THURSDAY 11:59 PM BREAKING NEWS… 2ND UPDATE WITH MORE EXCLUSIVE DETAILS… FRIDAY 2 AM WRITETHRU: This is a huge surprise: not just that Film Independent czarina Dawn Hudson was chosen as the new
CEO by the uber-establishment Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences’ Board Of Governors. But also that AMPAS insider Ric Robertson, who thought he was a shoo-in for the job to replace retiring
executive director Bruce Davis, was passed over and now has to report to someone else again. I’d been hearing for weeks ever since the most recent and wretched Oscars that certain board members wanted an outsider to tranfuse anemic AMPAS with fresh blood in the form of an experienced film executive with new ideas. That’s certainly Hudson “who not only brings tremendous credibility but turned the Spirit Awards from basically nothing to the terrific event it is today,” one insider just told me. “AMPAS almost always promoted from within. But the Board was just so impressed with Dawn.”
So here’s what happened, according to my insiders: Tonight the Board Of Governors had “the” meeting to vote on a new top executive to run the Academy. The Board last Thursday also met in secret and that was supposed to be the deciding confab. But it wasn’t. The reason is that there were two factions on the Board — one wanting to keep the status quo, the other wanting a clean sweep.
“There was some feeling to keep Bruce Davis’s deputy Ric Robertson who assumed the job was his. But that would have been a continuation of the old line, etc. And the Academy Board realized they couldn’t do business as usual anymore,” another insider gives me the scoop. “Tom Sherak, Annette Bening, Jim Brooks, Sid Ganis liked Dawn Hudson a lot. She talked about the creative side of movies, her involvement with filmmakers, the academy’s need to shape an updated identity. And that disasterous [Oscar] show helped her because they realized fresh blood was needed.”
I heard that BAFTA’s Amanda Berry was a major contender at one point along with several other outsiders like Dawn. But not before, I’m told, Jeffrey Katzenberg tried to insert himself into the selection process at the last minute by championing one producer for the job.
Dawn shared the news she was in contention with only a handful of people from whom she extracted promises not to tell me because she worried it would have totally blown her chances. Wrong, Dawn. I would have helped you get the job sooner because I could have thrown cold water on the only ding against you: that some Board members worried you knew a few but not many of the so-called “Hollywood movers and shakers” — like the major studio moguls and major movie players versus just Fox Searchlight, Sony Pictures Classics, indie producers, etc.
Needless to say, throughout the process, rumor and speculation were at a fevered pitch among the AMPAS staff, many of whom kept emailing me about what they considered to be the “inappropriate” and “dysfunctional” ways that the Academy was being managed. I, in turn, kept asking Board members to confirm or deny the info, and some started to investigate with the purpose of separating fact from fiction. I was waiting to hear their replies but then came today’s announcement.
AMPAS obviously decided that the Academy needed an intervention. Insiders thought Robertson would quit instead of take the COO post but he didn’t. In my opinion, the arrogant and autocratic Ric personifies everything that’s wrong with the Academy and the Oscars telecast and should have been shown the door – even before he demonstrated such poor judgment and yanked Deadline’s press credential to cover February’s Academy Awards because I posted exclusive spoilers: the entire rundown pre-show. Robertson threw a hissy fit and then successfully lobbied Academy President Tom Sherak to give him the OK to ban Deadline from the Oscars press room.
I know many AMPAS staff members were hoping Robertson would get the boot because a lot of them detest him for very legitimate reasons: like the very subjective promotions, selective pay increases, and unprofessional personal relationships between co-workers going on inside that organization. It also didn’t help that AMPAS staff members were so unhappy they were beginning to take the first steps to unionize by exploring how to join up with IATSE. (And how embarrassing would that have been to the Hollywood bigwigs) Maybe the AMPAS staff will just be content now to watch Ric’s daily humiliation?
I’ve been very critical of the Academy, its Board Of Governors, and Tom Sherak for some time now. (I almost called for Sherak’s resignation after this latest Oscars because of the dumb-ass decisions he made for it. Then held off.) But bringing in outsider Dawn Hudson is the first thing they’ve done right in a long while.
