EXCLUSIVE: This is exactly the kind of information that shareholders of Big Media need to know but rarely see. It’s considered a red flag when any public company pays one of its bigwigs – usually the CEO – three times more than the average for the four other top executives which the SEC requires them to list. So I’ve taken proxy statements and done the computations and discovered that at least 16 of 35 companies failed that test. Often miserably. Nearly half of the media company compensation packages disclosed so far for 2010 show a startling degree of hero-worship as boards of directors pay their top dogs sums that far exceed what the pay was for other top execs in the company.
Stock grants accounted for big chunks of the compensation for those who top this list, including Discovery Communications CEO David Zaslav, Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman, DirecTV CEO Michael White, Nielsen CEO David Calhoun, and CBS chief Les Moonves. Radio station owner Entercom was off the charts: CEO David Field’s $9.1 million compensation was modest by media company standards but still 25.4 times bigger than average for the company’s other four executives. It includes $7.9 million from stock grants that only pay off if Entercom shares rise to hit certain target prices.
Still, corporate governance experts who focus on what’s often called “CEO centrality” say that an out-of-whack pay package is bad news for shareholders. It indicates that the board of directors may be in the pocket of a CEO – or believes he or she has near super-human power to help the company succeed. In either case, the board is likely to give the CEO all the credit when things go well, and blame others when they go badly. Research shows that usually hurts the stock price over time.
I’ll track this and other measures of lop-sided pay as other media companies release information for 2010. But there are a few things to keep in mind: The SEC reporting rules only cover the top-paid executives of publicly traded U.S. companies. That means we probably won’t know how much privately held Hearst pays CEO Frank Bennack, or how much Japan’s Sony pays CEO Howard Stringer. It also means that we’ll miss a lot of highly paid people who work at subsidiaries of a big company; Universal Studios’ Ron Meyer may be a big deal in Hollywood, but he was a relatively small fish last year at parent company General Electric.
To make comparisons in our list here as fair as possible, we looked at the compensation for the five most highly paid employees for 2010. Sometimes companies report the pay for more than five people — for example, when a top executive is replaced during the year a corporation will include the incoming and outgoing person’s compensation. And the pay data given the SEC can spike in a year when an executive cashes in stock or collects deferred compensation. So here’s how the companies stack up, with the top paid executive’s 2010 reported compensation and comparison to the average (median) pay for the four other highest-paid honchos:
1. Entercom: David Field. The son of company founder Joseph Field became CEO in 2002, about 15 years after leaving his job as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs. Field made $9.1 million last year – the total of his $791,723 salary, $444,308 bonus, $7.9 million in stock, and $28,000 in other perks including medical insurance premiums. That’s a 348% raise in a year when company shares appreciated 53.2%. Though considered a strong operating executive, his salary stands out because it’s 25.4 times higher than the $358,692 average for the four other top executives listed in Entercom’s proxy statement. Field’s salary and the $3.9 million paid to CFO Stephen Fisher accounted for 93% of the $14 million that Entercom paid to its top five executives.
2. Discovery Communications: David Zaslav. The former head of NBC Universal’s cable channels, who became Discovery’s CEO in 2008, has impressed Wall Street by cutting costs as he turned Discovery Times into I.D., Discovery Home into Planet Green, Discovery Kids into The Hub, and forged a partnership with Oprah Winfrey to turn Discovery Health into OWN. But now the channels have to deliver, and the results have been mixed — with OWN off to a tumultuous and expensive birthing and then disappointing ratings since its January start. Last year, Discovery’s stock price rose 34% while Zaslav’s pay was up 265% to $42.6 million ($2 million salary, $20.3 million in stock awards, $15.4 million in options awards, $4.4 million in cash incentives, and $432,668 for ”other compensation”). His compensation includes $40,299 for personal security services after last September, when a deranged man with a pistol and explosive device held three people hostage at Discovery’s headquarters before being killed by police. Zaslav’s salary is 8.1 times higher than the average pay for Discovery’s four other top executives. His salary plus the $9.5 million that went to Discovery founder John Hendricks accounted for 78% of the pay that went to the top five executives.
