Lionsgate executives told Wall Street analysts this morning to expect big things from The Hunger Games, a series of four action films that the studio will release from the trilogy written by Suzanne Collins. COO Joe Drake said it was “the highest-selling film we’ve ever had” at the Cannes Film Festival and that overseas exhibitors consider it “the movie that can change their company.” Although Lionsgate wouldn’t disclose its budget for the films, Drake says Hunger Games could become an “outsized success” for Lionsgate. The studio says it bought the rights before the books became runaway bestsellers, and it has “retained the majority of the upside” in its talent and distribution deals.
On other matters following the company’s earnings report yesterday, Lionsgate says that it isn’t concerned about the public’s waning interest in 3D. “We never thought of 3D as a one-size-fits all solution to the movie business,” CEO Jon Feltheimer says. He added that Lionsgate’s recent deal to syndicate reruns of Mad Men to Netflix reflects his view that Internet streaming services can be “partners, not adversaries.” He hopes to “replicate these kinds of deals around the world.” He also told analysts to expect financial growth over the next year at Lionsgate’s struggling TV Guide Network cable channel. The company says it just renewed its carriage deal with Time Warner Cable and expects the channel to be in 80% of all pay TV homes by year end. Lionsgate says that the channel’s split screen, to meld programming with a listings guide, ”tarnished” it. But its new full-screen version is delivering higher ratings on DirecTV and Dish Network. Feltheimer also hinted at the possibility that some assets considered “non-core” may be sold. He told analysts to expect an announcement “in the near future” about an effort to simplify its business. Investors “will be pleased” he said.


Four movies out of three?! Dear god, it’s officially the new bad habit.
I’m a big fan of the Hunger Games, but there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON for one of those books (assuming it’s the last one) to be split into two movies. Such a blatant money grab.
I hate to admit that Harry Potter started the trend (which it did), since that’s the one example of splitting a book I’m on board with. The Twilight double-down is laughable, and The Hobbit adaptation has a lot to prove. Let’s hope they don’t muck up the story by stretching it out too thin.
Alright, I guess I will be the Twilight defender here. The book is over 750 pages long and has a very definitive event in the middle that makes the split into two movies plausible. Having read and enjoyed both book series I prefer they be split to include more from the books.
The problem with 3D is the enormous jump in surcharges that really make you think if you want to watch a movie in 3D or not. Why can’t theaters lower it like they do for matinees? All shows before 6, would have an upgrade fee that is half price. Paying an extra 50 percent for a ticket is insane.
I agree that Hunger Games could be a huge financial windfall for Lionsgate. It will be exceptionally big if they educate the public not only on what Hunger Games is, but what it IS NOT. The Hunger Games series has been compared one too many times to the Twilight franchise, and the two stories really have nothing in common. The Twilight comparison is turning the young male demographic off because they think it’s another story about vampires and swoony teenage girls (both on and off screen). Males are sick of that phenomenon. Lionsgate marketing teams need to educate the public, i.e. MTV specials, sponsor a “DVD on TV” special on the FX network that shows clips of Hunger Games while showing an action movie that men will likely watch, interviews in men’s mags…etc. Put emphasis on the action, fight scenes, and political rebellion and leave out the romantic sub-plot.
That strategy might work for the first film. But for the rest, the male audience will know exactly what it’s getting: a film based off YA novels for girls that has action elements, and a strong romantic sub-plot that is quite Twilight-esque. The smart money is to develop a strategy to draw out young girls and women the same way that Summit did for Twilight, and stick with that. Don’t bother trying to attract men; either they show up or not, but that’s not where you’re trying to make money.
You’ve just proven the original poster’s point. Hunger Games isn’t a series for girls. The main character just happens to be a girl, and even though she’s the focus of a little romantic interest, that’s not what the book series is about. Saying that Hunger Games is a romance series is like saying Harry Potter is a romance series just because he shows some romantic interest in a couple of classmates throughout the Potter books/movies. The action and politic rebellion is the primary focus of the entire series, and the male audience needs to be educated about it. Your comment proves that, ‘blistering’.
Exactly. Male execs are EMBARRASSED by these female-driven phenoms, so do everything they can to toss on “guy appealing” elements and downplay the female nature of these potential phenoms. They make excuses about “broadening the audience” when in truth they are just too embarrassed to embraces a female phenom. In the process they kill the golden goose. They end up with a mediocre porridge that appeals neither to males nor females. If I AM NUMBER FOUR and RED RIDDING HOOD and all the rest of the Twilight wannabes had had the guts to go after those females 100%, then they might have been a success. Instead they shied away and pretended they were “broadening the audience” by downplaying the female appealing elements. In truth, they were lessening the audience, by telling young ladies “we are ashamed of you and ashamed of catering to you.” Twilight marketing was refreshing, because it told an under-served audience “this is 100% for you” and the young ladies could feel good about themselves and their tastes. The Twilight wannabes always market themselves in ways that tell the girls to be ashamed of their tastes.
The Hunger Games has a bit more in common with the Japanese film Battle Royale.