Here’s the official statement:
BEVERY HILLS – The Board of Governors of the Motion Picture Academy voted on Thursday to establish a new executive structure for the organization, replacing retiring executive director Bruce Davis with former Film Independent head Dawn Hudson and long-time Academy executive Ric Robertson, who will become the organization’s CEO and COO respectively. Robertson will report to Hudson in the new leadership tandem.
Hudson has spent 20 years at the helm of Film Independent, which grew from a small non-profit into a nationally recognized arts institution under her leadership. Film Independent’s two signature programs are the 26-year-old Independent Spirit Awards and the Los Angeles Film Festival, held annually in June.“The Academy is the gold standard for the world’s most influential art form, and I am humbled by what the Board of Governors, the Academy members, and the staff have accomplished under Bruce Davis’s leadership.” said Hudson. “I am thrilled to have this opportunity to work with Ric, and to carry the Academy’s mission forward into the future.”
Robertson joined the Academy in 1981 following a short stint with the Los Angeles International Film Exposition (FILMEX), and became the organization’s second-in-command in 1989, when he was appointed Executive Administrator. In that position he has overseen the Academy’s public programming, its library and film archive as well as its public relations, marketing, legal affairs, and numerous awards-related events and activities.
“Having Bruce as a mentor has been tremendously valuable to me,” said Robertson. “It will serve me well as I move into this new management position and partnership with Dawn, as we help to write the Academy’s next chapter.”
Academy president Tom Sherak said that the new structure for the Academy’s executive staff had occurred to the officers of the organization as they began seriously considering the succession issue. “We’re a different organization than we used to be,” Sherak said, “with a range of activities that couldn’t have been conceived of when the present structure came into place. Now, with the leadership team of Dawn as our CEO and Ric as our COO, we have the ideal combination of new vision and institutional continuity to move us forward.”
Following a planned bylaw revision, already in the works, Hudson and Robertson will assume their new positions on June 1.
New ‘Man Of Steel’ Television Spot #6


Dawn Hudson is the nicest person in town. Major kudos!
The first thing the Academy has done right in a long time!
Congratulations to DAWN! This next year should be very interesting …
Maybe we can have a more interesting and exciting Oscar telecast.
Well, sh*t! This is not entirely good news. As a Film Independent member, I gotta wonder who’s going to run that now?
This is great news for the Academy and industry as a whole! Dawn has clear vision and is both generously personable and creatively engaging.
She has built up a strong running machine at FIND which will certainly carry the torch and hopefully light some new fires to burn brighter.
Can you stop bitching about Ric please? You don’t know him, you’ve never worked with him, and many of us who know and work with him like him a lot.
Waaaaaaaah!
Just because you like him doesn’t mean he’s competent. The Oscars have been an irrelevant crapfest for years, and this year’s was the biggest trainwreck of all. Grow some thicker skin, and get real.
Here, here. Ric is a stand-up guy and very well liked by a lot of people, including the Board of Governors. it was a very tight race down to the two of them with Annette Bening’s need to have a women fill the post, influencing others in the end. Ric is highly qualified for the job and will be used heavily by Dawn to make the Academy (which is more than the OScars, by the way) run for a long time.
Really? She got the job because Annette Bening wanted a woman? I didn’t realize she had that kind of power, but not enough for her to win last month. Pretty insulting to such a competent executive as Dawn. I am very glad to see Ric the Despot get repudiated so publicly.
Let’s poll the Academy staff, to see how many like/enjoy working with Ric. I believe the results would be rather revealing.
