
EXCLUSIVE: HBO has teamed with BBC2 to acquire the rights to turn the Robert Graves historical novel I, Claudius into a miniseries. The mini will be exec produced by BBC Worldwide Productions’ Jane Tranter and Anne Thomopoulos, who were executives producers of HBO’s Rome. The deal ends a long series of twists and turns for the rights to a book that was previously turned into an Emmy-winning 13-part miniseries in 1976 by BBC. In that mini, Derek Jacobi turned in the role of a career as Claudius. The book and mini gave a glimpse into the power, madness, murder, backstabbing and debauchery that was part and parcel of ruling-class Rome. It is seen through the eyes of Claudius, who was content to be the butt of jokes and hide his brilliance behind a stutter and a limp. Because he was never perceived as a threat, Claudius was never poisoned as many others in his circle were. Claudius outlasted them all, and became emperor in 41 A.D.
The feature rights were long controlled by In The Name of the Father helmer Jim Sheridan, but suddenly those rights were shopped in 2007. It looked like producer Scott Rudin beat out a competitive field of suitors to pay $2 million for the rights. He had Oscar-nominated The Departed scribe William Monahan ready to write it and Leonardo DiCaprio ready to attach himself to star. But the deal collapsed when Sheridan successfully challenged the claim in Ireland. By the time Sheridan finally bowed out, Rudin was no longer interested because he had moved on to another Roman Era epic, the movie adaptation of Stacy Schiff’s book Cleopatra: A Life, which has Angelina Jolie ready to play the Egyptian queen and David Fincher keen to direct her. Others flirted with the property, but the story is so big that it became clear that a miniseries was a way to get everything in. That opened the door for Tranter, who pursued the property for a decade. HBO has feasted on episodic period dramas, from Rome to its current run of Game of Thrones.
While BBC controls the original miniseries, the HBO/BBC2 production will primarily be based on the two books Graves wrote on the subject and not that earlier mini. There is I, Claudius: From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius Born 10 B.C. Murdered And Deified A.D. 54, and Claudius The God: And His Wife Messalina. No elements have yet been attached, but given the caliber of talent that pursued the property, I bet it will be formidable. The rights deal was brokered by AP Watt in London and Liza Wachter at the RWSG Literary Agency.


The original mini was brilliant! Hope this one will truly pay justice to it. But w. BBC and HBO aboard, it’ll be more “Rome” than “Spartacus.”
I don’t know if everyone else on this blog is talking about the same “Rome” I saw – it was a piece of shit!
HBO/BBC need to hire some exec producers who know something about writing and producing historical material for “Adults”, not give these two halfwits another chance to screw it all up.
“I Claudius” is much better material on which to build an epic mini-series around Rome. The trick is to populate the creative team with some serious writers who will run with this challenging material instead of creating more lame ass comic book history like “Rome”.
“Rome” wasn’t meant to be a documentary. For what it was, I thought the writing was reasonably good and the casting/acting were excellent.
Thank you, Rocky, for the sanity check. I smell “BOMB!”
wow, a deaf dumb and blind person on the internet, amazing. May I say that now you have dragged yourself this far it is a shame you choose to display your ignorance in such open fashion
Rocky is an IDIOT . The HBO Mini Series ”Rome ” was the best Mini Series ever and I have been watching them since the 70′s .
Rocky , you are the only dimwit ! Dumbarse !!!!
Seriously, see the original. If the thought of a BBC period drama fills you with dread, you will have your mind changed forever by this. Plus it’s fun to see so many of the people we regard now as the Grand Old Names of British acting back when they were young (Patrick Stewart with hair!!!).
I agree – I’ve seen BBC’s original “I Claudius” at least three times, and thinking back to John Hurt’s role as Caligula makes my hair stand on end! Rent the original and enjoy!
I loved the BBC original “I, Claudius” (especially seeing the Grand Old Names of British acting when they were young), so I have mixed feelings about HBO’s attempt to remake it.
If they can find a creative team who are able to do justice to the novel, I’m there.
Alas! Patrick Stewart was wearing a hair piece. Chrome dome bald as a bat even in his 30′s
I remember watching the original series. It was the first mini-series on tv and I wouldn’t miss one episode. I discovered through it such great actors, Sir Derek Jacobi, Patrick Stewart as Sejanus, Brian Blessed as Augustus, Shioban McKenna who was married to Peter O’Toole at the time as Livia, Claudia’s grandmother and of course John Hurt as Caligula. I have since tried to see these wonderful brilliant actors in all their different movie projects.
I wonder who they would cast in this new version. It will be interesting to see what names will be attached to it.
