
While there have been reports that Paramount might kill World War Z because of a $125 million budget and no partners, I’m hearing that hot and heavy talks are going on with David Ellison’s Skydance and as many as two other financiers to share the load on a movie that is gearing up for production as soon as June. The plan remains for Brad Pitt to star and for Marc Forster to direct the adaptation Max Brooks’ novel World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War. The book looked at the aftermath of a global zombie war 10 years after the conflict, with a researcher for the UN Postwar Commission interviewing survivors in countries that were decimated by flesh eaters. It was thorough, and a thoroughly creepy read. Matt Carnahan wrote the script.
The temptation is to joke about the irony of a zombie project coming back to life after it was pronounced near dead. As a devotee of great zombie movies from George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead to Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later, Zack Snyder’s spirited Dawn of the Dead remake and genre spoofs Zombieland and Shaun Of The Dead, I am excited enough by WWZ that I hope it stays on its fast track. Because if it waits around much longer, Hollywood might by that time have killed off the genre with an over-saturation of flesh-eating corpse movies that could be as fatal to the film zombie as a shotgun blast to the head.
A look at the roster of zombie projects that are either going into production or percolating in development is more than daunting. I’ve always found zombies a far more interesting movie species than vampires or werewolves, but the genre benefited when Hollywood paced itself. After all, there was only so much plot innovation possible with slow moving hordes of hungry corpses. who were not handsome and sporting six-packs like the Twilight Saga kids, with little romantic sparks possible when the key characters were in the process of decomposing when they came back to life. Still, a quick scan of recent zombie deals shows that there are probably more than 20 films with a realistic chance of getting made over the next few years, with story lines that twist the genre in directions that are new for zombies.

The films range from Summit’s move to set Nicholas Hoult as a hunky zombie heartthrob in Warm Bodies to Lionsgate’s period adaptation of Seth Grahame-Smith Jane Austen novel send-up Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, to Universal’s Robert Schwentke-directed R.I.P.D. (Ryan Reynolds and possibly Zach Galifianakis in an action comedy about a force of undead police officers). There are new installments of 28 Days Later, Zombieland and Resident Evil in the works. Jonah Hill is attached to direct The Kitchen Sink, where a zombie, vampire and human teen teams to fight invading aliens (sure it sounds like a bar joke, but Oren Uziel’s script made The Black List). There is Paul is Undead (a satire that re-imagines Beatles lore with the Fab Four as zombies); Sony Pictures’ just made a deal to turn the comic Zombies Vs Robots into a film with Michael Bay and his Platinum Dunes cohorts; and WWZ studio Paramount is playing the genre for laughs with Boy Scouts Vs. Zombies, where scouts battle the flesh eaters. TV is also getting into act, after AMC’s awesomely good first season of The Walking Dead. The CW, thriving with the bloodsucker drama Vampire Diaries, has a zombie series called Awakening, and there will surely be others. I’m sure other zombie fanatics will agree this is only scratching the surface of the total volume of projects in the works.
Despite my concern about zombie film overpopulation, is there any zombie fanatic not excited over a movie version of World War Z, if the financing lines up to share costs with Paramount, and Pitt and Forster follow through and team in the film?


$125M budget? Dear God, do not foist a PG-13 zombie film upon this planet.
Since when did low budget mean low rating? I remember several brilliant films that had MUCH lower budgets. How about this; wait until you’ve seen the film, then judge it? Don’t judge it before. That’s just silly.
What in the hell are you talking about? A higher budget usually means that the studio will water-down an otherwise juicy script into PG-13 territory. They do this so that the film can be marketed to a broader (and younger) audience and sell more tickets.
Don’t make comments on a post you don’t understand. THAT’S just silly.
LOL…
…funniest post today. You sound genuinely upset and offended.
Why I never!
Brad Pitt has not read the last 80 pages of the script yet and when he does he will bail.
That seems rather strange to me because he’s been working on putting this project together for over 2 years. I’d heard they loved the J. Michael Stracyzski script and had only hired Matthew Michael Carnahan to polish it up a bit. Considering some of Carnahan’s other work isn’t all that great that might not be such a good thing.
Word is that Carnahan did a Michael Bay rewrite job on Straczynski’s script. The original script was filmable for under $50 million from what sources say. Still, the book has a worldwide, epic feel that most zombie movies avoid in favor of claustraphobic atmosphere. With judicious greenscreen use, they could cut the budget down to a manageable one.
Well it’s true, zombies are your best bang for the buck nowadays. You can hire hundreds of zombie extras for very low cost they only require some brains and flesh for lunch but they can be hard to wrangle into position at times. A good zombie wrangler is worth the price for any production.
Paramount need hits. I doubt they’ll kill this.
