Raycom Media did its part today to help the broadcast industry in its fight to hang on to airwave spectrum — the over-the-air signals that many stations consider to be their life blood. The TV station owner was the first to unveil a deal to offer Bounce TV, which calls itself the first broadcast network for African Americans. What makes this different from a million other press releases about well-meaning projects? Remember: FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski wants TV stations to give up some of the spectrum that they use to transmit shows to TV sets with antennas. He wants to auction the airwaves to phone companies that sell wireless broadband services. Without a change, he says, people who use smartphones and tablet computers soon will face a crisis of high prices, dropped calls and dead zones. But stations offering Bounce TV can say that they are making better use of the airwaves. The network will give “underserved African American consumers a new local television brand designed specifically for them,” Raycom CEO Paul McTear says. The programming plans are still vague: Bounce TV executives including Martin Luther King III, Ambassador Andrew Young and the co-founders of Rainforest Films — Rob Hardy and Will Packer — say the channel will operate 24/7 and offer original shows, sports, re-runs and movies including Universal’s Ray, Do The Right Thing, The Bone Collector and The Wiz and Sony’s Philadelphia, Ali and A Raisin In The Sun. They expect Bounce TV to be available to half the country when it launches this fall. Raycom stations reach about 10% of all viewers. But political operatives at the National Association of Broadcasters appreciate how Bounce TV can help the trade group’s campaign against Genachowski’s broadband spectrum plan. It circulated the Bounce TV announcement and gave the project its seal of approval. Raycom is “utilizing digital spectrum in a very smart and truly meaningful way,” the NAB says, adding that it “fully expect(s) that other broadcasters will support Bounce TV.”


By this patronizing logic, African-Americans watch television but they don’t use smart phones and tablet computers? Maybe black consumers might feel they’d be better served with more broadband spectrum for contemporary devices. Just ask our Blackberry-wielding president.
Sounds like reverse discrimination to me. Also it is a dumbing down of the intellect of the African-American community by not providing better access to infrastructure support for telecommunication, smartphones, and tablet/pad computers.
Ok — let me get this straight. It is the year 2011, African Americans are not considered equal in the eyes of the public. We have a black president and most of the music industry is dominated by black artists.
Why do we need to launch a segregated network just for African Americans? What would be the consequences if a network for white people was launched. With ONLY white shows and white artists?
Al Sharpton would have a ten foot erection and would put it up everyone’s ass.
This will only breed resentment. It’s a BAD IDEA. Isn’t B.E.T. enough?
This country is a failure.
Nearly every major broadcast channel,and some cable channels on television were whites only for the majority of their existence? What these businessman are trying to do is serve a market that has limited options when it come to television shows that relate to them.Creating numerous option for african american in the way there are many options for other groups is in no way segregation.I mean, I didn’t hear any complains about the many spanish speaking television channels that have been around for years.Furthermore, I doubt bounce television will be any less inclusive then the major networks are now.Just because something is gear towards a certain market, doesn’t mean it will exclude other potential clientele.From what I can make of your post, you seem to have some serious problems with using logic.The biggest sign of this is bringing up we have a black president, as if the Obama being president systematically cause the sun and moon to collide, washing the earth inhabitants of all their sins while creating a utopia for all of mankind.The second sign of your lack of logic is the “This country is a failure” statement.America has many flaws, but as a whole we are a nation of good people, and if you attempt to used your brain, you would agree since you are still living in America.
Keep over the air the way it is – BAD enought they kept some broadcasters in the VHF band which is not as good as UHF for digital transmitting.
I have another issues with the FCC – why haven’t LP stations and sub-channels been made mandatory under the “must carry” rules? I got a big feeling based on his position, Genachowski would be against that,too! The sub-channels and LPs are still under-utilized.
I’m for BOUNCE because it targets an undeserved audience in the broadcast spectrum (and it won’t hurt that unlike Spanish channels, will have a white cross-over audience.)
Not every american home,especially poor ones, have cable or DBS service.
If white controlled financial instiutions are in the investment mix with Bounce tv~and i suspect there are some~there will certainly be an expectation of inclusiveness from a programming perspective especially from major advertisers.