
EXCLUSIVE: While the outbreak of zombie and vampire films has been well chronicled, Hollywood has also become flush with Frankenstein films. The latest is an adaptation of the Peter Ackroyd novel The Casebook of Victor Frankenstein, which has just gotten Pulitzer-winning Proof playwright David Auburn signed to write the script. The project is set with RT Features, and Sam Raimi and Rob Tapert’s Ghost House Pictures. The story covers the youthful days of Frankenstein, who begins experimenting with corpses, influenced by the outspoken English poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, whose Mary wrote the book. She’s a character in the film as well. RT Features’ Rodrigo Teixeira will produce with Tapert and Ilene Staple, while Fernando Loureiro, Jeff Vespa and Ghost House’s Nathan Kahane and Lawrence Grey will be exec producers.
That’s just one of several Frankenflicks. Universal is developing a new version of the 1931 studio classic movie with Guillermo del Toro and Scott Stuber; Summit Entertainment is developing This Dark Endeavor: The Apprenticeship of Victor Frankenstein, an adaptation of the Kenneth Oppel novel that is being produced by Twilight Saga’s Karen Rosenfelt; and Columbia Pictures and producer Matt Tomach recently acquired Frankenstein, a contemporary re-telling of the famous tale based on a pitch by Craig Fernandez. If that’s not enough, former Guns n Roses guitar hero Slash, whose Slasher Films is teamed with Scout Productions on a Jay Russell-attached Wake the Dead, a Frankenstein tale based on the graphic novel by Steve Niles (30 Days of Night). And let’s not forget Fox 2000’s remake of the 1975 camp classic The Rocky Horror Picture Show, last heard from around Halloween, when the studio courted Glee’s Ryan Murphy, right after he wrapped an episode devoted to the original movie.
Why the Frankenfixation? It certainly doesn’t hurt that the Shelley novel is in the public domain. Movie depictions have been hit or miss over the past few years, but Danny Boyle recently drew raves for directing a stage version at the London National Theatre. While there seems to be an endless appetite for zombies and vampires, the specificity of the Frankenstein creation story probably means that only one or two of these will survive the road to production. Auburn’s repped by CAA and Code Entertainment, while the RT producer/financiers are repped by UTA.


There are way too many Frankenstein projects in development. The only people who should be making a Frankenstein movie is Guillermo del Toro and Universal. Mountains of Madness will happen someday, but if del Toro can bring his Frankenstein movie under $40 million, I don’t see why Universal wouldn’t do it.
Their Wolfman movie turned out pretty good, but was way too expensive. These monster movies need to be low budget and not CGI effects heavy.
You’re kidding right?? The Wolfman was positively dreadful.
The Wolfman was one of the worst movies I’ve seen in cinemas this side of TF:RotF, I walked out 25 minutes into the film.
Valmo & The.Watcher are right. The Wolf Man remake was horrible. The sets and make-up looked great, but the story was abysmal. I laughed out loud when it turned into ‘Werewolf Smackdown!”
Me so CONFUSED!!!
Fire over here!
Flame over there!!
Me so BIG and CONFUSED!
Oh, look, a Butterfly.
The Frankenstein story of course is based on a fear of science. Now, more than ever, we have those selfsame feelings, with the gnome project, Big Pharma, mystery illnesses etc. So, yeah, it’s time for a Frankenstein reboot.
I see where MTV’s ‘Death Valley’ is taking on vampires and zombies but with a lighter touch. I’m hoping the vamps are cool (young actors like R.J. Cantu and others should be good at that). Let’s hope Hollywood doesn’t present the monster as just a poor misunderstood guy, wanting to be loved because that would be untrue to Mary’s original story.
Guillermo del Toro is brilliant! ‘The Strain’ is out of this world!
So glad del Toro passed on “THE HOBBIT” (the first two times). He would have turned it in to yet another Goya-esque fantasy about halflings avoiding/yet coveting rings, and the tall dark Lard who uses the power of the ring to ensnare shorties with low self-esteem.
Now — the newly toned and tanned Peter Jackson, welcome back my friend. 48 fps 3-D gansta epic is ON!!!
