed to make it this far on the internets to make a comment, why don’t you go a little further and look up that word yourself.
Has it occured to anyone that maybe he just doesnt care about it as much as everyone else does..why force the issue?
PLEASE! PLEASE! Bill (can I call you Bill?) Do Ghostbusters 3. We, the fans, have been waiting and waiting and WAITING. Do it for us Bill, what do you say? Once more for old time’s sake? I promise I will not only go and see it in the theater TWICE but I will bring my daughter too. The KIDS Bill… think of the CHILDREN.
Thanks
A Fan
Yeah Bill…please do Ghostbusters 3. But not FDR (unless its a comedy).
Keep F-ing with ‘em Bill, you rock. You don’t put up with the Hollywood bullsh#t. Don’t sell out. GB2 sucked, why would GB3 be any better. Don’t give in and ruin another crappy franchise that the studio just wants to make to reek in the mucho $. I’m sure GB3 is probably as bad as INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL – what the hell were they thinking.
Oh and do the Roosevelt one if you think it’s a good script. Could be an Oscar in it for ya! Focus Features rules – great artistic films.
Well the thing is, Murray already did another Ghostbusters — the video game. And he admitted he enjoyed it. So he’s still got a soft spot for the franchise. If the script is good, why not?
Yeah and written by The Office people? “not gonna lie”, if you want a cutesy hipster version of GB then go for it.
Good for Bill. Always a genuine class act.
That sounds like sarcasm, is it?
I love Murray. The guy has a unique style all to himself. But I find this a bit tasteless. He isn’t only effing the studio’s plans (which no one here cares about) but there are more than a few people depending and hoping for this. All I’m saying is that he should give them the up or down so everybody could move on.
Forget about the original cast. Way too old in both age and looks. Just get new (established) actors to take over the rolls. Vince Vaughn would make a perfect Peter Venkman.
… you’re the Devil, aren’t you?
I thought they were pulling an Indie 4.
You deserved to be punched in the face for making a suggestion like that.
it’s an inspired idea
no one really wants to see Murray and the rest come back to do another lame sequel…ghostbusters 2 did enough damage
on the other hand a completely fresh cast has more freedom to restart the franchise…I’m as sick of anyone of reboots and remakes, but this is one case where the lackluster sequel makes it easier to consider redoing the original
and Vaughn would be a really good add to the franchise, I know Hollywood snobs dislike Vaughn but I’m trying to think of the last time the fags in West Hollywood showed taste or discernment
yes, this kind of thinking is what gave us the carrey-free dumb and dumber 2 and mask sequel.
As I’ve heard it, pretty much everybody wants Murray to come back and do Ghostbusters 3 (if it’ll be good). You’re confusing everybody (“no one wants to see…”) with you (“I don’t want to see…). That’s megalomaniacal.
It should be noted he wasn’t an in-studio guest on the Stern show. He called in. It was an hour-long conversation though.
Noted.
I think Murray will ultimately give in to Ghostbusters 3, if only because he admits to feeling a sense of debt to Ivan Reitman for the early days (Meatballs, Stripes, Ghostbusters).
However, as with all long-delayed sequels such as this, it will likely be another reminder that you can’t go home again. Older fans (ie. the ones that have moved on with their lives) will no doubt have fun with it, but fanboys in general will lament that the project crawled out of development hell a little too late.
It’s a sequel that, ideally, probably should’ve happened in the early 90s. At this point, the passage of time will prevent it from having the same vibe as the first two, while necessitating the addition of younger co-stars.
Murray owes a debt to Reitman? I think you have that backward.
We all love you Bill. But shit or get off the pot already. Don’t leave your friends hanging.
They could easily do Ghostbusters 3 without this lunatic just start rolling film and stop waiting for this guy it’s crazy. Once he hears that production has started he’ll show up and they can then shoot his scenes for the few days that he decides to hang out with his old friends. Waiting for him is like waiting for Godot at this point. He gets an ego trip keeping people waiting and the more he’s indulged in this the more he’ll keep doing it. Enough already.
I recently watched Bill Murray in a little indie called Get Low and he was quite good alongside Robert Duvall and Sissy Spacek but I really don’t see what the appeal of this guy is to the studios – a good actor when he wants to be but never box office gold and a total asshole to do business with. If he acted like that in the real world, he’d be rendered unemployed until he deemed those around him worthy of a hint of respect.
