The Weinstein Company is ready to launch a PG-13 version of the Oscar-winning The King’s Speech on 1000 theaters on April 1, following an appeal and much discussion over the controversial MPAA R-rating the picture received because of liberal use of the word “fuck” in Tom Hooper’s original cut. April Fool’s Day seems an appropriate date for release because the whole thing seems so silly, but a good thing if you are a fan of the word “shit.” From what I’m told, the film is exactly the same length. What’s different? In that scene where King George VI (Colin Firth) tries a suggestion from speech therapist Lionel Logue (Geoffrey Rush) to curse in an attempt to get past his stutter, he now will mostly say the word “shit” about 42 times, instead of the word “fuck,” a word which isn’t used beyond the 2 or 3 times that is the limit for PG-13. Is this really what the movie business and the ratings board has come to? While Tom Hooper told Deadline during the Toronto International Film Festival that he wouldn’t change a frame of the film, I guess this was a way to do it without excising a moment of screen footage. Sources said that Hooper was involved in this dubbing effort that keeps The King’s Speech from carrying the same rating as films in the Saw franchise. The film originally got a 15 rating in the UK, but that was overturned by an appeal that considered the context the words were used in.
Harvey Weinstein wanted the PG-13 for DVD purposes and so it could be shown in schools and made available to younger audiences. Not sure how much it helps the film’s box office, which has reached $133 million domestic and $359 million worldwide. Here’s the announcement:
New York, NY, March 24, 2011 – The Weinstein Company (TWC) announced today that THE KING’S SPEECH PG-13, the family-friendly version of its Academy Award-winning historical drama about King George VI, will open on 1,000 screens nationwide on April 1, and will be the only version available in theatres. One of the year’s most celebrated, successful and beloved films, THE KING’S SPEECH was honored at the 83rd Academy Awards® with Oscars® for Best Picture, to producers Iain Canning, Emile Sherman and Gareth Unwin; Best Director, to helmer Tom Hooper; Best Actor, to star Colin Firth; and Best Original Screenplay, to screenwriter David Seidler. The announcement was made by TWC’s President of Theatrical Distribution and Home Entertainment Eric Lomis.
Said Lomis, “We are thankful to the MPAA for their wisdom and swift action in approving the release of THE KING’S SPEECH PG-13 release. The action enables those to whom it speaks most directly – young people who are troubled by stuttering, bullying and similar trials — to see it.”
The emotional impact of stuttering that was illuminated by THE KING’S SPEECH continues to be a topic of conversation with the recent statements by Vice President Joseph Biden about his own struggles with stammering. The release of THE KING’S SPEECH PG-13 offers families nationwide access to a positive story about stuttering and overcoming obstacles and social stigmas.





Every time I read about Bob and Harvey claiming themselves to be filmmakers I call bullshit because of things like this. The movie won Best Picture. Don’t mess with it. But they are about the money, not the film. I wished KING’S SPEECH never won Best Picture because it just feeds the Weinstein machine and they don’t deserve it. (FYI – they didn’t make KING’S SPEECH. They distributed. They are not filmmakers. They are brokers like Goldman Sach).
This isn’t about the Weinsteins or Harvey “Scissorhands”. This is about the archaic stupidity of the MPAA giving this otherwise PG-13 film an R rating because of one cuss word repeated a few times.
It’s absolutely ridiculous, and it’s even more ridiculous that changing the cuss word from fuck to shit gives it the PG-13 rating. The MPAA is an idiotic institution run by idiots.
MPAA is bullshit. But this is about money, plain and simple. Weinsteins are about money, plain and simple. PG-13 widens the audience which means more money.
Amen
double amen
And what exactly is wrong about being about the money? You do want movies to be continued to be produce, correct? Should they be happy with a 15% ROI when they could get 25%, thereby floating other films which only break even?
So, it is more acceptable for young people to hear the word shit 40 times instead of fuck? Is that the logic here? This has to be the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Swears are swears. And kids know how to swear.
Un-fucking-believable.
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Are they going to replace Rush’s whispered “fuck fuck fuck” during the speech at the end too? If they don’t, goodbye continuity.
I’m glad I’ve already seen the true version in the theater. Trading fuck for shit seems absolutely pointless to me. I didn’t know there were degrees of swearing. *rme*
I agree it’s a silly change to be made, but let’s direct the anger at the right source – the ridiculous ratings board that allows graphic violence to pass into the view of children long before an onscreen swear word (that they ALL already know anyway).
I can live with this change if it allows the story to be played in schools, etc. Anything that isn’t seizure-inducing animation or the slick Disney machine is welcome for students.
