2ND UPDATE: A 5 AM walkthrough of the Royal Wedding route took place today complete with carriages, trumpeters and up to 1,000 members of the Armed Forces wearing full ceremonial uniform. Meanwhile, the first spectator has claimed his spot right outside Westminster Abbey, kitted out with flags, a sleeping bag and an umbrella. But when Prince William slides the wedding ring on Kate Middleton’s finger on April 29, will there really be an expected global audience of 2 billion watching? NBC keeps saying ”it’s completely false” that it has cut back on the number of pre-taped segments because U.S. networks may have overestimated America’s appetite for all things House of Windsor compared to 1981, when William’s father Prince Charles wed Lady Diana Spencer. This time, around 140 million U.S. viewers are expected to watch. Worldwide, when 800 million watched the Charles-Di nuptials, this time Tim Santhouse, operational manager at AP Television News Global Media Services tells me ”the volume of broadcasters coming to London, and the number of camera set-ups involved, is unprecedented in terms of interest from overseas broadcasters and the proliferation of news outlets.” AP will be providing camera set-ups and satellite uplinks for around 60 networks doing direct-to-camera pieces including Canada’s CTV, Australia’s Channel 9, and Arab news channel Al-Jazeera. The 62 broadcaster members of the European Broadcast Union -– which include ARD in Germany, France 2 and RAI in Italy –- will be getting their clean feed directly from the BBC. Sam Dubberly, who is in charge of forwarding BBC coverage, tells me, ”the closer we get to the wedding, the more requests we’ve been getting from members.” But NHK, the Japanese state broadcaster, won’t only out of respect for its still-grieving population in the wake of the earthquake/tsunami disaster.
Talk about a high-tech event: one estimate has 8,000 TV and radio reporters and support staff traveling from around the world into London to cover the nuptials, which start at 3 AM PT. Around 140 outside broadcast trucks with satellite uplinks will be parked in nearby Green Park, with every major world broadcaster lining up cameras along the procession route. The BBC will be using 21 cameras inside the scene of the wedding itself, Westminster Abbey, some of them wireless and remote-controlled. But Prince Charles’ office stopped Rupert Murdoch from shooting the wedding in 3D, saying there just wasn’t enough room for his extra equipment in the Abbey.
Here’s who’s trying to cash in on Friday’s wedding day:
BBC: The BBC is hosting the TV coverage and pooling it for U.S. networks, but stresses that it is not making any profit out of the wedding. But how much broadcasters are being charged and where the money is going is being kept under wraps. The Beeb alone is sending 850 staff to cover the wedding. The Beeb’s critics say that once again the UK state broadcaster is just throwing public money at the event. Huw Edwards, the Beeb’s evening news anchor, will be leading BBC1’s coverage throughout the day. The channel’s feed will be made available to BBC Entertainment viewers across Asia, India, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East. BBC1 will be also broadcast on BBC Knowledge in Africa. There will also be a slew of royal docs on BBC Worldwide channels, including one about William and Kate’s relationship from their first meeting at St. Andrew’s University in Scotland to the present day. The BBC, meanwhile, has married The X Factor to the Royal Wedding to the delight of UK tabloids by hiring an assistant stage manager to help with its TV coverage.
NBC/ITN/ITV: NBC News has partnered with ITN for its royal wedding coverage. NBC will base 50 staff at the central London production base of ITN, the news arm of ITV which is co-producing NBC’s coverage. The U.S. broadcaster will offer 20 hours of combined coverage with MSNBC on the wedding day. Matt Lauer and Meredith Vieira will present a one-hour primetime doc tonight (8pm/ET) , while Martin Bashir –- the Brit reporter who famously got Princess Diana to admit Prince Charles’ adultery on TV –- will lead MSNBC’s London coverage. Every NBC brand will be devoting coverage to the event including live coverage on Today, Access Hollywood, Bravo, E!, Telemundo, The Weather Channel and women’s website iVillage, which will feature “an exclusive interview with the couple’s former landlady”. The UK’s biggest private network channel will have 10 hours of live coverage on April 29 from 300 ITV staff. There’ll be extended news peak-time news programmes, including an hour-long early evening news special at 6pm (1pm ET), plus an extended edition of its flagship ITV News at Ten. Its main anchors will be news presenter Julie Etchingham and daytime host Philip Schofield. ITN is charging broadcasters up to £200,000 ($327,310) each to access a “clean” feed of the build-up and ceremony so channels can then overlay their own graphics and commentary. ITN charged $2,350 for each minute of Prince William’s and Kate’s engagement interview last November, with proceeds going to Prince William’s and Prince Harry’s charitable foundation. ITN is set to have its own Royal Wedding payday after hiring out its facilities to more than 100 staff from 15 international broadcasters, including Canada’s CTV, Germany’s ZDF and Australia’s 7 Network and Network 10.