A gentle correction: it’s Siân Phillips who brilliantly played Livia, not Siobhan McKenna in the original series.
Excuse me, Mara, but “The 6 Wives of Henry VIII” is older than “I, Claudius”, so “I Claudius” couldn’t have been the 1dt miniseries on TV.
Glad they’re not trying to do this as a film — the scale of the story is much better suited to a longer treatment.
That said, they’ve got their work cut out for them. The original BBC series was brilliantly written and acted (though admittedly they didn’t have the budget for the grand sets you saw on ROME). I sincerely hope they get this one right.
Wow, after Rome they have some big sandles to fill. If this is as good then I’ll be very happy.
The BBC series was wonderful & wasn’t hobbled by idiotic US network censorship.
So, Why?
Is there that great a lack of original material?
I agree. Is ALL originality dead. The 1976 version was – well – an Emmy winner. Why do it again? I know that most works owe some part to what has gone before, but why just redo something. It is rare indeed that a redo surpasses – nay, even equals – the original. Take the money and donate it to charity or something. You think Congress needs to cut the waste – just think how much the studios could save if they stopped “green lighting” sequels, copies, and drivel.
So should there never be another Shakespeare movie either?
Of course not. This rage against remakes is really getting tedious. What matters is a well-directed performance with a great story. Whether or not that story is “original” is entirely irrelevant.
While the original “I, Claudius” was a masterpiece, it’s bare-bones production values leaves a lot of room for reinterpretation. Plus, there’s still plenty of stuff in the books that hasn’t yet been dramatized. A new series produced by HBO & BBC has tremendious potential. Can’t wait to see it.
I don’t have a problem w/remakes. Remember that the wonderful BBC series was itself based on a book, and that a film version of the book was attempted in 1937, w/a cast and crew at least as dazzling as the series would later use. (The director was Josef von Sternberg and the cast included Charles Laughton as Claudius, Emlyn Williams as Caligula, Flora Robson as Livia, and Merle Oberon as Messalina.) The project was abandoned after Oberon was injured in an auto accident.
While the writing and acting in the BBC series is impeccable, the settings really suffered because of lack of budget. It looks cheap, and stage-bound.
My all-time favorite movie is “The Maltese Falcon”. I was surprised to learn that it was the third version of the book to be filmed. Sometimes re-makes improve the original.
The first adaption was brilliant. Why try to top it? It’s not like there’s a lack of material. How about Hadrian? Now there’s a violent, sex-sick romp!
I’m a big fan of both the novels and the miniseries. I liked “Rome”, but it always struck me as Claudius-lite… It’ll be interesting to see if they can pull off another strong adaptation.
I’ve seen the original a few times, owned the VHS collection, read the books, etc. It’s interesting that HBO is doing this as it already has Game Of Thrones. I’ve never read those books, but while watching GOT I see “I,Claudius” peeking out. I’m convinced GRR Martin used Robert Graves’s books as his template.
Yes, I’ve ofter thought Cersei reminds me of Livia. But Livia was the original and Shioban McKenna’s portrayal of her was just incredible. Her deathbed scene ‘Make me a God, Claudius” is one of the great classic scenes ever shown on TV.
Been there done that. Looking forward to new versions of Casablanca, Gone with the Wind and Saving Private Ryan. They are all due for remakes aren’t they?
An excellent choice. I Claudius was a favorite Masterpiece Theater series in the glorious 70′s,as it possessed intelligence and dark humor and all those great performances,Jacobi and Hurt among the actors. Good!
What’s your beef, Garry? This isn’t a network production, it’s a cable production. And there IS no original material. If there are only about 7 basic plots in literature and film, you can only expect originality in how those plots are interpreted and delivered. Although the performances in the original “I, Claudius” are riveting, the poor production values are distracting. So time enough for a re-make.
It’s interesting to note that the first few episodes of “HBO’s Rome” was heavily edited and compressed for British audiences by the BBC. They left IN all the sex and violence and edited OUT the history. Why, you may ask. The Beeb justified the hack job by saying that Brits already knew all about Roman History and didn’t need to see those parts of the show again.
It’s not such a great thing to see “I, Claudius” going to HBO. That may lessen the chance of a Rome movie, which many of us have been waiting for. Bruno Heller has a script and Kevin McKidd (Lucius Vorenus) wants to direct. Ray Stevenson (Titus Pullo) is on board.
HBO deserves no credit for its failure to promote “Rome” with a decent ad campaign, nor did it support it’s actors for an Emmy. I believe the only performer to be nominated was Polly Walker.
Worst of all, HBO prematurely cancelled Rome just as filming for the second season was to begin. According to creator Bruno Heller, three seasons had to be compressed into the second and last season.