Maybe it’s me, but when I fit into the category of ‘younger audience’ back in the day, I was only interested in the R-rated movies, which were always easy to get into. Now I’m trying to picture this younger audience going to the movies on a Friday night desperate to see The King’s Speech. And those who are forced to watch it at school will wind up going to their next class asking ‘What the fuck was that shit?’
What’s even the point of this? I mean, the movie has been for how long now? It’s made a ton of money and won Best Picture. Everybody who wanted to see it has seen it. Just let it go!
I don’t even know how to respond to this. I’m just beside myself that Harvey can put out a press release calling this the “family-friendly” version and keep a straight face.
Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, that shit sucks.
While Weinstein does deserve some hate for the crap he has pulled, surely the MPAA has to be the focus of criticism here. It’s an absolutely ridiculous rating to begin with.
Hooper and Firth have public stated in interviews (during their post-Oscars press conference) that they are both against it but since they aren’t the distributors here, I doubt they had any say in this.
Why don’t they just explain to all the idiots in the world that the world fuck is actually an Olde English acronym which means:
Fornication Under Consent of King
or it also was used to abbreviate reason for punishment:
For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge if you did that you got in trouble.
The King’s Speech should have explained this in the movie.
Uh, because that is completely false, that’s why. Get your facts straight before you start calling people idiots.
hxxp://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/fuck.asp
I watched it on a plane and it sucked without the eff word. SUCKED! Wussifying a movie that made $200 Million is lame. Stand by your fucking work.
The MPAA needs to be taken down. Why do they still have any power, someone please ANSWER this question because there is no reason they should.
This shit is fucking ridiculous, and these cunts need to grow up. Let’s all wear diapers.
If you’re gonna complain, might as well proffer a solution. Mine dream rating system.
G
PG-11 (this replaces PG-13, anyone can enter)
NE-13 (no entry for children under 13 without adult)
R (stays the same)
AO (this replaces NC-17. No under 17 admitted)
C’mon! Something like this would be a lot more flexible. We desperately need something a little harsher than PG-13 and a little tamer than R. That’s why I propose the NE-13.
MPAA is just looking out for our children, and society as a whole. If adult material like King’s Speech can just slip through unedited as a PG-13, children will be prematurely exposed to the word “fuck,” and will subsequently be much more likely to say “fuck” themselves. This could lead to a whole new generation of people saying “fuck” a lot, which given how many people already say “fuck,” is a pretty frightening prospect. If we’d all follow the MPAA & Weinstein bros’ lead here, we just might be able to get children, and future citizens of the world, to say “shit” instead.
Sorry your argument is weak. MPA protects kids against the word FUCK but allows the N-word to pass for PG-13. So a swear word is bad, but a derogatory word against a race is ok. Weak, Stew.
I think you missed stew’s humor.
Sorry you missed the satire, there, Anon.
The MPAA hasn’t been forced to change its rules because of stories like this. Harvey and Bob get a TON of free press from bitching about the “R” (or worse) rating, as do most filmmakers who petition the MPAA to lower their respective rating(s).
OTOH, if the word “fuck” is used as an expletive, rather than in a sexual context, it should be allowed without prejudice in a PG movie. Using “fuck” in a sexual context can always be negotiated. It’s not like the kids’ ears are gonna burn.
Let’s all invite the MPAA to the big, grown-ups’ party, for fuck’s sake.
I’ll stick to the fucking ‘fuck’ filled version because of the ludicrousness of the whole issue.
I watched The Social Network recently – how come the MPAA decided that depicting men snorting cocaine off girls stomachs was acceptable for kids to watch, but not to hear the word ‘fuck’ – which most kids of PG-13 age will have heard anyway, if not used themselves.
I am personally happy to have the new version on the way. I teach Social Studies (World History) to 6th graders. I believe the movie is perfect the way it is, and I would love to show this film in class when we cover topics surrounding this era. However, I am NEVER going to show a film with F@$& in it. Yes it is ridiculous, but there are words I can let slip by and there are words I can get fired for. This new version will allow me to use film in class.
I’d always heard that a PG-13 movie can have one F-word, not “2 or 3 times” as stated in the article.
Shit this! What a shitting horrible idea! Way to shit the film in the ass. Shit, shit, shit, fuck…oh shit!
You can take the “fuck” out of “The King’s Speech”, but you can’t take the fucking boring, old people sap out of it.
This is what you get with a fucking old white senator in charge.
Old
An Old English Acronym?
America your ignorance is limitless.
Does this mean that the only dvd available will be the PG-13 version? Or will the R version also be available for those of us who do not need or want our films censored?
Very classy. . .