I really hope that when you say “AMC’s awesomely good first season of The Walking Dead” that you mean “good” in terms of ratings. Last I checked, it was a pretty god-awful first season, in terms of characters and storylines. I mean, it was REALLY fucking awful. If they had done some light restructuring of the graphic novels, I have no doubts that it would have been an “awesomely good” show. Seriously, they have a character named T-Dogg.
You’re in the minority here. TWD has been fantastic.
TWD STUNK !!!! The first 2 episodes were good, then it fell faster than a lead balloon. The CDC setting was DUMB “Stop asking him so many questions, he’s tired”, they asked the guy one stupid question! What the hell was with the individual barrels of oil powering the place?, ridiculous !!! something tells me they have NG torpedos with enough gas to last 100 years. Dozens of M4s lying around, noone picks them up ?? WTF
Also, what the hell were the Zombies day laborers too ? The grass around the CDC seemed pristine and manicured in a world overrun by the living dead, hilarious. Little mishaps like this in a show totally ruin it.
I can’t really come up with a more succinct response than “lol no”.
@BlahBlahBlah
You chose your nickname wisely.
Walking Dead is one of the few great new shows of this season. Next to Boardwalk Empire and Lights Out (R.I.P.).
Gotta agree with the shout-outs to BOARDWALK EMPIRE and LIGHTS OUT.
THE WALKING DEAD? Not so much.
BlahBlahBlah, I’m sure your script was SOOOO much better.
The Walking Dead was the best thing on TV when it aired.
Douchebag.
Ditto. It’s astonishing to consider otherwise.
In case this reply is not clear I am in complete agreement about the greatness of TWD. Cannot wait for S2!
You all have some pretty low standards. To put this show on stage with the likes of Boardwalk Empire and Lights Out is absurd to say the least. Those shows had stellar acting and great stories. Walking Dead had a cast whose talents were on-par with your run-of-the-mill Craigslist actor and some of the most uninspired episodes of anything I’ve ever seen on television. Seriously, a group of hardened thugs…running an old folks home (shame on you Robert Kirkman)? As Ktrx mentioned below, with new writers, hopefully the show will grow some new legs. I’m a huge fan of the books and would love for the show to be just as good. As it stands, though, it ain’t.
Finally, a person who speaks sense.
The Walking Dead had a terrible first season. It has me for 1 episode of season 2 and if it doesn’t crank up out great story lines, I’m gone. I’m sure that’s no skin off the producers’ noses but I’m not in the minority. The only people who love this show would love whatever had been produced, as long as it carried the name The Walking Dead. Dull television, people!
Spooky2k, go crawl in a hole. If you look around you and 98 percent of people disagree with you, you’re not in a minority, you’re a moron.
I don’t think there is any dispute that the first season of the walking dead had story problems, including slow pacing, some underwhelming characters and a surprising lack of action. It also abandoned story lines over the course of the season. The mystery over the fate of the angry hick who sawed his arm off was totally dropped late in the season. But frank has brought in new writers so I’m optimistic. The show got solid enough ratings for viewers to give it a second chance. They need more scares and more thrills.
I’d love to see Forster and Pitt team up for a high-profile genre pic, but $125M??? Wow.
The earlier commenter was spot-on about the rating that budget level requires, and a PG-13 version of that script sounds like a bad idea.
And are audiences of America ready to see Brad Pitt eating stewed human remains in an RV? Hmm. The whole resorting-to-cannibalism thing in post-apoc/post-cataclysm is pretty stale anyway.
The slow pace isn’t a minus that’s a big plus in my book. It was always supposed to be mainly about the characters and the new rules in this postapocalyptic world. Not unlike Battlestar Galactica without battleships and the religious chumbawamba. Splatter and Scares just on top. The slow pace is also important for the atmosphere.
@Merle
his storyline isn’t abandoned. He is supposed to come back in season 2. No need to end every storyline in the same episode it started. That’s one of the big adventages of serialized storytelling and you can find that in every great show.
Slow pace and character development are totally different things. The graphic novel series allowed you to get to know the characters through their every day struggles which may or may not involve zombies. The show couldn’t balance this. It was about a zombie apocalypse. The graphic novels were/are about people trying to survive in a dying world with danger lurking in every nook and out in the open. That level of paranoia and danger does things to people. The atmosphere you speak of comes from that. In the show, the apocalypse has made them do nothing but act like cliché stereotypes who constantly contradict themselves. Blood and splatter are at the forefront – that’s the problem!
@Merle: Everyone forgot about him in one episode. Even his brother. See my point above about characters contradicating themselves. It’s not serialised, it’s just plain ‘We’ll ignore that until it’ll surprise people again.’
