
Miral director Julian Schnabel was able to get an R rating changed to PG-13 after he and producer Jon Kilik recut it to downplay the implication of a molestation. Now, Miral faces a new obstacle as Schnabel prepares to show the film Monday at United Nations headquarters. The American Jewish Committee on Sunday urged the president of the United Nations General Assembly to reconsider his decision to sponsor a screening of the film for diplomats before Miral is put in limited theatrical release starting March 25.
The AJC letter prompted a quick response by Schnabel, the film’s distributor Harvey Weinstein, Kilik and Rula Jebreal. Latter wrote the script based on a novel she wrote, based on her experiences as an orphaned Palestinian girl who grows up in the wake of the first Arab-Israeli war who finds herself drawn into the conflict. The film stars Frieda Pinto, Willem Dafoe and Vanessa Redgrave.
In a letter sent to UN General Assembly president Joseph Deiss, AJC executive director David Harris called the film “a blatantly one-sided event…the film has a clear political message, which portrays Israel in a highly negative light.” The entire letter appears at the bottom of this post.
Schnabel, who with Kilik and Jebreal struggled to shed the MPAA’s R rating because he hoped the film would promote dialogue between young people on the complicated Israeli/Palestinian relationship, defended his film in a statement.
“I love the State of Israel,” said Schnabel, who shot Miral in Jerusalem. “I believe in it, and my film is about preserving it, not hurting it. Understanding is part of the Jewish way and Jewish people are supposed to be good listeners. But, if we don’t listen to the other side, we can never have peace. Instead of saying ‘no,’ I ask the AJC to say, ‘yes,’ see Miral and join the discussion.”
Said Jebreal: “Miral is a story about human beings, Palestinian, Israeli, Muslim, Jewish and Christian, and it explores how we all react differently to the violence around us, whether physical, emotional, political or otherwise. It is a film about love, education, understanding and peace. That seems like a good thing to show at the United Nations.”
Weinstein, whose The Weinstein Company is domestic distributor, said: “As a Jewish American, I can categorically state that I would not be releasing a film that was flagrantly biased towards Israel or Judaism. Miral tells a story about a young Palestinian woman, but that does not make it a polemic. By stifling discussion or pre-judging a work of art, we only perpetuate the prejudice that does so much harm. When I told my daughters, Lili 16 and Emma,13, about the AJC demand, they said, ‘give Mr. Harris a copy of the Constitution and point out the paragraph about free speech.’ I truly hope the AJC will join us for the premiere of Miral and the discussion that follows.”
Here is the original AJC complaint letter from David Harris:
Dear President Deiss,
I write on behalf of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) to express profound concern about the planned showing of the film “Miral” in the General Assembly Hall on Monday.
To say the least, we were surprised to learn about this highly unusual premiere under the auspices of your office. The film has a clear political message, which portrays Israel in a highly negative light. Permit me to ask why the President of the General Assembly would wish to associate himself — and the prestige of his office — with such a blatantly one-sided event.
AJC has had a long and productive association with the UN that dates back to the world body’s founding in San Francisco in 1945. Indeed, historians have credited our organization with a key role in achieving the human-rights provisions in the Charter. Moreover, the Barbara Hepworth sculpture in front of the Secretariat building was a gift from our president, Jacob Blaustein, to then Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold as a tangible gesture of support. Today, we enjoy consultative status at the UN.
It is in that spirit of deeply-rooted connection to the UN that we voice the earnest hope, even at this late date, that you will reconsider your decision about the film. Otherwise, you will only serve to reinforce the already widespread view that Israel simply cannot expect fair treatment in the UN.
Thank you for the consideration of our view.
Cordially,
David Harris
AJC Executive Director


As an Irish American who has seen films that helped expand the conversation as well as those that lambasted the Irish struggle as we worked towards the Good Friday Agreement; discussion is always better.
I hope of any place – the United Nations where such dialogue must occur films this movie.
Thom
As usual, any work of art that opines any consideration of Israel and it’s governmental problems is marginalized by the media, because now all discussions will include a “defense” of the politics of the film. The AJC and the ADL now serve as McCarthyite censors on all expression relating to the country of Israel. Generally, the word “anti-semetic” is thrown around, carelessly at such moments and this is no exception.
Already the merits of the film (if any) will play second place to the various stock complaints thrown out whenever anyone questions the illegal occupation of lands and the nazi-like, racist behavior of the right wing religious nuts who run the country.