Easy fix: Have Uma Thurman hunt him down.
Problem solved.
FDR is interesting – but I’ve never seen Murray kill the snark and you can’t have that with FDR. And, I’m sorry, but corner wino Louie and his cracked friend Messedup could do Ghost.
If the script is good he’ll do it. Plain and simple. He’s not interested in the money the greedy studio will print by releasing Ghostbusters 3D. The FDR project sounds great though. Fingers crossed he chooses that so he can get another crack at the Oscar he was robbed of.
Billy Murray smirking his way through FDR? No thanks. I just cannot take the guy seriously as a dramatic actor. I just can’t. Remember Jon Voight in the terrible movie “Pearl Harbor.” He was great as FDR. The role of FDR needs an actor like that.
Murray will be in the Arrested Development movie too.
@Jabroni — lol my friend. I blame you for Transmorphers, Red Riding Hood and Twilight. The mere fact that you spelled ‘roles’ ROLLS is hilarious. Guess you were part of that ‘No audience is left behind’ studio mandate when greenlighting shit films with plot holes you cam drive your mom’s prius through.
There is no Ghostbusters without Dr. Peter Venkman.
Nope, just pointing out that the shipped sailed on this one many moons ago. Anything else is wishful thinking or fanboy devotion. I wasn’t suggesting a reboot, but given the age of the material, I’m not against one either. The cartoon series managed to develop a fantastic non-Murray Venkman’, so a feature has a shot. Like all things Hollywood, the chance of failure is high. As for the mix up, dyslexia, my friend.
You’re a boob.
Does anyone know if the script is actually any good? Is it better than Year One, at least?
Stop with the “too old” shit. We loved the original cast. Bring them back. We hate the “newbies in training” screenplays. How many times has Hollywood pulled that routine. It’s called chemistry. The originals have it. Don’t change anything just tell a good original story…. Bill, call them or read or something. Just do something!
Who is “we”? And when did they elect you their spokesperson?
Just add Adam Sandler to the Ghostbusters or Kevin James or Jim Carrey and nobody will miss Murray. Explain it that Venkman retired and he’s gone missing and their goal is to find him from the netherworld they think he was turned into a ghost. This way Bill only has to show up for one day at the very end of the movie give him one big funny scene and he’ll be happy. If they really have to pass the proton pack to some younger guys they can do that by literally having Bill hand his proton pack to Seth Rogen or whoever they decide to cast.
Literally hand his proton pack to Seth? Wow! And silly me, I thought he’d figuratively do that! Thanks for the needless emphasis! Bill Murray was the heart of the original film and leaving him out of it is like starring ‘Jaws’ with a killer tuna.
Bill Murray get off your lazy douche hide and make Ghostbusters 3. You haven’t been in a hit in decades, let me repeat that, DECADES!! Yet you won’t read the script like a five year old child who refuses to behave at a candy store. The only person you are hurting is yourself you moron.
If you are concerned about the script than contribute ideas to it yourself to make sure the movie is up to your standards. The last hit you were in was GroundHog Day and that was like 20 years ago. Playing yourself as a “has been” actor in Zombie Land was cool but it doesn’t count. You made a peak out with Lost in Translation but only the art crowd saw that. You are becoming a joke “has been.”
If anyone who is a MANAGER, AGENT OR FRIEND of Bill Murray then you need to tell him that his career is AND HAS BEEN in the dumpster and he has one chance with Ghostbusters 3 yet he is to stupid to see it. ALL I’M DOING IS STATING THE OBVIOUS AND WHAT EVERYBODY ON THE PLANET ALREADY KNOWS.
Also, Ivan Reitman, this is your one shot at a real hit in decades as well. Ever since the 80′s ended your movies seem like “TV-Movies” without any of the micro-managing direction of theatrical movies. Take directing more seriously and micro-manage like James Cameron which is why he has had hit after hit since the 80′s. Don’t get me wrong, Ivan Reitman’s movies have not been total garbage since the 80′s ended like John Landis films have become. Wow, I remember in the 80′s when the biggest director and actor in comedy was Landis and Eddie Murphy. But, it turned out that they where phonies who completely changed personalities in the movies they made since then.
