2ND UPDATE, 3:35 PM: A federal court said it could take weeks before it decides whether to grant an injunction sought by NFL players to stop a league-imposed lockout. That’s because the judge wants both sides to agree to federal mediation to help resolve an impasse in finalizing a new collective bargaining agreement, according to Bloomberg. “Both sides are at risk. This is a good time to come back to the table,” the judge said. “This is really a matter to be resolved, in my view, with the services of the federal court.” Today’s hearing in St. Paul lasted five hours.
1ST UPDATE, 12:45 PM: Both sides are back from a break after more than three hours of opening arguments, NFL.com says. The league is making a case that the federal court has no jurisdiction over the injunction hearing until the NFL’s unfair labor practices claim against the players is ruled on by the National Labor Relations Board. Meanwhile, most of the big names in the suit — like players Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Drew Brees and commissioner Roger Goodell — did not attend.
PREVIOUS, 7:04 AM: Every network sports executive, high-profile advertiser and football fan will have their eyes trained on a St. Paul, Minn., courtroom today, when an injunction hearing that could decide the fate of the next NFL season is scheduled to get under way. If U.S. District Court Judge Susan Richard Nelson finds in favor of players who filed the suit to block the league from locking them out, games likely will be played as planned. If she doesn’t, the current stalemate — which began last month when labor talks between management and the players union broke down — could continue indefinitely.
The latter result would not be good news for network rights-holders like NBC, CBS, Fox and ESPN, who count on the sport’s sky-high ratings to set ad rates, or satellite carrier DirecTV, which stands to lose millions if it can’t offer its NFL Sunday Ticket package to draw in cash and new subscribers. And don’t forget the hand-wringing due brands like Anheuser-Busch, which Advertising Age says is paying $50 million a year to make Bud Light the official beer of the NFL (taking over that distinction from Coors Light beginning this season); Unilever’s Vaseline, which recently kicked off its NFL campaign amidst the lockout; and Century 21, which already has bought a Super Bowl ad and committed to sponsor NBC’s pregame shows, Ad Age says.
How the hearing will play out is anybody’s guess, but the players’ side might have gotten a boost this week when the judge decided to combine the players’ suit with one filed by retired players, who say the lockout will impact their benefits. That could make it harder for the league to argue that players negotiated in bad faith during contract talks — part of a separate suit the league has filed with the National Labor Relations Board — because retired players aren’t part of the union’s negotiating committee. Both current and retired players have filed similar antitrust suits against the league in addition to the injunction.
The players association said the NFL has refused overtures to settle the court case before today, with the league telling the NFL Network that it only wants to discuss a collective bargaining agreement. But with the main question being how to split $9 billion in revenue, any talks won’t be easy or brief no matter when they resume.


At the end of the day, few really care who wins or loses the player/owner battle.
Most fans just want to know that NFL football will be played with ample time to properly prepare for the season, and…some of us would like to see these greedy bastards allocate sufficient money from the billions they are fighting over…to seriously address and support the many players…growing more and more each day…who have suffered serious medical problems from playing this most violent game.
I have little sympathy for the players. They know this isn’t a walk in the park, and if they choose to play a contact sport, they know what could happen.
Excuse me…since when are players supposed to put their lives and futures at risk playing with serious injuries like concussions? No One…and, I repeat, No One…wishes or expects these athletes are playing football knowingly accepting that they may be brain dead in 20 years.
The only people who believe ‘it goes with the territory’ should be filling in the seats to watch the Romans kill Christians as sport.
Please. On any given Sunday what we line up for IS to see the Christians and Romans fight it out.
Rome had it’s gladiators and we have ours. Do you think the athletes in college do not see how the sport has affected the people who are their coaches. Most coaches have played so they have been affected also.
Someone did a survey of Olympic athletes and they asked if they could take a drug that would guarantee them a win but would substantially shorten their lives, would they take it. You don’t have to think hard on the answer.
No. what is going to happen is twofold. More fines will be imposed by the owners for hits to the head and a class action lawsuit is brewing because there are so many incapacitated retired athletes who were injured from playing the game.
And finally, unless you have tasted glory and basked in the aura of the adulation of thousands of fans after a win then you have no idea of the drug that glory is. What price would any of us pay to be able to say “for one moment I played with the best and I was the best, a winner.”
Hey Walter, why dont you google Dave Duerson, Andre Waters or Justin Strzelczyk and get some perspective…dont think any of them “knew” this could happen.
Even if the injunction isn’t granted, I see this dispute ending in time for training camps to open on schedule and for the season to proceed as planned.
The NFL will get lots of pressure from their TV partners to make a deal.
If there’s no NFL season, prime-time TV viewership (and not just on nights when NFL games are being played) next season could drop by 30% to 40%! And men between 18 and 35 years of age may stop watching television entirely.
Television (both broadcast and cable) may need the NFL to survive.
There is not going to be an NFL season. None of us can really comprehend how greedy and power hungry the NFL owners are. NFL contracts are the WORST out of all major sports. Do you know that an MLB or NBA contract is guaranteed money- but in the NFL if a player gets hurt, the team can just drop them?
NFL teams have NEVER even revealed their profit statements to show how much money they make- and they are not going to care if they have to lose one season to get a new contract that keeps things just the way they are.
This is going to get MUCH worse before it gets better…and by the way it is pathetic that this kind of nonsense is clogging up the Federal Judicial system- which as of Friday is going to be shutdown anyway because our congress is a bunch of complete idiots and aholes.
They should just make the stupid deal and give the players a little more money and be done with it. Give me a break!
I hope they get the deal done for all the people who work at the stadiums and depend on this income. Good luck
I don’t understand the concept of arguing over which group is going to be the one who gets millions (or exponentially more) dollars. There should be legislation created which says that ANYone who makes more than X # of million dollars is REQUIRED to donate a percentage of it to EDUCATION. The government may be broke, but these folks aren’t…
We are fast becoming the dumbest of the “developed” nations. If this country is to succeed, we need to invest “excess” income into education. And, if these greedy bastards need a rationale beyond the value of the altruistic effort itself, tell them that it will “feel good and right” to do so.
Call me a socialist (which I’m really not), but I do believe in the morality of spreading any amount of money that is more than one could possibly need, into the proper education and success of our youth — the future of our country.