3. Viacom: Philippe Dauman. Sumner Redstone controls most of Viacom’s stock, and takes care of his friends — no one more than Dauman, a former securities lawyer who was named Viacom’s CEO in 2006. The company’s shares rose 22.4% in the nine months that ended in September, the new wrap-up date for Viacom’s fiscal year that used to end in December. Investors paid more attention to the improving ad market and hits including MTV’s Jersey Shore than Paramount’s flop with The Last Airbender, or Dauman’s involvement with Redstone’s attempt to muscle a reporter into disclosing a confidential source in a story they found embarrassing. (“We’re not going to kill him. We just want to talk to him,” Redstone said in a voicemail.) That landed Dauman a 149% raise to $84.5 million ($2.6 million salary, $41.8 million in stock awards, $28.6 million in option awards, $11.3 million in cash and nearly $200,000 in other compensation including $118,000 for personal use of the Viacom plane). His pay was 7.9 times higher than the average for the four other top executives. Dauman and COO Tom Dooley, who made $64.7 million, accounted for 86% of the pay for the five executives listed in Viacom’s filing to the SEC. Add in Redstone’s $15 million, and it left the two other top executives with just 5% of the pie. Still, not bad for nine months of work.
4. DirecTV: Michael White. The former Pepsi executive was a surprise choice to become CEO of the No. 1 satellite company in January 2010. But he seemed to have adapted quickly, introducing discounts and programming initiatives to attract subscribers while the company benefited from its growing popularity in Latin America. DirecTV shares were up 17.5% while White collected $32.9 million (including $1.5 million in salary, $14.7 million in stock awards, $12.5 million in options, $4 million in cash incentives, and about $300,000 in other compensation including more than $26,000 for personal use of the company plane). White’s pay is 7.2 times higher than the average for DirecTV’s four other top executives.
5. Nielsen: David Calhoun. The former vice chairman of General Electric, and co-author of the book How Companies Win, became CEO of Nielsen in 2006. And he seems to have thrived as the company (whose often maligned TV ratings determine what shows survive, and how much advertisers will pay for them) prepared to go public — which happened this past January. His pay jumped 125% in 2010 to $14.2 million ($1.6 million in salary, $8 million bonus, $1.2 million in options, $3.4 million in cash incentives, and about $16,000 in other compensation.) His pay is 6.3 times higher than the average for Nielsen’s four other top executives.
6. CBS Corp: Les Moonves. Here’s another executive who has done well by pleasing Sumner Redstone, who controls CBS and named Moonves CEO in 2003. Company shares rose 37.3% last year — in part because of CBS’ success in maneuvering cable operators to pay cash for the programming on local TV stations that viewers with antennas can receive for free. CBS’ scripted procedural dramas including The Good Wife and CSI also performed well, although Moonves bewildering foray into motion pictures — CBS Films — didn’t. No matter. Moonves landed a 33.5% raise to $57.7 million ($3.5 million in salary, $27.5 million bonus, $8 million in stock awards, $14.9 million in stock options, $870,000 in improved pension benefits, and nearly $3 million in other compensation.) A Los Angeles resident, Moonves collects $2.5 million to make up for the extra tax that he has to pay New York for working there. His salary was 6.0 times higher than the average for CBS’ four other top executives.
7. Time Warner: Jeff Bewkes. Since he became CEO in 2008, Bewkes has been on a mission to simplify the once unwieldy media giant. But that’s also meant he has missed many opportunities for savvy acquisitions. Now that AOL, Time Warner Cable, and other businesses have been cut loose, Time Warner is largely a cable network owner and film studio that also publishes magazines. That hasn’t made the business easy: HBO lost subscribers last year. CNN trails Fox News. And the end of the company’s uber-blockbuster Harry Potter movie franchise is imminent. Still, with Time Warner shares up 9.9% last year, Bewkes landed a 34.4% raise to $26.3 million ($2 million in salary, $5.5 million in stock awards, $4.1 million in options, $14.4 million in cash incentives, about about $300,000 in improved pension and other benefits.) His pay was 4.7 times higher than the average for Time Warner’s four other highest-paid executives.
