The Film Department Withdraws IPO
EXCLUSIVE: I began hearing rumors from sources yesterday that The Film Department had laid off its entire staff. Today, I can confirm that it’s a very sad day for that 3-year-old company that financed and produced the hit film Law-Abiding Citizen: it will close as of May 27th. Here’s what happened in summary to Chairman/CEO Mark Gill and Vice Chairman/COO Neil Sacker: Though the company was profitable in 2010 and generated $90 Million in revenues in the last 18 months, The Film Department was not allowed to keep it due to lender stipulations forced upon the company during the credit crisis. So all that money went to lenders. When the company had become profitable and improved its balance sheet by more than $105 million in the last year, it sought to raise $200 million in new private equity and debt to become a U.S. film distributor as well as a financier/producer. But it was unable to close its recapitalization in challenging capital markets.
“What if you made $90 million and your banks wouldn’t let you keep it? Basically, that’s what happened to us,” Mark Gill, Chairman and CEO of The Film Department, said in an exclusive statement to me. “We managed to hold on in this impossible position for 15 months, but we couldn’t survive indefinitely.”
“We came within inches of closing our recapitalization on three occasions, but unfortunately close isn’t good enough,” Neil Sacker, Vice Chairman and COO of the company, said in an exclusive statement to me. “We’re grateful to everyone—filmmakers, talent, financiers, industry experts and our staff—who contributed considerable time, effort, expertise and capital to the company.”
Both Gill and Sacker have some exciting opportunities being offered to them now. But the recent past has been painful for them. Over the past 18 months, The Film department paid off $40 million in senior debt to its commercial banks under customary terms. But in September of 2009, in the aftermath of the credit crisis, the company was forced to accelerate repayment of its second-lien notes, which ultimately resulted in $50 million in early payments to a lender. That $50 million would otherwise have been available to the company to fund continuing operations. When leveraged with traditional senior debt financing, those funds would have allowed the company to generate another $100 million in production commitments. Previously, the company had paid off its $140 million senior production loan facility in full.
The Film Department is best known for financing and producing Law-Abiding Citizen, a $40 million thriller starring Gerard Butler and Jamie Foxx that has earned $133 million at the worldwide box office. The company also financed and produced two films not yet released: the romantic comedy The Rebound, starring Catherine Zeta-Jones and Justin Bartha, and A Little Bit of Heaven, a love story starring Kate Hudson, Gael Garcia Bernal, Whoopi Goldberg and Kathy Bates. Plans for those two films to be released in the U.S. by third parties are in discussion now.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


wow, Nikki. could you have gone any easier on the company that tripled their salaries over the years while losing money for their investors?!?
seriously sucks to have another “buyer” go away, but can’t say they didn’t do it to themselves…
I totally agree. I am one of those investors who lost $500k. They should have never received raises in light of the credit crisis or anything else. They deserved raises only after they paid back their origianl investors that put them in business.
Seriously – they paid off their senior facility of $145MM in full. However you fail to realize it was never close to fully utilized. The second lien note holders wanted to salvage their investment after one hit movie and two others that were essentially unwatchable. Rebound has been in the can for over two or three years and still has yet to find distribution.
The equity guys were smart to pull the plug on the exorbitant lifestyles of management.
These guys are hacks and they are totally spinning the story. They couldn’t make a good movie to save their lives. Mark Gill claims he knows how to pick movies. Really? If that was the case, then he wouldn’t be in this situation.
In short, the meaning of “debt” equals “it’s not your money”… The Film Department employees should be able to see their salaries sitting pretty in Neil and Mark’s bank account
Always sad news to hear.
I completely disagree with you two. In my humble opinion, every single one of this company’s employees were top notch, above-board and reputable. They must have passed on your projects for you to be so mean.
I am very sad that this has happened. I hate studio movies for the most part. Law Abiding Citizen is a damn good film and so were the other few films The Film Department made.
Damn good film? Come on Karen, you almost had us.
Dear Karen, I don’t think anyone was selling their employees short, its what Mark and Neal did that this company is no longer in business. Law Abiding Citizen was fine, but they were also $25M over budget… Get your facts straight…
If by damn good you mean completely mediocre then I agree.
LAW ABIDING CITIZEN was a damn good film? In what way? It made NO SENSE whatsoever. “and so were the other few films The Film Department made” . . . you mean the two other films that have never been released? Hey Karen, did you WORK for the film department or are you related to either Gill or Sacker?
The fact is that Gill and Sacker created huge overhead with a fully staffed company and expensive offices and high-rolling ways, years before they had any product to put through the system. They dug themselves a hole that was way to deep to get out of. The writing was on the wall before they greenlit their first movie.
