Cable Show: Will Economic Pressures Force Cable Operators To Offer Fewer Channels?
Wall Street analysts warned cable operators on Tuesday that they’d better fix their clunky user interfaces and lousy consumer service if they want to avoid a showdown with Internet and technology powers such as Google and Apple. The big threat “isn’t really Netflix. It’s something we haven’t seen yet,” Citigroup Investment Research’s Jason Bazinet said in a panel discussion about the industry’s financial prospects at the National Cable Show in Chicago. He raised one possibility that has grabbed many people’s imaginations recently — that Apple might design a TV set that would work with programming from a pay TV rival such as DirecTV. “That plays to Apple’s strength, which is not your strength, which is the operating system,” Bazinet said, calling cable’s user experience “a Rube Goldberg contraption.” Morgan Stanley’s Benjamin Swinburne says that although the Street is less concerned than it was a few months ago about Netflix becoming a major competitor, “that doesn’t mean what Netflix has done couldn’t be done by someone with a much bigger check book.” Deutsche Bank Securities’ Douglas Mitchelson also urged cable operators to improve the user experience before Internet services have a chance to establish themselves. He says that investors also are “pretty nervous” about the rising prices that cable operators are paying for programming — especially now that broadcast networks are demanding cash from systems that rebroadcast signals from their local stations. The Street would become just as fearful, though, if Comcast declared war on other cable operators by using the Internet to offer TV programming to consumers who live outside its franchises. Collins Stewart’s Tom Eagan, who’s optimistic about cable’s prospects, says investors “want more insight” into how operators make decisions.

Why can’t I get the stations I want to watch? Why do I have to pay for crap I’ve never heard of or want to hear of. I just need to get my local stations and about ten other channels so they way Comcast has me screwed I have to get a package that gives me that last channel I want but my overall cost goes up 25%.
Please just let me order the channels I want
Amen.
Because to get that ESPN channel, ABC forces the cable operators to pay for all the other channels they own. This in turn forces the cable operator to pass on those costs to you. If they had ala carte your cable bill might be higher.
The reason you have to get channels that you don’t want is because networks like Disney, Viacom, and others require cable operators to carry some or all of their offerings if they want to carry a channel. These contracts require channels to be in a certain package or channel range as well. So we can’t completely blame the cable operators, because to get channels that people want, they have to also carry other channels that we may not want.
Very appropriate photo
One frame fits in your pocket.
Another sits on your lap.
Of course they’re going to make a larger frame, it completes the chain.
The question is, can they control the experience like they have in frames 1 and 2?
I spend about $50/month on Apple TV rentals, and have retained cable only for the children. TiVo was great! IPTV is way, way better…
Finally! Someone telling the horrible cable providers to get their act together. They sure haven’t been listening to their customers. (Now, if only I could get Time Warner Cable’s internet service to work 24 hrs a day, like I pay for.)
Amen! Cable is a dinosaur that continues to screw the consumer. Enough already!
Get Verizon FiOS. It made me say something that I never thought I’d say: I love my cable company.
I agree about Verizon FiOS, to a point. They also play the usual “cable company” games. Sure, I got a great bundle rate with lots of channels for two years. But at renewal time, I find out they’ve rearranged all their bundle packages into “newer, better” packages. What did that mean for me? About a handful of channels that I regularly watch were dropped from my basic bundle and are now only available on a higher bundle package. Translation: $15 extra dollars a month to get what I used to get. I even tried the old “I’ll just switch to another provider” bit, but they didn’t bite. They know how much of a hassle it is to switch Internet providers and have to change your email address everywhere. All of them have us by the short and curlies.
“have to change your email address everywhere”
You need to enter the 21st century, friend. ISP-based e-mail addresses are like rotary phones; appropriately thrown away when the last century ended.
When the cable companies continue to put their customers last, the customers will jump at the first chance they get to go to a better service. That day is rapidly approaching, and I hope I am part of the team that destroys the cable companies that have screwed with us for so long.
I hope some cable moguls read this. Wall Street is spot ON. The ‘cable experience’ drove me to Dish. I use TW internet and it sucks – gloppy at best. I have to “buy” channels from any of these providers (sat or wire) like Bravo or E! w. the same mindless inane programming and still need to pay extra for NFL Net. And don’t get me started about the inane multiswitched remotes with their ancient software! Cable is gonna go bye-bye – and yes the media moguls are helping dig the grave w. their ever clamoring $ payments. Hey Content is King right? (Netflix & Hulu know) Just might give that Apple TV a try.
The last thing Cable will ever do is the first thing every cable subscriber wants them to do: charge à la carte! Let the customer pay for the channels they want and ONLY the channels they want. The technology exists 100% the desire to provide this service is at 0%. How is this not racketeering?
Cable is for suckers and/or people with more money than sense.
But I LIKE paying a monthly fee to have TW’s DVR in my home AND another fee to USE it (no joke).
I LIKE having a glitchy DVR that skips over a few seconds at random, then have them swap it out for a NEW DVR and have it get glitchy about two weeks later.
I LIKE having them tack on frivolous fees that if I just call and complain, they’ll instantly remove, while they make MILLIONS because MOST PEOPLE don’t have time to call (or want to go through the painful experience of browbeating a mouth-breather on the phone).
I LIKE asking for a better promotion and having them quote me a HIGHER rate, because, you see, you also get six months free of Showtime and four premium sports channels.
Btw, I also like the ridiculously high quotes to get HBO and Showtime, which I would love to have if I didn’t have to pay $25 extra per month for! I’ll wait for Netflix and watch all the episodes in a weekend, thank you, kind sirs.