Welcome back, indeed.
I guess none of these people have talked to Kenneth Branagh and Francis Coppola about how receptive modern audiences are to Frankenstein films. It doesn’t matter, though. The only people who have ever been able to capture lightning on screen with this subject are James Whale and Boris Karloff with Frankenstein (1931) and Bride of Frankenstein (1935). Everyone else has just imitated that success.
In Whale We trust.
Wasn’t there a novel series by Dean Koontz that was optioned as well?
Del Toro version is obviously exciting. Niles’ Wake the Dead is a good reboot because it’s a younger, modern version of Victor Frankenstein, which could be cool.
I miss Frank. Glad he’s back!
oh no, now we have to endure a ton of I’m sure rehashed poorly made Frankenstein movies . Yuck. Pass
What’s going on with Frankenweenie from Tim Burton?
I was trying to develop a sci-fi “Frankenstein” and ultimately arrived at “Blade Runner.” Such a great take on the story
The LAST and BEST version of Frankenstein is “Fucking Frankenstein”.
It’s just Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein with the F word inserted over 1000 times throughout the text.
It’s amazing.
The last word on frankenstein. deal with it.
Blücher!
[horses whinny]
Cant wait for a Bruckheimer version with Nick Cage and a car chase. I mean this again? It is like stories on Jesus, we all know the ending.
um … Frankenstein is a zombie.
duh.
Screw these lame-brain Hollywood re-imaginings — read the genius original book instead.
From the original novel here’s when Dr. F meets the monster who speaks like this:
“Did I entreat thee master when I was clay to mould me man? Did I solicit then from darkness to promote me?”
Umm, that’s from Paradise Lost my friend, although it is used in the beginning of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, as it thematically relates.
You also forgot about the LakeShore Project “I, Frankenstein” – which is still being developed there and which you reported on a few months ago…
Nice to see another iconic character will be absolutely destroyed by a painfully repetitive Hollywood…
What needs to be told about Frankenstein is the 1931, 1935, and the 1939 versions on how they were first developed and brought to the screne. It should include James Whales thoughts as to how he felt it should be done (leaving out all the Gay referances to Whale that was done with “Gods and Monsters”). Enclude how the makeup artist Jack Pierce came up with the looks of the monster as Whale visioned them to be and the pains taken time it took Karloff to endure it. The movie should be called “KARLOFF, the Making of a Monster”. Center the entire movie around him, Boris Karloff, from just prior to 1931 to just after 1939. His story, that of Boris Karloff, should be told so that he can be known as the great actor he was and what he went through duing the times of 1930′s and Universal Studios. Shara Karloff, I’m sure, has a lot of good, true materials and information that can be used and needs to have her fathers story told. It can also include the story behind the making of Son of Frankenstein, that Boris did with Basil Rathbone and Bela Lugosi as Ygor produced and directed by Roland V. Lee with such great sets, lighting, and in black and white. Karloff should be played by Jeremy Irons due to his similar looks to Karloff and could be transformed into a close likeness of the monster based on Jack Pierce’s orginal makeup. It could be Acadmey Award material if done with a ture story line and with correct acounts of the times.
Yes,i hear ya,this is what should be done,not some poorly done movie with modern cgi and bad actors.This is a classic,there have been other remakes over the years ,and none are better then KARLOFF and WHALE.They all want to destroy all of the things people love about a charachter.The make up…everything…if you can’t make a better movie then one made over 75 yeaqrs ago,stay away from it,or do it like this MIKE WAGENFEHR said…..They are killing THE MUNSTERS as i speak.Holly wood leave our classics alone.
Thank God and Hell my own take on this mythic fable is different on its own.
Even with this classic being in the public domain for so long…its genesis crosses from so many cultures, races and people of all backgrounds.
To cross the boundary of life and death; the mortal and the eternal — if done right, and with a lot of serious creativity — the myth of the dead resurrecting will always work.
Unless of course it includes high school teens trying to figure out…whatever.
Also there is THE LIVING AND THE DEAD by Todd Livingston and Robert Tinnell.