The letter sent by AJC’s director spews the usual “we can’t get a break from the U.N.” – when, as all lovers of democracy know – the US and Israel are overwhelmingly outvoted by the countries of the world on the issues of Palestine. The usual answer to all such votes is that “everyone” is “anti-semetic” – which really now means “we are bullet-proof to criticism” since any opinion – no matter how thoughtful and studied – will inevitably be described as racist.
The “Arab” states are not the only ones in the Middle East who are authoritarian, colonial, and dependent on religious laws written 3000 years ago. The 18th century Enlightenment bypassed this corner of the world and we still are paying the price.
With any luck, the world will finally tire of the racist apartheid governement of occupiers where “national security” covers all
Wow dude. Thanks for the history lesson. Who cares if the film is “anti-Israel” or not. No one makes a stink about films that show slavery or Native Americans as being Anti-America/White.
Quit your bitchin’! Its a film. Pretty sure no one will see it anyway.
You couldn’t be more wrong, Yawn. Whenever a film about American racism is proposed there are White people who start whining “why do we have to talk about this again,”"can’t they just get over it,” etc.
The fact that you seem to think these movies are anti-America/White is a perfect example of it. These movies tell the struggles of AMERICANS who happen to be of color. Why does that have to be viewed negatively as “anti” anything? That attitude explains why so many movies ostensibly about the experiences of Blacks and Native Americans have White lead characters. It’s a sop to complaining white people.
Everything in film and tv in this country is interpreted and judged by how it affects White people even when it’s someone else’s story. That in itself is racist.
First off, if anyone’s whining, it’s you. Secondly, did you just call Jews “people of color”? Interesting.
Personally, I hope people like you continue to abuse that minority card to tout your politically charged and divisive rhetoric. Long as your flawed world views stay obvious, it gives us younguns to see what America USED to look like and why we don’t want to revisit the past.
Stay ignorant pal!
You must evidently be blind to the race-mongers out there who serve no other purpose other than to foment racial division for ideological and political purposes.
“Whites” don’t complain about movies about racism when the movies are FAIR and not ideologically-motivated to bash whites.
Ironically, when a film portrays black/hispanic/muslim racism, THAT is NOT okay with liberals. WTH!?
Perhaps, the UN’s record of condemning Israel’s human rights “atrocities” as compared to the genocidal dictators who have yet to be condemned might be an indication of the UN’s racist predilections?
Right you are–and credit to Schnabel and (surprisingly, once again, but credit where credit is due) Harvey, for showing courage and principle.
What openly pro-Israel films have been released in the last 10 years. I’m not being coy. I honestly can’t think of any.
You Don’t Mess With the Zohan.
Munich?
The Debt
This barely makes up for many pro-Israel films in the 1970′s and 80′s that were propaganda – check out Prof. Jack Shaheen’s book “Reel Bad Arabs” and u will see it well documented -plus there are many subtle pro-Israel images in our images, such as in “Date Night” when there is a hot Israeli Mossad agent that is sleeping with Mark Wahlberg’s character – it makes Americans think that Israeli women are all hot and the Mossad is a friendly organization – its much more subtle.
Contrast that to how u have seen Palestinians or Arabs in general in movie after movie -i.e., True Lies, Rules of Engagement, Collaterla Damage, the list goes on and on and on.
Thanks to the courage of Harvey and Schnabel – who are true Jews because they are about compassion and fairness – this movie was made
true jews? who the hell are you to say who’s a true jew?
Israelis are hot and people sleeping him them doesn’t make any movie pro-Israel. That’s how crazy some people are.
You’re so right- how could anyone in Hollywood portray Arabs and/or Muslims as terrorists after 9/11? Get over it- in the Eighties and Nineties, it was Latin drug cartel bad guys, before then it was Soviets (the Cold War, remember?). During WWII, in films like the MALTESE FALCON, it was Nazis. Are you seeing any sort of pattern here at all?
The terrorists in “Collateral Damage” were Columbian. Get your facts straight, dude.
Munich…
maybe not about Israel, but certainly a jewish smack-down re-imagining of WWII- Inglorious bastards
Inglorious Basterds was *literally* about Jews as Nazis. Did you even pay attention? Tarantino went way out of his way to make the Jews as grotesque as possible while granting the Nazis individual personalities so as to make commentary on propaganda films. Pretty clever, until act 3, when he seemed to just give up.