OVERALL GHOSTBUSTERS 3 IS A REDEMPTION SO BRING YOUR A-GAME AND STOP MESSING AROUND.
P.S. To the morons coming up with stupid ideas like having a new group of Ghostbusters. That is idiotic. Learn from other movies mistakes. I remember when Lethal Weapon 4 came out and in the entire movie they where talking about how old the stars are when they where decades younger than Clint Eastwood. Mel Gibson was 42 years old. There are have been boxing champions and UFC fighting champions around that age. It was stupid and ridiculous. Nobody wants to see “the next replacement stars” for the sequels. We want to see the original stars in the great roles they played.
Here’s an extreme example: Raquel Welch is 71 and I guarantee you that 95% of straight men would sleep with her hot face and her tight body over an average 20 year olds. Stop being stupid about age. That’s why the youngsters coined the term milf and cougar.
Gotta love Murray. He doesn’t need the money and doesn’t play the Hollywood game. So you have the “insiders” telling him what to do and he just shrugs his shoulders and says “Whatever” and goes to the golf course. Hollywood hates it when one of their own tells them to F&%$ off.
@Justadirector – W@W! BRAVO
Your name “Just a director ” really explains a lot. Hang on the that “just”. Did you ever think Bill doesn’t need your little advance checks to pay the rent? That maybe he’s dropped some amazing art in the world and is enjoying life and will pick up a script when he’s damn good and ready? Not every artist is coin operated. It’s easy to tell that you are from the way you write. You write about him like he’s a chess piece in a game. Not every artist plays that way. I fell sorry for you and the woman who shares your bed. Poor thing. When was the last time you took her out and didn’t crowd the conversation with a topic not related to money? I bet it’s been months. You poor thing.
You’re an idiot. Hasn’t been in a hit in decades? Really, what was LOST IN TRANSLATION?
mental problems.
Just A Director, you are just full of #%$*. If Murray doesn’t want to come back as Peter Venkman, he’s got every right not to. Please stop trying to make him feel that this is a role that he has to play no matter what. Also, take a chill pill and stop getting your life bent out of shape over the Ghostbusters franchise; you’re not a Sony Pictures executive, so you can’t influence anybody in Hollywood anyway. Just live with it, and get a life.
The original Ghostbusters is a masterpiece. No need for another crappy sequel. Let the franchise die with some diginity. But I’d love to see Murray’s take on FDR.
+1
My guess is that he already read the script and it just wasn’t that great. So his choices are to a) say he’s not feeling it and wait for the inevitable onslaught of inane articles about how he “killed” the Ghostbusters movie or b) just say he never got around to reading it.
His signing for Ghostbusters 2 was out of loyalty to Aykroyd and Ramis and NOT out of the quality of the script.
He also did the Ghostbusters video game, for which Ramis and Aykroyd wrote the story. I think Sigourney Weaver was the sole holdout for that one.
Actually, the game was the reason he even talked about being interested in doing a third movie.
You want Bill Murry? Call Ray Parker, Jr, the BusBoys, et all and show some love for the folks who delivered the goods in the first place. If they hire Justin Beiber to write the theme song I’m gonna shoot Ivan in the head. Bill is not stupid, he wants quality.
It would be nice to see the guys back together – older, heavier, but no less entertaining. But I wouldn’t hold my breath at this point. Murray has worked whenever he has felt like it and has turned in some wonderful post-Ghostbusters performances (and a few stinkers). It is not like he NEEDS to do this, but I hope he decides he WANTS to.
Just not in 3D, mmm-kay?
To be Honest, I could live without GB3. But the idea of seeing Murray as FDR is intriguing to me. It’s the sort of role that requires some acting skill and other than Jason Robards (who is just slightly dead) I can’t imagine anyone in town who could do the role with the same sort of style.
Ghostbusters was a wonderful film. But people change, they grow, and yes, they mature. It’s been over a quarter century. Get Dan and Harold together and have them do something else. Their talent is unquestionable. The technology has exploded. Anything is possible. Go forward, but look back with fondness. But going backwards just for the sake of some “franchise” (two films?) or other may be a waste of time and talent better spent on new ideas.