
The pitched battle that began between Sony Pictures and visual effects house Hydraulx over the alien movies Skyline and Battle: Los Angeles is over. Sony Pictures objected to the fact that Greg and Colin Strause made their low budget Skyline and benefited from the work their visual effects house Hydraulx did for the big budget Battle: Los Angeles. At the time, the principals of Hydraulx (which has provided vfx for Avatar, 300 and other big pics) denied they did anything improper. When financier Relativity Media refused to change the picture’s opening from Nov. 12 until after Battle: Los Angeles‘s March 11 bow, Sony Pictures took the matter to arbitration. I’d been hearing that case was flimsy and largely based on the film’s producer Neal Moritz being angry at the time. Insiders deny this.
Now, Sony Pictures has announced that the matter has been dismissed, and everybody is positively hugging and kissing! Part of that might have to do with the fact that for their respective budgets, each film did fine. Battle: Los Angeles wasn’t at all impacted by the earlier film, and performed well enough and left enough plot room that a sequel seems absolutely inevitable.
Here is the official statement:
Sony Pictures Entertainment announced today that it has dismissed its arbitration against visual effects company Hydraulx Entertainment and its principals, brothers Greg and Colin Strause. The suit arose from Hydraulx creating visual effects for SPE’s “Battle: Los Angeles,” while at the same time providing special effects on the Strause brothers’ own alien invasion of Los Angeles themed picture, “Skyline,” which was released in November 2010. SPE had received information that visual effects from “Battle: Los Angeles” had been used on “Skyline,” but after the discovery phase of the arbitration, SPE was satisfied its special effects were not used in “Skyline.”
Here is the statement:
In a statement, SPE’s President of Production and Studio Operations, Gary Martin, said Hydraulx created outstanding special effects for “Battle: Los Angeles.”
Greg and Colin Strause stated, “We’re glad to put this behind us. We’ve been honored to work on several wonderful SPE projects in the past and look forward to future collaborations.” In addition, to “Battle: Los Angeles,” the Strause brothers and their companies have provided special effects for SPE on “2012” and “The Social Network.” Sony Pictures Classics recently acquired the film, “Take Shelter,” executive produced by Greg and Colin Strause and for which Hydraulx did the special effects.


serves sony right the
sony lost nothing. The only reason they didn’t drag it out is because the film did well at the box office.
If Battle Los Angeles bombed, you can bet that Sony would have kept going.
Success breeds strange bedfellows ( and, often truly interesting ones)…if Battle LA flopped…I agree, this suit would still be in the works!
it’s funny how money solves every problem
Well duh. Sony easily won the box office battle. No need to kick a man while he’s down.
I saw Skyline a while back (ouch), and watching Battle LA, I definitely thought the aliens and the aircraft were very very similar. I’d need to rewatch Skyline again, which will never happen, but they seemed way too close to each other.
The fact is they had no case, period. There was nothing to draw out and they knew it.
skyline is the WORST movie of 2010 — and its keeping me from seeing battle LA (along with it’s sub par previews. So for this viewer, skyline did have an effect. I’ll see it eventually but it’s not on my must see list.
They were both god awful.
The fact is that these guys were given millions to do effects for Battle LA, and at the same time they were working on their own cheap and similar alien invasion movie. Sounds like some people on Battle had no idea of the conflict, but who knows? Their movie sucked big time and pretty much tanked and we will see what happens with Battle LA. So far it seems to be performing decently. Sounds like Sony thought they were ripped off, discovered they weren’t and dropped it….. Of maybe it is as simple as the suits decided it wasn’t worth the cost of pursuing given that Skyline did so poorly…
It’s true the lawsuit was unjustified…However..the Skyline guys actually told their artists not to focus on the Sony production and instead put their resources toward their own picture, all on the Sony clock. That happened during an internal production meeting so many witnessed this.
Skyline did okay at the box office, despite getting dumped on by many film critics. Battle: Los Angeles has done pretty well so far, and the critical reviews for it have been mostly positive.
If Skyline and/or Battle: Los Angeles had flopped (on the scale of Mars Needs Moms), Sony might have attempted to press the matter further, but they didn’t have much of a case to begin with. For all we know, if the case had gone to court, the presiding judge would probably have dismissed the case, calling it a “frivolous” lawsuit.
I’d forgotten about Skyline; don’t know anyone who saw it (or remembers it). But I’m guessing big studios won’t want to risk having their ideas stolen like so many fake Gucci bags when they use an outside vendor.
Can’t see how Skyline was worth burning so many bridges.
I’m sorry to hear Greg and Colin’s movie was a pile of crap because I used to work with these guys years ago. I didn’t see the film and I probably won’t since I tend to believe the general consensus that it was poo. But I have to say that these guys are consummate professionals and would never re-purpose or rip off effects shots they were doing for someone else. Let’s face it, flying saucers and aliens tend to look pretty similar…
Nice to see the Winklevii doing well at Sony Pictures.