They’re doing a four-film series? Does that mean they’re planning to break Mockingjay into two films, ala Breaking Dawn or Deathly Hallows? I’m not sure if there’s enough material there to pull that off…
that’s exactly what I thought. I wonder if they’ll just stretch 4 movies out of all 3 books equally, although I don’t know how well that would work out either, cause then Catching Fire would be split into 3 parts essentially and that would just be weird.
No way that “Mockingjay” has enough material for a bi-section…and they’ve already got a problem in casting Jennifer
Lawrence, who’s starting out too old for the role….by the time they get to a fourth film, she’s going to look like one of the
30 year old teenagers from “Grease”.
Only if the first film does well they’ll stick with the four films. Of course, if it underperforms, they’ll probably cut their losses at three (or fewer).
i actually enjoyed the harry potter dh part 1 and i will love part 2 but now many movies are following it.. now remeber this though…it might not be mockingjay1/2 , it could be a prequel film to the series called the dark days or something..so dont get mad just yet
I believe they will take all three books into consideration and make a split as to which places would seem fit ala’ LOTR. They might end the first film in the First Arena without a conclusion… Just a thought.
I’m sure it will do as well as I Am Number Four, Beastly, Riding Hood and all the other non-Twilight knock-offs. Which is to say not as well as the studio hopes.
One thing Twilight and Hunger Games do share is the puritanical view of sex and violence: no sex, tons of violence. Characters can lose their heads, but they don’t give head. I know it’s “young adult” fiction, but if I was a teen, about to die on a game show, I would definitely be going out with a bang! Still, the Hunger Games books are suspenseful and exciting page-turners. The one problem I see with adapting them is tone and POV. They are told exclusively through Katniss’ POV, so secondary characters disappear completely after the beginning. You also never see the viewer’s side of the televised Games in the books; I’d hate for it to become another “Running Man”. Keeping the POV as Katniss makes it immediate and real and heightens the tension and suspense. If you cut into that with audience reactions, etc, it will break the tension and ruin it. I hope they realize that and don’t do it. Still, like I said, the secondary characters virtually disappear in the latter portions of the book only to re-appear in the sequels. It’s gonna be a tough job of adapting the books; I hope they get it right. (and making it into 4 movies is totally stupid, btw!)
Mockingjay seems too short a book to be split into 2 films, however if the script has fleshed out the book it could work as Mockingjay seemed far too rushed. And so far the Hunger Games has an excellent cast, (bar Liam Hemsworth), compared to Twilight. I just hope they don’t make it about the romantic subplot as it is really secondary in the book and it is not a love triangle.
Mockingjay doesn’t NEED to be split, but its not that bad of an idea. The book was super rushed and there was so much material in it. That is one of the reasons that the book wasn’t nearly as good as the first two. Movies already rush books so to try to rush a book that’s already rushed will be hard. Splitting it seems ok with me
Spliting MJ would be the best. Perhaps at the Katniss shooting part. With added time in the different battles that was just more or less tal;ked about that would add time into it. More story line in the Finnick/Annie relationship. More time spent with there wedding. Lots of added places to bring in 2 movies for it. I think though they really need to bring in Finnick and Johanna into this first movie. With them cutting Madge,and who knows else in the town,and Peeta and Gales family. It looks week as far as casting.
Beefing up and extending the Finnick/Annie story is the best idea, as far as trying to eek out another movie. And cast Finnick with a real heartthrob, a genuine stunning-looking guy. The girls at the fansites are all crying over how ugly the guys cast so far are. It was stupid of Lionsgate not to cast a heartthrob capable of selling the movie. The magazine spreads will need some sexy dude to feature. Finnick is their 2nd opportunity to do what they should have done the first time.
Not a good idea…not enough material….stop trying to make more money out of something that’s not there…they’ll spoil the book to movie adaptation yet.
“Lionsgate executives told Wall Street analysts this morning to expect big things from The Hunger Games,”
Isn’t that what they said about Kick-Ass?
They should split Mockingjay right after the rescue. That’ll give a good cliffhanger, it’s in the middle, and will leave enough room in the fourth movie for Finnick and Annie and the Capitol invasion.
I still cannot get over that they cut Madge, she gives Katniss the pin that’s the symbol for the entire rebellion and is a very important character.
I have always thought that people should not talk about thinks they know nothing about. Hunger Games is not a Twilight knockoff. Obviously you haven’t read the book or done your homework. There is mo vampires or other mythical creatures. There is no dutiful girl who does whatever her boyfriend says. There is no rabid love story that is the basis of all plot or subplot. Yes there is a love story but there is a love story in 99% of all books/ movies. What keeps this story moving is Katniss’ survival and the rebellion to the Capitol. I actually find the Hunger Games much more in common with Harry Potter. Although it certainly isn’t a Harry Potter knock off.
Cool loved reading this Im a huge fan of hunger games it’s the best book EVER!!! thanks
I can’t believe that people are just saying its another twilight and harry potter knock-off. I personally think the hunger games will have much more action then the twilight saga. But maybe they should think about spiltting one of the books.If they do, then I hope they don’t do what twilight did and make the first part very boring.
4 films out of 3 books it seem like all the new movies about books are going to split the last one into 2 is a good idea in some movies harry potter was awesome, breaking down that was boring and much critics says that is one of the worst movies of 2011 that is true
and the hunger games well i want to see it but i hope dont take so long to make all the books into movies