
The long expected merger between actor unions SAG and AFTRA is getting an extra push by both unions. On its website, SAG notes that in 2003, 57.78% of membership voted for a merger, but that wasn’t enough. AFTRA makes the same claim on its website. Now, they’ve got a logo and a unified message to both memberships. Here is a letter that was sent to membership by SAG prexy Ken Howard and AFTRA president Roberta Reardon:
The Screen Actors Guild and AFTRA Presidents’ Forum for One Union met on April 2 and 3, 2011, in New York City.
The meeting resulted in meaningful progress toward the goal of uniting SAG and AFTRA. Representatives of both unions unanimously approved draft resolutions for consideration by the unions’ respective National Boards of Directors. The recommendations include a draft mission statement for the successor union and the appointment of formal groups to work on a proposed meeting schedule to develop a merger plan.
The recommendations will be presented to the National Board of Directors of Screen Actors Guild at its meeting April 30 and May 1, 2011 and to the AFTRA National Board of Directors at its meeting May 14, 2011.
The Presidents’ Forum also conducted a comprehensive review of member input received at “listening tour” meetings across the country. In every location, members have expressed overwhelming support for the creation of a unified national union representing actors, recording artists, broadcasters and other media professionals. This outreach will continue, with meetings in Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., where Forum representatives will meet with members of AFTRA’s Broadcast Steering Committee. Meetings with elected leaders from areas not yet visited are currently being planned, along with additional meetings in Los Angeles and New York.
SAG President Ken Howard noted, “Each step we take together brings us closer to our crucial goal of becoming one union, and last weekend’s meeting was no exception. I look forward to sharing our work with the SAG-AFTRA Relations Task Force and, ultimately, the SAG National Board later this month.”
AFTRA President Roberta Reardon observed, “I am very proud of the strong partnership and clear vision that AFTRA and SAG members are forging together through this process. We have come a very long way in a short period of time, and I applaud each and every member who has participated in this exciting and important endeavor.”
The members of the Presidents’ Forum for One Union are encouraged by the results of their meeting and are pleased to share this information with you. Members will continue to receive regular updates regarding the progress of our work together to build one new successor union. For more information, SAG members may visit SAG.org/OneUnion and AFTRA members may visit www.aftra.com/OneUnion.htm.
CANNES: ‘Jane Got A Gun’ Moving Toward U.S Deal


For what does “AFTRA” stand?
This would be a good thing for everyone involved. It would make things a lot easier for actors trying to earn money toward insurance and pension plans. This needs to happen.
If we don’t merge, the producers will continue to successfully have us negotiate against ourselves. It should be apparent that we played right into their hands during the last contract negotiation. Digital changed the playing field and we need to adjust to put ourselves back into a powerful, unified position.
Great! Just one big union to screw us over!
Merger? How will that affect us actors here in Hollywood North (Canada)?
We have always been strong and UNITED!
As long as we gain more U.S. funded productions let ‘em battle it out down there. Hollywood is known for eating their own.
I would never vote for a merger unless Sag and Aftra can tell us ahead of the vote, what will happen to our Pensions. I am a vested SAG actor with 25 years in the business and I know exactly where I stand with my pension at this point. I am beside myself with worry that if there is a merger, then perhaps it will affect the pension I have worked so hard – as we all have – to obtain.
It is my hope that all SAG and AFTRA actors think seriously about what a merger could mean to our Pensions, as well as our health benefits. if they can’t tell us what will happen, then it’s safe to assume it may be bad and thus I will not vote for a merger.
Based on the 2003 discussions, my understanding is that pensions are protected once you’re vested. The combined union will start a new pension fund but you won’t be able to accrue towards your old pension once the new pension plan starts.
,,,,,,MERGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To Anonymous who’s worried about what will happen to his pension if we merge… You should be worried what will happen to your pension if we DON’T merge. You do realize it’s seriously underfunded right now? And that SAG is bleeding jobs away to AFTRA? Merger is the only way to SAVE your pension.
The SAG Actor’s comments on pensions and health insurance are THE POINTS that every SAG and AFTRA performer must demand that the merger planners detail BEFORE any merger is considered. I have over 30 years vested in SAG and recently retired. Anyone who has thoughts of letting these plans become diluted through a merger will have a real fight on their hands!
Question from a *newbie* as I just joined SAG about 5 months ago, and am considering AFTRA due to a possible upcoming booking on an AFTRA show. How will this merger effect the cost of joining AFTRA?..basicallysince I am already in SAG, will this merger give me AFTRA RIGHTS? I basically don’t want to spend the $1600 bucks now, only to find out it was in vain in about 3 months time!.. any feedback would be extremely helpful!