Chorion, the company which owns the rights to Agatha Christie, has told the BBC that the deal for Disney to remake Miss Marple has not closed. The Brit rights company and its reps were unavailable to elaborate. There has been general scorn over here since Deadline revealed Disney’s idea of reinventing Miss Marple as a younger, sassier amateur sleuth, with Jennifer Garner attached to play Marple. Her Vandalia Films label will produce. Disney confirmed the deal had gone down. Agatha Christie’s biographer Laura Thompson said that the author would not have been happy with Disney’s desire to mess with tradition. MGM cast Margaret Rutherford as Marple after it bought the rights
in the late 50s. But Christie even disliked Rutherford’s interpretation of Marple. She complained in one letter: “Why don’t they just invent a new character? Then they can have their cheap fun and leave me and my creations alone.” It’s difficult to see how a kickboxing hottie like Garner would work as Miss Marple, who is meant to be an elderly spinster living in the English village of St. Mary Mead. Mind you, at 38, Garner would not be called young, at least not by Hollywood standards. Should we take the estate’s unwillingness to confirm the deal as a clue they are having second thoughts after the outcry? I’ll let you know when estate reps ring me back to clear up the mystery.


In a perfect world Helen Mirren , Judy Dench or Meryl Streep would be Miss Marple … Not exactly a 13 dollar , wait in line at midnight, ticket…
Maybe Disney should get Demi Lovato as Miss Marple .. or maybe Miley Cyrus .. cause you know .. that would be .. you know .. really cool .. you know ?
Helen Mirren or Maggie Smith are the perfect Miss Marples. I’d definatly pay 10€ to see them in that role.
Never liked Rutherford, she was way to aggressive as Marple.
please dont give me these Meryl Streep ideas. fed up with her. she is way too overexposed and not English.
Judy Dench would be nice.
Dame Maggie would be amazing. Right age, right attitude and right accent. Dame Judy would do a fine job as well for the same reasons.
I wish you to stop talking bad things about Jennifer Garner, you dont actually Know how good is she and it is not depends on you, would she play or not, please, stop talk about things you don’t know, stop being rude, Because she is really pretty good to play the role and again don’t judge if you think you have any right go and try may you are lucky enough or strong enough to perform.
Why not just make her an adult Nancy Drew? Then instead of being criticized for being youth obsessed, they’ll be praised for casting someone older than expected.
I actually like Rutherford as Ms. Marple. Mainly because she was a bit aggressive.
I hope they don’t go with Garner. Not because I don’t like her, more I don’t like her in this role. Hollywood is and has messed up so many beloved characters. I could make a list a mile long at the movie remakes that destroyed the memory of its original.
Cute thought.. what about Betty White.. ok just joking..
YES! I think it had something to do with the comments, which I think is actually really cool. I’m hoping she can sell it to another studio who will keep the personality and appearance of Miss Marple.
Yes, it had everything to do with the comments. Because Deadline’s coterie of industry malcontents is the best place to gauge the validity of a project.
Except that the discontent wasn’t just here at Deadline. Everywhere I saw this written up (that allowed comments) had quite an outcry (EW, for example).
I agree with the biographer’s assertion that Christie would have preferred they create a new character rather than change the essense of Miss Marple. Re-imagining these classic characters is just pure laziness. If they wrote a great screenplay and hired a seasoned actress, audiences would flock to see the film. The population is aging and more affluent yet Hollywood is not capitalizing on the mature tastes that are emerging in the demographics. The Coen Brothers proved with “True Grit” that audiences would embrace the story of a crusty old guy on a horse if it was well executed. So why not a crusty old broad with an eye for solving mysteries? How many younger people are even aware of the Miss Marple books anyway?
Miss Marple is elderly. The end. Jennifer Garner? Please. Terrible idea. If Agatha Christie had wanted a younger Miss Marple, she would have written her young. Instead she created Tuppence of Tommy & Tuppence, a pair of young detectives not as well known in the US as Marple & Poirot. Someone should film their first adventure — ‘The Secret Adversary’ — an exciting romantic mystery adventure. http://bit.ly/a6EwTm
The best two Miss Marple’s were Joan Hickson and Julia McKenzie in that order. They best represent the fictional character literally and visually. Any changes that differ from the unassuming, smart, ‘cute’, deceptively shy spinister would not be Miss Marple…
Even chameleon Helen Mirren with all the required make-up would be too strong a personality to play Agatha Christie’s Ms. Marple.
As a recipient of the Agatha Christie Award, I find the idea of making Miss Marple a younger character unwise to say the least.
There are many excellent mystery writers living today who have created wonderful, memorable characters. One example is Charlaine Harris’s Southern Vampire series which has done rather well for Alan Ball and HBO, no?
Other writers (like myself) have mixed fiction and reality by making real historical figures sleuths.
