
EXCLUSIVE: While Arthur was a box office flop, Russell Brand has been staked to a first-look producing deal by Warner Bros. That studio has cut back as hard in recent years as any with its number of producer overhead deals, and slashed the ones that remain. But Brand becomes the latest case where the studio gives pacts to actors it primarily wants populating Warner Bros films. Warner Bros got aggressive on that front last year when it added deals with Robert Downey Jr., Ben Affleck/Matt Damon and Zac Efron, to go along with pacts previously given to Steve Carell, Leonardo DiCaprio and a few others. It has become reminiscent of those days when the studio had a star stable with the likes of Kevin Costner, Mel Gibson and Clint Eastwood (who, amazingly, is still there).
Brand will have a modest deal, but Warner Bros apparently hasn’t lost faith in him despite the disappointing returns on Arthur. The studio is bullish on two other comic vehicles that were acquired as star vehicles for Brand while the studio was making Arthur. One is an untitled laffer being scripted by William and Scott Bindley that would cast Brand as a David Beckham-like soccer player/playboy who gets arrested in Texas and draws the community-service gig of coaching the awful local high school team. The other is a remake of the British comedy show Rentaghost, in which Brand would play a spirit who starts a temp agency for the dead. One thing the studio has learned is that an entirely likable version of Brand isn’t necessarily the one audiences respond to. In the original Arthur, Dudley Moore was drunk the whole movie and picked up hookers. Brand played that kind of rascal in Get Him To The Greek and Forgetting Sarah Marshall, but his Arthur was sanitized by comparison. Better off turning him loose next time and perhaps pairing him with another star.

The overall deals Warner Bros is making with actor-based companies is proving cost efficient, I’m told. Development costs aren’t that onerous, and those overhead costs get burned off if the actors make even one film and has a producing credit on it. Downey, who made his deal while working for the studio on Due Date and the Sherlock Holmes sequel, has the potential to be a significant supplier along with his wife Susan Downey. Their Team Downey has several projects already that the studio is eager to make if Downey stars in them. That includes the Steve McQueen-hatched treasure hunt movie Yucatan with Holmes scribe Anthony Peckham writing. There is also an untitled musical with script and lyrics by Brian Yorkey and music by Tom Kitt, who teamed on the Pulitzer Prize-winning rock opera Next To Normal, which won three Tony Awards. Downey will play one part of a Broadway team that recovers from a career-threatening flop by surfacing as counselors to the camp they attended as kids. Team Downey and Warner Bros also took over a long-gestating project involving Hunter Scott, who after watching Jaws as a high school student, researched the WWII sinking of the USS Indianapolis in shark-infested waters. The kid’s efforts helped to get the ship’s captain, Charles McVay, posthumously exonerated of blame. McVay, haunted by guilt, committed suicide in 1968. That project once had JJ Abrams circling to direct it, but it languished and Warner Bros quietly picked it up several months ago.
The Affleck/Damon deal has mostly been about Affleck so far. Together they are still developing the baseball wife swapping film The Trade, but Affleck followed up The Town by considering almost every plum script in the Warner Bros arsenal as directing and acting projects before he committed to direct the Iran hostage pic Argo. Carell’s Carousel Productions brought in the upcoming Dan Fogelman-scripted Crazy, Stupid, Love, which Warner Bros releases July 29 and expects to be a hit. Efron is starring in the Nicholas Sparks adaptation The Lucky One as his company tries to develop other vehicles for him, as the studio waits for him to pop as an adult. These deals are easier to handle for the studio than some producing pacts, where producers submit every script they can get from agencies, and shackle studios with the packaging fee that agencies routinely tack on when they commission producers who’ve been given the scripts. 
As for the rest of its producer deals, Warner Bros has cut its pacts down to a few directors like Eastwood, Todd Phillips, Zack Snyder and Greg Berlanti, with an informal deal with the most important of them all, Chris Nolan. The studio has a list of term producers but leans heaviest on Donald De Line, Denise DiNovi, Joel Silver, Akiva Goldsman, David Heyman and former execs like Dan Lin, Kevin McCormick, Lionel Wigram and Basil Iwanyk.
NBC Sets Oklahoma Tornado Benefit Concert For May 29


Is that soccer/Texas thing just Mighty Ducks with a slight rewrite?
Oh, man, this town gets more and more depressing by the hour!
quack. quack. quack.
Or hardball without the Black kids…
I think you both mean The Bad News Bears. I have a feeling it’ll make me miss the original the same way Brand’s Arthur does.
Kicking and Screaming II. Brand stucks and he is already tired. And Mike Clint is still at the studio because he is the only one making good movies for WB.
I have not yet met one person who finds Russell Brand anything less than highly irritating, much less particularly funny. I get so confused when Hollywood does the occasional anointing of a new “Star” when there is little to no visible interest whatsoever from the paying public! Are these the “Stars” that have made a deal with the man below??
SHAVE DAMN YOU, SHAVE!!!
Great post Richard. Agree 100%.
Indeed, it’s incredible perplexing. Maybe dirty photos?
