Hot Trailer: ‘The Hangover Part II’

COMMENTS (48)

• did they just use the same script in a different city?
  whatever I am in regardless and i’m sure it will be hilarious

  Comment by jonathan — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:01pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Looks Solid. Just hope they didn’t show the whole movie.

  Comment by Dave — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:05pm PDT  Reply to this post

• I feel like I’ve seen this before.

  Comment by DejaHugh — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:06pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Same rehashed plot. Looks unfunny and totally forced. Just like I suspected.

  Comment by J — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:06pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Clearly it is not as funny as the first but it will still open at nearly twice the original’s $45.

  Comment by Bartha left out Again — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:08pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • ‘Clearly it is not as funny as the first, but…’ Wait, stop there. Have you seen it yet?

    Comment by Steve Reed — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 5:06pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Loved the original but I’m shaky on this. Looks like they went for the check. Hope this “hot trailer” isn’t a sample of what’s to come or this will be a disappointment.

  Comment by Curtis Scoon — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:14pm PDT  Reply to this post

• i didn’t laugh much at part 1′s trailers. this one i did. looks funnier. looking forward to it.

  Comment by tim dax — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:20pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Survey question, Which film that comes out on memorial day fells Luke something different? (Kung Fu panda 2). Which film uses the same script with words substituted in? (hangover 2). Kung Fu panda 2 will make 275 million and hangover 2 will make only 130 million.

  Comment by Chris etrata — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:23pm PDT  Reply to this post

• It looks great! Just as funny as the first one, maybe even more. WB will own the summer, no doubt about it. Harry Potter will be huge; Green Lantern will blow out all expectations, and The Hangover II will do gangbuster business. I can’t wait!

  Comment by Alex — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:23pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • Quoth Alex, the WB intern.

    Comment by Paloma Pigeon — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:36pm PDT  Reply to this post

    • Its the same &$@@&&&@ movie!

      Comment by Anonymous — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:57pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • I agree on 2 of 3, but I honestly think that Green Lantern might do under 100 million. Well under.

    Comment by Hunter D. — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 7:21pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Looks so f-ing lame. Will do gangbusters first weekend and then drop like a lead zeppelin.

  Comment by Justin — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:29pm PDT  Reply to this post

• I had no interest in seeing the first one and no interest in this sequel. I find this kind of comedy repellent and obnoxious. It’s got a mean streak to it and I don’t like it. I know I’m in the minority but that’s my right. You guys can spend your money on it.

  Comment by sorry not funny to me — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:39pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • I’m just curious what kind of comedy you like? 27 Dresses? The Dilemma? I don’t find this stuff that funny – it’s more eye candy and a fun ride – but not sure what else is out there that is good comedy….

    Comment by Henry — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:48pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • I’m curious what you mean by mean streak… Mean towards whom? I’d describe it more as broad and ska sticky with some “adult situations.” the joke is always on them though, no?

    Comment by LK — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 11:16pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • I would respect your opinion… except that you didn’t even see the film.

    Comment by ignorant — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 9:16am PDT  Reply to this post

• What happened to R comedies?

  Comment by Claude — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:43pm PDT  Reply to this post

• This is the exact same movie as the first.

  In.

  Comment by I'm I The Only Idiot Here? — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:48pm PDT  Reply to this post

• It looks like they didn’t even try to do something clever or inventive the second time around. “Hangover II” doesn’t even feel “written” but more like, well, shatted out from some dark, stank orifice.

  Wonder what Billy Wilder, the King of Written Comedy, would think of this trailer/movie?

  Comment by bobby the saint — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 6:48pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Totally derivative. And I laughed like a moron. $100+ mil. Bank it.

  Comment by amused — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 7:08pm PDT  Reply to this post

• You guy are a bunch of tools. This looks funny as hell. I’m very surprised they’re using the same formula for the second one, though.

  Comment by Jim — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 7:11pm PDT  Reply to this post

• This is so Lame. Not only is it the same exact story but in a different city, but Stu is marrying another hooker? Jamie chung can’t act either, and the whole trailer wasn’t funny.

  Todd Phillips- Struck gold once, but shoulda let someone else direct the 2nd one.

  Comment by kudos — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 7:14pm PDT  Reply to this post

  • Just cause she’s Thai doesn’t make her a hooker, you tard.

    Comment by Tard — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 10:58am PDT  Reply to this post

• HOLY CRAP! This looks HILARIOUS! I can’t wait!

  Comment by RJ — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 7:30pm PDT  Reply to this post

• Didn’t I just see this movie a year ago? It was called something like “The Hangover”, as I recall.

  Comment by stargazer — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 8:19pm PDT  Reply to this post

• I do confess to sometimes wondering what Otto Preminger, Vincent Minnelli, Billy Wilder, John Ford, or any of their peers might say were they to see The Hangover, any in the Scream series, or literally anything from Apatow.

  I suspect they’d be eager to return to where ever they are now.

  Comment by Comedymaven — Thursday March 31, 2011 @ 10:46pm PDT  Reply to this post

• “I don’t care if it’s any good! Set it in Asia or something. Didn’t the Kumar guys do that? Whatever, just get Hangover Part 2 released. I need more moneys!”

  Comment by Bob — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 12:10am PDT  Reply to this post

• Maybe I’m just dumb but this trailer is hysterical and makes every other comedy this year (I’m talking to you “Hall Pass” “Arthur” and “Bridesmaids” pale in comparison).

  I like Billy Wilder too, but that doesn’t make this any less funny. It’s the comedy of the year. None of your comments will change that. Drop $8, buy some popcorn, sit back and be entertained.

  Comment by IDK — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 12:10am PDT  Reply to this post

• There’s nothing at all likable about these guys. Shouldn’t protagonists be sympathetic? And endearing? These guys are idiots they get into stupid situations and trouble and then more of the same.

  Comment by Anonymous — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 1:18am PDT  Reply to this post

• It won’t be as funny as the first one, but it’ll be decent. And, Jamie Chung is hot.

  Comment by Justin P. — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 3:56am PDT  Reply to this post

• Hilarious! Even the trailer busted my gut! This is gonna be huge!!!

  Comment by Alboone — Friday April 1, 2011 @ 7:15am PDT  Reply to this post