I love mystery series and applaud Disney for wanting to bring one to the screen. Just not Jen Garner as Miss Marple, please.
Rosemary Stevens
Maggie Smith or Judi Dench would be absolute dynamite as Miss Marple. OK, so they won’t fill IMAX theaters on opening night (but would Jennifer Garner??), so what? Not everything has to be a big theatrical release.
Maggie Smith as Miss Marple would kill as a BBC miniseries or a Netflix production or WHATEVER (look at the huge success of “Downton Abbey,” big audiences in Europe AND in the US).
Better to do it right for the right audience than bastardize it and try to dress it up as a big budget studio release and force-feed it to unenthusiastic audiences. Yes, Jennifer Garner as Miss Marple is insulting to Agatha Christie, but worse, it’s insulting to AUDIENCES.
I like your pick of Maggie Smith. She would slay it. And also in agreement that Jen can’t fill a theatre… ELECTRA, anyone? I know it was a few years back, but still.
“Jen”?
Too late Chorion so shut up you already signed our agreement and we’ve cut you a check if you don’t want to deposit it tear it up but we’re not giving you back the rights. We now own Miss Marple and we will make the movie with Garner we have to now just to prove we’re not as dumb as everyone thinks we are. So stop complaining to the BBC or we will sue you in British court then in American court.
I doubt this poorly written post was actually by Disney.
That would be really funny if it weren’t so horribly true.
Maggie Smith would be a great choice!
Kim Khardasian!!!!!!!!
who is going to want to see this?
So this is the “Disney mandate” then? Take a much loved concept that has sold millions of books and tickets around the world and… DESTROY IT!
Jennifer Garner as adult Nancy Drew, married to Ned the lawyer, running a security/investigation company with the help of their young-ish teen kids, would work as an all-family flick.
Hopefully, the Brits have wised-up and will pull this outrageous idea… That being said, they should take a hard look at the overwhelming responses to this classic character and put together a project that does it justice… Good stories, strong characters coupled with PROFESSIONALS at the helm will draw an audience. Maybe, Hollywood isn’t the place for Miss Marple…Too many “idea-people” in the mix…
The Christie Estate didn’t have much problems in letting writers basically totally re-writing many plots for the UK recent adaptations. With Poirot they are more or less faithful but with Marple they keep to put her in story written with other detectives or adding sub-plots.
True. But those adaptations still keep what makes Miss Marple so distinctive and fun to watch–she looks like a “harmless old lady,” but is anything but.
Several years ago the trustees of the Agatha Christie estate put out the word that the estate was open to resetting the books in a contemporary setting as long as Christie’s whodunit plotting isn’t altered.
JG could simply be recast as a distant relative of Miss Marple who seeks her out for her sleuthing skills,paving the way for either Helen Mirren,Lynn Redgrave or even Emma Thompson to play the part.
Might be a bit difficult for Lynn Redgrave to play the part. What with her being deceased and all.
Lynn’s actually perfect. Nobody expects a harmless, unassuming old lady to solve crimes after she’s deceased. Great twist.
You’ve got me there:) And I’ll admit that Lynn Redgrave’s corpse would still be better casting than Jennifer Garner.
I would be ok with the idea if Jennifer Connelly or a good near 40s actress was attached to it.
Garner can’t act. She’s cartoony and her roles are either a rip off of Alias or the sweet naive girl.
I hope Disney shoots this project in the head.
As much as I like Jennifer Garner, this idea is about as dumb as casting Peter Ustinov as Hercule Poirot or Val Kilmer as a shapeshifting Simon Templar. Oh yeah, that happened, didn’t it? Yuck.
Well as far as Val Kilmer — that didn’t work out so well either did it?
And Peter Ustinov was a great actor, English, and age-appropriate for Poirot. I have no idea why you think he would not do well in the role.
I am drawn to one word in this article: “sassier”.
The prior Deadline piece gave no information whatsoever about the content or tone of the proposed adaptation, save to describe it as a “reboot” and to emphasize that it would feature a younger Miss Marple. All else regarding the potential characterization of that younger Marple — at least that I saw — came from the rampant speculation throughout the comment thread. Indeed, the original report suggests that Mark Frost has yet to complete a script.
I’m therefore puzzled; is the “sassier” tag simply more speculation, or is there more information available about the pitch or treatment used to promote the deal? If the former, I submit that it’s unwarranted; if the latter, I submit that readers deserve better context than we have been given to this point.
If Jennifer Garner gets the role, they should just call the film: “Miss Marple: The Wonder Years”
my first thought was, Jenni G. as Ms Marple? WTF?
But nobby, yes, “Ms Marple: The Wonder Years”, “Ms Marple: When she was hot” and “Ms Marple: College was a bitch” as a prequel trilogy with Jenni G. might do the trick.
“Should we take the estate’s unwillingness to confirm the deal as a clue they are having second thoughts after the outcry?”
One can only hope…