Ushpizin.
There are many more ‘neutral’ ones.
The Israelis=Jews comparison is lazy, foolish, and fundamentally antisemitic. It is a form of intellectualized Holocaust denial. There are dozens of more apt and more nuanced comparisons to make (Apartheid era South Africa, for example) but people jump on Jews-as-Nazis rhetoric very regularly.
But what is the implicit meaning of this?
Well, if Jews can act as Nazis then ANYONE can act as Nazis and thus there is nothing historically special or unique about the German regime. As such, the blood on the hands of the world’s nations (google “Évian Conference” for more details on how every first world nation knowingly allowed the genocide to occur) is washed clean and a large part of the necessity of a Jewish state is eliminated.
And it follows that if there is not legitimate reason for a Jewish state, then “the Jews” are using some type of illicit means of gaining special favor with the world, exploiting the Holocaust (which you have already stated in veiled terms that you do not believe occurred), and manipulating the world’s governments…kinda like The Protocols of Zion, eh?
Israel is necessary because time and time again every other nation in the world has proven, not in theory but in action, that they are pretty much a-okay with killing Jews.
Furthermore, “illegal settlements”? You know what? My girlfriend is half Native American. Can we, like, have your house? I mean, if you’re just gonna be morally consistent.
Every boarder on the planet has been determined by warfare and no nation on the planet except for Israel has ever been asked to “give back” land that it won, and won in a series of defensive wars no less. And certainly no other nation would be criticized for not giving “enough” land back. And, um…what’s the one big difference between Israel and all other nations? Oh, Jews.
I am not a big fan of the ADL. And I am even less of a fan of Israel. I want nothing to do with the state. I have never visited it and I never plan on visiting it. However, the vast majority of arguments put forth against the state, and a vast majority of the arguments you are putting forth here, are fundamentally Anti-Semitic and Anti-Jewish. There are no shortage of complaints to levy against Israel, you just choose the easy, slanderous ones that can be reduced to Holocaust denial and re-enforce of The Protocols of Zion.
Perhaps you should read the Palestinian Charter. Please note that of the 36 articles, articles 1-5, 6-10, 11-14, 15, 16-18, 19-23, 25-27, 29 and 30 all call for the death of all Jews in the world. And that’s not my bias opinion as a person with Jewish heritage, it’s the opinion of the PLO, who agreed to change all of these articles after the Oslo Accords…and then never did.
Again, I want nothing to do with Israel. It is a far right wing state that makes abhorrent and evil decisions on semi-regular basis. But your white washing of the matter is intellectually dishonest and duplicitous, to say the least.
But just to be clear, I am in no way calling you an Anti-Semite or a Jew basher. I am simply stating that much of your rhetoric is Anti-Semitic in nature. I do believe that there is a vast difference between the two.
As for this film, I hotly anticipate it. I think the Schnabel’s last film was brilliant and think that there is plenty of room for discussion. The Palestinian side is rarely depicted with any intelligence or nuance and I hope that this is a film capable of doing so. I know that I will certainly be there to see it as soon as it is released in my area.
This is a prime example of the name calling if you have an opinion on another country’s flouting of international law. Reminds me of a story in Robert Sherril’s book about LBJ:
One night during an early campaign, the race was tight and LBJ’s manager suggested that maybe he should float the word that his opponent likes to spend time in the barn with his hogs.
LBJ responded, “Hell, I’m not gonna call the guy a pig-f—er; I’m gonna make the S.O.B. deny it.”
That’s ultimately what this post is about – trying to get someone to “deny” that they are – yup, you guessed it – “anti-semetic.” That way, the slur and one’s personal pronoun appears in the same sentence.
You literally said nothing about a single point this person discussed.
Actually, I made a series of reasoned, historically verifiable arguments and went out of my way NOT to call the poster an Anti-Semite. It is possible to have Anti-Semitic attitudes without being an Anti-Semite.
But do note how many of the posts here make arguments about the “whiny” Jews, or the Jews media manipulation, or…as I predicted, Jews as Nazis metaphors.
Just sayin’, dude.
More Israeli propaganda to support “We need a homeland”. I’m not antisemitic (Arabs are Semites). I am anti-Israel. From Hitler to Netanyahu.