8. Rovi: Alfred Amaroso. The home video technology company was known as Macrovision in 2008 when it bought the decaying carcass of Gemstar-TV Guide. Amaroso, who became CEO in 2005, quickly sold properties including the TV Guide Network and TVGuide.com and changed his company’s name to Rovi. Its focus on digital entertainment, a hot business, contributed to a 96.4% increase in the stock price last year. But Amaroso’s compensation only rose 14.5% to $7.0 million ($550,000 salary, $440,250 bonus, $2.8 million stock awards, $2.5 million in stock options, $632,000 cash incentives, and more than $45,000 in other compensation). That’s still 4.5 times more than average pay for the three other people with positions that had to be listed in Rovi’s account of individual executives’ pay.
9. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia: Martha Stewart. Last year she moved her TV show from NBC to the Hallmark Channel (which promptly went into a retransmission battle), her merchandise line from Kmart to Home Depot, and started selling products under her brand name at PetSmart. But the company’s future is unclear: Is the Chief Editorial Officer of this money-losing company also losing her cachet or preparing for a financial comeback? In any event, the company shares declined 13.2% last year and Stewart saw her pay drop 40% to $5.9 million ($2 million salary, $783,125 in options, and $3.1 million in other compensation). Don’t feel sorry for her. Her compensation includes $119,039 for security services, $55,725 for a weekend driver, and $29,538 for a trainer — and every time she films at or writes about her sumptuous homes, it makes them all tax deductible. The total also is 4.2 times more than the average for MSLO’s four other top executives.
10. AOL: Tim Armstrong. AOL is trying to become a dynamic ad-supported digital content company before it loses all of the subscription revenue from its Internet service, which mostly serves dial-up customers. Armstrong, who left Google to become AOL’s CEO in 2009, spent much of last year buying and selling Internet content companies and launching Patch, a collection of local news sites. Still, AOL shares declined 2.6%. And people question the wisdom of this new deal with leftist The Huffington Post amid whispers that AOL lost a lot of subscribers because it incited a right-wing boycott. Armstrong’s pay fell 40% to $15.3 million ($1 million salary, $4.9 million stock awards, $7.1 million options, $$2.3 million cash incentives, and nearly $16,000 in other compensation). That was 4.2 times higher than the average for the four other highest-paid executives.
11. Time Warner Cable: Glenn Britt. The professorial CEO of the No. 2 cable company was glad to repeat his lectures about the advantages of his core business last year as industry leader Comcast went after NBC Universal. The hysteria about cable TV subscribers cancelling their subscriptions to watch TV shows from Web services such as Netflix died down as the realization sank in that cable has a virtual monopoly in providing broadband services that are fast and reliable enough to handle Web video. Britt, who’s been CEO since 2001, saw the company’s stock price rise 57.8% while his pay increased 9.3% to $17.4 million ($1.3 million salary, $3.1 million stock awards, $4.4 million options, $8.3 million cash incentives, about about $400,000 in improved pension and other compensation). Britt’s pay was 4.1 times higher than the average for Time Warner Cable’s four other top executives.
12. Warner Music Group: Lyor Cohen. The music business stinks and Warner Music hasn’t found a way to fix it. The stock declined 2.9% last year and the company recently announced that it hired Goldman Sachs to study “strategic alternatives” — which is the way corporations put themselves on eBay. But you wouldn’t necessarily know that anything’s wrong from the 30% raise that the company gave its highest-compensated executive, Vice Chairman Lyor Cohen, who was promoted to his current position in 2008. He made $6.5 million ($3 million salary, and $3.5 million bonus). That’s 3.9 times higher than the average pay for the four other top executives. Cohen’s pay plus the $5 million that went to CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. accounted for 71% of the pie for Warner Music’s top five.
13. Live Nation: Irving Azoff. Here’s another music executive who doesn’t seem to have suffered from the industry’s woes. In 2008, Barry Diller gave Azoff a lucrative package to run Ticketmaster. That included folding in Azoff’s management firm Front Line, whose clients include golden oldies The Eagles and Fleetwood Mac. Azoff made out like a rock star again last year when Ticketmaster and Live Nation merged — and Diller left the board. As Live Nation’s chairman, Azoff made $22.8 million ($1.9 million salary, $5 million bonus, $462,000 in stock awards, $1.7 million in options, and — amazingly — $13.8 million in other compensation). Azoff’s perks include $10 million in interest and other payments for his Front Line holdings as well as a $49,071 auto allowance. His pay is 3.5 times higher than the average for Live Nation’s four other top executives. With the $15.9 million that went to CEO Michael Rapino, the two executives accounted for 69% of the compensation for the company’s top five.