Anway, I hope HBO learned some lessons and handle “I, Claudius” better. If not, let them be raped by dogs! (wink)
HBO is notoriously cheap, both in the sense that they hand out “sweetheart deals” to their actors, and that they fail to offer monkey points on DVD sales, which have surely taken a big tumble in the age of downloading.
That being said, the acting is so good in the original series, I barely notice the cheap sets. That’s what any remake will be judged by: the acting chops of its cast.
If it’s well-cast, and the “Rome” production staff are involved, including some good writers, it could be excellent. At least Sian Phillips could return as “old Livia” without any make-up.
Um, wasn’t it already an epic miniseries?
Um, wasn’t this explained in the article?
I know – why don’t we all go rent the original BBC “I, Claudius” which you will never equal, and you can spend the time coming up with something fresh and original.
Sure, the performances in the original were stellar. Personally, I find the poor and antiquated production values to be distracting from those stellar performances. It’s been time for a re-make for a while now. Glad to see it happening.
The original production of “I, Claudius” was well written and well acted.
I hope, HBO and BBC2 do not attempt to “sexify” the story to attract viewers, as showtime did with the “Tudors”. The original did not use graphic acts to maintain viewer interest, it used first excellent writing, fantastic acting and impeccable direction.
I am looking forward to the production continuing with the story.
If you’ve read the Graves novels (or better yet, the ancient sources they were based on) you’ll know that the 1970′s series had to tone down the sex (and violence) considerably to get it on the air. After all, Caligula is one of the story’s main characters. I imagine an HBO series will be considerably “sexier” than the previous one, but that just means it will be more accurate.
If I may be that annoying person – it irritates me irrationally when people just write “BBC” without the “the” in front of it, because we always say “the BBC” in full when we talk about it in the UK. It’s jarring.
…Anyway, the original “I, Claudius” was epic and this looks like it could be excellent, though the original cannot be more recommended.
~Sigh~ Why? It was already done 30 years ago or so. Is it to get younger audiences interested in reading the classics or learning more about ancient history. Good luck with that. This is so typical of studios and networks to rehash a past classic hoping for the same success with the “newer” version.
I sincerely doubt you will find a cast that comes close to equaling the original. Now THAT was some heavy weight talent!
So then don’t don’t watch it, you big crybaby. No one is making the old series disappear.
A lot of those people are still around. Be nice if they could be cast in different roles.
If they re-make they MUST include these classic quotes from the original:
Claudius: [after being asked by Antonia to hide a letter for Tiberius inside his history of Carthage] Well, I suppose I could, but I don’t want to give him this copy. It’s got elephants drawn all over it.
Antonia: You are the biggest fool any mother was ever punished with. Who cares about your stupid history of Carthage? Nobody’s going to read it anyway, and certainly not Tiberius. The only way you’d get him to read it is if you drew naked women all over it, and then he’d only look at the pictures!
>>>>>>>>>>>
Tiberius: [about Macro] Do you know him personally?
Caligula: No, but I’ve slept with his wife several times.
Tiberius: And is deception with the wife regarded these days as a sound introduction to the husband!?
>>>>>>>>>>
Claudius: Senators, it is true that I am hard of hearing, but you will find it is not for want of listening. As for speaking, again, it’s true I have an impediment. But isn’t what a man says more important than how long he takes to say it? It’s true again I have little experience of government. But, then, have you more? I at least have lived with the imperial family who has ruled this empire ever since you so spinelessly handed it over to us. I’ve observed it working more closely than any of you. Is your experience better than that? As for being half-witted: well, what can I say, except that I have survived to middle age with half my wits, while thousands have died with all of theirs intact. Evidently, quality of wits is more important than quantity. Senators, I shall do nothing unconstitutional. I shall appear at the next session of the senate, where you may confirm me in my position or not as you wish. But if it pleases you not to, explain your reasons to them [points to the Praetorians], not to me.
Thi spost writer knows his stuff: These quotes are absolutely accuracte down to the commas.
Let’s be honest: Remaking “I, Claudius” underscores the bankruptcy of creatity in this business because the original mini-series is, very arguably, the single greatest production in the history of television: Brilliantly written by Jack Pullman, sensitively and imaginatively directed by Herbert Wise, flawlessly cast and brilliantly acted by Derek Jacobi, Sian Phillips, Brian Blessed, John Hurt, Patrick Stewart, and a host of equally brilliant lions and lionesses of the British theatre.
