
Exactly 20 years ago, German rock band Scorpions released Wind of Change, which became an anthem for our generation of young Eastern Europeans going through a dramatic political change: the fall of communism. Coming back from the broadcast upfront presentations in New York last week, I’ve been having a hard time getting the catchy tune out of my head. While less far-reaching and profound, there is a clear sense of changing of the guard and a new direction for the broadcast networks this year. I can’t remember a time where the majority of the networks had new heads at their upfront presentations. Paul Lee took over for Steve McPherson at ABC, Bob Greenblatt for Jeff Gaspin and Angela Bromstad at NBC, and Mark Pedowitz is succeeding Dawn Ostroff at the CW. There is a similar changing of the guard among the top TV producers this year. Upstart Chernin Entertainment and DreamWorks TV, which is re-entering the broadcast arena, topped the pods with the most new series, three each, with another recently launched company, Aaron Kaplan’s Kapital Entertainment, scoring two new shows. And in its first season, Marty Adelstein and Shawn Levy’s 21 Laps/Adelstein Prods.got one pilot, Tim Allen’s Last Man Standing, picked up to pilot, with another, Fox’s Family Album, in serious contention. Meanwhile, such longtime upfront fixtures as Jerry Bruckheimer TV, Mark Gordon Co. and Wonderland didn’t land any new series for next season.
Also in a departure from upfronts’ recent past, bullish by the influx of ad dollars from the recovering economy and driven by the desire of their new chiefs to stand out, ABC, NBC and CW took bigger swings than usual with such unconventional projects as the Broadway-themed Smash and Inception-flavored Awake (NBC), fairytale mystery Once Upon a Time and horror thriller The River (ABC). Meanwhile, CW successfully went after a pilot that had been developed and produced for a much larger network, CBS’ Ringer. And there are two other changes that I feel may signal a shift in the way TV development is done.
First: actors taking things in their own hands. Tired of waiting for the perfect pilot script to come along, more actors than ever went ahead and wrote a pilot for themselves this past development season. Many of the scripts went to pilot and then to series, including Whitney Cummings’ Whitney on NBC, David Hornsby’s How To Be a Gentleman, Chris Moynihan’s Man Up and Lennon Parham and Jessica St. Clair’s BFF.
The other trend undermines the fundamentals of the broadcast development system. A lot has been written about the cumbersome and painful network notes process; creators often complain that it interferes with their vision. Well, the network brass circumvented their traditional development process more than ever this season, going heavily for spec scripts that were often taken out in the final stage of the development process. Both of CBS’ newly picked-up comedy series, 2 Broke Girls, which became CBS’ highest-testing pilot ever, and How To Be a Gentleman, were spec scripts CBS nabbed in December and January, respectively. Also based on spec (or previously developed elsewhere) scripts are six other new series for next season: NBC’s Awake and Smash, ABC’s Apartement 23, Fox’s Alcatraz and Touch and CW’s Ringer. They say that in television it’s all about the distinct voice of the series’ creator. With so many new shows making it to the screen with the voice of their creators virtually unfiltered by the network development machine, maybe the broadcast networks will move closer to the cable and British model of auteur TV. The only downside is that many TV development execs may be out of a job.
TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.


I have heard over and over that ’2 Broke Girls’ has tested through the roof. So if it fails what does that mean for the testing process? (P.S. I love Cat Dennings, but the promos I have seen for the show make me go Meh….)
Goodman says test groups are just lonely people happy to have someone listen to their opinion. They’re like people who post comments on the internet.
If there’s anything in TV that’s proven baloney, it’s testing. If testing worked, TV would have nothing but hits.
Didn’t lone star test through the roof — but that fox mishandled it. There have been many shows that have tested well but the network doesn’t give it a chance to grown.
Lone Star didn’t test that well.
LOL. Highest testing pilot ever! We have heard that before so many times, especially from CBS. I bet they say that because their Mondays are a mess since Charlie Sheen left and their previous sitcom Mad Love bombed. 2 Broke girls looks awful. Same as 2.5 man without Sheen.
Highest testing pilot ever. LMAO.