The film is excellent. Important. The Palestinian plight needs to be seen in the US. Most of the world now recognizes that this current Israeli government is practicing an aggressive form of apartheid. If you really care about Israel you will take the hard road of criticizing a friend so they strop hurting others and destroying themselves. Its never easy but history will show you that its the only route left.
The five Israelis murdered in their home were certainly apartheid, weren’t they? The Palestinian ‘plight’ is manufactured in order to expel what they call ‘descendents of pigs’ and there will never be peace there because of the barbarism of Islamic culture. That is not debatable, it is FACT.
Arabians have more rights in Israel than in other arabian countries. How about googling apartheid before writing it?
You obviously are not educated on the history of this matter.
I can’t but help believe that thisnis just another western PR ploy.
Get press, get viewers
I saw MIRAL at Toronto International Film Festival last September. I am an American Jew. If the Israeli government is so fearful of the truth, then it should do something to change it. It’s time for JewsN Israelis and Palestinians to honor the Treaty and end the immoral barriers that shame the Jews every day they let it continue. While it may take another century to heal, it has to start somewhere. No one believed that Berlin would be a place where Jews could move back to as well as be venerated only 65 years after WWII. It is time for the Jews and Palestinians to put away their hatred and begin the healing. Julian Schnabel’s film is a testament to what has happened and what is possible. I hope everyone will get to see it.
What Israel is fearful of is the perpetuation of lies, not the disemination of truth.
Shayners, you are absolutely correct. The UN and the left are spreading the lie that Israel is an apatheid state. Arabs living there have the right to vote, but why interfere with the anti-Israel propaganda? Can Jews vote in Saudi Arabia? Oh yeah, no Jews there, no Christians, no Buddhists, no Hindus. Instead of focusing on the tyranny of Islam, they center their hatred on a small state in the middle of an ocean of insanity. Leftists have turn the world on it’s head, good has become evil and evil good.
Steve – if you can’t admit that Arab Israelis don’t have equal rights (serving in the army, far less $$ for their villages and schools), then you have never been to an Arab village, or you are deeply in denial, or you’re just disingenuous.
Even Israelis admit this.
I’m looking forward to seeing “Miral”. It always bothers me when anything critical of Israel is seen as anti-Semitic. When 1 out of 3 Israeli’s are quite critical of Israel’s foreign policy it can hardly be considered that.
It smacks of right wingers in the US telling liberals here that we are anti-American. When we marched against the horrible Iraq war conservatives screamed that we were against our own country and when we were correct about WMD’s and all the lies we to this day have received no apology from our accusers for those atrocious accusations. I’m so tired of conservatives mud-slinging of liberals in any country, enough!
>It always bothers me when anything critical of Israel is seen as anti-Semitic. <
It's not. You don't need to start with that. It becomes antisemitic when people go against Israel while ignoring everything else. For Israel there are other rights. Everything they do is bad. If other countries do the exact same thing then it doesn't matter.
And btw lies have nothing to do with being critical.
I’m glad the United Nations General Assembly has the time and wasting of money to even sponsor the screening of Films. Because there aren’t more important things going on in the World right now that needs their attention.
Sigh…
Sure, the UN has plenty of things to do. Like condemning Israel while appointing Libya to the Human Rights Commission. Like ignoring what’s going on in Iran. Like doing nothing about Darfur. They are very busy.
Dear President Deiss,
Blah, blah, blah… screw freedom of speech… blah, blah, blah… c’mon, we’re buds and go way back… blah, blah, blah… we even got you a gift for God’s sake! Blah, blah, blah… Otherwise, whiny, poor us…
Cordially… not really,
David Harris
AJC Executive Director
Ha! Exactly.
The AJC is going to be up in arms when LOGJAMMERS finally gets released. The role of Schlomo Plowstein is quite controversial.
Miral has a 20% rating on rotten tomatoes. That’s the real problem with it. IT SUCKS!
The real story is that it is a boring movie with a 20% rating on rotten tomatoes.
I hate it when folks pull the “anti-Israeli” or “anti-Jew” card.
It’s a film, for crissakes – not an oral history or a wikipedia entry. Some Israelis are just too damn sensitive. I could see the fuss if someone was trying to assert the Holocaust was a fiction. But THIS is entirely different. Some Jews/Israelis are the most sensitive, thin-skinned people on planet Earth. Lighten up people!!!!
