Based on the company’s generally disappointing financial report this morning, it looks like Sony CEO Howard Stringer will have to keep waiting to see a big payoff from the strategy to meld entertainment hardware and software. For the quarter that ended in March, Sony says the industrywide decline in DVD revenues and the lousy results for its Jim Brooks film How Do You Know partly accounted for the 11% drop in movie and TV sales, which came in at $2.1 billion. But operating profits at the segment were up 8%, to $433 million, due largely to belt tightening and a one-time $325 million gain from its revaluation of its 40% stake in the Game Show Network. That will come back to bite Sony next year: The company projects that movie and TV revenues will improve in 2012, but profits will be down without the one-time benefit.
At Sony Music, the company says the continuing slide in CD sales mean that revenues will fall once again in 2012 after dropping 13% to $1.3 billion in the first quarter of 2011. But the operation’s cost-cutting efforts enabled it to report a $46 million operating profit, up from a $7.4 million loss last year.
Sony warned this week that a $4.4 billion charge to account for costs from this year’s tsunami and earthquake, as well as the recent cyber-attack on its PlayStation Network, would trash earnings for the the fiscal year that ended in March. The company says it wound up with a $3.1 billion loss on revenues of $86.5 billion, down about half a percent. But it’s optimistic that the fiscal year ending March 2012 will end up with a 4.4% increase in revenues, and a profit of nearly $1 billion.

Isn’t it time for Amy Pascall to be converted to a producing deal? Her “star” relationships keep her so out of the loop of the actual movie making business that she becomes blind to the consequences of her deals. If not for their amazing marketing department she’d have been sunk years ago. Witness: HOW DO YOU KNOW and SPANGLISH and I SPY and the Nancy Myers Kate Winslet Jacck Black debacle.
Industry wide she is made of. Not because of her crazy antics, or giant mood swings, or obvious kiss ass behavior to Lynton but because she’s fundamentally clueless. On one hand her job defines her to the point that without it she’d be orbitting her own sun, but on the other hand, she doesn’t get her hands dirty enough WIHTIN THE PROCESS OF MOVIEMAKING to stop problems before they start.
Sir Howard: Do the words NEXT mean anything to you?
HOW DO YOU KNOW was so awful I don’t know how the script ever got greenlit. I get it’s Jimmy Brooks, but come on. I turned it off after 30 mins – I can’t believe I got that far. It was a complete stinker. Such good talent wasted. Even Nicholson’s first scene with Rudd was awful-even the great Jack couldn’t save it.
Also, who was going to buy Reese Witherspoon as someone “just” turning 30?
Couldn’t be further from the truth. Amy is undoubtedly the most creatively involved chairman of any movie company — and has taken a chance on movies like Social Network, Superbad, District 9, Zombieland, Karate Kid — none of which is a “movie star” movie and all of them made a whole lot of money.
“has taken a chance on movies like Social Network, Superbad, District 9, Zombieland, Karate Kid — none of which is a “movie star” movie and all of them made a whole lot of money”
Wow, you have to be joking, right? Talk about lips wrap around her bra straps.What risk did she take with any of those movies? The Karate Kid already had name recognition and Will Smith producing and promoting the film, alone with Jackie Chan starring which did plenty to help sales in the asian markets.The Social Network had a critical acclaim director and is base on the founding of Facebook, the biggest social networking site on the planet.Superbad and Zombieland were two inexpenive comedies that just happen to make bank, no real risk with either film.District 9 could be consider her only risk, but then again, it was an inexpensive film with Peter Jackson name attached.Taking a chance/risk is what the Warner Bros brass did with Inception, greenlighting a bunch films that combine production budgets are a hundred million less than Pirates of the Caribbean:On Stranger Tides is not risky.What was risky was the 120 million spent on a romantic comedy.
where exactly did the person above you mention risk? he/she points out correctly that amy makes great decisions and reaped big rewards on the kinds of movies a lot of studios tend to pass over.
What about supposed “bomb” The Tourist? You know the one that made $280M in box office? Apparently that wasn’t the big flop as originally reported.
Unfortunately, The Tourist was a big flop when you consider what it cost to make and market compared with what it brought it. It’s not like everything taken at the box office flows straight to the makers’ profit account.
The Tourist was considers as flop a flop that earned over $280 million it goes to show that movie industry needs to get its fact right and let the movie sell first than to declare it as aflop even though it’s not where as How do you know well sony should of known better resse isnt such star puller
I love when clueless people criticize a very successful and well revered studio executive when they themselves probably have no experience whatsoever in a job that is far beyond their own capability.
Sony disproves the old adage “two heads are better than one.” Why does this studio need Lynton AND Pascal??? Sony has done a lot of “restructuring” over the past few years but for some reason, they won’t get rid of some of the dead weight at the top.
Considering the rate at which Sony is hemorrhaging money, some more cost cutting needs to be done and Pascal should go.
The whole company is lacking a strategy… it was just a question of time that this shows in the numbers. And don’t believe for a second that the tsunami is blame for all. Without their “revaluation” in the Game Show Network (a move to polish the numbers and only allowed in the US) the entertainment division would be in the red. Deep deep in the red. Management has little clue about the business and often comprises people without any background in the film industry… often getting upped from their electronics retail arm. Then there’s the political infighting between television, releasing, and digital, the lack of trust among employees, the non-existing vision and innovation… I sold my stock long ago and so should you.
It’s sad but true. What was once a great innovative company, is anything but today. Creativity is extinct at Sony. From their electronic devices that look like they were designed in 1982, to the string of box office bombs and low-brow sitcoms, there is hardly anything exciting coming from the company today.
Apple and even Samsung are creating the kind of ground-breaking electronic products that Sony USED to be known for. And Warners and Disney have them beat with new features on the home entertainment side. And to top it off, they came up with some lame campaign, Make-dot-Believe. Sounds like a slogan Disney would have rejected in the 80s.
Unfortunately, because of the lack of focus and bad management, Sony is destined to continue to fade into obscurity. Sony is a sinking ship.
HOW DO YOU KNOW is simply the worst movie ever made, which was obvious from the first script to the last pitiful reshoot. The studio head gets her due when she picks a plum that rotted on the vine years ago.
Stale studio, all insiders with no guts or perspective.