That has been used by CBS before. It means the show is awful. And sure looks that way.
CBS needs a good sitcom to help the silly idea of 2.5 man without Charlie Sheen, because their Mondays are terrible since Charlie is gone. 2 Broke girls is a dud.
“They say that in television it’s all about the distinct voice of the series’ creator. With so many new shows making it to the screen with the voice of their creators virtually unfiltered by the network development machine, maybe the broadcast networks will move closer to the cable and British model of auteur TV.”
As a television writer no statement gives me more hope for working with the networks than the one above.
It gives me a lot of hope as a viewer, too.
Highest testing pilot ever??? LOL. CBS has used that before. The show looks awful, but after Mad Love bombing , 2.5 with no Charlie and the rest of the Mondays shows going downhill, I can understand them saying that.
CBS bring Charlie back. Your Mondays need him.
Revenge was one of the highest testing pilots in ABC history.
In the 1950′s and 60′s. New York area television viewers had 7 television stations only, other areas had less; you watched the few TV channels over the air or nothing. Yet, with these few networks and independent stations airing re-runs, there was always something to watch. Fast forward to today: cable, fiber optic, satellite, over 100 channels and I hear people complaining en masse’ there is nothing to watch. So they surf the web or turn to social media. Now what does that tell you about today’s program directors?
The days of prescheduled TV broadcast are short lived soon to be replaced in part by a system using ondemand direct internet broadcasting. Gone will be the days of rushing home to watch you favorite show, the DVR and the Tivo. With the increases in broadband internet services and digital TVs, broadcast TV as we’ve known it is dieing. Once both large and small TV networks implement a system where they simply schedule a release date making not only the latest episode but past episodes as well, viewers can have the options to watch what they want when they want. Demand for quality entertainment will increase. Advertisers will embrace this because they will simply pay for each recorded viewer instead of a program based on past viewer ratings. Louis, you and I talked of this more than 10 years ago in Fort Worth and I remember the conversations clearly! Look at what’s changed and happened since then! Blessed Be!
I think this fall was great (minus NBC) as there where very few procedurals,big names and returns to the small screen and a batch of fresh (and not so fresh) comedies.I’m excited for a number of new shows and can’t wait to see all my returning favourites so all in all a better fall than last where the batch of procedurals that mostly failed and sitcoms all based around the same plot of romance most where unfunny with a few exceptions (Happy Endings).
Modern Familys pilot tested very well. So, obviously testing works when it’s very high or low.
The film industry is a very welcome one especially when we talk about entertainment. Yet you still need to look beyond the production of westernized entertainment. What about the combination of both the africanised films> African/American social cultural piece which will change the general orientation of the world and build more united trend within these continents. More so, i will appreciate the existence of warner brothers or disney family in africa, in respective of which country should it be situated. Please Build more bond within the africans and americans. Can there ever be Fox studio in africa, that will be giving us a more unified and meaningful movies? I am looking forward to that great period and time. Thanks for your understanding. Hon. Sajere kingsley(FHNR)
I just watched a clip of this ’2 Broke Girls’ and I’m not laughing. Good luck with that ‘tested through the roof’ thing…
“The only downside is that many TV development execs may be out of a job” … Nothing personal, but many of them deserve to be.
Chernin Entertainment is an “upstart” … I’m still laughing at that… an upstart production company is three kids in a garage with a good idea, a hundred dollars and an old video camera. Peter Chernin is maybe the best connected man in Hollywood; he is worth hundreds of millions of dollars and he can get any actor, director, producer, financier, et al, on the phone day or night. This was a joke, right?
I agree Emor. I felt the same way about “2 Broke Girls”. Who participated in these tests? A bunch of horny straight guys who just wanted to see a couple of young girls in short, tight skimpy outfits navigating the treacherous waters of New York City?
And development execs won’t be out of a job simply because actors are finally taking matters into their own hands. It makes sense to come to the table with a fully-formed idea that goes beyond a simple catchy pitch. Creative-minded development execs should be able to know a good idea when they hear it and instead of taking over the creator’s process, nurturing it and then stepping back to let the creator create.