FOX/Sky: Fox News is not paying for its feed because Sky News is already one of the 3 official UK networks covering the event. Fox News is shipping in at least 50 staff from American offices. Shepard Smith and Martha MacCallum will anchor live coverage of the wedding beginning at 1 AM PT. The network’s programming leading up to the event will include the documentary Countdown to the Royal Wedding (April 24) and simulcasts of the UK’s Sky News (April 27th-28th). Eamonn Holmes, Sky News’ breakfast anchor, will be leading rolling coverage on the Sky News channel from 160 staff. Sky News’ coverage will begin at 6 AM (10 PM PT Thursday) on the day from a purpose-built studio outside Buckingham Palace. Holmes will be joined by Sky’s royal correspondent, Sarah Hughes. There will also be reporters on hand in spots around Britain significant to the couple, including St. Andrews in Scotland, where they met; the Welsh island of Anglesey, where they now live; and Kate Middleton’s home village of Bucklebury. Sky Living, Sky’s female-skewing channel, will be airing a cheeky tie-in, How To Nab a Prince, presented by actress Patsy Kensit.
CNN: CNN already has 75 staff in its London bureau. But Piers Morgan will be the linchpin of the network’s coverage, believing that his British accent and London connections will give him the edge over rival presenters. Morgan, who has photos of himself snapped with the royals dotted around his house, boasts: “I’ve met and know quite well most of the royal family. I have connections that most American anchors can only dream off.”
ABC: Diane Sawyer and Barbara Walters will anchor ABC’s live coverage of the wedding of beginning at 1 AM PT on April 29, followed by a live West Coast edition of Good Morning America hosted by Robin Roberts live from Westminster Abbey. The wedding caps a bunch of Royal Wedding programming on the network, beginning April 18 with a Special Edition of 20/20: William & Catherine: A Modern Fairytale, anchored by Walters. Throughout the week leading up to the event, GMA, World News With Diane Sawyer, Nightline and 20/20 will broadcast from London.
CBS: Outgoing CBS Evening News anchor and former Today star Katie Couric will lead live coverage of the event. Couric will also anchor a one-hour primetime special at 8 PM that night, airing against NBC’s special hosted by Matt Lauer and Meredith Vieira.
Channel 4: The 4th UK broadcaster, which specialises in youth programming and the irreverent, will just be extending its 7 PM (11 AM PT) half-hour Channel 4 News to a full hour on the day. It will not be covering the wedding live. Channel 4 will, however, attempt to upstage William and Kate with a one-off of its reality TV show, Big Fat Gypsy Weddings, which has been a cult hit here. The channel will also be airing one-off docs about Kate Middleton’s family with TV historian David Starkey arguing that, in not marrying royal, William is in fact returning to tradition.
Five: Matt Barbet and Emma Crosby will be presenting news coverage.
Cinemas: Both Vue Cinemas and Cineworld, which between them have nearly 1,500 screens, have abandoned plans to show it. St James’ Palace, the official residence of Prince Charles, says the decision has nothing to do with it – pointing a finger at the BBC. The BBC in turn has suggested ITV and BSkyB have blocked cinema operators’ plans. Steve Wiener, CEO of Cineworld, tells me no reason has been given. Tim Richards, CEO of Vue, says it’s “a lost opportunity for the business and for the country”. Both Cineworld and Vue were hoping for a windfall, thinking people would want to watch the wedding with others as it unfolds in state-of-the-art sound and vision. The BBC tells me it scrapped its own plans to make the wedding available to cinemas outside the UK because it couldn’t get music rights cleared.


Thank you! i think ABC will do a great job but one would think you will have to watch the BBC’s coverage. Toss in a little Fox and watch poor Patsy Kensit.
WHAT IS THE PAY TO THE ROYAL FAMILY FOR THIS EVENT. IT HAS TO BE IN THE 100′S OF MILLIONS OF US DOLLARS. IF BILLIONS ARE WATCHING THIS,THEN THE PAY MUST BE EXTREMELY GREAT? LIVE COVERAGE AROUND THE WORLD. THIS IS WORTH WHAT? ANY ANSWERS TO THIS QUESTIONS?