Absolutely 100% agree. Nowadays they’re all hype and no substance. Years ago you had to build some type of portfolio to show studios and agencies your worth,,, now even Russell Brand & Jennifer lopez are hyped up again. Fran Liebowitz made a great comment in her documentary about how in the beiginning of the AIDS epidemic, we lost most of our creative A Listers and subsequently, the B & C Listers moved up… so true.
Russell Brand does not exactly exude athleticism. I’m having trouble coming up with a svelte actor who is actually less “David Beckam-like” than Brand. Though I’m sure I can come up with one later. Still, doesn’t bode particularly well for the proposed project.
What happened to Man That Rocks the Cradle? That’s the perfect WB’s project for him.
The public have spoken. They do not not want or like Russell “Ugly Skull-Face” Brand in their theaters.
Did they also green light his movie, FAILING UPWARD?
Russell Brand is brilliant, authentic, honest, funny and very real–and his co-stars love working with him.. He will last a long time in a business which has few such stars…
Be honest–
The WB had a previous deal with Brand and now doesn’t want him in any of their films…
So they’re rolling him over to a POD. It’s over, Rover.
Man That Rocks the Cradle? Never even heard of it but let me take a wild stab at it—screw up who has no business caring for a kid (wait for it) is forced to care for a kid.
Russell Brand is the new Shia La Beouf.
The new who…?
Exactly!
Russell Brand is one of the few actors who actively keeps me away from a movie. I don’t really know why. I’m sure he’s a decent person, and someone must find him funny for him to have this career. But there’s just something about him and his whole act/look that makes me recoil at the idea of spending two hours in his world. It’s star power in reverse.
Brand is “star power in reverse”-the “black hole” of stardom, sucking energy in from the audience rather than giving energy out.
Real stars give off light, heat, and like the sun, make us happy to be alive.
Reverse stars like Brand are Black Holes: They give off no light, no energy, and make us feel depressed.
PS For what it’s worth, the reverse of “Star” is “Rats”, sort of what animal Brand personifies.
I have nothing against Brand personally, but he is definitely in an acting rut. Playing the same annoying character in all his films. I guess if Adam Sandler can play the same character , I guess anyone can.
He’s married to the awesome Katy Perry. Enough said.
HE CAN’T ACT!!!!! Good lord, Warners. Dudley Moore was a terrific comedic/dramatic talent. Very special. Brand is a buffoon who has NO ACTING CHOPS WHATSOEVER!!! HE IS BOX OFFICE POISON!!! What is the thinking at Warners? Frightening. Stop underestimating your audience.
Hollywood makes even less sense than Washington.
Harsh, dude.
True, but harsh.
Gee. I wonder if this will in any way reflect on the genius of Greg Silverman…
Way to take the reins Robinov! Horn’s got nuthin’ on you.
Arthur is a flop already? I love Hollywood.
Russell Brand is the new Yahoo Serious.
I just don’t get it about this guy. He’s not funny. At all. He had his moment in Sarah Marshall. Get Him To The Greek was imo Diddy’s show. But this deal he has with WB…utterly perplexing.
How low has WB gone from Clint Eastwood to Rusell Brand.
Maybe when Brand is 80 he’ll direct some good movies.
For the time being they should just lock him up in a basement til he turns 80.
This article main flaw is the statement:
One thing the studio has learned is that an entirely likable version of Brand isn’t necessarily the one audiences respond to.
To say that his “Arthur” was “completely likable” isn’t accurate. It’s not that audiences flocked to see Brand in those other films he just had the good fortune of comedic co-stars but on his own he’s not a box office draw or considered funny.
He’s a one trick pony that used up his jokes in Sarah Marshall but it looks like they’ll continue to milk it with these other Bad News Bears Soccer and BeetleJuice UK.
The difference with Brand and someone like Adam Sandler is that men, specifically, relate/connect with Sandler’s type of humor while Brand’s frizzy hair/skinny jeans is an oddball almost prop type of humor that is stale and not a audience draw. No one looks at Brand “getting” him because he’s attempting to be a farce and be laughed AT but the problem is that the jokes ran out in his first film and recycled humor isn’t worth $10 for a movie ticket.
I laugh looking at his inclusion that list: Matt Damon, Robert Downey Jr., Leonardo DiCaprio…Russell Brand. Bwa ha ha ha ha. Better off throwing money out the window…at least then you could get it back.
The fact that Warners is trying to present this as a good thing probably means Brand already has the $ on these products so they might as well pretend they’re happy about it. Seriously, is there a studio head that could actually be excited about being the in the Russell Brand business?
Guess I shouldn’t be surprised that there aren’t any actresses or black performers of note that have deals at Warner Brothers? Couldn’t recall where Heigl or Aniston (not “of note”); Swank or Foxx (actually “of note”) are settled.
Russel Brand is a joke. He was a good character in 1 movie. Cut your losses and move on from him.
The studios shouldn’t wait for Zac Efron to grow up. He is done as well. Had a great run, but nobody’s interested in him.