Finally. Some meaningful changes to the Oscars. But will the AMPAS voters still treat their awards ceremony as a popularity contest rather than recognizing which film, director, etc. truly deserves the gold statuette? Due to my interest in one movie and director this year, I became a first-time follower of the minutiae of awards seaon; the plethora of information available from various sources on the internet helped shed some light on the shenanigans on how the AMPAS members vote. Awarding the Oscar-baity The King’s Speech the best film over The Social Network exemplifies how the dinosaurs enjoy keeping the staus quo. Especially egregious was Tom Hooper’s win for best director over David Fincher; I’ll never forget and never forgive the AMPAS voters for this petty snub as Hooper did not win a single critics award and yet cleaned up when it came to the guild and Oscar voters. The new hire won’t change their antiquated voting habits overnight and in the meantime, I’ll now enjoy the morning-after discussion on how the voters are once again a group of dinosaurs with a high school mentality voting on who they like rather than objectively voting on the best product based on its merits; I used to think The Golden Globes were star effers but they did the right thing by voting The Social Network the best film and director and after this year’s Oscar debacle, I now give them more respect over the Oscars any day of the week. While I’ll definitely watch The Golden Globes again, I feel the Oscars aren’t meant to be enjoyed by the People but rather a ceremony where a self aggrandizing group pat each other on the back; get a room. A private one. Evidently, The Social Network and David Fincher snub still leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I’ll not be watching the 2012 telecast in protest. Depending on how the AMPAS votes in 2012, their gold stautette’s meaning to me will either be further diluted towards irrelevance or a step towards respect as a group of impartial voters who make their decisions based on merit.
Talk about waaaaaaaaah. Come on! I am sure your protest will change everything and next year the Academy members will vote as you see fit! Sour grapes indeed. People who lose always think the voting block got it wrong. They didn’t. Tantrums are irrelevant. Unless you are 7. Maybe you are…
2 different movies, and just like any other award in art, the Oscars are subjective. the King’s Speech was an incredible, entertaining film made out of a rather boring subject matter. “Some old King struggles with a speech problem”… I was pretty upset to be dragged into this movie with my in-laws, but of course ended up watching one of the best films i’ve seen in a while.
anyway, dinosaurs don’t like facebook and they definitely don’t like watching justin timberlake so you had to expect the outcome.
i hope you find a better way to “protest” than “not watching.” that will be as productive as blabbering off on deadline.
Two reasons (off the top of my head) why the GG will NEVER have any real credibility:
Burlesque and Pia Zadora.
Add The Tourist.
The spirit awards are one of the worst produced awards shows out there, especially two years ago. If you think that is better than the oscars, ugh…….
The Oscars are boring and crappy EVERY year!!! Expecting it to be anything but is the definition of insanity. It will always be boring and stuffy. It will never become the Teen Choice awards (Anne Hathaway or not).
The Globes are much more entertaining.
The Globes are more entertaining because the majority of awards they hand out are to recognizable actors. And they’re all sitting at tables drinking cocktails and wine and having a grand time of it all there.
Oscar hands out about 24 awards and exactly four of them go to actors. And while some producers, directors and even writers are sort of recognizable, many of their awards go to people that no one outside of Los Angeles will ever hear of and for jobs that no one outside Los Angeles gives a rat’s ass about.
The show is destined to be boring every year because of that. This year was particularly disastrous on many levels and yes, improvements can definitely be made, but the core structure of the show is what it is and that ain’t going anywhere.
I have been in film and TV industry for 20 years. I have never felt the influence of these people or this organization. Could someone please explain what they do and how they are important.
I’m not trying to be an asshole, I am really curious.
Maybe we can get rid of all the academy members next and replace them with actual moviegoers. Oh wait, MTV already is doing that.
Best B-12 shot in the world, Dawn Hudson is the real deal, a progressive movie lover, a delight to deal with, no previous
“Hollywood” agenda..can’t wait to see what she does with the Academy and next years Oscar program and whether lil’Sid will still get his requisite close ups so he feels big and tall.
Sid is a great guy, one of the nicest in town….and he’s no longer president, schmuck.