14. Lionsgate: Michael Burns. The vice chairman of Lionsgate since 2000 will remember 2010 as the year he helped fend off Carl Icahn’s hostile takeover attempt. But Burns, a former investment banker, failed in his own effort to merge the film and TV company with MGM. Most of that drama took place after March 31, when the company’s 2010 fiscal year ended. Stock prices for that 2009-2010 fiscal year rose 22.1%, while the pay for Burns jumped 138% to $6.9 million ($925,000 salary, $1.5 million bonus, $4.5 million in stock, and more than $17,000 in other compensation). The company paid more than $13,000 for his auto allowance. His pay is 3.5 times higher than the average for Lionsgate’s four other top executives.
15. Sirius XM: Mel Karmazin. The satellite radio company was dangerously close to going bankrupt in early 2009, and had nowhere to go but up last year. The good news for Karmazin, who became CEO in 2004, is that the auto business improved in 2010. The bulk of Sirius XM’s subscribers are people who buy cars that have the radios pre-installed and discover that they like having 130 or so channels to help them pass the time while stuck in traffic or on a long car ride. Karmazin also avoided a potential crisis by signing a new five-year deal with one of his best-known attractions: Howard Stern. Sirius XM shares appreciated 177% in 2010. But this year Karmazin didn’t have the $35.2 million in stock options that contributed to his $43.5 million take in 2009. (The company notes that only $1.6 million had to be reported on his W-2 for federal taxes that year.) He ended 2010 with $9.9 million ($1.5 million salary, $8.4 million bonus, and $7,350 in other compensation). That’s 3.2 times higher than the average for Sirius XM’s other four highest-paid executives.
16. Disney: Robert Iger. The fiscal year that ended in September was the best for Iger, who became CEO in 2005. Disney’s film studio had two $1 billion-plus grossing films: Toy Story 3 and Alice In Wonderland. ABC’s TV stations enjoyed a rush of political campaign ads. Cable channels including ESPN scored when the ad market began improving. And in this thawing economy, Disney was able to raise theme park admission prices and still see attendance grow. The stock price was up 21.6% in the year ending in September, while Iger’s salary rose nearly 24% to $29.6 million ($2 million salary, $7.4 million stock awards. $4.4 million opions, $13.5 million cash incentives, $1.6 million in pension improvements, and nearly $800,000 for other compensation). His pay is 3.1 times higher than the average for Disney’s four other highest-paid executives.


I wonder if they actually ever do the math and say to themselves “If I trade in one of my millions in bonuses I could keep 10-30 jobs for people at my company.”
But then the second thought kicks in: “No, I will cut jobs and just make everyone in the middle and the bottom work harder, for two people. Why should my bottom line and personal bonus suffer? So what, it just fifty people out thousands and I can use the extra couple million to hire that personal testicle washer I always wanted!”
However, you can bet the farm these CEO’s who pretty much all of them have overseen massive layoffs at the companies to achieve profits, not necessarily though growth and business but through shrinkage and business, the problem is they expect everyone to work harder but….
THEY DO NOT WORK HARDER OR WORK MORE THAN THEY HAVE IN PREVIOUS YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!
Does anyone really think Les Moonves is working more this year than last?
Unfortunately they are only doing the bidding of the analysts, investment bankers and, yes, stockholders who want lower body counts. They don’t like paying out extra social security, unemployment and health benefits. So the they love telling the CEOs to keep their payroll low. The financial gurus are the main reason for job losses at publicly traded companies. The SEC rules about doing everything to please investors and stockholders must be changed. The people wanting lower employee counts, the SEC and anybody in Government who supports their thinking should do hard time!
you just confirmed what I have always said to friends on CEO’s and there expansive pay scales is not needed at all for what they do–
here it is
” a trained one eyed chimp with a dart board with all the
recommended decisions on the numbered spaces can by chance make the same percent right decisions as the CEO –with the dart toss!! so why do we need him or her just get a chimp and bananas!!”
What’s the gripe? Personal testicle washers have to pay their union dues just like evrybody else.