Did you really write the sentence “Some Jews/Israelis are the most sensitive, thin-skinned people on planet Earth. Lighten up people!!!!”? At best it’s a ridiculous generalization, at worst, the rantings of an anti-semite. Only you- in your tiny little heart- know which.
The truth needs to be told from all different sides.
What a BUNCH OF ANNOYING PR!CKS. Seriously. Isn’t $3 billion in defense money enough? Dammit.
I hope it will not fail me as the story here seems to be fine but the rank didn’t..
Israel always hates it when the truth about the Palestinians is shown. Most American Jewish supporters of Israel also hate it. But it’s time for the world to wake up to the fact that what Israel has been doing to the Palestinians is very similar to what the Nazis did to the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto. The problem is the right wing Likud party that dominates Israeli politics they have truly become zionazis and they are rapidly turning Israel into a fascist dictatorship. Major props to Harvey and Julian for making this film.
Everyone knows the truth about the Palestinians. They got fucked, and no one gave a shit, not the Arabs, not the Europeans, and not the Jews. Unfortunately, until someone figures out a way to deal with this stalemate, it is a war for land and water, just as it has been there for the last two thousand years. I don’t like a lot about Israel, primarily the far right religious fundamentalists who hold themselves to a law above the law of the state but, unfortunately, they have little choice in many of their security decisions.
For you to make a comparison to the Nazis in the Warsaw Ghetto is fucking ludicrous. If the Israeli government wanted to liquidate the population, trust me, it would have already been done.
I both support and am critical of Israel, and I support the telling of anyone’s story when they are caught in the middle of this sort of horror.
Am waiting to watch the movie ,but in all let there be peace and love your neigbour as you love your self is a clear massage.
peace to the world and peace in Isaerli.
Dr Dubem
This post illustrates the tiresome lie put out by Israel bashers, that any criticism of said bashing constitutes censorship. The Jewish community is entitled to free speech as well, in pointing out the biases of the film. They are not calling for some government to ban it, they are objecting to an act of preference and privilege being granted to this in fact biased film.
The poster pictured plays into this by putting forth the lie that only the Israeli side has been heard, while in fact the Palestinian side is the one predominantly or exclusively heard.
And indeed, the screening of the film at the UN illustrates the real situation, which is that the pro-Palestinian/anti-Israel narrative is the preferred one. For example, take a look at http://www.jimena.org and consider the almost complete lack of attention paid to the ethnic cleansing of Jews from predominantly Arab/Muslim countries.
Richard, you are correct. There is also ethnic Christian cleansing going on in a lot of Islamic countries. The media doesn’t have much of a problem with that, either. British Muslims demonstrate with signs that say ‘wait for the real holocaust’. The west is being attacked by Islam and some seem to welcome it out of a sense of some sort of guilt. God help us.
Steve– Don’t be an idiot. The media has plenty of problems with it and it gets reported all the time. How else did you know about it?
Schmuck.
The issue isn’t whether the film is anti-Israel. The issue is that the UN is screening it. Art with a political message is still just art. It is subjective opinion as told by a biased individual and presented with no rebuttal. Maybe it’s a great movie – though the critics suggest otherwise – but it has no place in the capital of global politics.
I am embarrassed I share the same faith with Harvey Weinstein and many of Hollywood’s leftists. It comes as no surprise to me that someone like Harvey Weinstein is happy to distribute and profit from such a film. After all, many jews collaberated with the Nazis as well.
How many films or documentaries have been produced highlighting the senseless killings of innocent Israelis at the hands of Palestinian terrorists? How many attacks on Christians at the hand of Islamic terrorists have been documented in film or even reported by the left-wing media? Just this past week, parents of an Israeli family from the West Bank settlement of Itamar were stabbed to death by a Palestinian along with three of their children aged 11, 4, and 4 months. Three other children survived including the oldest, 14, who was at a youth group meeting at the time of the attack.
Where in the middle east other than Israel can Christians, Jews and people of other faiths live and pray openly without fear of death? The Islamic countries never were and never will be tolerant of others. They cling to a medievel culture and world view that is not compatible with modern western values. These countries are ruled by despots who nurture hatred of Israel and the west to divert attention from the exploitation of their own people. Surely, whatever sins Israel has committed pales in comparison to what these thugs have committed.
Thankfully, people are finally waking up and this film is likely to fade into obscurity.
This is the UN we’re talking about.
The home of anti-Israel bias. Why break the habit of a lifetime. The whole organisation is dominated by the oil lobby.