Yes Jimmy – commonly known as – ‘I have my head squashed in a Tiara.’
The money you mention that is generated from telecasting the Royal Wedding and any subsequent generating monies doesn’t go to the Royal Family, you idiot!
This is where the United Kingdom and the tax paying UK public start to make money from having the Royal Family – they definitely earn their keep, in other words. It’s the old, ‘scratch my back I’ll scratch yours, routine.’
Watching it now. This is Britain at it’s finest and best what we, as a nation, do exceptionally well!
Can’t imagine why anyone would watch this.
The chicks will watch this.
I’m a chick and am gagging on this crap.
My kind of woman.
I second that. The media is trying to trick us to give a damn by convincing us that most of us DO actually give a damn. They almost had me yesterday!!!
You can bet your bottom dollar all you sneering, gearing and possibly leering non-entities, who obviously know nothing about Tradition and History because most of your own buildings are less than a hundred years old, will be sneaking a look or even a full watch along the way and then you MAY just learn something useful outside your own – very remote – goldfish bowl.
Your positive aspirations only lie at the bottom of your empty mugs of black coffee.
I completely agree.
Why would anyone watch this?
Who cares?
What’s next, slides from their trip to aunt Edna’s farm? Oh Boy!
As an American, I sure as hell won’t be.
Watch it yourself and perhaps you’ll learn something about tradition, history, respect for an institution…need I go on….you may just realise it is less about the union of two people and more about the uniting of a Nation and it’s associated Commonwealth peoples!
WHY ON EARTH DO WE CARE ABOUT THESE PEOPLE. WITH THE WORLD IN AN ECONOMIC MESS. THE NET WORKS ARE SPENDING MILLIONS ON THIS.
A global audience of 2 billion watching your wedding? Wow no pressure….
They pull these viewing figures out of their ass. 2 billion? A third of the world’s population? Get real, the average person couldn’t care any less about this.
WHO WILL WATCH THIS CRAP !! IT’S A GOOD DAY TO REMEMBER THE REVOLUTION !
I am so excited to have lived long enough to have seen Her Majesty the Queen, crowned & married. Charles & Diana married and now her wonderful son to be married. May William and Kate find the love and happiness Diana thought she had found.
My order for CD,DVD is already in to my friend in England.
Are you an idiot or do you just play one on this site?
That is just plain nasty to say that to this person. It is a terrible thing to use your anonymity like this. I don’t personally care about the Royals but a lot of people obviously do, they have watched that family through all kinds of great moments in history and it is an understandable interest. One that is a bit more interesting than the ones we plaster all over the rag mags her in the U.S.!
Yeah. A lot of people watched Lebron James’s “The Decision” as well. It was equally stupid.
I watched his mother’s/father’s wedding…the coverage of his birth…the coverage of his parents’ divorce…and the coverage, which was heart-rending, of his mother’s funeral. If you don’t care, then don’t bother with it and why post? For those of us who do care, and want William and Kate’s marriage to be successful, why not just let us enjoy it. My husband glues himself to the TV during football season; not all that different I guess.
ABC will be lame and Fox is a total joke. BBC and NBC are the only way to go.
Why?
I’m not picking on the Brits by any means, but why on EARTH do the Networks think we give a good damn?
A survey done by Vanity Fair and 60 minutes showed that 65% of Americans don’t care about the upcoming Royal wedding and aren’t planning on watching. The news networks are just going to embarrass themselves. There is really nothing special about this couple and no justification for this orgy of coverage. People watched Princess Diana’s wedding because she had a good story, was beautiful, and there was genuine interest. Will and Kate don’t have any of those going for them. It’s all manufactured interest by the networks and they suckered lots of sponsors into paying for the airtime. I will be shocked if even 500 million watch let alone 2 Billion. Nikki will be making fun of the weak ratings the next day.
NATO should probably take this opportunity to send ground troops to Libya and take out Ghahdafi while the idiotic newscasters are all videotaping wedding cake!
Americans watch stupid stuff on TV all the time. Have any of the above ever watched WWF? Jersey Shore? News about Charley Sheen? Almost any reality show? Bridezilla? The Bachelor? All of these programs and many, many more are dumber than the Royal Wedding which is – at least – a few hours of positive images. I bet more than 65% of Americans watch really stupid TV all the time or there would not be so much of it. So let the folks who long for a romantic story have a few hours away from the constant nasty dreck that predominates the airways, and Internet chatter.