The model should never go 100% one way or the other. Level the playing field. Development exec should always be developing but independent producers should also have an equal chance. It’s called competition. It’s how you get the best out of a development season.
It’s really that simple.
Yes, me, too. TV UpFronts alway make me think about the fall of East European Communism.
TV development execs should be out of a job. They suck at it.
They continually ruin good material because they FEAR their bosses. They try to end run and second guess their more powerful higher ups.
The networks owning studios has ruined development. Execs at studios affiliated wit networks have fewer options and develop scripts to death.
The team at ABC/Disney and ABC network lived in such fear of McPherson that their notes were given like abused children to push off a later beating from the big daddy. That studio is simply the worst.
CBS-P is also terrible. They only know procedural writing. Their notes are mind numbing and they don’t appreciate character or originality. CBS the network is terrific as they are given tremendous creative freedom in the development process. Maybe not in the pick up process.
NBC has been a black hole with development execs as cold and humorless as their previous bosses. Fox too has a black hole in its heart.
As for the other studios WB and Sony are the only studios who protect the original voice as they can sell to any network. Unfortunately CBS would rather pick up a show from their own studio and make more dough. But in the last years their shows from outside studios are their better shows usually from the get go.
It means that you the viewer, not the show have failed. Not just failed but are a complete loser who should most likely kill themselves for being so stupid as to not love two broke girls.
Didn’t you hear it tested as one of the highest tested shows ever tested in the history of testing shows being tested?
The Scorpions reference was random but overall I think a pretty spot on assessment by Nellie. I might have mentioned a shift away from procedurals this fall, but with Person of Interest in a key spot and Prime Suspect getting buzz, it’s hard to say that definitively though it is there in essence. Maybe next season when CSI gets canceled.
Couple points. Just because it’s a spec script sale does not mean there will not be network notes. The only difference is that the notes come later in the process. As for testing, great numbers mean people who watched it like it. It does not mean they, or rather the general audience, will be inspired to seek out the show and watch it. That’s an entirely different process. The television landscape is littered with shows that tested through the roof and went nowhere once aired.
Change is the law of the land. good luck with the new shows. Maybe one or two will stick around.
I wouldn’t describe these spec buys as evidence that the shows are ‘virtually unfiltered’ from the creator. Most of them still went through a notes process after being purchased, and it’s not like they won’t get notes from Current departments once the seasons starts.
Testing at CBS means dragging broke people of the Vegas strip over spring break and offering them cash (a 20 dollar bill to be exact) to watch a pilot and answer half a dozen questions. How a pilot tests at CBS is meaningless. Their highest testing pilots don’t get on the air all the time because CBS is controlled by one guy. If Mr. Moonves has to argue he turns to his Board of Old White Male Friends, I mean Board of Directors (who are so grateful to have a place and a paycheck to do his bidding) to nod yes and back him up.
So a bunch of drunk, desperate for a cash infusion to get to the next casino, people are who have dubbed this pilot highest testing.
That’s why CBS is the Tiffany of networks.
Maybe you need to be high to watch it.
I remember NBC yapping about their best testing pilot ever. “Emeril.” Those 7 episodes kicked ass.
I think one problem is all the networks make series decisions all in May, at the last minute and it leads to bad decisions. It’d be better if the networks developed new shows all year long. Film a pilot in say January then view it and then if it has potential then reshoot part or most of it if needed and then view it again say in March and review scripts of future shows and letting the creative team work out the kinks and by the time May comes around they have all their ducks in a row and are ready to go, having done the work and the research and give a show a better chance to make it. Maybe even having part of episode 2 filmed to see how things work, or don’t work. By doing this year round all the networks aren’t competing for the same actors and staff at the same time. It’d be better if they all didn’t do development at the same time and might lead to better results.
Agree Don. Year round development would yield a much better product.
The people who make up the test audience for CBS are drunk folks in Vegas. It’s pretty pathetic.
Networks and studios are so out of touch and have no gut instinct. If the development was year round they might be able to breathe and think. As it is execs just follow the people above them like sheep.
Network development execs…. what are they good for again?