One enormous problem with the academy is their members are members for life…and they stick around that long. Also the actors branch is by far the largest branch. So you have a lot of old actors who haven’t worked in forever and they’re very old-school in their tastes (and maybe a little unhappy too?) So they keep change from happening to the Academy, and things just keep staying the same, while the rest of the industry and the world keeps evolving. Then again they are faced with keeping ratings high for an old-school awards show, and no matter what changes they make, that’s just an impossible task anymore…award shows are no big whoop anymore, no matter how much you tweak them.)
Someday Hank, you’ll be old too, you assh@le.
Well good for her.
Oh, and Deadline, if I put a lot of effort into anything that I created and someone came along and thought it was ok for them to list spoilers, you’d get kicked out of my house too.
Really, what did you expect.
The core structure of the show mirrors the core structure of filmmaking. The Academy will never turn their back on the key department heads. The below-the-line talent are just as deserving to be recognized at the telecast and I believe the actors, producers, writers and directors who work side by side with them agree. Nikke, you missed the party and nobody missed you. Quit crying, it’s a snorefest.
Hopefully not Josh!
Won’t last.
Dawn’s job at FIND wasn’t really difficult; her Board is very forgiving. She was just running a warm-and-fuzzy club. Spirit Award disaster? No problem. “We’re the little guys. Don’t pick on us.” Good luck with that tactic now!
Ric Robertson will be gone soon. One of Dawn’s keys to success is having no heir apparent. Then her management skills(?) will be put to the test.
But she does know how work politics so I give her about two years.
This isn’t about the Oscars only, it should be about bringing someone in that understands that AMPAS is a non-profit with over $75M in revenues and nearly $40M of pure profit.
The previous leadership had NO CLUE what to do with that money, other than buying up land in a ridiculously stupid manner and failing to build Bruce Davis’ personal Xanadu. (That land is now a huge problem for Hollywood, almost a homeless squatters paradise, filled with crime and problems.)
If you want to fix the show, get rid of the PRODUCTION TEAM that is in charge every year. If you’re tired of it, it’s because you’ve seen the same thing from the same over-paid production team every year.
If you want to fix the organization, get serious about being a charity — actually GIVE some of your profits to filmmakers, not just the same old tired film fests. Infuse youth into the organization, and understand that the way business has been done the past 20 years under Davis is the absolute wrong way to run an organization.
You say things that are not true. There are problems with the Academy, yes, but:
1) The Academy of Motion Pictures itself is NOT a non-profit. That’s why the Academy Foundation, and its sub-foundations, were created.
2) Yes, Bruce wanted the Museum, but if you knew anything about how the Academy works, you’d realize that it takes more than one person to get any project approved and completed – the Executive Director (now CEO) cannot just wave a magic wand to get what s/he wants.
3) The block the Academy bought for the museum project is an eyesore, yes, but is surrounded by a fence and regularly patrolled – there are no homeless there. And to my knowledge, there is no “crime or other problems”(whatever those are) there.
4) The Academy is not a charity, but does gives money to film festivals (not just tired old ones), scholars, budding screenwriters and others. Of course it could do more, but don’t say it doesn’t give back at all.
LOVE that official press release from the Academy. What crap!
In spite of the bullshit semantics and smoke screen, the FACT remains the same: Ric was passed over for the top job. Plain and simple. So, in order to save face, the Academy sent out that ridiculous press release, attempting to bolster Ric’s importance and position as the new COO, to assuage any embarrassment he may be experiencing over this public humiliation.
He’s the Academy’s eunuch. He’s still number 2, literally and figuratively. And now, someone else has the job he’s been masturbating to for 30 years.
Suck it!
I wonder if she would help me get a pitch meeting…Hmmm…
so now maybe they’ll give the co host with Anne speed instead of weed this year and wake us up more
Isn’t Dawn a staunch opponent of the MPAA’s ratings board as well? I seem to remember reading somewhere that she was – if true, maybe she’ll push to abolish what isn’t needed now and what hasn’t been needed in a long, long time..
Could not agree more! Congratualtions to Dawn!
what’s the over/under on how long before the relationship btwn Hudson and Robertson blows up? 12 months? i don’t know either of them but based on the article above, how can that set-up last?