Ma’at – no offense is taken, even in the UK we’re amazed at where these numbers – 1 in 3 of the entire planet – are coming from when not even 1 in 3 of the UK population are following the relentless day to day coverage in the British media.
The UK has a national holiday on the wedding date, assumedly so everyone can watch the ceremony but the simple truth is that very few people I know are even going to bother. The shops are going to be open and people I know who work in retail – who’ve been given the choice to have the day off or not – have nearly all said they would work that national holiday.
Case in point, for Charles and Diana’s wedding in 1981, almost every street in the country had a “street party”. I was very young but I do remember it. However, 30 years later only 4000 applications were received by the government which only backs up the claim that of the 65 million people in the UK, only 4000 could be bothered to do anything.
In closing, I’d like to state that I am neither a republican (in the British sense of the word) nor an anti-monarchist but there is a massive feeling of apathy towards the whole thing which has people wondering what would happen when William’s brother Harry gets married in a few years time? And by contrast, William’s cousin Zara is also getting married in a few weeks time to a well known and popular UK sportsman in a very low key ceremony in Scotland and if you didn’t read the British tabloids, you wouldn’t have even known about it.
Yes, but on the Royal list of who matters…………….Zara ain’t anywhere near the top of the list.
Unlike the future King of the country, which is why it gets special treatment.
At any rate, we in the UK have to avoid the US Presidential Inauguration crap when it gets covered on UK TV so have a taste of it back.
If you don’t like it, maybe a Kardashian is making a new sex tape to debut instead.
Oh I like it! Didn’t you hit the nail right on the head!! Bravo!
There’s no way a third of all living people are that interested in a wedding.
Who cares? These people are “special” because they were born? You work hard, pay your taxes and then Charles and Camilla take that cash and spend $500,000 for a two-week vacation aboard a yacht. Nice. They’re just a bunch of foppish tax dodgers. It’s time for another Cromwell…
here here
I can’t wait til this thing is over and I get to read on Deadline that the Royal Wedding garnered the worst ratings numbers in twenty years.
Didn’t we have a war to get rid of these peeps!!!!
You know, that really doesn’t have anything to do with this.
2 Billion? How can anyone even type that lie? I believe that about as much as I believe that 1 billion watch the Academy Awards. Have these morons ever traveled? Like anyone in China, Africa, India or Indonesia cares about this messed up family. Take those countries out of the equation, and about 75% of the rest of the world would need to watch this train wreck to get to 2 billion.
Good luck…..
I was born in Hong Kong but grew up in Canada. I’m too young for Diana’s wedding but my mom woke me up in the middle of the night to watch her funeral. In Hong Kong, many people still look upon the royal family fondly. Especially when you consider the chilling reintegration with China… So I’m looking forward to watching the royal wedding. It was something I shared with my mom, a reminder of what Hong Kong used to be, and what the heck – im a sappy girl who loves a fairy tale even if it’s manufactured and part of a dying institution.
You are SO American. Congratulations!
Samantha, you and I will get together and watch. I’ll bring the hankies!
To quote Jerry Seinfeld’s comment about the royals “These people aren’t special.”
I’m just staggered by the media feeding frenzy. The Weather Channel? Good grief. People have lost their senses.
Are you all nuts? People love this stuff. I have two friends who are taking off work on Friday so they can be up early to watch. And they are both CEO’s by the way.
The first couple of words of the headline on this story were already more than I care about this, or the wedding.
Yeah, I understand millions of Americans apparently disagree – they’re eating up this garbage with a spoon. But I can’t help but suspect it’s the same folks who think Trump would make a great President, that Palin is admirable, that the rich and corporations in America are overburdened, and that a polyester blanket with sleeves is “a darned clever idea.”
They toute their twisted version of history, and see no irony in their fawning and flipping over a Royal Wedding.
I for one am very excited for the wedding I will be getting up at 4 in the morning to watch it with my sister till we have to leave for school but contrary to your belifs I don’t think Trump would make a good president in fact I cringe at the thought of him even being on the ballot and I don’t think Palin is all that great anyone can be excited about about the royal wedding not just extremly right winged people
Wow, way to stereotype. I am an American. I am also extremely excited for the Royal Wedding; almost giddy. I work full-time, and I am proud to say that I took a vacation day this Friday so that I can watch the Royal Wedding live.