When people talk about remaing this or, for example, the Peter Jackson remake of “King Kong”, I can’t help but shake my head at the arrogance, self-importance, and hubris of the filmmakers. I mean, “The Adventures of Robin Hood” is the single-greatest swashbucking adventure film in the history of the movies, one of the 2 or 3 greatest movies Warner Brothers ever made in the Golden Age of Hollywood, and yet along comes Kevin Costner and then Ridley Scott with the hubris of thinking they can some how top a nearly flawless masterpiece. It’s just Idiocy On Parade.
As good as the original was acting wise, it hasn’t aged well in terms of production values. I’m sure the HBO cast will be as good as the original cast. Helena Bonham Carter would be perfect as middle aged and older Livia for one.
I know that HBO’s remake of Mildred Pierce was critically acclaimed, but it was the lowest rated miniseries for the network in the past several years. I did appreciate the faithfulness to the source though. It didn’t seem to fit too well with HBO current series and I think that is what hurt its ratings. It seemed like an odd fit with True Blood, Boardwalk Empire, and Game of Thrones. I know HBO passed on a miniseries adaptation of the DC Comics series Preacher a couple years ago, but that or a miniseries of Sandman seems like it would be a better fit with its current series and would get decent ratings.
Fans of “The Sopranos” will find that the sub-plots and even some character names (Livia is Tony’s mother’s name as well as Claudius’) are duplicated. The original was riveting television and I suspect that this new version will make every effort to be as good if not better.
IT IS ABSURD TO REMAKE I CLAUDIUS. THE ORIGINAL SCRIPTS, ACTING AND DIRECTION CANNOT BE IMPROVED. I LOVE ROMAN STORIES, BUT PLEASE, DO SOMETHING ORIGINAL LIKE THE LINDSEY DAVIS OR SIMON SCARROW BOOKS. PERSONALLY, I WILL PASS ON THE NEW ONE AND WATCH THE BETTER ONE ON DVD.
Oh, I am really looking forward to this, if HBO/BBC do justice to it as they did for Rome and Game of Thrones in production values and actors. But, please for the love of God, NOT Leonardo di Caprio!
As I recall, the BBC series managed to keep in most of Graves’ best scenes, except for the destruction of Varu’s legions by the Germans and the subsequent mutiny along the Rhine, for obvious budgetary reasons. In other words, HBO can put back in all the big action sequences now. Reason enough to tune in to Claudius 2.0.
Apart from the glorious acting by Jacobi, Philips, Hurt, Blessed, Tyzack, Stewart et al, what distinguished the Beeb’s “I Claudius” was the writing by the late great Jack Pulman. He more than anyone was responsible for it. HBO may produce a more historically complete and state-of-the-art visual production, but nobody will match the tone that Pulman set for the entire series: a combination of colloquial speech and black humor that made all that Roman decadence hilarious. HBO will undoubtedly come up with a diligent, well-researched, meticulously crafted, and ultimately dull series. Another “Mildred Pierce”.
I love the original. I even own it. I am not a fan of remakes, but I would like to see a different adaptation of this series. Nothing can replace the original but I hope they, at least, do this series justice.
I would love to see this series!! However, I am concerned that they will over sexify the entire thing. Its one thing to imply that people are having sex, or show some sex scenes, its an entirely other matter though to have graphic almost pornographic sex throughout which distracts the viewer and makes them want to shut it off. HBO did a bad job with the Game of Thrones sex, eliminating scenes which should have been there (like Ned and his wife) and putting ones in that had no place (that brothel scene or the one w/ Greyjoy wth?). ROME, while having a good enough plot, had a lot of gratuitous sex which was overdone. (key word is overdone). I dont mind if there is sex in a show, but random penis pictures and boobs for no reason is just stupid. I got the feeling with Rome that a 13 year old boy wrote half the scenes or just felt like seeing certain actresses’ naked. Oh please. I hope they don’t do the same with I Claudius, where the plot is far more important than random graphic humping scenes.
I can agree with this . The show was freaking awesome and could have been just as awesome without all the sex and porno. HBO blew it with that issue . I thought the sex had a purpose but too much of itelminates too many customers .
Very intelligent post Rachel
What annoys me is the lack of historical context of many of the posts here. I Claudius, like Upstairs Downstairs, was made at a time when drama on British TV was theatrical in nature, was, as Freddie Shaughnessy put it, filmed theatre. And Shaughnessy preferred TV to be theatrical rather than filmic. Anyway, it is apples and oranges to compare theatrical production values with filmic ones that derive from Hollywood. Unfortunately, film has now captured even the British TV castle moving television away from the theatrical towards film light. Even then much British and even some American TV is vastly superior to the unimaginative crap made for tweens that comes roaring out of a Hollywood governed by postmodernist notions of simulation.