Sometimes saying how much more then the average you make doesn’t really put this in to perspective. There are some overpaid executives. But I look at a few of these and think their employers are getting a good deal. When Mel Karmazin went to SIRIUS, it was a virtual train wreck. Outside of brokering a major merger with XM, he then locked up talent, guided it through the FCC, and managed to get investors to commit to a project that the street thought was dead. I don’t know of any other executive in his company that could have pulled that off.
Yes, I’d concur someone like David Zaslav is being overcompensated considering the return to value, it doesn’t mean a high return to value can’t be earned.
It’s all about whether or not their results show they tend to be make it worth it – and if you have to pay them highly to keep them jumping ship and going somewhere else. Same as anything..
let me see he made deal with the only other company in the same business that was in trouble, got experts and lobbyists to jump all over the FCC to approve the only merger that made sense even thou it meant a monopoly and approved the work the lawyers did over said same . then got talent some entertainment testing group say Nealson for example or other to hire talent that made sense that “would” take the pay and change in format–AND he did it from a position of I HAVE ALL THE MONEY I”LL EVER NEED BUT WANT MORE!!!! place of risk, that even failure on his part was OK in and would not look badly on him,then asked for a gigantic bonus for its OK is nuts
hmmm. any of these guys single?
Is that you, Chelsea Handler?
Really, I don’t think CH could do much better than #235 on the “high pay” list…
Are you there, Chelsea, its me – God.
Hi David -
Can I suggest adding one piece of information? The stock price rise over the CEO’s tenure and over the corresponding year for the compensation. I would agree that this distorted compensation practice in the long-run devalues the stock, but the market rewards short-term performance. Curious to see if the hypothesis of it injuring the stock price (or not at least achieving the same multiple of performance)shows up in the corresponding time.
I think deferred compensation (stock options etc) may be considered differently by the rules. I don’t see how the legal teams of those companies would blatantly violate SEC rules on the face if simple computation would reveal the truth about their top paying exe.
Speaking of BOD worship, I wonder how many of these guys sit on the Boards of other companies. It’s a big, incestuous, “you vote to give me lots of money, I’ll vote to give you lots of money”, world out there in corporate America.
What’s brad grey pulling in?
Martha Srewart is the only one deserving. Her name is the company. These others name don’t matter. So if MS wants 10x more it’s her purgative. Hear me? Hear me!!!!!
“purgative”? Funniest spelling error/pun of all time!
Thank you, David, this list is great journalism.
As for the “we’ve gotta pay ‘em to keep ‘em” argument, really? If, for example, CBS had said, “Sorry, Les, we can only afford 40 million,” do you really think he would’ve walked?
I have great respect for Ms. Martha. Talk about someone who was considered finished…lok what she has done. Do you remember when Kmart was on the robes and they were losing their Star vendors left and right? MSL showed integrity and loyalty and hung in with them to give a chace to stabalize. How many jobs of many people did she save by literallly giving up her freedom to serve prision time..only to see long trusted friends turn their backs. It has always struck me that the person who literally could have saved himself by simply testifying against her and thus becoming a Media prince and a hero to haters everwhere..chose instead to go to prision..become finacially destroyed.. banned from his company and has basicaly vanished. I mean of course her co-defendent. He could have gotten anything he wanted…but instead…he chose integrity! I wish Miss Stewart well and hope that as she continues to restore her Brand that her loyal fans stay with her.
Like anyone posting here wouldn’t accept those paydays if they could!
WTF does that mean? An idiotic statement based on poor fundamental intellect. Good people should have limitations to greed imposed not by what is available but what is morally correct. If your right pocket is paying your left pocket while the rest of your organization suffers then maybe you should take a stand.
Yeah, especially after being laid off by the people who make those paydays in the interests of “shareholder value.”
That’s the point of the article–we’re allowing ourselves to be reduced to serfdom while we buy BS arguments about the value of single CEOs to companies. Funny, CEOs were worth just as much to companies back before they earned eight figures and declared massive lay-offs for the folks earning six figures and less.