I LIKE having to pay $10 extra to get the pro speed internet, even though it’s not faster and is down just as often as the normal shit.
So, you see, why use something that’s cheaper, easier to use, more reliable and more catered to my tastes?
WHY, I ask you?!!
I have no problems with my cable company. I pay for the channels I want, and don’t subscribe to the ones I don’t.
I don’t see what the issue is.
Really? Where do you get your cable service?
I pay $20 a month to Comcast just for reception of local channels.
I get my internet access from the phone company.
Most of the TV I watch is now on the computer for free (Hulu and network websites).
Comcast wants to sell me internet and digital phone, but I’d like to drop cable altogether.
If my TV reception was OK, I’d cancel cable and pay for Netflix or a Hulu membership.
Get a rooftop digital antenna/receiver and you should be able to get all your local channels for free. I just have a set-top digital antenna (don’t own the roof I’m under) and I still get 6 of the 8 local channels crystal clear.
I canceled my cable about a year ago after I finally got a flat screen TV and it was the best decision I’ve ever made. Not only have I saved over $500 in the past year, but I no longer have to deal with the god awful cable company(Insight Communications). Now if I could only get them to stop flooding my mailbox with their “great offers” and stop sending salespeople to my door about once a month, that would be even better. But I get around 25 channels with an antenna and for $8 a month, I have plenty of stuff to watch on Netflix. In ten years, traditional cable will be obsolete. Everyone seems to realize this but the cable companies themselves.
Apple making TV’s makes no sense.
Even computers with built in monitors have real issues and making the screen bigger just makes the issues more prominent.
Assuming they didn’t then you would still be limited by your install base.
iTunes store runs on windows for a reason. At best you would be making a halo part that competes with everyone you need to do deals with. Ala Nexus 1/S.
All you need is one device with enough power to play media and connectivity to get it to the TV. In apple terms that means you need either a wireless network or a mini displayport to HDMI cable. Throw in power over HDMI and you have portable distribution platform for anything.
If you start seeing TV’s with displayport or lightpeak then there’s a decent chance it is Apple led. (not that optical looks to be in the card for the mobile space in the near future)
Terrestrial over the air networks will be out evolved. There is only so much bandwidth and eventually frame rate and resolution will exceed what is deliverable and image quality will fall behind. Throw in stereoscopic 3D if it turns out to be useful, not to mention eventual real 3D.
Already you get networks cannibalising spectrum to run additional channels. Trying to run high def channels with poor bitrate. And experiencing compression artifacts. The transition from mpeg2 to mpeg4 will delay things but not forever.
>iTunes store runs on windows for a reason.
Too Funny.
I just got the new upgrade to my Comcast DVRS
its like they puposely made it harder to DVR my shows
im already looking for alternatives
ALL PayTV Companies should have gone a la carte a long time ago.
For x amount you get to pick 20 channels, for Y amount, 40, with premium and sports packages as extras. One of the main reasons I don’t have PayTV is that they always include the sports channels that I NEVER watch, but will constantly be the source of price increases.
They also need to get better programming on their menu. Why are there 5 sets of channel listings? Get it sorted!
I am paying $150.00 a month to watch television. This includes the never ending Insurance and credit score commercials. To borrow an old cliche’ “What’s wrong with this picture?”
Even if every cable company was driven out of business because of their terrible practices, in the long run you won’t catch any breaks. How long after their demise do you think it will take for all those free (Hulu)/low-cost (Netflix) cable alternatives to start jacking up the cost? You’ll pay one way or another. And everyone shouting about being able to pick your cable channels a la carte, good luck. Yes, they can do it, but guess what, you’ll pay a lot more, even with just a small amount of channels. Why? Economies of scale. They can keep the overall costs down by selling you 210 channels, because it costs them less to do it that way.
U-verse and Fios are awesome. They are fiber based systems and run on an IPTV platform. So no one will come close to competing with them on speed of delivery, quality of content, and most importantly quantity of choices. However ATT and Verizon, respectively, have to make sure the installation time is reduced and more predictable. Once you overcome that experience, the quality is unbelievably better and more stable. It’s not 200 channels sharing one narrow pipe. It’s only the channel you are watching traveling through a wider pipe. Plus you get better land line phone and high speed internet connection!!! Honestly, it’s worth the money! If they actually focused on the consumer (like Apple and Netflix), then it’s game over. They win.
Just look at HBO GO … I am waiting for more channels to simply offer their shows and service online for a flat price and take ALL of the money instead of paying the cable company …
cannot wait for this. yeah, i like History channel, etc. But they now have nothing but crap. History went from the nazi channel to the white trash channel.
I love HBO, Showtime, Starz b/c i watch the shows on them. Plus, we have kids, so we only ever watch movies when they come to cable. I would gladly get rid of my cable is I could just subscribe to these individually.
And no, I am too impatient to wait for those shows to hit Netflix.
I have not had cable or dish or any crap like that for over 8 years now. Cable was crap back then and it’s only gotten worse. I download everything I want to watch. Haven’t seen commercials in all that time either. Screw the cable companies. I did, and it feels good.
i just purchased four roku boxes for the bedrooms and living room. i also have dish network. but that is soon to change. i will drop all but the most basic package with dish, because with the roku i get almost everything i need. i say almost because there are still some things you just cant get with roku. but if that day ever comes…….
Wise words but I doubt they listen. Instead I would guess that has their customer base drops off they will simply charge the remaining customers more and more. Then when the bottom completely drops out they will cry for help and receive Federal aid and give huge bonuses to all the executive levels to ensure that they will be financially secure when the company goes under. I know this sounds cynical but this plan usually works rather well.