First of all, I do not consider this, as you so eloquently phrased it, “garbage.” I also do not believe that Trump has much presidential merit, nor do I admire Sarah Palin in any conceivable way. If you had any handle on the American economy, you would know that the majority of middle-class Americans do NOT sympathize with the grossly rich, nor the billion-dollar corporations.
Oh, also, it’s a “Snuggie.” That of which, my husband and I have continuously joked about since the day we first saw the advertisement. It is a joke here in the US, just as it is elsewhere.
I am not touting a “twisted version of history.” I am simply enjoying the festivities of a once in a lifetime event. Regardless of the past, this is a significant moment occurring in the present. I was not present for all of history, but I am present for this. And I am choosing to share in the joy and celebration.
Pity to those who rain on everyone’s parade.
I was young child when I watched Princess Diana’s wedding and I loved it. My mom loves the royalty and because of her, I do too. I am thrilled to be able to watch this wedding live. However, I will admit, that the amount of American media coverage is a tad nauseating. I can understand the major networks covering it, but why have a stranglehold on all the other smaller channels.
I am happy this wedding is on a Friday, as my husband and kids (who are not interested in royalty, only me) will be on a road trip the next day. I’ll be up watching this live.
this was from an earlier post:
I was young child when I watched Princess Diana’s wedding and I loved it. My mom loves the royalty and because of her, I do too. I am thrilled to be able to watch this wedding live. However, I will admit, that the amount of American media coverage is a tad nauseating. I can understand the major networks covering it, but why have a stranglehold on all the other smaller channels.
i was young child when i watched my dad drink beer and i loved it!
my mom loved to watch my dad drink beer and because of her, i love to drink it too! i am trilled to drink during the wedding…. “live”
However i will admit that the american beer can sometimes be nauseating especially when i drink too many too quick. all the major networks cover most beers with excellent commercials, but why have a stranglehold on good whiskey?
If you don’t have don’t have anything positive to say, why bother spreading negativity? If you don’t embrace the Royal Wedding, who cares? You are part of a party pooping minority so quit judging the rest of us who ARE interested. If it’s not your thing, just bow out graciously and let the rest of us enjoy it. Go make positive comments about something else instead and quit dumping insults on the rest of us for our support and enjoyment of this event. It’s rude and unnecessary.
I remember being a teenager and seeing my mom sit in the floor and cry when Princess Di died. We have so much crumb and crap in the world, why not focus in on something fun for a minute. Yes they might be tax dodgers, but it is a fairytale wedding. Princess Di did amazing,amazing things for her people and will graciously live in loving memory forever. So, to watch her son get married to a commoner just like herself is very special and it is history.
The Americans lap this stuff up because essentially they have no history or heritage. After all, if it wasn’t for European explorers discovering America, they’d all still be living in tents.
everyone calm down – it’s obvious that most young people who live online wont be interested by royal anything – it will be those of a certain age who consider it an historical event and many females (as has been said) who love a fairytale
I have been an anglophile for years and the spectacle and tradition emobodied in a royal wedding is what I want to see – and I think Trump is a rude joke, Palin a stupid one and the military industrial complex may just bring on the end of civilization as we know it.
Turn off your TVs during the wedding and donate some money to a good cause why doncha?
I always find it hilarious how people act like they don’t care about this royal wedding, find the hubbub stupid, etc., yet here they are reading the articles and even taking the time to post a comment! If it’s all so ridiculous, why are you here reading and posting?! Go back to saving the world!
I totally agree. I have a cousin who I could see doing something similar, only he wouldn’t do it online. If I mentioned it to him he would probably call me stupid and tell me it’s a waste of time to watch something so completely unconnected with myself. But I think these people obviously have nothing better to do with their lives than find something they find repulsive and down anyone who would find it to their liking. People like that shouldn’t be allowed to have internet access to be debbie downers all the time to others.
as a brit living in the u.s. i’m surprised how many people here have such a nice fairy tale image
of the royals. and why not? from here, it’s kinda harmless and just more celeb gossip.
in the uk, however, i think there’s more people than not who are anti-monachist
(mainly because of the cost of such a useless institution)
and don’t have the rosy glasses at all.
the royal’s priviliges and wealth are being chipped at all the time. the people are revolting!
even when charles and di got married, the Specials “ghost town” was #1 for a reason!
but i do wish i got the day off like everyone in the uk!