Problem is that it only seems to happen against Israel or Jews.
Where are the films that show the British being the ones in the wrong during WWII for example? there aren’t any because most historians know the Germans were at fault.
It’s fashionable to be anti-Israel at the moment.
you are obviously an idiot. What a thing to say.
The film is excellent. the tide of common sense and human decency is turning against Israel’s illegal and brutal occupation and attempted genocide of the Palestine people. We can spend all day arguing and scoring points on the web but in reality the worlds eyes have been opened. The US was just the last to be shown the truth. I believe in Israel’s rightful place but only fairly and legally alongside a free Palestine. The sooner this Israeli government accepts its situation and stops the military oppression the sooner it has a chance of saving itself.
You obviously don’t know what genocide is. If the Israelis had wanted to murder the entire Palestinian population within the borders of Israel, they would have already done it.
However, I guarantee you, if the Arabs ever have the means to do the same, they won’t hesitate. And then, I’m sure that people like you will blame it on the Jews.
James, please provide you source for the charge of genocide. And as far as your insult towards the person who made the comments you don’t agree with, it takes one to know one and I know you are but what am I? Arabs don’t want to live in peace with Israel, they want to destroy it and murder every Jew living there. They carry signs saying ‘get ready for the REAL holocaust’ and cheered the murder of BABIES. I’m sure you don’t stay up nights worrying about those babies, they were perpetrating genocide, or at least on the side of those who are, right? Their throats were slashed, James. Now please provide proof of your charge of genocide, and I hope you aren’t going to use collateral damage as a basis. Cannot wait for your response, and I hope I get one.
Your post is really laughable. Palestinians that live in Israel won’t ever leave it for a Palestine.
And when was the so called genocide attempted? Are you falsly using the Gaza war which was started by Hamas and where Israel said for a week that they should stop with their bombing? Yes, people were killed but people seem to forget that 70% of them belonged to the Hamas. Again the ones that started it.
Have you seen Lawrence of Arabia? (smh)
It’s not the Israelis who are thin skinned, it’s the AJC which is clueless and archaic and does not represent the vast majority of American Jews who support Israel, but do not confuse support of Israel with a blank check support of some of its policies. How clueless the AJC is, is evident in this moronic letter, which seems to have been written by the head elder in a shtetl circa 1870. We gave you a statue half a century ago? WTF? This is how out of touch they are and they do Israel no favors with their attempts to silence honest, concerned criticism.
As per the idiot who asks what pro-Israel movies have been released in the past 10 years, check out the good films coming out of Israel recently. They speak for themselves. And you may want to see Munich. By the same token, how many “anti-Israel” movies has Hollywood ever released? Movies are not supposed to be PR.
Munich was Pro-Israel?
I seem to remember that being a movie about averah garaget avarah, as shown by making a moral juxtaposition between real murders of real people by real terrorists with a make believe 007 type plot. Didn’t exactly strike me as logical.
But whomever pointed out Don’t Mess with the Zohan, I guess you’ve got me there. That was an openly pro-Israel film. Possibly the only one in modern memory.
Movies which aren’t anti-Israel but are about Israel aren’t received well. They immediately call it propaganda. Even if the movies/ documentations don’t have anything to do with politics.
This is a great contrast to the images of the Arab world struggling for freedom and democracy in country after country while Israel wants to censor freedom of expression – and the Israeli govt is involved in this – believe me this major Jewish group wouldn’t act if the right wing Israeli govt didnt give it’s blessing. That is the problem -its a very right wing Israeli govt which is causing Israel these problems- such as expanding the settlements which are for Jews only – no Christians or Muslims allowed.
When Americans finally hear both sides of the Middle East conflict, it will hopefully cause Americans to push for a just and fair peace bc they will they see merits in both sides, not just the Israeli side.
I saw the film at a screening, and it is no doubt filled with anti-Israel imagery and rhetoric. In my opinion, there is, at a minimum, clear anti-Israel bias, and at worse, anti-semitism in this film. The Weinstein brothers should be ashamed of themselves for being involved with this project.
Can you imagine if it was directed and produced by Gentiles ? Oh the uproar !
Fortunately it’s again a case of Hollywood Jews sticking it to the die-hard Israel Fanboys.
What’s wrong with “blatantly one-sided with a clear political agenda that portrays Israel in a negative light?”. This is art, not the news.