These 2 gentleman were making over $1 million dollars a year and if they got funded they wanted a pay raise. WOW! No wonder they couldn’t raise capital. Wall street wasn’t buying this act.
Sorry, guys. You did good, and you caught lightning in a bottle once, with a damned good movie. I have no doubts you’ll do it again, and we want to see you succeed in your next incarnation. Good luck!
One horrible movie release in four years is good?? I want to work for you!! Don’t forget to pay me for doing nothing!
Anyone who gives money to Sacker deserves to loose it, given his track record.
I guess the sky fell on the Film Department
3 films in 3 years? Only 1 release (albiet, a hit, but nonetheless). Um…how did anyone expect them to survive? Sounds like they had major issues developing material. You gotta do better than 3 films in 3 years to survive these days.
I feel horrible for everyone involved. Mark and Neil, Robert Katz and Scott Nemes. (Nemes esp – very fucking smart cool dude) I really respected what they were trying to do and in all my dealings with them they were incredibly hard working, strait shooting creative guys who favored genuine collaboration rather than the ham-fisted notes shoved down your throat — the norm at many studios.
I hope to work with them again in their next incarnations and I wish them all the best.
nice post, Nemes.
Mark Gill is one of the really good guys in the business and there is no new good news here. I think this is balanced and fair reporting of a sad story.
Whenever a company like this falters, it’s bad news for all of us trying to make movies.
I agree. Gill has great taste. This is a shame.
Mark Gill is one of the smartest, classiest guys in the business and he will rise again and make more great movies. Too damn many bitter haters on anonymous comment boards!
Beyond infuriating, when you consider that the banks that accelerated the debt got hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in bailout money.
anyone who has worked with Mark Gill knows that he is a CLASS act. He cares about his employees, his
filmmakers, actors, and all involved in the process.
Scott Nemes was the only reason I brought my best projects to Film Dept. Neil and Mark should be ashamed of themselves! Double-dipping called, they want their act back!
Nemes is a good dude.
i think you accidentally put an “e” at the end of dud.
good riddance.
sorry to say it – but those guys were just too focused on rewarding themselves instead of paying back their investors.
Their statement should read: “We’re grateful to everyone—filmmakers, talent, financiers, industry experts and our staff—who contributed considerable time, effort, expertise and capital to the company, most of them FOR FREE, except, of course, for the non-union writers, to whom we shall be particularly grateful.” Enough said.
Neil Sacker and Robert Katz learned the biz at Bob Yari. And we all know what happened there. (Yari owes EVERYBODY money.) Not a happy ending.
Nor is this.
Can you teach a dog new tricks?
““What if you made $90 million and your banks wouldn’t let you keep it? Basically, that’s what happened to us,” Mark Gill, Chairman and CEO of The Film Department, said in an exclusive statement to me. ”
Basically. Except for what actually must have happened.
I think you meant to say we had revenue of $90 million but nevertheless were in material breach of our loan agreements and the lenders were entitled to and did accelerate repayment. And that you couldn’t convince them to leave their money in or anyone to refinance you. That about sum it up ?
There is so much spinning coming out of The Film Department, Los Angeles should be put on tornado watch.
as an investor, never had a clue what was going on..story changed every time I asked…
I do not believe you are an investor. I still stand by my opinion of the employees of the former Film Department.
Great news, Karen as we were all on pins and needles worried that you changed your mind.
Sacker has a reputation in hollywood, sorry investors weren’t aware. See; Nomura Ent, Destination Films, El Camino Films, Creative Union, Miracle, Yari Films (fraud lawsuit against Yari & Sacker), bye Film Dept. Why hasn’t Sacker been investigated??
The reason Gill and Sacker have not been investigated is that they duped people who know nothing about hollywood (PT Barnum), took their money under the auspices of making commercial movies when they really want to make self-indulgent arthouse (read – no chance of making money) movies, and find an excuse to hire their family and friends for jobs they are not qualified for, then blame “the perfect storm of economic crisis” or some other such hand of god like calamity that has nothing to do with the complete mismanagement of the assets, then use their money to pay their PR firm to help whitewash the mess and start the whole pyramid again.
Anyone who contemplates working with them or who has worked with them in the past need only do a little bit of digging to see behind the facade of puff pieces and exaggerations. Go read the public S1 filing to see what a losing proposition the IPO was to get some kind of sense as to how fast you can lose your shirt trusting these folks as an investor.
Also.. Start up companies that quickly went no where but Sacker did collect or attempt to collect money from investors! Stratus Films, Sacker Consultants, and Enchantment filmsm to name a few.