As someone who never read the graphic novels, or otherwise knew anything about the story of TWD prior to watching it (and full disclosure, I have only watched 4 of 6 episodes), I would have to disagree with your assessment on character development. Everything you say wasn’t in the show is what I liked about it. I’m sure it can’t compare to the novels because no movie can ever really dive into character like a book. Its just the nature of the medium. I agree with some of the assessments on the acting and some situations, but I think its doing a relatively nice job of exploring life after the apocaplyse and how the survivors are coping.
zombies and pg-13 don’t mix.
I want a rated R.. and if Brad has a say.. and Brad does have a big say then it will hopefully be R.. I’m just reminded of how he stood by David Fincher in Se7en when they didn’t like the ending. Refused to change it. So we will see.
125 million is a lot..but I recall that Reese Witherspoon’s comedy How Do You Know costing 120 million. so a Zombie epic at 125 seems about right.
I for one can’t wait.. and Brad Pitt does Dark characters very well.
More zombies properties added to the current cultural lexicon. Excellent. Only a matter of time till I get the Plan 9 From Outer Space remake I have been waiting years for.
Plan 9 is currently being remade because it’s in the public domain you could do your own remake of it if you want to. Nobody ever bothered to renew the copyright or copyright it in the first place.
Can someone who knows the script tell me what there is here that costs $125 million? Apart from Brad Pitt’s salary, Hollywood’s usual overheads / gouging etc. etc. that is.
SPIDER-MAN 2 came with a price tag of $200 million and only $45 million of that was designated to the actual, physical production, so….
Haven’t read the script BUT if it follows the book – there are some heavy duty/intense action scenes for sure.. the submarine and floating flotilla, the battle in the Bronx, the rich douchebag in his fortified home and getting overrun by survivors and zombies.
Lots of green screen work that’s for sure, China, Antarctica, Northern Canada etc etc..
Still not sure though, if that warrants a $125Mil budget though.
This is hands down the best book I’ve ever read in the genre. I hope it works as a film.
That said, I have my fears. The Studs Terkel Oral History aspect is a wonderful literary device, but I’m not sure how that’s going to translate into a two hour movie. A 13 episode limited series maybe, but as a feature it’s got a lot of challenges.
It’s not just the physical scope of the story, which is pretty much the entire globe. It’s the human scope, the wonderful characters and their vignettes that make this thing sing and elevates the piece beyond gore and flesh-chomping (though there is plenty of that). The character of the transcriber — i.e., the guy who’s collecting these stories –is virtually invisible in the book which works to great effect. For the film (I believe) they’re going to make him the main character and try to make it his personal story. Fair enough, studios are more comfortable with a single protagonist and point of view. Whether this results in a film that’s equally as powerful is the book is questionable.
I think the best treatment would be to do it almost in the manner of a World War II documentary, follow the individual stories while showing the overarching sweep of the narrative.
I’m sorry, but Marc Forster has no aptitude to direct a movie of this genre and this scale. How soon we forget the bullshit shaky cam of Quantum of Solace – possibly the worst directed Bond movie EVER. His other films aren’t anything great either.
I loved Quantum of Solace.
Go fuck your hand, Gregg.
I don’t see how Brad Pitt can “star” in this movie. Every chapter of the book is a stand-alone tale that builds upon the chapter before it. Once you turn it into a star vehicle, it becomes something else completely. I’m guessing it never gets made.
Um… consider this. He plays the interviewer. Doesn’t take a genius to figure this out. Kind of just takes an average intellect. Sorry to inform you…
never going to happen. Brad will bail. The script is bad and the market does not want another Zombie movie.
The Walking Dead is bad news for other zombie movies in the pipeline.
As for World War Z, if you want to keep cost down, hire unknowns for lead roles (ie brits). Brad Pitt should recuse himself from starring in the movie.
BlahBlahBlah makes some compelling arguments. I was also a huge fan of the books, and I had extremely high hopes for the show. Some of the new characters and situations, I wasn’t so fond of… but other changes and developments I thoroughly enjoyed. I didn’t LOVE the show, but I didn’t hate it either.
As far as WWZ, I’d rather see it on HBO as a mini-series. Otherwise, it has no chance of being as epic as the book.
Carnahan’s script is junk, a real p.o.s. I hear they are actually saying it will be more like $175 mil
WWZ has been read by me at least 3 times, some booboos though:
“Mets Fan” should have actually been a Yankees fan if she was from the Bronx.
Who re-loads .22 rimfire cartridges ? No one.
If Solanum lives outside of the body for up to 48 hrs, would not a Zombie (dead) body be considered “outside the body”, thus rendering spread to a limit of 48 hrs post reanimation ?
RE: “Mets Fan” Not necessarily, my father grew up in the Bronx as a Brooklyn Dodger fan!
how many frikkin times do i have to tell you that 28 days and 28 weeks later are NOT zombie movies..theyre infected with RAGE VIRUS..they DONT EAT their victims..they beat the LIVING SHYT out of them until they ARE ALSO INFECTED BY THE VIRUS…