It’s not wealth that “trickles down,” it’s inequality. I’m up for a book contract. Not too long ago, a book advance would’ve been enough to support me while I wrote the book. Now, my agent is warning me that advances have dropped so low, I’m likely going to have to take a job on top of writing the book, which is already a full-time job. You might argue that’s because the Internet is tearing the shit out of the publishing industry–until you remember that the CEOs of the conglomerates that own publishers are basking in eight-figure salaries.
So here’s the end result: I may walk away from writing the book. People do get to the point where they say, “Enough is enough!” When those people aren’t just “mere” writers, but say, doctors and nurses sick of being squeezed while insurance company CEOs make millions, maybe people will finally realize what’s wrong with the system.
Pay attention, union brethren (WGA, SAG, AFTRA…). These are the employers you are negotiating contracts with and whom claim to be too poor to pay fair rates for your talent and work, nor able to afford to pay you anything for “New Media” usage and residuals for past usage.
Remember this: the AMPTP is laughing at you behind your back(s), as is Les Moonves, Bob Iger, et al, every time they get a paycheck. Laughing at you and how they played you all…
Speaking of unions…let’s look at the salaries of their senior management. Granted, they are not anywhere near the levels of these corporate leaders, but they are still quite high.
And, often these union leaders spend more time keeping their jobs…than doing them for the members they serve.
For example, let’s look at the several million dollars SAG spent on an NFL executive to help with the negotiations. He did nothing, and left with a whole bunch of the union’s money.
The people at the top in business, politics, sports or most everything involving money are like feudal lords with their serf minions only there to fill the pockets of their masters.
And, AMPTP sets the curve for arrogance and stupidity for hiring a disgraced Senator who was thrown out of office after five terms…Chris Dodd and his almost 2 million a year salary.
This whole dialogue is a big circle jerk…and, nothing will change.
“For example, let’s look at the several million dollars SAG spent on an NFL executive to help with the negotiations. He did nothing, and left with a whole bunch of the union’s money.” Utter bullshit.
Doug Allen did everything he could to advance the stated desires of the membership. He was hired by Alan to do just that, and was set up and cut off at the knees by insider jerry-mandering (and by AFTRA-owned personalities) of SAG principals, principles and constitutional rules. (Rules which go unchallenged today, mind you.)
Further, Alan Rosenberg was elected as SAG President particularly for his promise to fight as hard as possible to bring the membership a fair contract – a membership which (after the fact) folded under false pressure from the AMPTP and its lying, two-faced minions who by then were running SAG into the ground to benefit AFTRA.
I don’t know what Alan Rosenberg’s salary was as SAG President, but he never asked for anything more than support from the membership to get them/us the best contract possible; to stand up and fight for something fair. People may bitch about how Alan went about it (in hindsight), but at least we could trust his motivations. Today is a different story.
And even further, Doug Allen was “fired” by the current NED – he didn’t leave “with a whole bunch of the union’s money”. The balance of his salary being paid was his contract. This act was the choice of the NOW, CURRENT NED (go figure), who’s making just as much or more money than Doug Allen did. Both Doug Allen and Alan Rosenberg were simply doing the jobs they were elected and paid to do.
It’s shameful to see where SAG is now because of a once-powerful membership kowtowing to empty threats and bullying. Shameful.
The President of SAG in an UNPAID position. Alan Rosenberg likely damaged his own personal acting career for fighting for the membership, while the current scumbag sitting in the president’s seat is getting bits and cameos for selling the rank & file (like me) down the river.
(I’m aware of this, but I didn’t want to sound like I was piling it on – it is rather unbelievable.)
The AMPTP is not laughing behind the backs of AFTRA and SAG … The Studios and the Union Heads are all in on it together, laughing behind the backs of the membership.
Everyone in Hollywood … print out this list and keep it in your pocket. It’ll be a great reminder for the next time the corporations try to cut your union benefits or tell you to take a pay cut because “it’s the economy”.
Thanks for compiling this list! Very informative.
The key is the lack of incentive this system provides for CEOs to really innovate and solve long term issues within media. Why innovate and take measured risk when you can just slumber along and make $20m? These Boards are a joke – independent oversight? Where else can Les Moonves make $58m? Where is his leverage and I am pretty sure any young star would love that gig for next to nothing. Please reform the system and kick these old greedy geezers out.
And I’m sure Nikki is going to let everyone know how much she makes in comparison to her staff, right?
Good one, Rocco! Way to stand up for the millionaires! If you won’t protect the soulless jagoffs who get richer by laying people off and cutting salaries… who will?
Keep fighting the good fight!
And meanwhile @ The WGA, we’ve been told to smile at getting a 2% increase on the MBA. America has become such a shitty country in so many ways.
There are heads of teachers unions who make more than a quarter million a year while the actual teachers make maybe $70k. There are health insurance CEOs that make millions a year in salary and bonuses while there are many doctors who make $150k. There are real estate moguls who erect luxury apartments they can sell for multi millions but stiff the contract workers. And in each case it is the teachers, the doctors and the laborers who are the ones with the training, the skills and the sweat equity others leech off of them.
The answer? I think more talent should be independent contractors – mobbing up does not seem to have helped talent get their due in respect or money.
Good idea. However, most of the talent is too scared of the unknown to that. I mean how many artists do you know that have a manager, an agent, an attorney and a business manager all with their hands in the cookie jar? Heck, I can think of 10 I know off the top of my head. Face it, most people don’t want to do all the work needed to be a successful independent contractor.
Heck a lot of actors I meet won’t call their entertainment attorney’s straight away, always delineating those duties to the manager/agent. They aren’t even A-list busy either. That’s just laziness.
Can anyone weigh in on what Brad Grey makes? I remember him telling one of his cronies he was worth 500M, and that was before he took the reigns at Paramount. I would be curious to know how much cashish he is pulling down that he’s buying up 20M houses in the hills of Holmby.
I know they’re privately held but it would be equally interesting to learn how much the head of the big agencies make. How much do you think Lovett is pulling in these days?
Overlooked in all of this is a shocking question:
“Who REALLY foots the bill (stock options excluded) for these unconscionable and counter-productive media compensation packages?”
Poor, dumb, corporate-whipped, gullible, average Americans, that’s who-the very people forbidden entry to the gated communities of these Media Moguls (unless, of course, they’re the help.)
They pay either directly by buying the media company’s movie tickets, DVDs, music, media services, and spin-off products, or indirectly, by buying the overpriced goods & services sold by advertisers, who in turn pay the media companies for their ads.
In addition, Americans pay a horrible, hidden psychological price by watching the violent, useless, mind-numbing garbage movies and TV shows produced by these CEO’s, the insipid “Two and a Half Men”-type flotsam, the endless CSI murder crap, the 24/7/365 commercials (even on pay cable!), the ceaseless movie junk featuring ignorant, violent “heroes”, the crazed violence of video games & rap music sold to children, etc, etc.
Surprise, surprise. Serfs pay these CEO’s their kingly compensation. That’s where these media companies get their money, which they dutifully funnel to their top execs.
Joe Six-Pack, Jane Working-Mom, Louis the teenage wanna-be nerd, and Tina the 20-something “Sex in the City” wanna-be, all pay their tribute to the CEO’s on this comprehensive list.
As long as there’s a Joe, Jane, Louis, and Tina, much smarter media CEO’s will skim off billions from these indentured servants and live like Lords of the Manor.
Feudalism never ended…just changed its name.
Perfectly stated. Everything that’s wrong with our country is emblamatic right here in this story and this posting.
Wait! Martha Stewart only makes 4 times what her top employees do? I mean, she’s the entire product.
Why is the guy in the photo so happy when all the bills are singles?
This is great journalism. Good to know Deadline has some balls and isn’t afraid to go after questionable big media practices.
For those that asked Brad Grey made $29 million last year from just P’s salary and VIA stock options.
The compensation packages of LESS (FOR SHAREHOLDERS) and Dauman are simply put ludicrous. But It’s a statement being made by the best loved guy in Wall ST. and Hollywood,SUMNER DEDSTONE.He’s letting everybody know that he’s the BOSS and his Bored of Redstone agree with everything he does. Why not, they pull down between $198,931 to $267,891 for saying “you’re right Sumner”. And what about Tom Dooley, COO of VIACOM, his package is worth $64,651,720.
Forgot to give you “I’m going to live forever’s” little package CBS $16210,900(would have been more if he didn’t send that bimbo to SHOWTIME for a $50,000 job to do nothing). Viacom gives him $15,033,600. Does anyone see him go to work every day?